Do girls like guys with high cheekbones?
Yes, as evidenced by the fact that 95% of male models and a good proportion of everyday Chads look like the pic in OP.
>>28336516
Mine are pretty high, but they just make my face look skeletal and sickly.
Idk, there are so many other factors.
high but not flaring like the fag in OP
flaring cheek bones is a clear sign of mongol admixture
>>28336551
Yeah, and I have chubby cheeks that make me look fat/baby-faced even though I'm in my 20s and skinny.
You got the better deal mate.
>do girls like guys
No.
>>28336816
what are muslims then
>>28336850
A hideous mixture of White, Armenid (pic related), Negroid, and mongol.
>>28336850
arabs are caucasian
Theres a scary, empty look in his eyes.
>>28336850
Technically they're considered 'caucasoid', as are/were Abos. Shows you how much of a meme these classifications are.
They're inaccurate and outdated. Stick to haplotype and haplogroups. Actual genetic DNA, not arbitrary pseudoscience.
Rate this gentleman face.
>>28336816
This. They like cheekbones high and wide on men.
>>28336990
6.5/10 too intimidating imo
>>28336990
>>28337020
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rico_Verhoeven
>>28336990
pretty average maybe even below average for some people.
overdeveloped facial bone/Neanderthal look.
I would put him at about a 5/10
>>28336972
Haplogroups don't mean shit. They only tell you where one of your direct ancestors came from out of thousands.
Example: A viking rapes some moorish woman in North Africa and she has a bastard son. The son mixes with local moors. The grandson mixes with moors, and so on. A thousand years later the descendants don't have any viking blood in them but if the paternal line is direct then some men might have the same haplogroup as vikings even though they are totally moorish.
>>28336955
To me, it's more of a vacant, "I see that the television stopped playing" level void of intelligence sort of face.
Kind of reminds me of my dog.
If you threw a ball at this kid, I'm sure he'd light up like a Christmas tree.
>>28337093
He looks more of a pretty boy on video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cncd8WBvIXo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lurFHvBuOdY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXJJn-HnnLI
>>28336990
He looks good from a distance but up close his butt chin, girl lips, and sunken cheeks look gross
>>28336503
Not necessairly, but it can help.
>>28337151
eh he looks shit without complimentary lighting to hide some of his facial features.
but so do most people, that's why lighting is a part of production and photography.
to me it's just overdeveloped/edgy mess with random bone protrusions.
honestly he looks like somebody who abused growth hormone and test for years and fucked up his bone development
>>28337117
It's a lot more accurate than comparing skulls.
>>28337252
>>28336972
>>28337117
Ever head of autosomal dna?
Look for that kind of map, they're the most accurate.
>>28336503
That guy looks like a heroin addict
>>28337236
>honestly he looks like somebody who abused growth hormone and test for years and fucked up his bone development
He's 6'5 at 250 lean pounds, you may not be too far from the mark.
>>28336990
Too much test
>>28337252
>It's a lot more accurate than comparing skulls.
fucking LOL
Tell that to forensic anthropologists who can determine the race of a victim just from skeletal remains.
>>28336816
Australoid looks pretty cute
>>28337452
>Australoid looks pretty cute
So does this dog.
>>28337452
I agree with you anon, 100%
>>28337440
Right, because when I think Caucasian I think Somali or Mauritanian.
Forensic scientists have to use pseudoscience because their entire profession is basically pseudoscience tbhq.
>>28337452
This is probably the cutest one I could find quickly. Most of the ones I've seen are much worse.
>>28337633
>Denisovans + PooInLoos = not even once.
Their whole phenotype is JUST.
