Only participate in this thread if you swear to G-d that you won't legalize modesty laws (ie you won't make it law to dress modestly for women).
There is a reason why you shouldn't, but for fun's sake I'm not going to share it - the purpose of this thread is to find out the reason, when it's found, I'll quote it and say "This is the reason!".
Now then:
I get bothered by women dressing immodestly so all I ask is they do the simple task of wearing a loose fitting shirt and loose fitting pants. Why is this wrong?
because it's their life, and you don't get to decide what they wear?
>>28376600
Them getting to wear what they want would only be allowed because it has the most utility, or in other words because it reduces the most pain and/or causes the most pleasure.
However, them wearing what they want causes me pain. Them wearing the clothes I prescribe causes them negligible pain. Therefore, if this logic were true, I should be able to live in a society where 'sluts aint allowed to dress like sluts'.
Why isn't this logic true?
>>28376702
replace 'true' with 'sound'
I would never make it a law for women to dress moderately because that would be a violation of the non-aggression principle.
>>28377030
The criteria for what action you should do isn't the non-aggression principle but utilitarianism.
>>28377059
Who are you to decide the criteria for what actions I should or should not do?
>>28376559
The fuck you blathering on about?
