For those of you who would only date a 6 out of 10 or higher: How do you justify that thought process?
Beggars can't be choosers. I really want to know though, what is your excuse for not dating a ugly lonely person?
Believe it or not but To robots that girl is average
>>28107808
I would rather be dead than date an ugly person. I may be an autistic fuckup stalker addict with every X-let checked off in every category, but I have my pride.
With this I have managed to not be a robot fuckup like you guys settling for the 1/10 fatass zitfaced shitbag women, and have dated several attractive women in my thirty and one summers.
>>28107808
Because they aren't that desperate.
Plus, most Robots aren't hideously ugly, and no moderately normal person is going to date a 2/10, no matter how pussy starved they are.
What would be the point of dating someone I am not attracted to? At that point it would be better to be single.
>>28107826
my ex looks a lot like that girl and you're right, I did think she was average. If I hadn't been so nervous about keeping her and trying to knock her up or a stalker like >>28107860 I'd probably still be dating her.
That hasn't stopped me from being a thirsty beta though, that part just comes naturally. I'm sure there is something wrong with all of us, including you, but nothing I'm smart enough to diagnose.
>>28107904
>>28107867
Then they aren't lonely enough.
Robots rage about how easy ugly women have it, and how even the lowliest hambeast could get a good man, but they won't put the orcpussy where their mouth is.
>>28107951
Exactly.
Plus robots are so shallow they refuse to date an ugly girl but why do they think they are somehow good enough to date an attractive one? Since they are just assholes. I wish people looked on the outside how they acted.
>>28107941
If I'm not lonely enough after 23 consecutive years of virgin-ness, I don't think I will ever be .
>>28107951
It's because Robots are essentially women.
They're all vain and selfish and think they deserve the hottest women.
The only difference is that Robots, being men, lack the sexual currency women have, so where an ugly woman can get a handsome man, a robot can't get anything.
A Robot is essentially what a woman would be if men had standards
>>28107936
>my ex
He was referring to robots, not you.
If you refuse to date an ugly person based on their looks what makes you think you deserve a good looking person?
Just some food for thought guys.
You never know the type of person who is posting this either. I consider myself attractive BUT I'd never want to date someone who was like 'okay you look good enough'. Which is almost 100% of thirsty betas I've talked to on here. Have you ever heard of such a thing as being kind, having a personality, having hobbies, or anything mental, spiritual, intellectual, creative, or personality based to offer?
I just find it next level ironic that robots are stereotyped as such ugly worthless losers yet you will be hard pressed to find ANY grouping of people who are as shallow. Even among alpha guido douche-bags. So by a robots own logic, wouldn't a girl be better off just going for the best looking guy? Since the chances that they would have a good personality would all be the same anyway. /r9k/ is a place that proves ugly people even shockingly ugly people can still have absolute shit personalities.
>>28107980
>but why do they think they are somehow good enough to date an attractive one
We don't think that we are good enough to date anyone, seriously, how can you miss the point that bad?
>>28107808
why would I date an ugly girl when I can fake being a chad for long enough to get an attractive one
>>28107999
Not lonely enough to date a fat ugly girl?
>>28108033
>It's because Robots are essentially women.
>They're all vain and selfish and think they deserve the hottest women.
>The only difference is that Robots, being men, lack the sexual currency women have, so where an ugly woman can get a handsome man, a robot can't get anything.
This is so true.
>>28108076
>If you refuse to date an ugly person based on their looks what makes you think you deserve a good looking person?
>Deserve
Normies love to use the word "Deserve". it's as if they believe there is some cosmic entity doling our karma. Chad doesn't deserve His harem. He was simply granted one given his superior genetics. Did Chad "deserve" his lot? Did the tall, intelligent, and strong "deserve" their genetics?
You get what you get, and we just get nothing.
>>28108039
jokes on you, I identify as miley baltazar from facial abuse. I even have the constant smirk.
>>28107808
Simple. I'm not a beggar. Being lonely sucks. Being with someone I don't like sucks worse. I come here to bitch about being lonely from time-to-time, but when push comes to shove I ain't lowering my standards just cause some normies tell me it's the only way Imma get laid.
I get fat chicks/2outof10 chicks who have unreasonably high standards cause I'm the same way. Being alone ranks higher than being with someone I'm not happy with.
>>28108162
that's deep. I'll make sure to autistically spew that same phrase whenever I hear someone say deserve or fair.
no, I'm not joking.
I can tie that in with "the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must" from that one greek guy.
>>28108162
fuckin preach m80
>>28108076
>deserve
Stop thinking anyone deserves anything. I don't care enough about losing my virginity or getting a gf that much to go for a 4/10 landwhale. I'd rather die a virgin or just fuck some hooker.
>>28108162
This. "Deserve" is a meme word.
>>28108162
>>28108200
OP here, these are good replies thank you.
>>28108033
I agree, and all the unironic misogyny here is hilarious because this board sounds like a collection of self-absorbed moody bitches.
My favorite logic:
"All women can get sex whenever they want!"
then buy a prostitute
"A prostitute will never love or cherish me!"
>implying hideous girls are loved and adored by the men who fuck them
"BUT FEMALE PRIVILEGE"
How I'm supposed to date someone I'm not attracted to? It would be a shitty relationship and my penis wouldnt get hard.
Also, I have never thought I "deserve" a good looking woman. Why do you imply that?
>>28107808
ugly/average girls are actually harder than cute girls
ugly girls are emotional wrecks
average girls are on the pedestal because they get approached the most
>>28108162
Well this:
>>28108076
>Have you ever heard of such a thing as being kind, having a personality, having hobbies, or anything mental, spiritual, intellectual, creative, or personality based to offer?
I do completely agree with some of your post. There simply are things you are born with. No 'deserve' comes into the picture at all. But also there are things you can work on and have control over- like how you treat other people or possibly yourself.
Many robots feel entitled to treat others badly because they themselves were treated badly and then fail to see how this continues the cycle of hate and bullying.
By overcoming this or other issues people can have more to offer on a deeper level than the things we can't choose like looks.
>>28107808
Because by that point it would be better to just use your hand instead of providing upkeep for some ugly cunt you're not attracted to
You're putting too much stock in the rating. Most of us barely venture outdoors, it's easy to look at images online and really think about how attractive they are because you're going off visuals alone. Everyone's standards are higher on the internet because you're not thinking "this is a human being". It's different when dealing with someone in person, a 4/10 can seem sexier if they're cool as fuck
I remember my old boss was mildly attractive, I'd put her in the worth a squirt category but nothing more. After I realised she was also a really nice person with a good sense of humour, I developed an infatuation and couldn't stop thinking about busting a load in her.
tl;dr stop taking things literally on fucking /r9k/ of all places.
>>28108312
>Also, I have never thought I "deserve" a good looking woman. Why do you imply that?
I don't know either. Sounds like OP has some really great misconception about robots.
>>28108370
there was this fat girl at hs that I would always see as a 7/10 because of how she was cool and smiled a lot
>>28108306
>then buy a prostitute
The main problem with this is its illegality, and yes, that is the most pressing issue, as most robots are, in fact, American.
Legal prostitution would vastly bring down the over inflated sexual currency women have, and it'd solve the robot epidemic.
>>28108359
> like how you treat other people or possibly yourself.
Oh wait, I thought we were talking about unrealistic standards? Are we now talking about bullying? I'll bully whoever I damn well please. Why? Because I don't give a shit what you normalfags think of me. You were given a good life. You probably have a gf, friends, a job, and a future. Let me throw my shit at you from my hovel.
>>28107808
>what is your excuse for not dating a ugly lonely person?
there is literally no reason to date an ugly lonely roastie when there are mail order bride services.
>>28108370
>Most of us barely venture outdoors, it's easy to look at images online and really think about how attractive they are because you're going off visuals alone.
>someone sees a robot
>"this guy is a 4/10"
>someone knows a robot personality
>"wait, this guy is a 2/10"
>>28108454
Buying sex may be technically illegal but it's easy and common to get away with fucking escorts in the states.
>>28108576
Nailed it, famalamadoodle.
>>28108608
>tfw completely legal in my country
>can fuck a famous pornstar for 70$ (converted)
>>28108454
So robots are to stupid to know whoring is legal in Vegas? They (being robots and women)/don't want to get laid, they want validation. If someone just wanted to get laid, you can legally do it regardless of gender. And don't try to bring up "not everyone can afford a whore/Vegas". Broke men and women should have bigger concern then sex.
>>28108454
The thing is that legalizing prostitution would not have any effect. Pussy is valued when it is virginal and unused. Why would pussy that gets fucked by hundreds of dicks a week be of any value? It wouldn't. No man is going to take pride in a prostitute. Sure it's good for a quickie or for an urge or two. But if all you manage to fuck are prostitutes youre still less of a man.
Also there are European countries that have legal prostitution and women still have tons of value and power over there.
Hell. Look at the effect porn has and camwhores. Porn is readily available for free but there is always a man who will pay 5 bucks for a girl on cam to show her feet.
Legalizing prostitution only gives women more power. There would probably be a prostitutes union created and salaries regulated so that prostitutes will be upper middle class citizens.
Keep it illegal. It doesn't belong in a highly capitalistic society like this.
>>28108608
Oh come on, who knows how to do that?
Not a real robot, that's for sure. Plus, robots are cheap.
Opposites attract. Who wants to wake up to the fucking mirror?
>>28108640
>validation
I think you basically hit the nail on the head.
>>28108640
>robots just want validation
?
>>28108659
It's not that much about sex, it's about having someone who cares about you and you care about.
>>28108660
Anyone who spends as much time on the internet as a robot should be able to look up guides to this. There is no excuse.
>>28108731
What's the question? I thought my statement was obvious, robots want vaildtion, or to be more wordy; someone who likes them despite them being fucked up. They also want someone who is on a similar level as them so they don't feel like inexperienced losers/have to deal with being less knowledge about sex and relationship tactics. That's the same thing women want, hint why robots are unattractive to ugly women while being just like them. Robots and ugly women are two sides of the same coin, its just women have sexual value.
>>28107808
Because the 5/10 girl I liked wanted a chad
>>28107808
> beggars cant be choosers
Its simple, I choose not to be a beggar. If I can be happy alone why force myself to be with someone I don't truly want to be with?
>>28109108
That's something common to all humans, no matter they are robots, females, normies, they all want validation. So what?
>>28107826
desu that girl is considered like 8-10/10 in our society. But I think based on merit, and difficulty she's probably a 5. A guy with the same traits and merits is a solid 3
>>28108306
Faulty logic in the second half of your post. The conversation about prostitution concerns sexual validation. A prostitute doesn't count because you are literally paying someone to fuck you, there's no validation. But girls get all the validation they want.
You made a major mistake equating finding validation with finding love. You may not get love as an ugly girl (although i can argue against that aswell) but you get tons of fucking validation left and right from desperate men. Its why women think everyone is ogling them, and wants to rape them
Because it really doesn't take much more than being healthy to look somewhat attractive? Land whales and dirty whores deserve nothing.
>>28109541
A man wanting to have sex with you does NOT mean the same thing as a woman wanting to have sex with you.
Why would it?
I'd wager a man wanting to use a woman's vag is the same as a woman wanting to use a man's wallet, or pretty close.
>But girls get all the validation they want.
Is sex from anything less than a Chad validation? To feel validated you'd have to feel better than others, if all women can get sex, it doesn't mean anything, not all men can't get sex, so sex feels pretty validating for a man.
>you get tons of fucking validation left and right from desperate men.
Them being desperate completely undoes the meaning of validation.
You honestly think sex has the same feeling of validation for both genders and that is so laughably false.
6/10 is still probably not high enough for me. But I don't see a reason why would I date someone lowee than that. It's just admission to the fact that you don't really think that the person isn't that attractive to you and you're dating him/her just because you don't think you can do any better, which is just condescending and cruel to the other person.
Of course you can fall for person you might not find as attractive and that's a legitimate thing, but going in a relationship with someone you simply aren't attractes to is just silly and nonsensical.
If it just came to me having to date someone I don't like or be forever alone I wouldn't hesitate even for a while and if you would pick person you don't even like, it just means you're whipped beta failed normalfag with no standards willing to do anything to fix your insecurities by sucking affection out of someone else.
>>28109796
>A man wanting to have sex with you does NOT mean the same thing as a woman wanting to have sex with you.
Wrong
you could make the argument that because women are given so much positive attention in their lives, and have so much sexual value in our society that they are completely unaware of the concept of validation.
but that is incorrect. Women know what validation is because they seek it from chad, they know that millions of men would fuck them, and they feed off the positive attention.
>To feel validated you'd have to feel better than others
wrong, and this is where your blatant ignorance shows. For guys, validation is all about being respected, or admired by someone whether sexually or not. For girls its all about who can get the best 9/10. A guy
will get validation from a 5/10, a girl will not
>>28109796
Simply put, the higher your standards for validation, the more self esteem you have. And given that women have such high standards of validation, I think you can figure out the rest. Women have overtly inflated self esteem
>>28107808
>How do you justify that thought process?
I'm at the very least a 6/10 myself, why would I settle for a girl uglier than myself?
>I really want to know though, what is your excuse for not dating a ugly lonely person?
What would be the point in investing time, money, and affection for a girl I couldn't get a hard on with?
>>28109991
>they are completely unaware of the concept of validation
I never said or believe this.
> Women know what validation is because they seek it from chad
That's exactly what I fucking said
>For girls its all about who can get the best 9/10. A guy will get validation from a 5/10, a girl will not
This is also what I said, banging a 9/10 guy feels pretty good because not all girls can do that.
>wrong, and this is where your blatant ignorance shows.
sure buddy, Doing something that most people like you can't do isn't validating at all.
the average man can't get sex readily.
the average woman can't get sex from Chad readily.
almost as if women who get sex from chad feel better than other women, and men who can get sex feel better than other men.
So how is
>To feel validated you'd have to feel better than others
wrong? and blatantly ignorant?
>>28110251
>Doing something that most people like you can't do isn't validating at all.
I never said that. As I simplified in my post >>28110092 women seek validation from 9/10's because they have over an inflated self esteem and don't appreciate the admiration they get from guys in their own league. That is not to say, they don't acknowledge it. They're entire superiority complex is built off beta males
My point, the reason women don't appreciate sexual advances is because they are spoiled and sheltered with over inflated egos
>>28109315
Not really, at least IMO. I mean, the desire to be wanted sure, but that level of neediness, where you desire a mate not because you respect/like that person, but becasue you want a person that validates your own failures/insecurities is really weird and not at all normal. Most people fuck and date men/women because they like men/women, not because they hate people but feel that sex or some "perfect" women/man would solve everything. That's just ugly women and robots broski.
>>28107808
>what is your excuse for not dating a ugly lonely person?
i think of you get with someone because you feel like you cant get any better youre on the wrong premise for a relationship anyway.
besides, robots really aren't that low scores, womens rating are just hugely inflated.
>>28107808
Because I can't flirt with someone I'm not attracted to. My standards aren't EXTREMELY high but I gotta at least be interested in her, that's when I bring my A game.
>>28107808
Why date?
MASTURBATE!
I dunno, fuck, I stopped caring big long ago, dude. At this point if that 6/10 were interested in me and showed it, I'd literally have no idea how to react.
It's not really about things that women are born with that make them ugly that I'm worried about, it's things that their lifestyle has caused.
I don't want to date some fat mess who can't groom herself, she might be raising my children one day, and that apathetic attitude will not do.
Of course I don't want o date somebody whose face looks deformed, but I'm definitely not demanding an 11/10 super qt.
>>28107808
>tfw 5/10 girl black as midnight chick stares at me all through class
>ass fat as fuck, athletic build(not fat)
should i just fuck her r9k? semesters almost over anyways, 1 class left
>>28107936
>my ex looks a lot like that girl and you're right, I did think she was average
You think your ex looks like her because they both have red hair? And you think that girl is average? Are you fucking retarded?
Both her face and her body are easily good enough for her to be a model. If you saw her modeling you wouldn't question it for a second. Any girl that can easily pass as a model is not average.
I agree with you guys on almost everything but when it comes to rating a girl's appearance you are fucking bonkers.
>>28108162
dis nigga right here gets it
>>28107808
I'm not so desperate for a relationship that I'm willing to settle for someone I'm won't be happy with, and that includes physical attraction.
I'm lonely and kind of sexually frustrated and my complete lack of contact with women at age 22 makes me sad every day, but it doesn't mean I'm willing to date someone I'm not attracted to.
>>28110983sage
Ignore him, probably just some normie bragging about his life.
I'm glad that so many ugly robots have such high standards and will never be-able to procreate and pass of their genes because they only want perfection
Because i'm patient and i'm like an 8 out of 10 myself.
I'm a legit 6-7 and could probably be an 8 with time at the gym and a better job.
My one ex was a full-blown 9+ with makeup on, and ever since our breakup I've had trouble with the idea of downgrading. I'm currently trading texts with a 6 who'd be a 7-8 if she lost weight, she hit me up on OKC and has been coming after me really hard. She's got a really cute face and is a weeb, so I'm going for it, and hopefully will finally break my 3+ year streak.
>>28107808
My thought process is this:
If I can't get an erection when I look at her then it's not going to work. period.
I'm not hideous. I don't deserve a hideous woman.
>>28107808
I consider myself a 6, 7 on a good day with potential to be an 8 if I was /fit/. I also have a half decent job at 22 with long term potential to earn 85k-120k AUD pa
Why would I settle for a 5-6 now? when I'm 26-32 I will have my pick of girls.. For now I will focus on my game and career skills.
I value personality over looks as well so I don't want a basic Stacy either.
>>28107808
I dated an easy 8/10 for just over a year. The only catch was that she was an introvert and came from a family of hardcore catholics.
With that said, it was like having a supercar that wouldn't ever leave 1st gear. She didn't want sex despite having the physique of a pornographic goddess to which I respected and she was crazy for having kids (after marriage, of course) despite the both of us being 22 at the time. I ain't no male model myself, so I suppose this was the first time she ever had a "proper" BF.
Continuing on the supercar analogy, I just stayed with her to brag to my friends and revel in the fact that she looked good on my arm. Highlight was seeing a jock from school (who worked in a shitty Apple store) do a double take at me and her, to which he stared in amazement.
I'm now 26 and have resorted to Tindr.
>>28107826
we need to stop this meme
>Female
>HURR, HE ONLY LIKES 10/10 STACIES
>Male
>SHE ONLY WANTS TO FUCK CHAD AND WILL KEK YOU INTO OBLIVION
Its like this place has become so imprudent...
>>28107808
I don't think this girl has an attractive face at all. She's not ugly by a long shot, but her face is a total turn off for me in a non-ugly way. It's just that she looks completely and totally exactly like what I do not want (in a different way than fuck ugly girls do)
>>28107808
If you consider 6/10 as "regarded as bangable by majority of men," it is as simple as not be fat.
To have any sort of sexual intimacy, you need sexual attraction. Don't expect people to want sexual intimacy with people they don't find attractive.
>>28107826
Strangely enough, real-life vision ensures that many real life girls look bangable.
