Please help me.
My normie friend says the answer is 26, but it's clearly not 26. I think the answer is 26.41421356237
And I can prove it.
Who is more autistic?
What? It's 37.
>>28164273
you count the fucking pixels in the taco/quessadilla?
You're retarded op, basic math skills will get you 26. Stop being so autistic
>>28164273
lemme see that proof bad boi!
>>28164298
I got 27
>>28164298
>>28164273
obviously 26...
>>28164273
20+20+20
20+5+5
5 - 2
2 + 20 +5
The last one is 27 you imbeciles.
>>28164273
this is like basic algebra for retards
>>28164319
>>28164325
taco = 20
20 + 2xquessadilla = 30 -> quessadilla = 5
5- 2X PEPPER= 3 -> 1 PEPPER = 1
1 + 5 +20 = 26
I got 27 too
>>28164325
Only one pepper champ.
Try again.
>>28164342
shit you got me. i didn't notice the 2 peppers.
taco = 20
burrito = 5
chili = 1
? = 26
I got mustard gas
>>28164273
>3T=60
>so T = 20
>T + 2B = 30 = 20 + 2B
>so B = 5
>B - 2C = 3 = 5 - 2C
>so C = 1
>C + T + B = 1 + 20 + 5 = 26
20 20 20 = 60 (taco = 20)
20 + 5 + 5 = 30 (burrito = 5)
5 - (1*2) = 3 (pepper = 1)
1(pepper) + 20(taco) + 5(burrito)=26.
>>28164325
Had it been only pepper you wouldn't even need to solve individual variables, you'd just do eq2 - eq3.
3x=60; x+2y=30; y-2z=3
x=20; 20+2y=30; y-2z=3
2y=10; y-2z=3
y=5; 5-2z=3
-2z=-2
z=1
I get where you're coming from anon, here is the normie way:
3A = 60
>therefore: A = 20
A + 2B = 30
>20 + 2B = 30
>2B = 10
>therefore: B = 5
B - 2C = 3
>5 - 2C = 3
>-2C = -2
>therefore: C = 1
A + B + C = ?
>20 + 5 + 1 = 26
And here is the robot/autism way:
same until B - 2C = 3
>interpet two juxtaposed chillies as a multiplication operation since addition hitherto has been explicitly a plus sign
>B - C*C = 3
>-C*C = -2
>therefore: C = sqrt(2) = 1.41421356237
A + B + C = ?
>20 + 5 + 1.41421356237 = autism = 26.41421356237
congrats all
>>28164393
when you look at 2 peppers together in real life do you see 2 peppers or pepper^2?
>>28164316
>>28164315
Okay
Taco = T
Burrito = B
Chilli pepper = C
T + T + T = 60
T + B + B = 30
From that, we can establish that T = 20 and B = 5
5 - C^2 = 3.
C^2 = 2
C + T + B = ?
Square root of 2 + 20 + 5 = 26.41421356237
>>28164393
probably should have mentioned that
>tAcos are A
>Burritos are B
>Chillies are C
>>28164419
sorry anon you're too late
>tfw I won this autistic race fair and square
>>28164448
Nah I was OP trying to explain how I got the answer.
Anyone who says anything but 26 is a literal retard and should not have children
It's unsolvable. The value of one pepper hasn't been established.
>>28164415
when you look at food in real life do you think 2 bananas = 11?
>>28164477
it's not unsolvable, there's three equations and three unknowns. a unique solution exists for any set of assumptions / interpretations about what the three equations actually are.
3T=60
T=20
T+2B=30
20+2B=30
2B=10
B=5
B-C=3
5-C=3
-C=-2
C=2
T+B+C=x
20+5+2=x
x=27
Where exactly do roots become involved?
>>28164497
Oh shit, didn't see that there were 2 chillis the cheeky fucks
26
>>28164497
please just kill yourself
origndel
>>28164497
>"Where exactly do roots become involved?"
>never if you're a robot
quad erat demonstrandum
desu
>>28164273
(%i1) solve([taco+taco+taco=60,taco+burrito+burrito=30,burrito-2*chili=3,chili+taco+burrito=unknown],[taco,burrito,chili,unknown]);
(%o1) [[taco = 20, burrito = 5, chili = 1, unknown = 26]]
>>28164542
how are you still alive with this level of retardedness?
60-3x=0
60=3x
x= 60/3
x=20
---------------------------------
x+2y=30
20+2y=30
2y=10
y=5
----------------------------------------------
y-z=3
5-z=3
-z=-2
z=2
-----------------------
x+y+z=?
2+20+5=27
For our retard firends
>>28164569
>can't even get to the normal wrong answer
>get's a special wrong answer
>thinks it's the others who are retarded
>>28164552
(%i2) solve([taco+taco+taco=60,taco+burrito+burrito=30,burrito-chili^2=3,chili+taco+burrito=unknown],[taco,burrito,chili,unknown]);
(%o2) [[taco = 20, burrito = 5, chili = - sqrt(2), unknown = 25 - sqrt(2)],
[taco = 20, burrito = 5, chili = sqrt(2), unknown = sqrt(2) + 25]]
>>28164494
Literally speaking it is. There are four unknowns, one of which hasn't been properly established- the singular pepper. Its value is only inferred. It's an undefined value.
>>28164589
**gets
jesus christ too drunk for this shit
>>28164521
>so cheeky they clearly drew 2 chillis
Them crazy folk, mang, how are they're even coming up with these crazy stunts? You adhd ridden retarded millenial
its 26, stop lying to me
>>28164601
I would agree except to point out that there are three unknown variables and one unknown operator. There is no answer without some sort of assumption as to what the juxtaposition operator does. For example if you supposed it multiplies the operand by zero then the answer is now 25.
>ITT autism makes friends with food
>>28164542
i literally just realised that theres only one chilli on the bottom row
so yeah, its 26
Are the 2 chilli's 2X or X^2?
>>28164684
>literally the entire point of the thread
>asks it as a passing question
>>28164273
| 3a=60_______>| a=20
| a+2b=30____>| b=5
| b-c=3_______>| c=2
| c'+a+b=?___>| ? = 25+c'
the result denotes the equation y=25+x which on the complex plane, writing c' as re+i*im, describes a line parallel to the bisecting of the first quadrant and touching the real axis at (-(25+re),0), and the imaginary axis at (0,im).
a rough plot is :
..............Im(x)
..............^
...............|:::/
...............|::/
...............|:/
...............|
............../|
-------------------------------> Re(x)
.........../:::|
........../::::|
>>28164273
It's 26. The problem is there's two peppers in the third expression but only one in the fourth
>>28164273
3xtaco = 60, ergo taco = 20
1 taco + 2 wraps = 30 hence 1 wrap = 5.
1 wrap (5) - 2 Chili peppers = 3
Chili pepper has to be 1 each
Chili pepper (1) + Taco (20) + Wrap (5) = 26
How do you guys fuck this up?
>>28164706
how are high functioning autists still this fucking retarded
read the thread genius
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=a%2Ba%2Ba+%3D+60,+a%2Bb%2Bb+%3D+30,+b-2c+%3D+3,+a%2Bb%2Bc%3Dx,+solve+for+x
It's 26
>>28164725
we sadly can't link the information given by the third equation to the one the problem asks us to solve as the symbols of 2 chilis and 1 chili used to signify the variables are different and the problem doesn't give us a fifth equation that links the two. as a result the solution isn't unique since, once we solve the system, we have 2 variables and one equation. this isn't an identity, so we can't hope to get a number as solution, but in quality of equation, we get a space of solution consisting of infinite -tuples of real numbers, depending on the space in which the equation takes place (for example in the real plane it would be an infinite amount of couples of real numbers, which form a line, in the complex space the solutions would line up to form a plane)
>>28164419
>1*1 =2
Yep, you're might autistic. Not the good way though.
>>28164847
You don't need a fifth equation to link the two, this isn't theoretical math, it's a brain teaser for kids. Two chilis is obviously twice one chili.
>>28164865
I could concour if in the third equation we would've had 2 not overlapping, clearly copypasted chilis. however, the fact that the chili in the back is partially covered by the first one doesn't allow us to infer a correlation bewteen the last two equations, since the covered part could be missing or the foreground chili could be covering more than what we'd be inclined to think.
>>28164948
lmao are you serious right now
>>28164273
Third line, move the pepper over. Then substitute once into the second line. The first line is a decoy.
>>28164273
60 / 3 = 20
(30 - 20) / 2 = 5
5 - 3 = 2
20 + 5 + 2 = 27
>>28164273
I'm shit at maths but I'm pretty sure it's 27
someone confirm
>>28165043
Can confirm you're shit at maths
>>28164273
It's 26, you mathematically illiterate.
>>28165122
The question is deliberately designed to trick you by changing its format in a way you didnt expect.
Doesn't really make you shit at math.
>>28165043
There are two peppers in line 3, 1 pepper in line 4.
>>28164273
what type of rip off mother fucker sells 3 tacos for 60 dollars?
>>28165282
they could be 60 sixtieths of dollar
1 chili is the square root of 2, fags.
>all these people not taking the root of 2 to find C
ITT: Post your math degrees of STFU. Will post mine with timestamp in 5
>>28165282
Where does it say dollars dumb fuck
>>28164273
I got 27...
Oregano
>>28165548
Oh shit there's TWO PEPPERS!
People who got 27 confirmed ADD (like me)
26, only one hoz pepper at the bottom you memeing fuck
>>28164273
they should have at least changed the order of these equations
>>28165642
>>28165571
>>28165581
just realized i fucked up. sneaky cunts with those peppers
>>28164342
ITS A FUCKING BURRITO
>>28164273
3*T=60 | /3
T=60
T+B+B=30=20+B+B=30 | -20
2*B=10 | /2
B=5
B-C2=3
5-C2=3 |+C2 -3
5-3=C2
2=C2 | ^1/2
2^1/2+20+5=1.414+20+5=26.414
>>28165821
Oh I forgot that ^2 gets turned into just 2 by 4chan
If pepper = x, do two peppers next to eachother represent x^2 or 2x?
>>28164273
26, ya'll need to learn to math
>>28164273
Tacos are 20 each.
Burritos are 5 each.
Peppers are 1 each.
1+20+5= 26.
>>28165917It is whatever you want it to be. Cartoon vegetables next to numbers is not math.
this should help:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6blD-cfko1A
>>28166060
Academia disagrees.
>>28164273
What is going on in this thread?
blox
>>28164273
just use methemetics ya dingus
I fucking suck at math but is clearly 26
>>28164419
idk how these tards are getting 26
its a fucking dumb question but your answer is the best
>>28164342
Wrong autist
All these shitters than can't into math.
The two peppers aren't added together therefore saying that pepper=2z is fucking wrong. It's z^2.
Take this for example, >>28164342
He says that 20+2quesadilla is equal to Taco+Ques+Ques. Then he says that Quesdilla-Pepper*Pepper is = 5-2x.
FUCKING WRONG YOU NIGGGERSSKDNGLNLADSGJKNLDHKN
>>28164273
Is this beaner pre-algebra?
26? I'm kind of retarded.
>>28164325
seems legit.
taco = 20
wrap = 5
chilli = 2
2 + 20 + 5 = 27
WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU PEOPLE GOING ON ABOUT
ALL I SEE IS FOOD
>>28165658
>just realized i fucked up. sneaky cunts with those peppers
It was a clever trick
>>28166927
If you could put your glasses on grandpa, you might notice that there is a differing number of chili peppers in the 3rd and 4th equation.
I thought it was 26 when I saw it on normiebook, thought it was 26, but you autismos are right, it's 26.414. Well done.
>this thread
This thread is an example of why the education system is a failure.
If w=2, does that mean v=1 because v is "half" of w? No it doesn't. They are two different quantities. Fuck off with these normie math memes.
It's 27 you retards.
>>28164273
taco = t
burrito = b
pepper = p
3t = 60
t = 20
20+2b = 30
2b = 10
b = 5
5-2p = 3
2-2p = 0
2p = 2
p = 1
1+20+5 = 26
>>28167457
Ah it's actually 27, the 3rd equation is just there to trick you, fuck my low iq.
>>28167505
>third equation just to trick you
In what way? It's 26.
3x = 60 => x = 20
x + 2y = 30 => y = 5
y - z = 3 => z = 2
z + y + x = 27
>>28167535
Yeah never mind, I just started to doubt myself when I saw all 27s in the thread.
if the double peppers mean 2xP the answer is 26
if the double peppers mean PxP then the answer is 26.414...
>>28164273
Taco is 20, cause 3 x 20 = 60
Burrito is 5, cause Taco is 20, so 20+5+5 = 30
Two Chilli is 2, cause Burrito is 5. and 5 - 2 is 3, so assumedly One Chilli is 1
1 Chilli + 1 Taco + 1 Burrito = 1+20+5= 26
Where you getting those decimals from, retard?
>>28167636
He's reading two chilies as xx, or x^2, rather than 2x. This is correct in a mathematical sense, since two numbers beside each other are multiplied, not counted, but in the sense of logic or applying a real world perspective to the problem (such as deriving costs of buying two chilies, burritos, etc.) then 2x would be more correct.
Since there is no clear answer for how the equation is to be read, then both 26.414 and 26 can be correct, depending on how you choose to interpret the two chilies.
>>28164273
literally matrix algebra in beaner speak. answer is 26.
26 obviously
> 1 chilli = 1
This is why we need to build a wall
taco = 20
burrito = 5
chili = 1
The answer is 26
>>28164273
It's either 26 or 27 depending on the value of chillies which remains undefined, it can't be known if the image of one pepper is worth the same as two.
3x=60 -> x=60/3 -> x=20 | Taco = 20
2y+x=30 -> 2y=30-10 -> 2y=10 > y=5 | Burrito = 5
y-2z=3 -> 5-2z=3 -> z=(5-3)/2 -> z=1 | Chili = 1
z+x+y=26
Assuming that it's supposed to be two chilis on the third row, and not that "any image of chili represents the number 2". If so, the answer would be 27.
>>28168697
Unless "two chilis" = z*z, then zz=2 and hence z= square root of 2, i.e 1,414213562373095
Hence the answer would be 26,4142135623731.
Hence it all depends on how the image of chilis is interpreted: as 2z, zz or just z.
>>28167762
The question would be "how would one represent 2x in images?", i.e. not chili*chili but just two pieces of chili? I can imagine no way to do so, if picturing two of them side by side means they are multiplied. Since it's real world objects, counting them in kind makes the most sense.
People who think chili&chili is 1+1 are normal people who actually go outside and interact with the physical world
People who think chili&chili is multiplication are autistic
This is an autism test
It's 26
source: I'm hispanic
>>28164273
two chilis could be an entirely different symbol from one chili that represents something entirely different
we can't know for certain...
>>28164273
taco=20
burrito=5
chili=2
2+20+5=27
its 25+sqrt of 2.
burrito - pepper*pepper=3
burrito= 5
pepper*pepper=2
pepper=sqrt of 2.
>>28164393
2*C is C+C and NOT C*C
This is simply false imao
>>28169850
Chili = 1
Dumb lil shitter
>>28164273
Okay obviously taco = 20. That's a given.
Obviously that must mean the burritos = 5
That then means the two peppers = 1 each, if we assume the two peppers and the one pepper are different things.
So the answer is obviously 26 and really, you're just baiting and I don't know why I wrote this out,
