In your opinion, are women inferior beings to men? And if so, what makes you think that?
no, just different. two sides of the same coin.
Even if we aren't intellectually superior (which historical evidence suggests) we at the very least are physically superior. All else being equal means that men > women
>>28430696
>men are more aerodynamix they can beat up mean grils and faster
Are men superior? No, that's silly. Do women have an easier life, overall? Yes.
it doesn't matter on a whole from my perspective
the fact is most women and men are far more successful than I am so it would be like a subhuman calling an angel a piece of shit
Men are superior physically and mentally than women.
that is why women have it so easy in life, and they hold their holes to ransom in order to fulfil their agenda.
>>28430696
I think they are. But I also think beautiful ones are the only thing that makes the world bearable.
>>28430837
Do you like cute things, anon?
Pretty much anyone who suggests dismay at women having a gender advantage is dismissed as irrational or bigoted in public thought, when usually these men are just emasculated or sad.
Emasculation is a central root of male depression or eventual suicide, and empowering, masculine roles in life are usually about being in the right place at the right time.
Yes. This is the only possible conclusion the truly masculine & thoughtful man can reach. Women like to troll the internet to brand misogynists with insults ("virgin" - as if that's bad, "fedora", ect.), but if you read Church writings about women you'll see what the best among our ancestors thought about roasties. Nearly all the great men of history have regarded women as inferior. Even that Prophet of Islam (a religion which says that marriage is half of piety), Mohammad, said that most of the inhabitants of hell are women.
>>28430696
If you look at historical figures, the vast majority are men.
A lot of people would misinterpret this as evidence that men>women, but I believe it suggests men have greater variance in ability. Average ability for either gender is most likely very similar.
This makes sense when you consider the role of women as child bearers, and men as the majority population and inherently competitive. Men have been observed to behave in a more risk prone fashion in most activities.
The male population is more diverse and 'risky' than the female population because this is the side of the species that can innovate with the least risk to the overall population.
It's very interesting to consider.
For the sake of the argument, we can assert that men have achieved more than women, and will continue to. Whether this is reflective of ability or the dumb luck of the successful is debatable.
>>28431180
Wouldn't that imply that if women outnumbered men, they'd be smarter even though they on average have less neurons than men? Or is it perhaps possible male brains simply evolved more than female ones out of necessity due to competition to reproduce?
>>28431012
>but if you read Church writings about women you'll see what the best among our ancestors thought about roasties
Got any of those you'd like to share?
>>28430696
women are scum but so am i
sadly they don't see that we have this in common
>>28431366
Not really. I don't want to hurt any feelings. I really don't hate women at all. Very few people do.
>>28431770
>Not really. I don't want to hurt any feelings.
Now I'm curious. Friend, please help me alleviate this feeling of anxiety by at least referring me to some names so that I may do my own research if you will not share quotes or passages yourself.
>>28430696
It's not that men are superior and women are inferior, it's that men are meant to play a certain role and women another one. Men are meant to be the workers and protectors and providers of society, women are supposed to be the mothers, caretakers, and soothers of society.
Now it's all fucked up, women are working and men are betas and nobody is happy. Another problem is that women should never have been given the right to vote. They are naturally socialist by their very nature and it is killing the West.
>>28430696
>>28430894
What's the name of the artist making these pictures? Or is it different people with similar styles?
>>28431938
lrn2iqdb
>>28431938
Kuvshinov-Ilya
>>28430696
Ladies are pretty. They're like angels. All of them.
>>28431345
I don't think I make that implication.
I posit that men have the potential for more extreme ability, either high or low.
Intelligence and brain mass are not mentioned.
It's worth noting though that on average, women are physically smaller than men.
Lower brain mass correlates with reduced overall size. This could reasonably explain this frequently cited observation without the need to leap to the conclusion that women r dum.
I don't know if they're inferior, but they could do better if held to the same standards as men.
>>28430696
This picture really unsettles me.
>>28432091
What's wrong with it that disturbs you?
>>28430696
Not really your question. But I was thinking the other day, we can barely distinguish males and females from eachother when comparing animals, so does the same apply to humans? In other words, am I a cute anime girl to a gazelle? :~
>>28432067
You'd have to completely re-structure society for that to happen. Women are protected and given tremendous help and advantages that men are never, ever given while being treated with kid gloves.
I'd say only 1% of women could truly compete with the average man.
