>>28283008
why would you made us read that?

>>28283008
1) why were they all so short
2) why did they stop at 5'7"

>>28283244
Because short people exist.
Because they were going to be 5'3/5'4 before the treatment.

>>28283405
5'7" is a nicer height than 5'3", but why stop at all? They're not going to turn into 7' monsters with heart problems overnight.

If I were them I'd still be bummed about being 5'7" (as someone who naturally grew to that height). A chance to be average or better thrown away, as if I'm not good enough?

>>28283534
The study ended. Apparently there are ethical issues with enhancement that you can get around with enough money, but that's true of most things