Do women prefer rejecting men, denying them entry as the gatekeepers of sex. Or do they prefer to fuck the 1% tall handsome men? Which is more pleasant for women?
>>28239602
they prefer to fuck the 1% tall handsome men
>>28239622
Very possible, but what if the rejected guy is just the top 10%?
>>28239602
Women can keep their legs closed all they want. Men will just perfect virtual sex, making women wholly obsolete.
They're literally digging their own graves.
>>28239763
>women can breed without men
>women can fuck without loser men
>somehow loser men are winning because in a few decades VR sex might be 10% as good as the real thing
deluded
>>28239741
I don't know what you're talking about, I just copied the text from your post and pasted it because I'm lazy. The real number should be like 20% or less but I'm not going there right now.
>>28239763
Women will not allow that. They barley tolerate pornagraphy. Prostitution is rooted in tradition, like the drug alcohol. Sex-bots and VI waifus will not be allowed. They will be portrayed as rape victims. Cause they are programmed (forced) to consent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxVBjfHzdI4
>>28239804
Ah, I see we've a specimen of the neutered nu-male posting.
>>28239763
>wymyn protest
>'grr sexbots degrade real wymyn!'
>'OBEY MY VAGINA, LOSER'
>>28239855
I am open to hearing what your rebuttal is but I think your MGTOW mentality is what's neutered
>>28239622
Yup.
> Be 6'5"
> Work out 3 times a week
> Have good high-paying consulting job
> Drive a luxury car
> Rent an apartment in a trendy part of town
> Have no trouble finding women to fuck
> Even have a couple friends who I fuck on occasion, no strings attached
> Feels good man
>>28240006
If you're not going to post your face then don't even bother to brag about anything else.
The attractive ones are the latter because they can have the best so why settle and the ugly ones are the former because Chad neither wants nor needs them but they will not settle for less so they choose celibacy.
>>28239741
It literally doesn't matter, women are hypergamous by nature. They would reject a top 2% man if it meant they could get with a 1% man.
>>28239763
>implying women will care
oh no! what will they do without fat autistic loser neets?!?!!?!
the reality is they will probably be glad not having to deal with you losers anymore. at the very least they wont care. they will continue to be able to fuck chads and tyrones who dont give a shit how horrible they are as people and dont give a shit about vr because they arent autistic and prefer the real thing.
as for the beta bucks, you are again deluded. this isnt the 1800s. women dont need you to support them. this is one of the few good things feminism achieved. women arent reliant on ugly betas to make the money and provide them food so they dont die. they can survive on their own now and tbfh do it better than most men(see r9k). thats why i think feminism got this right because women are much better workers and better at getting what they want in the world. they also are much better students so things will continue to improve for them. now that they are in the workforce and stable financially, they can be free to date and have sex with people they want just like men always had.
like i said women are actually good at surviving unlike neets here and the difference will only get more apparent as time goes on. men will have 80 percent of guys becoming neets while the rest of guys achieve financial success and sexual success. the girls will be taking all these jobs and if they really want to can eventually settle down with a rich chad and be a stay at home mom. do you SERIOUSLY believe that women making 100k a year living on their own and fucking chads will want to settle down with a neet virgin living with his mom? even settling fown for beta bucks will be a thing of the past so you losers wont even be getting used up pussy.
just face it and stop deluding yourself, the 21st century is the century of women. they are finally free from you beta autists. in fact the majority of them will actually be more successful than you.
>>28240053
Why does that matter? Although washing it often helps immensely.
>>28240109
Only more successful because the state props them up and caters to them, and that will end when Europe and "Western Values" collapses under the failure of the bloated and unsustainable welfare state and the success of Islam and other minorities-who-will-no-longer-be-minorities.
A firm reminder that women are not independent, they simply replaced their husband with the government.
>>28240109
>women are much better workers
Except they're not talking about "MEternity leave"
>better at getting what they want in the world
By showing some cleavage and getting some schmuck to do their bidding, real good
>much better students
Because the modern educational system is built around how girls learn instead of how boys learn (hence the increasing emphasis on group work and textboosk instead of individual work and the near abandoning ofhands-on learning)
>they can be free to date and have sex with people they want just like men always had.
Most of history had arranged marriages so men didn't have much of choice either, and most men settle for uglier and/or more masculine women so it's not like they're with "who they want"
>>28240329
*Except they're NOW talking about "MEternity leave"
SpellChecker catches spelling but not grammar mistakes, damn.
>>28240109
well Muslim horde are coming to west,and it will take women right back to stone age.
so Allah Akbar!my fellow robots
>>28240109
I agree with most of your comment, but you're making it sound like woman are the happiest they have every been. The life expectancy of white woman in the US has actually started dropping, not only that but a lot of women are pretty unhappy when it comes to their love lives.
Yeah, woman can now support themselves, but that doesn't mean they like it. A lot of women won't admit it, but they want to be dominated by a man and play their roles essentially. There was actually a study done that basically said that in marriages where husbands and wives shared house chores, their was actually a drop in sex rates and female satisfaction, lol.
With the growing rise of feminism and MGTOW, men and women are basically taking their toys and going home and no one is really having any fun. Not only that, though, this is really only a big problem in western countries, mostly white men and women. That being said, it's only a matter of time before all whites basically allow everything they have built in the west to slip through their fingers and into the hands of the others. You don't even have to be a /pol/tard to see it.
Life Expectancy Drops For White Women, Increases For Black Men -
http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/04/20/474884894/life-expectancy-drops-for-white-women-increases-for-black-men
Husbands who do more traditionally female housework have less sex -
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130130082258.htm
>>28240367
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aEMxQloXP0
>gatekeepers of sex
>gatekeeper
Why haven't you become the keymaster yet, anons?
>>28239602
Men want to fuck, women want to cuck. Females invest more in each offspring, so over the last 100 million years, evolution wired women to let alphas fuck them and to cuck betas.
Formally, cucking means
1. reproducing with alphas
2. not reproducing with betas
3. minuplating betas to serve the children of alphas
Immagration, adoption, socialism, divorce, and abortion are generally all forms of cucking. Its not womens' fault that they're inclined to cuck anymore than it's mens' fault that they're inclined to fuck.
>>28239844
Nah, desperate NEET virgins with nothing to lose will just start to terrorize and mailbomb them
Legitimately interested in this
