Chart thread
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /r9k/ - ROBOT9001
You are currently reading a thread in /r9k/ - ROBOT9001
Post & r8 em
Also, yes, I'm doing this for attention
>>28032310
This is shit. Someone else start a chart thread; this cancerous hipster does not deserve to be OP.
>>28032310
template needed
>>28032310
Template plz OP
These threads are so fucking retarded, nobody cares what kind of shitty music you like or what kind of t shirt you wear.
>>>/soc/ is for this kind of shit
you people really shouldn't navel gaze so much
>>28032310
you listen to the same music as my 12 year old brother
>>28032567
>reggae
>black metal
>hip hop
>thinking you're in a position to tell shit like "you listen to the music for 12 year olds"
Also, Saints Row is shit, Matrix is babby's first serious movies, and Ergo Proxy is shit
Iron Maiden and Alestorm? Hell yea you have good taste my friend.
3rd night in a row
So I'll post the big chart this time
Judging by my typical responses on here, I guess I'm a gay normie
>>28032856
>not a virgin
>likes traps
You are
>>28032999
I'm technically a cyborg, and at worst, very incidentally bi. I've tried fapping to gay porn, but it just doesn't do it for me.
No bullying, onegai fampai
>>28033279
You have horrible taste in politics and women
Beyond that you're cool
>>28033114
really interesting
template fagtrons
>>28033358
Not OP but here's the template for the big one
>>28033395
For the small one...
>>28033416
And the extra small
>>28032310
lol forgotten weapons is the shit. good taste op
HelIo family to be honest.
>>28032310
>those views
>that compass
op wtf happened
>>28033513
[vanity intensifies]
>>28033555
[dubs turn to trips]
Originalll commento
You have been muted for 2 seconds, because your comment was not original.
make fun of me hombres
>>28033619
>not wanting to be a fuckboy
i should update a bit but meeeh
>>28033619
>>28033279
guud music boys
>>28032310
Noice vidya
>>28033541
the fuck you talking about?
[insert originality here]
>>28033848
the fact that you don't want to be a bernie supporter but your political compass aligns with democratic socialism
>>28033513
Top waifus, familia.
>>28032310
B^) ey senpai
>>28033619
>Mulholland Drive
Nice taste
>>28033279
YUNG LEAN DOER
Bape Shark hoodie
>My man
>>28032310
Not sure if you're being ironic mate, if not. I don't think we'd get along. I like Morgan's though.
>>28032567
Merchant Ships
You're alright mate.
>that hair though
Shocking.
>>28032787
>use to be history channel, but it's shit now.
I feel the same about Discovery. I miss when it actually showed shit like animals in the wild, stuff about space and all different cultures. Now it's animal planet and Ax men/Hardcore pawn or whatever their one is.
Don't think we'd hang out though.
>>28032856
>Music has the right
Not even the top 3 B.O.C album, but Boc there is good enough.
>House of Leaves.
I liked the navidson stuff.
>>28033279
>vaporwave
Disgusting mate.
>>28033513
So much effort
>suomi
If you like hockey I'd chill with you. If not, then probably not.
>>28033605
>high int
>likes metal
doubtful
>>28033619
I fucked your mum.
>Saint Lauren
mate, RAF > Hedi
YSL will be better without him.
>>28033797
>sweden
>white
you poor guy.
>>28033830
>can't draw long hair
that's because blokes shouldn't have it, unless they're gays mate.
>>28033921
r u tryin to be adventure time?
>>28034111
>doubtful
and why would that be?
>>28032310
made this for the last thread but i liked how it turned out
>>28032310
Dayz/10
>>28033279
metalcore famalam
>>28033513
Suomi perkele
>>28033830
weapon
>>28033921
3-d girls are overrated
I love how I'm doing this instead of actually studying for exams. Such is life when you're a piece of shit. I hate my life.
>>28034180
Most metal heads have a hightened sense of intelligence because 'I read game of thrones and listen to music that isn't rap or country'.
I'm not saying you aren't smart, just I wouldn't give good odds if I was a bookie.
>>28034111
>that's because blokes shouldn't have it, unless they're gays mate.
No you.
>>28034205
>weapon
Very nice choice. Alternatively my favourite vehicle would be a Ju-87 Stuka.
>>28034226
okay, makes sense.
oc
>>28034196
Your ideal partner is has the Ethan Klein aesthetic.
>>28034196
Hope that's a dyke mate and not a 'dad' bod faggot, you can do better. Hell, everyone should shun dad bods.
>>28034205
Good int and looks
>no sex life
>low confidence.
Mate, I think you're rating yourself wrong.
If you know you look good, take advantage, or stop lying.
>>28033876
I guess you could go way futher down with libertarianism then
What makes me left leaning is that I think there should be lost of public services
other than that, the govt should leave me (and my guns) alone
>>28034254
Stuka was ugly imo. Then again, there wasn't really a single dive bomber which was aesthetically pleasing.
Stick with the Spitfire, preferably one of the earlier models.
>>28034196
be my qt zit gf
>>28034196
that flag is the wrong way
>>28034331
Something about the fixed landing gear, gull wings and diving whistle makes it probably more of a favourite than the Spitfire in all honesty. But have to hand that spot to a Merlin or Griffon Engine.
>>28034316
>If you know you look good, take advantage, or stop lying.
That's the thing about having no confidence or self-esteem; regardless of how many girls flirt with me in class or around school, I'm always going to be hung up about the girl whom I liked that deemed me unsuitable.
Just to be clear, girls don't flirt with me a lot; it just happens enough to where I think I can give myself an "average" in the looks department.
>>28034331
>spitfire
>>28034395
>stuka
Both of you are wrong
>>28034440
>that eyesore of an aircraft
Disgusting.
>>28034447
Get out low test roastie
>>28034395
Dude my autism flows when I talk about this shit; the sail-shaped wings and the slim airframe and the pointed nose just look so good, not to mention the engine sounds fucking fantastic. It's like they made an aircraft to be beautiful and it just happened to fly well, too.
I got to see one flying at an airshow about two years ago and it's probably one of the coolest things I've ever seen.
>>28034473
True perfection
>>28034466
Get out of here with your low energy aircraft. If you're posting American aircraft other than the P-51 you're doing it wrong.
>>28034440
>liking an american plane
>it's not best girl
homie are u high
>>28034440
What the hell was the design philosophy behind that plane?
When one plane isn't enough, three is too many and you've only got one pilot.
>>28034473
Lucky bastard you are. Never been to an airshow that featured WWII aircraft. My autism flies off the handle talking about WWII as well.
I just want to see and hear something incredible like this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5rGyP6SSYM
>>28034551
>>28034554
>>28034567
same poster
anyone who doesn't like the P-38 is a gommie faggot
>>28034614
The P-38 is one of the most unimpressive and ugly aircraft the US military has every produced.
>>28034680
t. Stalin's fuckboi
>one chance at life
>born into a universe where anime is not real
>>28032674
>thinking you're in a position to tell shit like "you listen to the music for 12 year olds"
I just said those are literally all bands my 12 yer old brother likes no need to get butt hurt
>>28034693
Could you even roll that plane? It looks like it would stress and tear itself up.
>>28034757
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p26NYiRXm2s
>>28034693
Even the Soviets built something better than that shit.
>>28034804
>Red Bull
Seems appropriate.
okay that's better work
>>28034910
>top websites
>tumblr
triggered
shit taste central
Plox don't bully me
>>28034979
AWWOOOOOOOOOO
originaIl
i made this in like 10 mins pls no bully
>>28033619
I'd marry you
>>28035341
You like Painting With and Sleep Cycle? I think Deakin really pulled through
>>28034713
>Bjork
>Joanna Newsom
Bretty good anon
![Red-Flag[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/d8Wql3Q.jpg "Red-Flag[1].jpg")
>>28035341
>Animal Collective
>Virgin: N
>lots of dogs
deakins new lp is good, that being said ac is trash
Original commentos: the fresh maker
>>28035327
where do you live honey let's set a date
>>28035500
Excellent taste in cinema friend
>>28035391
i love it but it def had to grow on me. lying in the grass is a masterpiece. sleep cycle is good. not really what i was expecting after waiting five years. i really liked the sounds of it when he performed it live but i just didn't really dig the final product... but good house is a jam.
>>28035398
hmm
>>28034713
Good taste in magical girls, anon.
>>28032310
I'm doing it for attention, too. Worse yet, I want attention and couldn't even be assed to draw pictures.
>>28035500
How're the powers working out?
>>28035391
You seem like a degenerate hipster, but that's okay. I tolerate degenerated more than normal people.
>>28035298
>GitS
What do you think about the upcoming live-action?
>>28035176
>hentai-loving med student
When are you guys gonna get to work on making my cat-girl dreams a reality?
>>28035763
>What do you think about the upcoming live-action?
I dont see all the fuss about scarlet johansson being cast, i just hope it isnt turned into shit like other anime live-action movies
>>28032310
>needs tera collecting partner
>needs alpha female.
okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk, shal be toddling along now
UKINGS ov middllanders, no agencies allowed
original thought crimes
First time making this, took a while too.
>>28036422
why do your parents want you to be a pot smoking cuck
>>28036439
Probably because they're pot smoking cucks.
they're the type of parents who say quotes like "don't let your schooling get in the way of your education." and then smoke up.
everyone can have kids i guess.
>>28035515
the golden state
>>28035763
>this fucking chart
Fucking die you pathetic weeb
>>28033459
Also InRangeTV too don't forget...
fuck your template
Since nobody posted a blank template I'm going to shill my 6x6 taste mosaic again
>>28037957
>Movies
10/10
>Music
3/10
>TV
6/10
>Anime
0/0
>Books
7/10
>Vidya
6/10
Looking for some sort of female presence in my life.
I wish I never fell in love.
>>28039652
I hate you, cut your fucking hair.
>>28039652
your drawing of yourself makes you look like a douchebag
>vaporwave
>2016
This is almost a year old and it still somewhat applies.
Please r8 and b8, normos.gf applications are currently closed.
origanario commentio
bumpidy bump bump please respond
>>28039135
Nice taste in music famm, also shrooms for life
>>28039652
Trump for life bro, also nice dog preference
>>28039954
/out/ and buddhism, cool bro. Also Spyro is GOAT
>>28040415
Crash is great, also now i want some orange juice fuuuck
>>28040867
Great political view, also good taste in vidya
>you gain brozouf
>>28041989
Thanks chadbrobro
god these charts are self indulgent bullshit. "the person your parents want to be" "the person you never want to be"? jesus christ write a blog or something retards.
>>28032486
every single one of these threads one of you gotta come around and say this shit
well you're not wrong
you're stating the obvious
pointing it out doesn't make you any better
honestly who gives a shit, everyones a fuckin special snowflake piece of shit
>>28032310
This comment sure is oregano. I swear it is.
>>28036422
Yeah anon, why do they want you to be a pot smoking cuck
>>28036422
What's your contact bud?
>>28042303
>that porno
>KEK KING
I am on acid and did this while on acid.
>>28035763
>the person your parents want you to be
>oniisama
chuckled
>tfw you take a bath in the dark after rock climbing while listening to CCR
Been a while since I'd experienced comfort of that level.
>>28034713
>>28035176
>>28044991
you anons seem pretty based
>>28045119
Je dirais le meme de toi kohai, texhnolyze is VERY BASED, j'ai completement oublie de la mentionner dans mon post
>>28045422
je me suis senti completement vide pendant une semaine apres avoir fini texhnolyze. L'atmosphere, les dialogues et le scenario sont parfaits
serial experiments lain est assez similaire d'apres ce qu'on m'a dit
>>28045575
>completement vide
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKNv8QKLJeE
Un sentimement valide quand tu considere la facon que l'anime a termine
J'ai essaye de commencer Lain mais c'etait un peu lent pour moi, mais c'est certainement sur mon liste de choses a revisiter
>>28045678
meme si c'est lent lain vaut le coup, au meme titre que kino no tabi ou mushishi (meme si c'est pas le meme registre)
>>28032310
BECAUSE WE'RE OHH RHODESIAN AND WE'LL FIGHT THREE THICK AND THIN WE'LL KEEP OUR LAND A FREE LAND STOP THE ENEMY COMING IN
Tox my shit up:
AF00206B2DF62664F4AA34BD3340CDDDF6405F00DFC61F0A370C04C04874101E5C2E32ACD6DB
>>28041989
You are so painfully underage
please fuck off for a few years
>>28046078
>anarcho-
nice
>communist
why do you have to be like that
>>28046078
shaggy?
>>28046261
because a society of free association cannot exist under capitalism. If workers do not control the industries, then an employer does, and if an employer controls the industries then they accumulate capital from the labor of their workers, allowing them to gain wealth at an increasingly exponential rate for nothing more than reinvesting their capital into assets that acrue more capital and power.
An egoist anarchist like myself desires an economic system driven by demand not by profit-motive, for fiat capital does nothing more than arrange power and create a hierarchy.
>>28046078
I love how people always rate themselves 7-10/10 intelligence on these things. I support the violent overthrow of the capitalist status quo and the establishment of anarchistic communism too anon, but you're probably not an 8/9 out of 10 genius. Your looks are probably not that high either if your sex life is that low, that is unless you're completely autistic.
>>28046335
>a society of free association cannot exist under capitalism
It can exist only under capitalism, you mean.
> they accumulate capital from the labor of their workers, allowing them to gain wealth at an increasingly exponential rate for nothing more than reinvesting their capital into assets that acrue more capital and power.
I don't see the problem with that.
>An egoist anarchist
If you're a stirnerian egoist, like me, then why do you subscribe to an ideology like marxism? I don't understand.
>>28046397
>read Stirner
>doesn't want a union of egoists
I don't subscribe to marxism per se, I just think that workers should control industry. I think that since I am like most people and do not have the ability to become a bourgeois parasite it would be in my best interest to bring about a society in which individuals are the highest unit of society.
Such a society can come about through anarcho-syndicalism. Workers decide when to start businesses, how they businesses are organized, how capital will be distributed, and all these dynamics will be balanced by demand satisfaction. Demand satisfaction, especially completely mutual demand satisfaction, is perhaps the ultimate realization of the ego.
>>28046494
How does a union of egoists fall under the realm of anarcho-communism? Please explain.
>workers should control industry
Why? I read the communist manifesto, and Marx's ideas struck me as irrational, biased proponents of an illegitimate revolution.
> since I am like most people and do not have the ability to
If you do not have the ability to claim property, why do you think you deserve anything? This goes against stirnerian philosophy.
>bourgeois parasite
Oxymoron.
Please tell me what you consider a bourgeois to be, and how thriving in a given environment makes one a parasite.
>it would be in my best interest
I think I understand. I'm not calling you out on anything, but since you don't believe you have the ability to survive in a society based on merit, you think egalitarianism is the best course of action for your own benefit?
>Workers decide
Why?
>how capital will be distributed
Why would anyone save for the free market decide how capital shall be distributed? You're impeding on the individual liberties of people here.
>>28046572
The communist manifesto is a manifesto, it would make no sense if you do not know any of the theory, so of course you think it's shit. Read marx's capital volume 1 if you want to get what marx is talking about:
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf
I can summarize why worker's should control industry for you though:
A business owner (bourgeoisie) (or in modern days, the business itself since we have corporations now) charges workers a wage or pays them per action performed in a way that allows them to profit off of their labor. If workers controlled the business themselves then their surplus value would not be extracted in this way, and they could keep that value for their own gain. To an egoist that realistically can only ever be a worker, it is therefore in their interest to work in a worker owned industry, not a capitalist-owned one, since they would gain the full reward for their labor.
>you think egalitarianism is the best course of action for your own benefit?
Egalitarianism is not the name of the game, the name of the game is getting what I deserve out of my labor, something that doesn't happen in a system of wageslavery.
>Workers decide
>how capital will be distributed
What is meant by this is that for any business to work some of the value created from a worker's labor will have to go to the collective pool for the group they work with so that they can then decide to get more equipment, improve working conditions, or just distribute the entirety of the surplus labor to themselves.
The reason workers should decide is because they do the work, it's fucked up that a business owner or cabal of shareholders should decide how other people work.
It's in the egoist's best interest to decide how they should do things.
>>28046725
also here is a glossary of marxist terms so you know what bourgeoisie and proletariat mean:
https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/s/o.htm
You are not a bourgeoisie, friend. A bourgeoisie in simplest terms is the class that makes money off of the labor of others.
>>28046725
I've been putting off reading the capital for some time because of how underwhelmed I was after reading the manifesto, but I'll do it.
>in a way that allows them to profit off of their labor
It's a voluntary association. I don't see how it's wrong for someone to profit off the work of someone else if the two parties agree to cooperate (which they do, unlike what communists claim).
I understand what you mean, but
>To an egoist that realistically can only ever be a worker
Why do you say that?
There seems to be a false dichotomy between the bourgeois and the worker. The are several classes of people between the proletariat and what you like to call the elite, and those classes also benefit from the work of others.
>getting what I deserve out of my labor
But you don't deserve anything, at least not according to the egoist ideology. What you cannot claim as yours, you do not deserve to have.
>The reason workers should decide is because they do the work
What, the physical work? All current forms of association in a corporate context are voluntary. It seems normal to me that some people earn more money than others, especially when you compare the worker, who has little to no responsibilities, to the business owner, who bears the whole structure of the company on his shoulders. This is especially true in the case of small businesses (which are, arguably, the most relevant, since a truly free market would eliminate oppressive monopolistic entities).
>It's in the egoist's best interest to decide how they should do things
I agree. The worker can always walk away, if he is not satisfied with his voluntary association with the business owner.
As an egoist, I believe that capitalism is in my best interest.
>>28046765
Thanks for the link.
>You are not a bourgeois
>class that makes money off of the labor of others
It seems that I belong in a family of bourgeois, since most of my family members own small/medium-sized businesses, employ people, and earn quite a lot.
>>28046892
I think the key ideological difference between you and me is our views on voluntary association. While there certainly could be some voluntary association in ancap land, I do not think there will be an acceptable amount of voluntary association.
It's not acceptable that the choices for most people are: work hard for years and hope that maybe someday you'll have enough capital to start a business of your own, or live in absolute destitute. With profit-driven motive, there'll be few employers that have the worker's interests in mind, so it would be hard to just choose a different employer, they'd pretty much all be treating workers as poorly as possible, and they will have to do that if there is any hope for their business competing with another business.
In a syndicalist economy however everybody has the ability to start a business, all they have to do is get together with enough workers to petition a worker's federation for the investment capital necessary to start it. They also have a great deal of choice in making agreements about their working conditions, since democracy is the whole point of federations, and it they absolutely hate working in a place they can find someplace else to work because having something besides just a profit-motive makes it possible for businesses to have lots of different qualities of working conditions.
If free association is your primary interest, then capitalism shouldn't be your interest, unless of course you are a member of the bourgeoisie.
>>28047157
Why don't you think that an ancap land couldn't entirely depend on voluntaryism? The free market (not "free" like it currently is in America; I mean truly free) would eliminate all oppressive monopolies, and boost competition, thus allowing smaller businesses to thrive and making voluntary association much more prevalent.
>It's not acceptable that the choices for most people are: work hard for years and hope that maybe someday you'll have enough capital to start a business of your own, or live in absolute destitute.
I agree, but that situation is caused by statism, not by capitalism. It's the state that prevents individuals from creating small businesses and that allows huge businesses to act as predators to everyone else in order to maintain a monopoly. All of that is the state's fault, via subsidies and lobbying.
>there'll be few employers that have the worker's interests in mind
In the case of smaller businesses, the workers' interest is the employer's interest, and vice-versa. Both are interrelated.
In the case of bigger companies, it's not quite the same thing, but as I said above, competitiveness would prevent employers from being as tyrannical as they are today. They would be forced to adapt in order to maximize their profits.
Employers aren't always pieces of shit that treat their workers like animals, unlike what you seem to think. Even if it's hyperbole, there are lots of businesses where employers and employees are in good terms and work towards a common goal.
In syndicalism, I see a worker's federation as an illegitimate limiter to free trade. I shouldn't need the permission of anyone to create a business.
>democracy
Democracy is not a good thing, especially direct democracy, unless your community is entirely comprised of intelligent, rational individuals.
>unless of course you are a member of the bourgeoisie
I think workers and the "bourgeois" can work together efficiently.
I can't draw gud cause of my weird irish hands
>>28047546
>click when selected to edit text
>>28047546
>single: no
>virgin: yes
wew paddy
>>28047303
Small businesses are awesome, I think we can both agree on that. If all businesses were small businesses then the employer would indeed really just be a manager, and it might be fair that management gets paid more.
So here's the issue:
The state is not what causes monopolistic competition, a profit-driven motive is what causes monopolistic competition. In a truly free market economy supply and demand would determine the price of goods, but businesses want to be able to fix their prices so that they can make more money. This causes the following without a state: businesses will claim that their brand is different from the other brands and will hire security to ensure that their secrets are kept secret since copyrights won't be around without a state. By having a specialized product, they have some control over the market, they have a monopoly over one specific sector of a type of product (their brand of it), and thus can fix their prices a little bit. To see this in action, compare a grocery store to a farmer's market. The farmer's market is based on the optimal price so all the goods are roughly the same and all are near the same price. Compare this to a grocery store where there are many brands of the same thing and they all have different prices.
Anyways, brands will always work together to create an oligopoly so that they can fix the prices even more, and when one company in the oligopoly gets enough power it'll buy out the rest and then boom monopoly, and there is nothing something the monopoly from existing because with all the capital that it has it could always produce products cheaper than everybody else.
Markets will never be free if there is a profit-motive, capital will always centralize.
>>28047557
my favorite hobby
>>28047562
the struggles of long distance relationships
>>28047565
>it might be fair that management gets paid more.
I guess that our diverging opinions on business owner wages come from our different experiences. I've seen a lot of people in my family struggle for decades before managing to set up a successful, small business. Therefore, I think it's completely legitimate when one of my acquaintances manages to bring home two million dollars a year while working twelve hours per week, because I've seen the man bust his ass while most of his counterparts fucked around. See what I mean?
>The state is not what causes monopolistic competition
The state is what maintains illegitimate monopolies and prevents them from dying out. Subsidies, lobbies, bailouts, you name it. I'm not against monopolies if they're allowed to exist by the free market, because they would be, by definition, the best the industry has to offer both in terms of the product they're selling and their work environment (otherwise they'd get crushed by competitors hiring their own workers).
>a profit-driven motive
There's no economy without that, and I don't see what's wrong with wanting to accumulate wealth.
What you're saying about the centralization of capital is interesting, but I disagree. A business can fix its prices, but the law of the market will eventually determine whether or not these prices can stand up to the competition. This depends on the consumer's choice, but also on the worker who manufactures the company's goods. A company that tries to fix its prices while lowering its wages will be faced with serious problems in the long run, when its workers can't take it anymore and when the consumers aren't able to afford its goods (even in the case of necessity goods, this would still happen in the form of riots and boycotting).
The market regulates itself, always. An illegitimate monopoly will get crushed by a cheaper, more effective, less tyrannical competitor.
The reason why we don't have that right now is because of statist regulations.
>>28047726
I think you would benefit from some economics 101
Watch this video about market structures:
https://youtu.be/84gJUwgQcno
and this one about types of business organizations:
https://youtu.be/aWpsAGCQ840
>>28047931
If you disagree with what I said, address my point
>>28047959
>>28047726
Well, what I wanted you to see from the videos I linked is that the advantages of corporations and monopolies/oligopolies are tremendous for the people profiting for them but pretty shit for everyone else. These are completely neutral videos based on economics 101 textbooks, and they show advantages and disadvantages.
If the motivating factor is profit, there is no reason for people not to adopt these business models that fuck everyone over.
If you are an egoist, and you are part of the vast majority of people, this shit is definitely not in your interest. It would make much more sense to partake of an economy that is motivated by meeting demands. A syndicalist economy can create a demand driven society, groups of workers or people living together would make their demands known and adjust their supply to others who are making demands to ensure that the demands are met. The incentive to work would simply be getting what you desire, it's an egoist reason to work.
>>28032310
this is a statement of great originality.
>>28032310
>Also, yes, I'm doing this for attention
I never get a you in these threads.
>>28048068
why taller? you are a manlet? small penis? what psychological problem is the cause of this disgusting fetish
>>28048103
where is the test for the "extroverted intuition" thing?
>>28048141
http://www.celebritytypes.com/cognitive-function/test.php
There you go friendo.
>>28048139
i'm a manlet but not nearly as much as i used to be. also, it's patrician-tier :^)
>>28048139
>what psychological problem is the cause of this disgusting fetish
insecurity + mommy issues
not him but I'm 5'11" and I have it
>disgusting fetish
relax
>>28048064
I'll watch the videos, but I've already taken econ 101 and I see no particular flaw in what I've said earlier: monopolies would either be unable to thrive in a free market, or they would have to adapt to the consumer. I don't understand what's wrong with this claim.
>there is no reason for people not to adopt these business models that fuck everyone over
Price elasticity has a limit and consumers won't simply abide, even in the case of necessity goods.
>this shit is definitely not in your interest
I believe that I can be successful by starting up my own small business.
I dislike syndicalism because it limits an individual's access to free trade and free enterprise.
>The incentive to work would simply be getting what you desire
It's the same thing in ancap.
>>28048193
Distributing goods in mass where people want them in exchange for supplying goods to anyone that wants them is free trade.
putting price barriers on things as much as it can be gotten away with is not free trade.
needing ludicrous amounts of capital to start an industry is not free enterprise, just having some fellow workers that want to get started with you and being given the capital to start is free enterprise.
>implying anyone can do anything about a monopoly
What are you going to do when they can afford all the security they need? What are you going to do when there is no possible way to compete with their business because they protect all the best ways to produce what they are producing?
I get what you are saying, they can't charge so much that nobody will buy their good, but they will charge so much that everyone is forced into destitute or slavery to them if they need their product.
>>28032310
shit taste in music. lewronggeneration-core/10
>>28048285
Agorism is a good way to undermine oppressive monopolies
Not the original but fuck that shit and fuck you too OP for being a dumbass left liberal
>>28049004
>gay swede
>doesn't like anime
sums it up basically
rate me, please. this took a long time to make, for some reason.
>>28049160
I love when people say "HURRR GENDER IDENTITY >>TUMBLR"
but then they put "bi" as their sexual orientation
like, you're just as bad as tumblr
>>28049197
>liking guys and grills is as bad as making up new genders and pronouns
wew
>>28049245
you're a degenerate and you'll never be allowed to be le epic ubermensch you want to be when they find out you like dicks
k y s
>>28049262
You're probably right.
You're a degenerate as well though, for posting anime.
>>28049160
Comedian: Boehmermann
Politician: Frauke Petry
What? You have some serious problems anon.
Reminder that everyone is degenerate, and that a lack of degeneracy is a completely ideological invention to signify perfectness, like the Ubermensch or the Buddha.
>>28049315
>You have some serious problems anon.I know that
Honestly, I just didn't know who else to put as a comedian
L I T E R A L L Y me. Trust me, its the best me, I have the best me, ask anybody, the'll tell you!
>>28049531
>all that pop punk
Jeez what the hell
>>28049568
u jelly that you dont jam out to the sounds of the 90's revamped with the lyrics of today?
>Being this much of a l00ser! xD
>>28049293
Not him but I don't he cares about being a degenerate unlike you.
>all these people rating their intelligence as above average
Literally why? We're all fucking stupid or else we wouldn't be here in the first place
what if I make website with many many questions from all sites like these in one place? You could share your charts with one simple link(profile) and be able to find friend with similar personality and pm him?
>>28052345
r9kbook
No muting pls
>>28036266
wtf u talking bout m8?
