>free education
>free healthcare
>plus a wall
Tell me why you aren't a National Anarchist yet.
>>28124100
>see, the wall is not to keep foreigners out but to keep the population in
Wtf u talkim bout ma ni**a (hi goremn)
>>28124136
And anyone who doesn't like it can leave.
>>28124136
>le NWO dogma
nice try liberal
nationalism and anarchism aren't compatible
In order to enshrine nationalist principles, a state has to enact laws that enforce them. But this goes against the entire idea of anarchy. Statism is Statism.
>>28124222
>implying we can't have a strong national identity without the implementation of the state
Nigga u craycray.
Requesting zaheer.
>>28124253
how do you have free healthcare and education without a strong state?
>>28124420
We don't need a state to have economic policies.
I'm just a regular old white nationalist. Why do I have to be an anarchist? I don't care if a state exists or not.
>>28124420
by whoring out advertising space to multinational corporations
why? becaue we're GODDAMN AMERICA
we're breeding the new soma, the new generation of serfs. this is a glorious ideology.
>>28124466
Because without Anarchism, a caste system begins to grow. In that, people are born in inequality with no way of ever getting out. This is the only way to put the tyrants in their place.
>>28124253
Nationalism exists because of the state, nationalism is the worship of the state above all other things. There is no UK without the Queen, no France without the Republic, no America without the Constitution. The term "nation" is almost always used in reference to a group of like minded people that, very typically, organize together to create a set of laws and policies to govern themselves with.
The state is just a tool people came up with to make their collectives stronger. Thus you could have multiple collectives/settlements identify under one brand and share resources. Sometimes this means subjugating other nations, but even those subjugated nations often have their own state as well (see Gaza, Tibet or the South for example).
>>28124732
You don't need a state to have laws and regulations. The Constitution doesn't mean there has to be a state associated with it. As long as we are unified without a class system, we can all be National Anarchists.
Anarchism means no hierarchy not no government. Nationalism is used to reinforce hierarchy.
>>28125163
>nationalism enforced hierarchy
Quite the opposite! How can a nation be united if a hierarchy divides them? I don't believe you can be a nationalist without also being an anarchist.