If i buy a hooker do i lose my robot status ?
Probably not.
Being a robot doesn't mean not being a virgin, especially if you had to pay to lose it
>>28060894
Who do you think is the main clientele for hookers?
It doesn't change the fact that nobody ever chose you. Nobody ever wanted you. Nobody ever accepted you.
>>28060966
Why won't you guys ever get this, having sex does stop making you a robot
Because it means
1) you were able to make friends with the girl beforehand
2) you were social enough to keep the relationship going
3) you were able to actually not be a sperg and engage in sexual intercourse
All notes aside however, having sex with an escort doesn't not remove the robot status as you had to actually pay for it
>>28060894
>hooker
>lose robot status
anon...
Why would you want to keep this shitty status?
The point of being here is that you want to leave desperately. Why would you even want to be here in the first place?
>>28060894
No, because she didn't actually want you to fuck her. It changes nothing. You are still a loser and you will always be a loser.
No, it actually solidifies it.
>>28061459
because it's all OP has
>>28061404
But how is this a bad thing? shouldn't we strive to encourage each other to succeed and finally leave this shithole rather than pretend like thing we envy are bad and that we are above the people that we want to be?
I never understood the double standart. We spend our whole existence crying that we are failures, that we wish that we were successful and could get laid, but when a robot finally succeed, we scorn him in anger for being a damn normie. It makes no fucking sense.
TFW its time for real nigga hours but I'm not real or a nigga
>>28060894
if you were a true robot the whore would all you a needle dick and take your cash and run since you are too beta to fight back
>>28061546
Because being a normie on /r9k/ is like being a girl in a 10 year old boy's tree house, you're not supposed to be there, and it ruins the fun for everybody.
It's just the rules, I don't make 'em, but I live by them.
>>28061546
>shouldn't we strive to encourage each other to succeed
Most of us can't succeed in the ways that we want to succeed. People have limitations. It's not a choice; it's just not going to happen.
>>28061605
So when someone manage to go past their limitations, shouldn't it be proof that limits are meant to be broken?
>>28060894
If anything it would enhance it. You're a failed normie for even asking this.
