Fembots, are there any things you miss about the past?
Do you feel men were more polite and gentlemanly?
Or the closer family environment?
There were also greater restrictions on what men could do back then, in terms of sleeping around.
>>28228139
There were also greater restrictions on what men could do back then
In terms of pretending to be a female and posting on r9k
Kill yourself
>>28228139
There were less restrictions for men to sleep around back then- brothels were very popular and considered absolutely normal since "men have needs" (including married ones). The restrictions applied mostly only to women. So no, I dont think past was better in any way. Certainly not for women.
>>28228217
If a man got a woman pregnant and then did a runner, his name would be put on the front of the church to shame him. Seriously.
>>28228263
If a woman slept around she would be in general disrepute and no one would want anything to do with her
>>28228291
So what?
You don't sleep around I'm guessing so it wouldn't apply to you.
You also wouldn't have to compete with those porn star tier women who do almost anything in bed because no man would ever marry one back then.
Kind of. I just want to be a housewife and raise a big loving family. Everyone looks down on me for not caring about a job or career or anything in 2016, when all I want is a loving man to take care of me and our brood that I raise.
>>28228371
You're definiteIy a man, aren't you?
>>28228952
Nope. Cute lil pussy and everything. Just raised in a traditional household I guess.
>"Fembots"
no such thing though
>>28228972
Are you pure?
>>28228327
They wouldnt marry them but would cheat with them and visit them on regular basis (and bring wife some good old syphilis)
>>28229004
Nah, I've had boyfriends and I like to fuck. But otherwise I'm a good girl.
>>28229126
>Nah, l've had boyfriends and I like to fuck. But otherwise I'm a good girl.
>>28229126
Why didn't any of your previous boyfriends want to get married?
>>28229126
To be honest, I get the feeling that you want to be a housewife so badly that you aren't as selective of the guys you get with. So when you pay attention to a guy like me, in some ways it feels worse than being ignored. You don't want me, you want the scenario I can provide. I can't trust that you really love me.
>>28228371
Sounds alright, you'll find a husband. I want a big family as well least 3-4 kids. The wife i wouldn't let work since i am the one that will bring the food on the table. I'd rather have her relax at home, even when the kids are grown up and enjoy herself.
>>28229283
Only in the last one were we old enough or serious enough to consider that, and we both realized we weren't compatible long term like that. That said, the most major problem he had with me was that I'm not ambitious about a career. A family was not really of primary importance to him so he would have preferred a working wife.
>>28229342
That's not true, I don't want some idiot I can live off, I specifically said I want a big loving family. That includes a man I respect and love and take care of in turn. There are women just in it to be the trophy wife, and I could have done that with my ex, but that doesn't appeal to me, I want the whole happy family package deal.
>>28229367
That's the dream right there, you're a smart man.
>>28229401
>That's the dream right there
Indeed it is, someday it will happen i hope (At least a man can dream). Having 3-4 boys if i am incredibly lucky and all going out camping, shooting, riding dirt-bikes together. Wife can join as well, in fact when it comes to motorcycles/dirt-bikes it will be mandatory.
If i was to ever have a daughter, forbid help whoever tries to hit on her.
>>28229462
I'm torn between only wanting boys for the ease and throwing a couple girls in too because I think I would do a competent job raising smart, cool girls. Guess I'll just roll the dice when the time comes.
>>28228139
>are there any things you miss about the past?
my hopes and dreams
>>28228952
kekd
orignali, des thomosexaul
>>28229515
Be my girlfriend and we'll realise them together. I am your anchor to the stars.
>>28229390
Well, you gave that up when you were a whore.
Fuck off roast beef
ROASTIE ROASTIE REE REE REE
>>28229506
>Guess I'll just roll the dice when the time comes.
Amen, regardless of what it is you'll still end up loving it. Though if it's a girl I'm turning it into a tom-boy.
No question about that.
>>28228217
>the restrictions applied to women
LOL NO.
In the medieval period it was true that a woman could not refuse her husband.
It worked the other way around, too. If a man, "Wasn't doing the deed," she had every right to go get some dick someplace else. AND it was a divorce-able offense.
You're completely uneducated. In fact, the world's, "First Feminist," Christine de Pizan pointed out that if women wanted men to take them seriously they had to stop acting like whores and start acting respectably as men did.
Not really, I'd rather work than push a bunch of kids out of my pussy.
Can't say I'm interested at all in hookup culture though, so the idea of actually just dating and not just looking for sex is appealing.
>>28229390
I was interested in a girl who had a dream similar to yours. I wasn't against it, or for it really. I would have considered it because it made her happy and I thought I might have loved her. It worries me though. Both my mother and sister were housewives and weren't treated well by their husbands. I would like a wife with a degree and at least the prospects for a career so she is a stronger person role model. I admit, being the bread winner is appealing. I already took a job specifically because it would provide for a family best, even though the job wasn't best suited to me.
>>28229558
AND to follow up, these, "Restrictions on women," (which you wrongly think applied to them only) are a fairly modern creation, circa the "Victorian," age. Created by the ruling monarch at the time.
And the name of the age is a hint as to which gender fucking created them.
>Hint: It's a girl's name.
>>28229578
as big if a hypocrit as a woman
>>28228139
Are you for real? Even going 50 years back women are basically house pets.
>>28228139
>There were also greater restrictions on what men could do back then, in terms of sleeping around.
That would go for you too roastie. I bet you couldn't handle not being able to fuck 30 guys in college.
>>28229618
How so? I was aware how serious an undertaking starting a family is. I wouldn't have done it just to please her.
>>28229578
But what is the point of sinking $100k into a degree when I want to hopefully be married and having kids by the end of my 20's? Even with the degree, if I immediately had a family and wanted to use the degree later it would be useless after years without any practice or experience. Wanting a family makes me basically unemployable, so when school started costing too much I just dropped out and made a bunch of money with an opportunity I was presented at the time. Now I have a nice nest egg but no degree, which I'm fine with but the world looks down on. Hopefully in the next few years I find someone to love who respects this and won't take advantage of me.I'm getting older and it's looking grim though, they don't make men and women like they used to.
I'm gonna post this here.
women can't be lonely, and hence cannot be robots.
Ever noticed how depressed, suicidal, introverted, shy etc men mostly have no friends, not to speak of romantic prospects, yet the most depressed passive lunatic suicidal women always have something going for them?
notice how most of the time those women have mostly male friends. they'll came they "get along better with men". That's obviously a lie.
It goes, as follows:
For men:
1. man has nothing to offer to the table.
2. man is isolated and lonely
For wymen:
1. woman has nothing to offer to the table
2. wait, she does, by merely existing, i.e her body
3. with this body she will get social attentions from these kinds of males:
a. those who intend to sleep with her
b. those who hope someday to be able to sleep with her
c. those who have no hope of managing to sleep with her but are still drawn to her because of biological imperative
That's why failed women have mostly/ all male "friends". but that means women can never be lonely. sure, it's not true relationships, but it's far better than nothing.
Notice how somewhat attractive gay men are in a similar position (not entirely as sex flows farr more freely there so the thirst is far less real)
tldr; no such thing as fembot get out
>>28229814
I understand what you're saying. Part of my middle class upbringing was to value higher education. I would like to marry a girl with the same values, someone who is intelligent, educated about the world, and curious about things. I put myself through school on a shoestring budget. The job I have now only required that I have a degree of some kind. It's a gate people maybe unfairly impose.
>>28229814
>>28229911
And to be honest again, I don't look down on a girl for not having a degree. I would have enjoyed helping the girl I liked get through school. It was something I knew I could help with and it might have been fun for both of us. It was an obvious if not ham-fisted way I could help her to grow more capable and independent of me. Then it would matter more if she chose to stay with me when she didn't need to.
>>28229970
Reading that, I realize she might have hated it. I wanted to bond over something like getting through school before putting a relationship to the real test of supporting happy and healthy kids.
