What's the best you think you could do robots?
>>28516657
>best you think you could do
I KNOW the best I can do is 0
there is no need for this hypothetical
5 if I'm being lazy.
7 if I put in maximum effort.
>>28516657
Probably a 4 or 5, but I would never EVER dip below a 6, thus I am alone forever.
6 now
8 if I got real fit
9 if I was taller and had a bigger dick
>>28516698
I feel like you should be able to at least get a 1/10. Are you a midget or something?
>>28516657
That chart is retarded as fuck, bothers me a lot.
The ugly tanned chick with the ugly pink glasses, that the guy who made the picture probably made because she's his gf/crush or whatever
The chav stacy with the necklace and sunglasses is also not a 9 and neither is the gook.
none of 'em
WHOS THIS SHE IS ADORABLE
>>28516657
This chart is fucked up. A lot of the 5s are unusually unattractive. Most women my age I see are around 6 or 7 on this, which is dumb. I almost never see people ugly enough to be 3s on this, but I see 8s or 9s pretty regularly.
>>28516763
she was a poster on /cgl/ and goes by ophelia
9 I guess. Getting a hot girl isn't that hard. Getting one with a tolerable personality who's not a slut is the hard part.
