http://sluthate.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1012144
"Usually, before two people begin any long term relationship there is an inquiry into the past. Creditors run credit checks. Employers ask for references. Leasers ask about past evictions. In contrast, there is a certain stigma about doing this with regard to sexual relationships. Many men feel uneasy listening to their wife or girlfriend talk about how she got skeeted up by a parade of dudes. Women in general are very sensitive about their reputation and will often avoid the subject with "the past is the past.
The past isn't the past, it's an indicator of the future. Just ask any insurance company. If a person drives around town like he's in a bumper car, his insurer would rightfully consider him a liability. Likewise, if a woman has a string of drunken hookups and short term relationships that pussy is a liability. You wanna be known as that dude whose girlfriend publicly jerked off a marine to Calvin Harris on her girl's night? No? Then you should probably get the Ho-Facts."
-GayLubeOil
What is Slutfax?
Slutfax is a user-contributed site where anyone can share the sexual history of a woman. The format of this site is inspired by wikis and textboards. The site has its ideological roots in the Manosphere and Redpill movements.
>>28385887
OP if you made this website you might just be the most autistic person on this board.
>>28386161
That's just like, your opinion, man.
That girl is cute though.
Can't a guy just make up stuff about a girl he doesn't know, though? Like, in a girl rejects him and he gets angry about it, can he go on there and write a bunch of stuff saying that she's slutty?
You can't always expect people to be honest.
Oh boy a site dedicated to doxing. Enjoy your lawsuit
this shit doesn't even exist. I think.
Because I can't find the website anywhere.
>>28386627
even people who are mad at being rejected might know some facts that are true.
Ultimately, it's the job of the reader to verify what is true and what is not.
I am working on a rating system that can fix this problem partly, though. It's too early though at this stage.
>women who have sex are EVIL TAINTED AND BAD
>/r9k/ why won't any woman have sex with me??/ i'm so lonely ;___;
>>28386672
>i'm hungry
>WHY DON'T YOU EAT THIS DOG TURD ON THE FLOOR ANON??
you are a retard, my friend
>>28386691
>cooking is EVIL AS FUCK I HATE PEOPLE THAT COOK
>i'm so hungry why doesn't anyone cook for me ;___;
>>28386902
that was an awful analogy
don't ever use analogies ever again, you're not good at it
>submit dox
>go to jail
Sounds legit.
>>28386661
It's on TOR.
>>28386902
Memeing aside, people have sex. Why do you care so much r9k? I mean if I'm looking for a relationship I wouldn't want a girl that's cheated or had casual sex. However she is free to choose how she lives and I am free to go after her or reject her. I feel like r9k's problem is that they want a Disney-esque romance and consider it to be one of the most important things in their life. I would prefer a virgin but going into your 20s that's not going to happen and people can be cheated on and people change. I hate to shill but this vid is pretty fuckin good. I feel like every robot should watch it. https://youtube.com/watch?v=QYA9DaSIddo
>>28386666
But Satan, doesn't that make it hard to trust anything written on that site? "It's the job of the reader to verify what is true" sounds like a fancy way of saying that you can't really know anything. Any guy could write anything about any female he doesn't like, so how could you know for sure if you saw a girl on there? There's no way you could just trust everyone on the site. Some people can sound convincing, and some people could be genuine but won't be believed for one reason or another. The rating system might not work, either. What if a few white knights, feminists, or the like got a hold of it and rated everything as not credible? You really can't just rely on the honor system for something like this, especially not on the internet.
It's kind of a badly thought out idea.
I'd also rather keep registries of people to just things like serious sex offenders and violent criminals. I know that some dumb girls have made registries of creepy guys and such, but those are wrong too and shouldn't exist. But to each their own, I guess.
>>28387050
>implying I won't date as young as I have to just to get a virgin.
>>28386627
Oh no, poor womenz may have to deal with rumours that their reputations isn't squeaky clean. What the fuck type of redditor are you to care about that?
>>28387050
Meming aside, I don't see why people care about cheating, it happens, it's difficult to be loyal to just one person. If you're in your 20's and you don't accept that your girlfriend is a bit loose with other guys that's YOUR problem. Who cares if this becomes the standard for the vast majority of women, you can just choose not to date the loose ones.
There's literally no way to verify the "facts" anyone can report about a girl.
Also, your site could be considered revenge porn if you include the only real proof (pics and videos), which is illegal in California and many plans are putting laws in place for it. Just ask that guy who started IsAnyoneUp.
Without pics or videos (even emails or text screencaps can be faked easily), there's literally no reason for anyone to believe anything on the site. You'll need a better system. And I don't think there's a foursquare for girls. Unless maybe it was a geotagging thing but I feel like that would be even more illegal.
Just go find some virgin religious girl and then get sick of her when she isn't young anymore like every other guy like you.
>>28387180
>it's difficult to be loyal to just one person.
no it fucking isn't you stupid whore
>>28385887
You guys realize women have had sites like this about men for years, right?
>>28387180
Men are spread breeding its natural for men to have multiple partners simulataniously. women are not. Biological they are meant to stay with their mate. Any that does not is a degenerate whore that is ruined by feminism.
THEY STOLE MY FUCKING IDEA
FUCKING HELL
>>28387180
holy cuck
lol
No hymen, no diamond. I've been insulted by a girl I dumped because she wasn't a virgin and saw her true colors. If she can't wait for marriage she obviously doesn't take the relationship seriously.
>>28386691
How can you truly consider yourself lonely if you wouldn't take a non-virgin? Over half of women lose it in high school, and a large majority lose it after 21 or so. Maybe you'd prefer a virgin, but aren't you aiming too high to truly consider yourself lonely? People criticize women all the time who consider themselves to be lonely but won't date anyone but a turbo Chad - aren't you doing the same thing?
I could understand having some low standards that you simply won't do, like having an abusive girlfriend or an extremely ugly one who looks like her face got hit by a monster truck. But that's a pretty high standard to have, especially if you're like a lot of /r9k/ denizens and women don't find you all that attractive.
</White knighting>
>>28385887
i'd still gf her desu.
