>this is considered acceptable clothing for an American woman to wear outside
THIQ
>>28173051
Are you gay by chance?
>you posted this yesterday
>>28173051
And why is that a problem?
>>28173051
I'd fuck her with the shorts on. Just wedgie em' up in there and go to town like there's no tomorrow.
Don't be stupid. Amerifats can't fit in those shorts, that's clearly a Canadian girl
>>28173051
awesome
i love freedom
Outrageous! She should be forced to cover herself from head to toe.
>>28173079
Canadians are fat af too.
In fact, the whole of the First World basically is, discounting France and the Mediterranean.
Props to Mexico, though, for being so fat despite crippling poverty.
>>28173225
We have to send our excess high-fructose corn syrup somewhere, anon
>>28173065
No, and I don't like how the stereotypical reaction of a man who thinks with his dick as opposed to his brain is "LOL IF U DON'T LIKE WHORES THEN U R GAY XDDD".
>>28173070
Because it encourages promiscuity, it encourages a "muh dick LMAO" mentality in men, and it reduces women to wet, walking holes who have no redeeming qualities whatsoever beyond their short-lasting physical attractiveness.
>>28173066
That's right, and I'm posting it again today.
>>28173097
I do too. I'm not saying it should be illegal for women to walk around looking like whores, I just simply wish they wouldn't. It sets a bad example for children and creates an absolutely cancerous sex-driven climate. What happened to modesty?
>>28173291
a sex driven climate is created by the people who are sex driven, not the people who facilitate it.
>>28173051
t. bitch nigga who doesn't get any pussy getting salty over nothing
What are those shorts/underwear/whatever called? I want to make mygfwear them
>>28173291
We're animals.
Guess what drives animals besides hunger and thirst? Sex.
>>28173405
I want to wear them myself
>>28173405
They're called Sophie's now get the fuck out
>>28173371
>calls someone else a virgin
>on r9k
not even him just thought this was funny. I love the muslim clothing/social rules for women- thinking of converting. I find the fact that covering up the female body in public is so important makes seeing a naked muslim woman even hotter. Also hijab porn? Holy shit sandnigger women are thicc. Search up Yaniss Epik vs Djamila for a better understanding.
>>28173343
>>28173432
I guess I just wish we weren't so degenerate desu.
>>28173051
You realize it's all the thirsty betas who encourage this cancer.
They think letting women dress like prostitutes will help them get laid.
I rather have my girlfriend wear cute long dresses than having her ass hang out of her shorts for other guys to see. Many Americans are cuckolds and get off to thinking about their wives dressing like sluts to provoke other men to fuck them.
Shit is nasty, no one wants to smell her fucking yeast infection and period blood.
>>28173051
And?
It's not that hard to not wanna fuck someone just because of their clothes you autistic dingus, what are you a virgin?
>>28173291
If you are a straight male, why would you object to seeing a woman's body? Especially if she is cute.
How does it encourage promiscuity? Men will have sex drives no matter what. If a woman covers up, a man will learn to focus on the curves of her body revealed by the fabric. How does a woman's choice of clothing reduce her? If you are wearing shorts or pants does it change your personality, thoughts, identity, etc.?
Children see their mothers breasts all the time. Nudity is a natural state of being. What value does modesty have? Why teach children to be disgusted by human bodies?
I'm guessing you're sex starved and insecure- you feel powerless over your situation so you wish women would cover themselves up so you wouldn't feel so lacking.
>>28173563
Obviously not that anon but people seem to be disgusted by their own urges and wants. Like people seem to avoid wanting to be actual human beings and instead want everyone to be PC androgynous...things.
>>28173291
>No, and I don't like how the stereotypical reaction of a man who thinks with his dick as opposed to his brain is "LOL IF U DON'T LIKE WHORES THEN U R GAY XDDD".
>Because it encourages promiscuity, it encourages a "muh dick LMAO" mentality in men, and it reduces women to wet, walking holes who have no redeeming qualities whatsoever beyond their short-lasting physical attractiveness.
>I do too. I'm not saying it should be illegal for women to walk around looking like whores, I just simply wish they wouldn't. It sets a bad example for children and creates an absolutely cancerous sex-driven climate. What happened to modesty?
completely agree desu
but of course all we can really do at this point is sit back and watch society collapse because the moment you don't support any of this shit you're just a mad virgin unable to get any pussy.
>>28173631
What does a woman's clothing choice have to do with the stability of society?
>>28173405
Booty shorts
>>28173661
dude half the country's population is irrelevant lmao
>Feminists whine about patriarchy
>More respected and revered in patriarchy than this feminized society where women are objectified
I want out of this brave new world
>>28173563
Because dressing like a literal whore is not "cute" in any sense of the word--it's the exact opposite of cute. There's a big difference between teaching children that the naked human form is nothing to be ashamed of and exposing them to sluts walking around with their tits practically hanging out trying to catch Chad's eye, much like there's a difference between showing your child naked sculptures in a museum and letting them see inside a strip club.
>>28173291
Those hijabs don't stop sandworms from raping them. They probably get horny as fuck at the flash of an ankle. It doesn't matter what people wear at all.
>>28173051
I'd rape her, no joke.
>>28173784
Anon you're missing the point. Women WANT to be objectified. If they didn't they wouldn't do any of the shit they do.
You don't want to objectify women? That's fine, but you'd have to be pretty sackless.
>>28173757
Thats pretty hot though, who actually cares? Its you sheltered prudes faults for all being repressed and not getting your sexual urges out by normal means, who go into full rape beast mode when they see the slightest bit of flesh on any woman and probably get aroused, but since you don't view sex in a normal manner your brain translates that into rage and you decide "WAHHHH I DON'T LIKE IT CAUSE I HAVE PTSD FROM A PRIEST TELLING ME SEX IS WRONG WHILE HE FUCKED MY ASS, I HAVE TO RUIN IT FOR EVERYONE ELSE"
>>28173809
Where did I mention hijabs? There's a very large healthy, modest middle ground between wearing shorts that go halfway up your ass and being covered from head to toe in a hijab, not even allowed to show your hair. Not supporting one in no way means you automatically support the other.
>>28173890
Fuck off roastie this isn't tumblr or reddit.
>>28173930
>I don't like seeing scantily clad bitches
It's alright anon. Not everyone here hates gays.
>>28173924
Even in that middle everyone'd still want to fuck them.
>>28173957
>Dude vagina lmao xD
It's alright anon. Not everyone here hates immature horny little teens.
>>28173661
>the bigger picture
Womens clothing is just a symptom of the problem with societys stability, really.
Centuries ago fat women were considered beautiful because being able to bear healthy children was an ideal in society.
Decades ago thinner women were considered beautiful because being part of the working class was an ideal beauty in society.
These days sluts are considered beautiful because indulging in pleasure is considered an ideal in society.
These days it's all about lust and pleasure. It's no longer about stability or growth. It's about indulging in every type of pleasure possible, which shows itself in lots of ways. Girls dressing like they do being one of them.
These bitches are "comfortable in their bodies" only because we are telling them what it means and idealizing sex.
The nuclear family is dead because it didn't sell enough.
>>28173890
I honestly can't understand the mindset of people who look at shit like this and go 'oh thats hot.' what about that do you find hot? the notion that those girls have likely taken forty dicks between them? the notion that they're vain, shallow retards who have nothing more to offer except their bodies and couldn't carry a conversation to save their lives? idk bro, if that gets you off then good for you, but I just can't fathom it. then again, I say this in a society that glorifies casual sex and in which people openly admit to using hookup apps without a hint of shame. sometimes I wish I could buy into this shit just because I feel very alone being one of the few detractors to it, even on /r9k/.
>>28173784
so if a guy goes to the beach and just wears swimtrunks is he dressing like a male stripper or something? or if I wear jeans and a trench coat am i dressing like a terrorist? why shouldn't people be allowed to dress however they want?
do you see the way you're structuring your argument?
1. children shouldn't be ashamed of the naked human form
2. if a woman's body is exposed [in your opinion- a woman only exposes her body to attract the eye of "Chad", not for any other reason such as temperature control, comfort, fashion, etc.] children should not look at it.
>children shouldn't be ashamed of the naked body but they shouldn't be able to see the naked body
seeing a woman's body in a public setting is very different than being inside a strip club, which is a place where money is exchanged for sex and the illusion of sex, hopefully between adults- also, people smoke and drink inside strip clubs, which children shouldn't do.
>>28173957
Desu-bh, I actually prefer the traditional garb >>28173757
I hate how America has killed off all world culture with its shitty industrial Slut Wear.
I mean, maybe if it were just Americans wearing this, but it's everyone.
>>28173291
>Because it encourages promiscuity, it encourages a "muh dick LMAO" mentality in men, and it reduces women to wet, walking holes who have no redeeming qualities whatsoever beyond their short-lasting physical attractiveness.
Welcome to the red pill. That's exactly what they are, anon.
>>28173051
Cankles. NEXT
![[ CUBAN PETE ].gif](https://i.imgur.com/f0a3Xn4.gif "[ CUBAN PETE ].gif")
i dont have a problem with it as long as she isnt my sister or gf
>>28174041
>These days sluts are considered beautiful because indulging in pleasure is considered an ideal in society.
people have indulged in pleasure since the beginning of recorded history. do you think promiscuous sex is a new invention? how is indulging in pleasure related to an aesthetic like fat or skinny?
people of island nations wear grass skirts. japanese famers used to wear loin cloths. should people that live in southern california wear pea coats and sweaters because that's seen as an ideal in new york city?
>These days it's all about lust and pleasure. It's no longer about stability or growth. It's about indulging in every type of pleasure possible, which shows itself in lots of ways. Girls dressing like they do being one of them.
there will always be lazy people. there will always be productive people. how does wearing more revealing clothing reflect on people being lazy and indulging in pleasure?
i think it would relate more to global climate change and rising temperatures.
>These bitches are "comfortable in their bodies" only because we are telling them what it means and idealizing sex.
i don't understand what you mean by this sentence. idealizing sex? you mean the thing people do to sustain the human population? sex has been "idealized" since the beginning of human history.
>The nuclear family is dead because it didn't sell enough.
there have always been broken families. there have always been stable families. this is still true.
>>28174081
But I'm not saying they shouldn't be able to dress this way, I'm merely lamenting the fact that they want to in the first place. And do you really not see the difference between exposing children to the unsexualized body versus the sexualized body? "Comfort" and "temperature control" aren't justifications for walking around with a half-covered ass or nearly-exposed tits. We don't live in the fucking Sahara and you're not going to die if you wear regular knee-length shorts on the twenty-minute walk to work. You can't be 100% comfortable all the time. We live in a society and concessions have to be made. Do I like wearing long pants to work in the summer? No, not really. Would I feel more comfortable showing up in a G-string and a sock? Probably! Would that be justified? Absolutely not.
Do you, by the way, also believe that women wear makeup "for themselves" and yoga pants "for comfort?"
>>28173065
Hunnabansinthelam
You know, the, "You don't like looking at scantily clad girls, Faggot?" meme only really works if you only get to see a naked woman on the street.
Chad would get to see a naked woman no matter what she wore.
In my home county a woman would be stoned to death if she dressed that way
>>28174330
why are you lamenting the fact that they want to dress that way? does it have any affect on your life whatsoever? just look it at like eye candy and move on.
children don't know the difference between sexualized and unsexualized unless it is taught to them. if they live in a place where it is normal for women to wear shorts and lowcut tops, they won't think anything of it.
different parts of the world have different climates. even though they wouldn't die from wearing knee length shorts, they'll probably be sweaty and uncomfortable, and also look unfashionable/out of touch.
while it wouldn't be appropriate for you to wear a g string and a sock to work, it is unfortunate that you have to be controlled that way - although there might be some real health concerns regarding sweat, hair, and bacteria.
women and men's fashion are very different. this girl is probably not wearing those shorts to work. women at the work place are also expected to dress conservatively.
i think women wear makeup to boost their confidence in themselves, which is influenced by the perception of outsiders.
i think women do wear yoga pants for comfort - just like sweatpants, except yoga pants are more flattering.
>>28174574
Your homeland is shit too.
Women should be allowed to dress how they want, but they shouldn't want to dress like huge sluts.
>>28174585
Because it doesn't appeal to me and i find it disgusting? Its not "eye candy" if you dont like it.
And that makes it okay, that children blindly mimic whoreish adults and in turn become sexualized themselves? That makes it okay that four year olds across the country are twerking because they saw it on TV? That's okay, just because they don't know what they're doing?
"Oh no, I occasionally get sweaty and uncomfortable! It's almost like living in a civilization involves curtailing certain aspect of comfort in order to function in society! It's almost like the world doesn't revolve around my comfort! I'm scared!"
It's less to do with health concerns and more to do with professionalism.
Women's fashion is a million times more varied than mens, has a million times more stylistic options and combinations, and yet women can't figure out a way to dress comfortably without showing off their asses, breasts, or midriffs? Please. They just don't want to.
You don't see this as a problem? That women compulsively feel the need to alter their real facial features to the point that they can't go out to buy groceries without putting on makeup? You don't see a problem with the fact that women literally pluck out their eyebrow haira one by one, just to draw them back on? It's absolutely ridiculous that we encourage that kind of behavior.
What a coincidence that women can pick from two aesthetically-different, equally-comfortable legwear options, and somehow manage to pick the one that shows off their ass almost every single time! Woaaaah! Face it, it's not about comfort, its about vanity.
>>28173343
>>28173405
>>28173563
>>28174081
>>28174243
>>28174585
Don't discuss with people unable to see past their nose, and think beyond their dick.
These people are deluded by their hedonism, to strive for the lowest of their human aspects, they strive for the fastest and less constructive ways to please themselves, as long as the gratification is obtained instantly.
Women are not the problem, they just follow the main current, it's in their nature, unfortunatly today's main current leads them to a life of sacrificed potential in their youth, in exchange for sexual gratification, and a life of suffering in their later years.
Women depend directly on men, and no healthy man with self respecting accepts whores, in fact is disgusted by them for a moltitude of reasons; what we are experiencing here today is not only a moral degeneration, but also a genetic one, just notice at what ratio human trash have children.
The west is at an end, this is just a sign of the illness.
More conservative societies will replace the suicidal white ones, unfortunatly muslims will one of these.
sage.
>>28174243
>people have indulged in pleasure since the beginning of recorded history.
>humans gonna human anyway
So? We did it before so we should welcome it with open arms and accept it as not a fault but an ideal?
We also had the urge to kill, should we legalize murder? We always had murderers and people who want to kill others will so anyway so why do we even lock people up for it?
We always conquered, so why did we stop colonizing?
Why give up and say "yeah that's not gonna change so just deal with it"? Why not try to better ourselves? What's wrong with acknowledging room for improvement? Or are you saying we should merely loosen up on the moderation? Have you seen current divorce rates? Suicide rates? Incel rates? Do you think it has nothing to do with this?
>should people that live in southern california wear pea coats and sweaters because that's seen as an ideal in new york city?
So you can't wear shorts two inches longer, you immediately have to switch to pea coats?
>how does wearing more revealing clothing reflect on people being lazy and indulging in pleasure?
If you don't see this after my previous reply then i don't see how i can elaborate.
>i think it would relate more to global climate change and rising temperatures.
See above.
>i don't understand what you mean by this sentence. idealizing sex? you mean the thing people do to sustain the human population? sex has been "idealized" since the beginning of human history.
True. But in the past people wouldn't flaunt it as much as today.
We've upped the importance of sexuality to an extent where it is almost the only thing that matters anymore. And it isn't about sustaining population anymore.
>there have always been broken families. there have always been stable families.
See first point. I think that even though it didn't always work out it's still a good ideal to have because it supports stability and deeper relationships.
>>28175070
>with self respect*
>unfortunatly muslims will be*
>>28173051
Exposed buttocks is illegal if I'm not mistaken. Depends by state.
But people generally don't give a shit about public indecency as long as you're not in a bikini/swimsuit or half naked in public.
I've seen plenty of girls with shorts that pretty much leave their entire thighs exposed, so I don't know why some girls like to have their buttcheeks hanging out. And even then the ones who have their asscheeks hanging out spend every fucking second pulling down their shorts to cover the view.
>>28174330
Damn son when was the last time you talked to a chick.
That last sentence says a long time. Yoga pants are so popular because it's the best of both worlds, they're extremely comfortable and can look good. It's literally a "looks good outside of the house" version of sweatpants.
Ask any chick, often showing their ass off is just a bonus. Plenty of fat chicks etc. also where them when they've got nothing to show off. Pure comfort.
>>28175598
Damn son XDD bix nood mufugga TRUUUUU *crying ghetto face* *A-okay hand sign*
>>28173371
I know your 15 year old hypebeast ass blew in from /b/ so how about you hop back into your cancer cauldron and go away stupid bitch
>IT 2016 XDDDDd
And this is why the world is already flushed down the toilet. By year 2020 its gonna be acceptable to just be fucking nude in public. Probably sjw's will fight for that too. Women know their worth and thats their vagina. How can they attract men without literally saying lets fuck? By dressing like little hoes and prancing around thinking their shit doesn't stick. I hate/love women. When Im not horny and need to bust my nut then I will want a girl, until then all bitches are the same. They all listen to drake, they all listen to country and want some fucking pop boy romeo to save them because they feel they are just TOOOO good for everybody because her daddy slams $1000 in her debit card every month. Fuck these modern day hoes man I swear to god I cant wait for the robot waifu.
>>28175598
oh boy look what we got here fellas
we gots us a cuck! huhuhehehehehuheuehuehue
>>28175792
>by year 2020 its gonna be acceptable to just be fucking nude in public.
honestly i wouldnt even be surprised anymore
>>28173051
>look her way and notice her buttcheeks slightly hanging out
>"Eww, did you see that creep checking you out to your left?"
>laughingwhores.jpg
>>28173051
I'm with you OP. Here buttcheeks are literally hanging out. That's just nasty and disrespectful
>>28173432
>we're animals
>this is what idiots actually believe
well technically true we wear clothes, have writing, computers, laws, and a ton of other shit, so the animals argument isn't that great. Then again there are a lot of problems with society, so maybe we should just start fucking in the streets and beating each other to death with rocks.
>>28173857
WOMEN ARE FUCKING OBJECTS, AND I DON'T WANT MY PROPERTY ON DISPLAY! IF ALL OF THE FUCKING NIGGERS CAN USE THE SAME SHIT I PAY FOR, WHY PAY FOR IT? I DON'T WANT OTHER MEN TO HAVE AN EASY TIME OGLING MY WIFE. IT MAKES DAUGHTERS TOTALLY UNMARKETABLE! WHY FEED THE WOMAN IF YOU CAN FUCK HER FOR FREE?!?!
>women have been wearing skimpy clothing for ages - the flapper era, the 60's and mini skirts, the 80's and slutty hair metal chicks...
>an autistic omega male on 4chan thinks short shorts (a 70's fashion staple) is somehow new or interesting in 2016
Fucking omegas.
>>28174243
almost every sentence is a question, just shows how much in denial you are
>>28176157
>60 years ago
>ages
>>28173683
Not enough ass for my tastes.
>>28173405
dolphin hem interlock shorts
look @ american apparel
>>28173051
I don't see anything wrong with it. Maybe you should move to Saudi Arabia, might be more your speed.
>>28173291
ur a faggot homo fag
>>28173051
god damn it why dont I ever see that
>>28176157
Okay then, you fucking braindead retard. Let's compare modern New York City to New York City in the summer of 1991:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWCE2G789SY
WOW, WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT--SKIRTS AND COVERED CHESTS, SENSIBLE AND APPROPRIATE CLOTHING FOR THE WEATHER
Kill yourself, you fucking drooling dick for brains.
>>28176430
>one chick going braless
>other girl showing off her long legs
>>28173051
I don't go out much anymore, but I would go the the mall every weekend with my brother, just to be around other people.When I saw girls dressed like this,beautiful girls, I would feel motivated to better myself so that I could be with one of them. but now,after giving up, it just hurts to look at them.
>>28175070
Wearing skimpy clothing =/= whore
You have your head so far up your ass I'm surprised you haven't suffocated yet.
What evidence do you have of any of this shit you're saying? The west is at an end? How so? Cus teenagers are wearing shorts when it's hot out?
People are driven by sexuality???!! Holy shit!!! Dude you're blowing my mind.
>>28176158
You are a retarded shithead. Your post doesn't make any sense. I was questioning him to point out the many holes in his logic.
Give it up, OP. You cant reason with porn addicts. They blame women for all the problems in society yet dont realize they are the ones that ruined women.
>>28176157
>hair metal chicks
That sounds fucking rad.
>>28176332
I went to this thing where restaurants in the city let people try the food at the downtown square and saw 2 instances of that.
Basically if you're in a crowded place where it's hot you'll see booty shorts
Well at least she looks good.
My wife wears short shorts but they never leak cheek. This is America though. People can do what they want. Not that they should, but they could.
>>28173225
>discounting France and the Mediterranean.
France still has a 50% overweight and 17% obese population.
Greece is 57/23, one of the fattest industrialized nations in the world.
Spain is 53/16
Basically every country in the world has a 50% or greater overweight population, with obesity ranging from 15-20%. Still not on par with Amerifats 67/33 hamlard corpulency status, but they're catching up.
>>28177661
>Wearing skimpy clothing =/= whore
ok, so you're not a whore, but you are wearing a whore's uniform, so you shouldn't be surprised when you're treated as one.
>>28177867
People with a lack of social awareness and no knowledge of fashion trends will try to pay them for sex? And then they can say actually I'm not a whore.
Okay, so what does this have to do with the downfall of western civilization?
>>28175184
>So? We did it before so we should welcome it with open arms and accept it as not a fault but an ideal?
people have indulged in pleasure since the beginning of history, so the fact that they are still doing it has nothing to do with a woman's fashion trend. whether or not women wear shorts that reveal their ass, people will seek pleasure and want to have sex. it is a non issue that women wear shorts that expose their ass.
>We also had the urge to kill, should we legalize murder? We always had murderers and people who want to kill others will so anyway so why do we even lock people up for it?
We always conquered, so why did we stop colonizing?
again, murder, conquering, stuff like that, which are societal ills, have nothing to do with women's fashion. you have not made any type of argument which says that women wearing revealing clothing causes a negative effect on any person's life.
>Why give up and say "yeah that's not gonna change so just deal with it"?
you were saying that today's society is somehow inherently different than previous societies, so i was saying that you are wrong- people have always wanted sex and behaved promiscuously.
>Why not try to better ourselves? What's wrong with acknowledging room for improvement? Or are you saying we should merely loosen up on the moderation?
how would making women wear more conservative clothing better society?
(1/)
>>28175184
>>28178231
>Have you seen current divorce rates? Suicide rates? Incel rates? Do you think it has nothing to do with this?
in what country? what demographic? the divorce rate in america is high because a lot of people get married as teenagers and realize they were stupid to do such a thing and then get a divorce. in earlier generations, people didn't have this freedom so they were forced to stick out unhappy marriages. additionally, women didn't have as much earning power so they were more financially dependent on their husbands and couldn't leave them. that has nothing to do with your idea that rampant hedonism has infected the globe.
>If you don't see this after my previous reply then i don't see how i can elaborate.
you're not making an argument though. you just keep saying people wear revealing clothing because our society celebrates sex. humans have always been celebrating sex, but they haven't always been wearing revealing clothing. so, what does the current celebration of sex (which btw you haven't proven is any different than the rest of human history) have to do with women now wearing revealing clothing?
>So you can't wear shorts two inches longer, you immediately have to switch to pea coats?
are you that dense? the point is: people's clothing choices usually reflect the environment they're living in, not so much "society's ideal beauty standards" [a person in a new york blizzard will wear different clothing than a person on the beach in los angeles, even if they are technically living in the same society]
>True. But in the past people wouldn't flaunt it as much as today.
what past people? have you seen any greek ceramic paintings? or read any literature from other societies? sex is on people's minds just as much today as it has been in the past.
(2/)
>>28173051
>Tfw lots of animals and societies (I think) are driven partly by sex
I get it, libido and such, but I feel we are focusing too much on sex and physical pleasures. I think there's more to life than sex, I'm not sure, but society and technology was built on more than just penor in hole
>>28175184
>>28178231
>>28178326
>We've upped the importance of sexuality to an extent where it is almost the only thing that matters anymore. And it isn't about sustaining population anymore.
who's "we"? do you have a source for this? or what is leading you to say this? do you have any evidence at all to support this claim? again, what society are you talking about? because in some countries women are being stoned for getting raped. if people thought sexuality was the only thing that mattered, why are all these advancements happening in science, medicine, technology, aerospace, engineering, etc.?
>See first point. I think that even though it didn't always work out it's still a good ideal to have because it supports stability and deeper relationships.
people being interested in sex does not mean they can't have a family or relationship.
I never realized robots were so jealous of other people having sex. Holy shit.
You people are the literally definition of crabs in a bucket. I sincerely hope all of you stay lonely virgins.
>>28178481
>I never realized robots were so jealous of other people having sex.
This is probably bait, but I'll respond seriously.
It doesn't bother me that people have sex. Having sex is pretty normal, in my opinion. I'm just frustrated that having sex is considered so important, I guess? I understand that having sex is a biological imperative and if you're not having sex there's a pretty good chance you're messed up on some level, but I don't think that merits all the importance society places on sex.
I don't believe in "x is degenerate" or "degeneracy" because I think those are value-judgments that serve no real purpose other than to express an opinion.
>>28178481
are you new here?
legosroriginal
