Can't argue with this logic, can you? Do robots agree?
>>28479344
Assertion 1 does not follow.
>>28479344
>To find women you need Time and Money
>Time and Money
>Time and Money= Time x Money
Wouldnt it be Time + Money, as 'and' implies addition?
If you have 3 AND 4 you would have 7 not 12
>>28479509
"And" implies that you need both time and money. Thus, if you have 0 money, you would have (time) * 0 which would result in 0 women.
To make that math work, assertion one should be different.
Maybe, "Your ability to Attain a woman is a product of your time and money."
>>28479344
I think I found two flaws, but we both reached the conclusion anyway so I don't really mind.
