There's a pretty common argument women make when they claim that "women can be robots/forever alone too!".
It goes along these lines:
Forever alone men are so because they desire sex but can't have it.
Forever alone women are so because they desire emotional intimacy/romance but can't have it.
This premise is flawed on the many levels, the most simple of which being that men desire emotional intimacy/romance as well. In addition male robots are also further disadvantaged by being denied sex anyways, whereas female "robots" have all had sexual encounters.
So what about this loveless sex that female "robots" complain about? Well, it's fairly simple: These women have offered their pussy to high-value males and are bitter that the male did not become their partner. They do not want emotional intimacy or romance, or else they would actively seek out male robots to form a relationship with.
The truth is, men and women are not analogous at all. It is men who are the better sex when it comes to romantic notions. Women would rather share and pine for Chad than be exclusive with a beta.
I'm very tired of seeing apologetics for female behavior, they really are disgusting, calculating snakes. They are not just " complex people with wants and needs just like you."
Women seriously need to die.
>>28007921
>Women seriously need to die.
This but rape them first
I know this from experience IRL,before I even came here.Picrelated`d not settle for me,and endlessly pine for Chad,while informing me(her only friend mind you) how she`s lonely.
>>28007921
Why is her navel so high up?
>>28007921
>This premise is flawed on the many levels, the most simple of which being that men desire emotional intimacy/romance as well.
This is true.
However, one of the following is true and why women don't tend to think this:
They either don't consider betas as men, or they confuse Chad who only wants sex with all men.
Or maybe it's just willful ignorance? I imagine if a "lonely" woman went on Tinder and said she was looking for a romantic relationship with no sex she'd still get responses. Dating a pretty religious Christian male is always an option, too, but I don't tend to hear of many females even considering this.
>They do not want emotional intimacy or romance, or else they would actively seek out male robots to form a relationship with.
To be fair, they have standards just as some robots here do. They do not want to date neckbeards or men devoid of any personality or passion any more than people here don't want to date landwhales or single mothers.
>Women would rather share and pine for Chad than be exclusive with a beta.
This is true, but you also have to consider there are normal men who are neither Chad nor betas who have no trouble entering a relationship, and who women are content with despite your memes.
>They are not just " complex people with wants and needs just like you."
They are, they just tend to have more similar sexual tastes than men do.
>Women seriously need to die.
I seriously hate women; I'm half playing devil's avocado and half pointing out what I've recognized observing women and their online posts.
>>28007921
>These women have offered their pussy to high-value males and are bitter that the male did not become their partner.
In fairness, it's possible that they got pumped and dumped by a mid-value male, because they're ugly or crazy or otherwise undesirable.
>>28008053
Because.No one really cares.It`s just another bewb pic.
>>28008327
I care. It makes me feel uncomfortable.
>>28008350
I don`t know.I guess it just happens sometimes.Or the artist was just plain unskilled?
Some of your points I am fully in agreement with.
>This premise is flawed on the many levels, the most simple of which being that men desire emotional intimacy/romance as well.
Absolutely correct, and a point that's often missed on this board. If the simple act of sex was enough for men, there would be no wizards. Prostitution is an option, after all. And yet the wizards exist, as do the apprentices who, if God and Nature love them just a tiny bit, will spare them the fate of their elders. However, laments regarding late male virginity are often met with cries of "get an escort" and so forth.
And I also agree with the point you've made regarding the problem with the apologetic argument that that although women can get sex easily, they struggle all the more with developing romantic partnerships. Here's the thing. Men desire sexual affection, they want sex with a woman who desires them. Even those women who find some grand romance elusive still have access to sexual affection; unlike the repulsive male who has to resort to a prostitute, the woman who has sex at least has sex with someone who desires her. At least said woman knows a man finds her acceptable, even for a brief encounter. For many men, this is an impossibility. For many men, even that casual encounter is as far from them as Heaven is from Hell.
The one point I want to disagree with is the idea that all women have access to sexual affection. The vast majority do, of course. I wouldn't contest that. However, just as there are some men no woman wants, there are some women no man wants.
They are rare, but they do exist. There are witches in the conclave as well as wizards. It is these women, although very few in number, that I sympathize with. After all, they are in the same situation as I am in. And when all is said and done, I would never cast someone out of our order, as it were, just because of their gender.
I suppose I'm something of an egalitarian in that respect.
I used to hate women. But I found an online relationship with another robot and found the affection that I so craved. We both love one another, we both fulfill eachothers sexual needs in a non-physical way and we spend all day talking and watching anime together. It's nice, and it has dulled the hatred in my heart towards women somewhat. They don't even appear on my radar anymore, positively or negatively. I have what I want, and even though we both know that we're dudes each of us are fine with it. We just take turns pretending to be girls to help eachother out.
If any of you Robots truly do seek romantic relationships and don't care about the physical, perhaps one day you can find someone else on this board to share your feelings with.
>>28008386
The thing is that Witches have probably been called witches by normies at some point of their lives.No one insults using "wizard" though.
>>28008462
Well, I'm using "witch" to describe an adult female virgin of a certain age, in the same sense "wizard" is used to describe a man in the same situation. That's all.
>>28008498
I was joking about it,but I think using "sorceress" fits more,seeing as it can`t be used as an insult,and actually is more of an actual female equivalent of "Wizard".
>>28007921
>They do not want emotional intimacy or romance, or else they would actively seek out male robots to form a relationship with.
>implying I haven't dated two robots
>implying they weren't both shitty, neurotic, self-centered partners that made my life hell
>implying they both didn't want to change everything about me for their own comfort while refusing to change anything about themselves to make the relationship work out
robots are shit, that's why they can't have relationships.
>>28008386
>The one point I want to disagree with is the idea that all women have access to sexual affection. The vast majority do, of course. I wouldn't contest that. However, just as there are some men no woman wants, there are some women no man wants.
>They are rare, but they do exist. There are witches in the conclave as well as wizards. It is these women, although very few in number, that I sympathize with. After all, they are in the same situation as I am in. And when all is said and done, I would never cast someone out of our order, as it were, just because of their gender.
Sorry, but can you actually name a single one?
>>28008580
There are many robots.Some tend to be decent.And robots are like that because we`re damaged.You`re probably like that too,at least a bit.
>>28008580
If they managed to date a girl then they aren't robots you dumb bitch.
Just because you met them on an imageboard doesn't make them robots.
>writes paragraphs on image-sharing websight using a cheeto-dust encrusted keyboard about why women are all snakes and need to die
>mad that girls don't want to date him
Gee OP, wonder why.
>>28008142
>there are normal men who are neither Chad nor betas who have no trouble entering a relationship, and who women are content with
I disagree with the above point. You can easily find countless examples, on the internet or through your own personal experience, of women who seem to be "content" with these sub-chad men, and end up cheating or otherwise revealing that they were not actually content. As long as there is a better man out there, a woman will be prone to discontentedness at least part of the time, if not all the time, and will end up treating her average boyfriend like garbage in some form or another eventually.
>>28008631
Maybe he`s mad because girls have rejected him before again and again leading him to start shitposting.
>>28008631
>wilfully ignoring how shit women are just to get pussy
Cuck.
Besides, you probably have all your little tricks you use to get women to like you. Normies and Chads don't even realize how much work they put into manipulating women to have sex with them.
Touch her arm when she's out with you! Make a goofy innuendo! Display your worth in the form of social media and assets!
With all of the things you do to wrangle a woman, you'd think you normies be in the BEST position to see how shit women are. But I guess a complete lack of self-awareness is what makes you a normie.
>>28008598
>Sorry, but can you actually name a single one?
Absolutely! They exist, I can guarantee it. I won't provide names, of course, because that's quite impolite. So you'll have to trust me just a bit. It's one of the benefits of being an old man like myself. You see wondrous things purely by virtue of having been around a little bit longer. There are women that suffer as we do. There are women no man wants, has no desire for, does not see as a sexual being.
They live lives of quiet desperation, just like men like myself do. They are tolerable to others just so long as they don't betray the fact that like, all human beings, they feel sexual desire as well.
Trust me. There are witches just as there are wizards, and their pain is the same. Granted, they lack a Y chromosome, but they are still abortions of Mother Nature. They are not given license to live as humans live. Because that license comes from others, and others do not desire them.
Sure, you may have to take what I have on faith. But I can assure you, my gospel isn't a poisonous one. I'm not a prophet, of course, but were I one, I would not be a false one.
>>28008707
>You can easily find countless examples, on the internet or through your own personal experience, of women who seem to be "content" with these sub-chad men, and end up cheating or otherwise revealing that they were not actually content.
I don't mean to say NAWALT, but there's nothing to suggest this happens the majority of the time. These relationships are normal ones and run their course, as all relationships tend to. Cheating does happen sometimes, as does one party revealing their lack of contentment. But it does not happen nearly as often as you suggest it does. I wish I could provide a source but this is all anecdotal.
Men cheat on women, too, so it goes both ways. It's not their fault all the time.
>>28008631
He has no standards, they do. That is the issue. A very serious issue I may add. These women need to be knocked down a few pegs and understand they may have to settle with a manchild if they wish for romance. Men already have the maturity to simply love anyone who is nice to them.
>female robots
>falling for the meme
There are not female robots, these threads are all made by wannabe smug trolls.
>>28008386
>women that no man wants
The ONLY such instances of such women are those who are severely overweight or severely deformed. If they are overweight, it's their own fault. And even if they are deformed, truly anything except the most severe all-encompassing deformities will be happily overlooked by many men.
Men, on the other hand? Something as simple as being under 5'6" can damn you to an entire life of ridicule and disrespect from both sexes, romantically and professionally.
>>28008775
>He has no standards
Yes he probably does.
Look at your average robot here, they complain about
>tfw no gf ugh I want to kill myself I'm SO LONELY GUYS
but as I mentioned earlier they will refuse to date landwhales and single mothers, who would be willing to date them. Don't believe me, install Tinder and keep at it for a few days. You will find someone, probably.
>>28008768
The average women has a ton of casual sex with more attractive men. The average women then sometimes enters into a long-term relationship with the average man.
The average man does not have casual sex. The average man gets sex when he is in a relationship. What robots call normies is the average man who has had 3 girlfriends total by age 25 and sex outside of them maybe one time.
It's imbalanced and women and their shamelessness and self-serving nature is to fault, no doubt about it.
>>28008600
I know I am, but I do my very best to make a relationship work. the guys that I mentioned, neither one of them cared how I felt. ultimately, it was all about their desires and wants and needs regardless of how I felt. relationships are always give and take, check and balance. or, they're supposed to be.
it was like pulling teeth to get them to communicate, forget about anything even slightly romantic. my last boyfriend broke up with me on Christmas Day because he went through my phone and saw texts to my dealer saying that I was coming over and assumed I was cheating on him. he wouldn't hear a word of reason. we got back together a few weeks later, just in time for him to make promises to see me on my birthday, then blow me off, and then make promises to see me on Valentine's day, and blow me off again. I put up with so much controlling abuse from this guy - him telling me what I was and wasn't allowed to do, how to dress, how to style my hair, trying to tell me I couldn't hang out with my only irl friend - and he got defensive when I asked him to maybe be a bit romantic sometimes, you know, initiating conversation, maybe saying cute things, a card, flowers, anything. I cleaned his house and made breakfast, lunch, and dinner for him every day we were together. I baked cookies and made cute surprises. he gave nothing back. he was the kindest robot I ever met, but once things got intimate he completely shut off.
I wish there was someone out there who would just love me, and put up with my shortcomings as much as I'm willing to put up with theirs, who would treat me like a human being worthy of love and affection - but for people like me it just doesn't exist.
Chad only wants Stacy. robots only want to complain.
>>28008865
>The average women has a ton of casual sex with more attractive men.
I don't necessarily think this is a true statement. I suppose it depends on your location? Your average woman in SoCal probably does, but in more conservative areas it's not very widespread.
>The average man does not have casual sex.
You're probably right about this.
It is imbalanced to a degree, though again I think you're overblowing it.
>>28008754
Tell me this.Are they REALLY FUCKING UGLY to the point of being unsalvageable?Or are they just not conventionally attractive?
>>28008932
In my experience, it's actually more widespread in conservative areas, but I understand your rejection of blanket statements. I wish I was as optimistic as you. And I wish I was on my other OS where I keep my folder of pepes and relationship subleddit screencaps.
>>28008803
>The ONLY such instances of such women are those who are severely overweight or severely deformed.
You'll have to take my word for it, I suppose, but I have known women that are not grotesquely obese or afflicted with some horrible tortuosity that no men want. They do exist. Their standards aren't ridiculously high, and yet their desires are frustrated. I've seen it with own two eyes. These things do happen in our world.
>Men, on the other hand? Something as simple as being under 5'6" can damn you to an entire life of ridicule and disrespect from both sexes, romantically and professionally.
Please bear in mind that the vast majority of men do have sex with women they haven't had to pay for the privilege. That includes fat men, short men, ugly men, shy men and so on. The statistics bear that out. Have you ever wondered why there are so many ugly people walking around? It's because ugly people reproduce and give rise to yet another generation of ugly people. Shy people with poor social skills are often in that position because they've been raised by similarly awkward parents who, for all of their lack of social grace and facility, still managed to have children of their own.
Virginity is a rare thing among adults precisely for this reason. Nature is merciful to the vast majority of her children. There are exceptions, and they are wretched indeed. But they are few in number. In that respect, even God has proven himself to be merciful to most.
>>28009025
>relationship subleddit screencaps.
I browse r/relationships mostly to find cuckb8 and women being whores, but it's pretty evenly spread out. For every post about a woman cheating, there's a post about a man doing the same.
https://iy.reddit.com/r/relationships/search?q=flair%3A%27Infidelity%27&restrict_sr=on&sort=new&t=all#inf
This may be a bad example as there are, on the first page, more females than males but you can see what I mean, normally it's more even. Go check the other few pages.
>>28008768
You're right, it probably doesn't happen the majority of the time. But it doesn't have to happen the majority of the time to justify mistrust and hatred. Would it REALLY make you feel better to find out that it just happens 20% of the time? Or even just 10%?
Can we agree that it happens at least 10% of the time, for women under the age of 30? And if so, does that make you any less hopeless or full of hatred for the fucking shallow animals we call "women" ? Does that let you be at ease going out into the dating pool? Not me. Those odds are still awful.
>>28008930
Try again.Aim lower.I`d ask for your skype,but I`m not this pathetic and I`m aware fembots always reject you.
>>28009079
>freely announcing that you browse Reddit
>posting le Reddit
>>28009123
Fuck off you incoherent freak, you can barely type straight and you're hitting on me while I'm pouring my heart out. Get lost.
>>28009097
>But it doesn't have to happen the majority of the time to justify mistrust and hatred
It doesn't have to happen the majority of the time or even a significant amount of the time for people to be so mistrusting and misogynistic. At least going by /r9k/, a lot of people are upset they've never been in relationships and hate women for that reason, or haven't been in a relationship/around many women and can only judge based on cherrypicked screencaps, or have only had bad experiences with women.
I will say flat out that I do hate women, it's wrong of me to do so, I'm trying not to, but I do. I recognize it's silly to hate an entire gender based on 10%, but it's not just about infidelity to me, I loathe women admittedly because I'm a beta and they have things much easier than I do. It's silly and this could be easily extended to starving African children and the fact that everyone has things worse than you.
>>28009165
I only go to r/relationships for the screencaps of cuckbait and woman hate thread fuel.
>>28008930
You tried twice, roastie. TWICE. And from the sounds of it, those weren't actual robots. They sound like bad boys to me. Which would make you a painfully typical roastie, who has probably willfully overlooked the millions of forever alone nice guys out there who are literally marriage material. Marriage material if you ACTUALLY want stability and love, that is. Which you probably don't. You want a bad boy. And you want to complain about bad boys for that sweet sweet attention and validation.
>>28008965
They are women no man wants. They are not hideously deformed or grotesquely overweight. They are simply women that men do not find the object of sexual desire.
Yes, women like that do exist. I know that contravenes every red-pill philosophy ever preached by every false prophet that has a tase for such gospels, but there is. However, that doesn't make it any less true.
However, let me raise the following question: What if they were hideously deformed? Would their hurt be any less significant for all of that? Or does deformity magically liberate one from the desire to live as all people do and experience what all people do?
The people Nature gives license to live as people like to forget old virgins exist because no one likes survivor's guilt. It's not very much fun, after all. But there are people of both sexes left behind. That's one of Nature's cruel little secrets that the normal and healthy like to forget.
Let us not fall into the traps of such wishful thinking and hold Nature accountable for her crimes. Trust me, she is more than guilty of them.
What do you think of Tomoko? I get that she's fictional, but is a girl in a situation like her a robot?
>>28008930
What the fuck? How is that dude a robot? It sounds more like you got the aloof bad boy experience you so badly crave.
>>28009195
This.
Get rekt Stacy.
>>28009190
You literally made my day with your attention,oh enlightened one.Oh please continue acting with such grace and you shall have many great relationships with radiant,beautiful men.
>>28008053
genetics.
probably not original.
>>28009206
>They are women no man wants. They are not hideously deformed or grotesquely overweight. They are simply women that men do not find the object of sexual desire.
No, you're making this up. You're a pseudo-intellectual trying to come off as intelligent by refusing to make blanket statements, but then you're making up this "normal but unwanted" woman out of thin air to justify your stupid behavior.
Stop posting in your dumb messiah narrative tone and fuck off to reddit.
>>28009206
No,deformed people deserve to be happy as well.The thing is that almost no one can derive happiness from deformed people.If I suffered from Proteus syndrome I wouldn`t expect no women to actually want me.
>>28009206
>>28009325
Yeah fuck off to wizchan grandpa
We don't take losers like you here
>>28009230
Kind of.
Tomoko does have friends.
Additionally, at least in this dimension she has thousands of men interested in her.
>>28009123
is it okay then if I ask for your skype?
>>28009190
>>28009279
this wasn't me.
>>28009195
both of them were virgins. the most recent one had severe, severe social anxiety and basically nothing happened between us unless I initiated it. I think that's a big reason why things were so awful - he never made any attempt to overcome or push past his anxiety, even at the expense of our relationship. even though he made constant demands of me regarding my own mental illness and refused to put up with my symptoms, despite knowing what I had before he agreed to be my boyfriend.
nice try with the muh stereotypes muh roastie muh stacy garbage, but in case you didn't notice, I already browse this board. your comments are neither novel nor insightful.
>>28009264
read the above comment.
>>28008930
>my boyfriend was really bad
>my boyfriend
>who i dated
>and fucked
>was really bad
>which i was aware of at the time that i let him fuck me
You fucking gross slut. You found a bad boy, and rewarded his behavior with pussy. And now you're here complaining about him. Yeah, he sounds like a complete asshole. It sounds like you were completely aware that he was an asshole. And what did you do? You had sex with him. Probably hundreds of times. After you broke up, what did you do? You got back together with him.
Fucking typical. "I don't want a bad boy" So what to you do with your life? You fuck bad boys. Fuck off, you dumb cunt.
>>28009190
Your tone,proves you`re not one of us.No robot would lash out and try and call someone inferior,just because they tried to start a dialogue with them.Apparently you are literally what OP described.Learn humility and actually give your skype to the next guy who asks.Play some Dark Souls and learn that effort and perseverance lead to victory.At least for women they do.
>>28009325
>No, you're making this up.
So would you be more comfortable if I lied to you, if I told you I hadn't seen such things for myself? Would that fit more comfortably into your little narrative? Would those echoes be more welcome in your little chamber?
I'm sorry to break it to you, but reality has the final say. Blanket statements are for those who have little to no experience of the world and you may find them far more pleasant, but that doesn't make them any more universally true.
I know it hurts to believe there are human beings of the female sex who hurt the same way you do. It's incomprehensible. It's blasphemy.
But, when all is said and done, it's true.
I'm curious. And, if you're capable of answering in some substantive manner, please tell me why what I've said is so offensive to you? Seriously. Why does it cut so deeply? What gospels of yours have I blasphemed?
I'm only describing the world as I've seen it and experienced it. Nothing more. Nothing less.
>>28009430
stevengoldsmith291
Have fun.
>>28009371
>We don't take losers like you here
fuck off, chad
>>28009371
>Yeah fuck off to wizchan grandpa
Wizardchan isn't fond of me either. They are far too fond of their echo chamber. They hide from reality, they shrink from real discussion.
You may want to check them out, actually. You might find it a nice fit.
>We don't take losers like you here
And yet here I remain. Let me ask, what type of losers DO you take here?
>>28009532
Ones filled with bitter hatred.We take Sith,not filthy Grey Jedi like you.
>>28009430
The point is things were awful and you knew it. AND YOU STILL STAYED WITH HIM. It doesn't matter if he had social anxiety, he TREATED YOU LIKE GARBAGE. He was still a bad boy. And you still stayed with him. You even got back with him after breaking up. You still chose a shitty boyfriend over one of the countless nice guys out there. Typical Stacy detected.
>>28009475
You're a strange man. And yet I want to believe you, I really do, but I can't accept your notion that some women (with no disabilities or disfigurements) are never once offered sex.
>>28009528
WOW who let this nerd in here??
>>28008631
>using a cheeto-dust encrusted keyboard
what a creative response beta whiteknight
>>28009622
>nice guys
he wasn't purposely shitty, he just had no idea what a relationship was supposed to be like and he let his anxiety get the better of him too much.
he got better with some things, of course. we dated for 10 months. obviously, it wasn't all shitty or I would have left earlier.
he just got more and more paranoid near the end of the relationship, and started trying to control everything I did out of fear that I would leave him, which I eventually did.
he was a really nice guy. he was just shit at relationships. I'd bet most of you are like that.
>He was still a bad boy
everybody watch out, we have a socially retarded, kissless virgin "bad boy" over here
>>28009447
again, read the above comment, and stop making things up that you want to hear.
I gave an honest robot a chance. I tried to stay with him and help him learn what a relationship should probably be like, because he had no fucking clue and openly admitted that. I tried not to bail at the first sign of adversity because that's not how you treat someone you love.
do you consider yourself a robot?
case in point: robots are not any good with relationships and never will be.
>>28007921
Guaranteed maximum number of posts.
>>28009230
thousands of betas would give their LIVES for her, do you understand?
>>28009655
I'm not all that strange, at least not for the reasons you're implying. Back in college, most of my friends were women. They didn't see me as a sexual threat (after all, one can only tolerate a monster to the extent they neuter said monster). Some of these women desperately wanted a sexual and romantic relationship. And yet men didn't want them.
You needn't believe me, of course. But what motivation do I have to lie about such a thing? It is only because I want to provide a bit of reality into the discussion that I bother stating the truth. Obviously, doing so won't win me any friends.
Again, I know this sort of example upends some very dearly held beliefs on this board. But there are women who walk lockstep with men like me into middle age as virgins. If a man had offered them sex, they would have taken the opportunity. And yet there was no opportunities to be found.
>>28008048
She's also ug.
>>28009798
I have realized that,and am wondering how to break it to my sexuality.I really don`t want to bother,but I keep subconsciously blaming myself for not having a gf and never having kissed a girl.
>>28008461
>I have what I want, and even though we both know that we're dudes each of us are fine with it. We just take turns pretending to be girls to help each other out.
That was quite a twist you had there. Glad you're happy though anon.
>>28009881
She looks less ugly from a good angle,but yeah that was my fucking point.
>>28009841
You sound like an interesting old man, and I actually welcome the dose of reality that you're dropping seeing as how life isn't simply black and white. Hats off to you for saying what robots are afraid to hear
>>28010395
I`m not afraid to hear it,I just don`t feel like I`ll experience any of this...Maybe with time...
>>28010395
Well, if nothing else, we elderly do have life experience. Philosophies come and go, thrive and wither away. When all is said and done, Nature remains with Her truths. Whether those truths are pleasant or painful is of little concern to her. I hate Nature for this reason, as well as for many other reasons, but am still compelled to worship her. Not because she is particularly lovely or kind (particularly to men like me) but because she is unrelenting.
>>28010431
Maybe with time, maybe not. Please bear in mind that I'm not talking about a huge number of women or anything like that. Very few women go on to become witches.
However, also please bear in mind, very few men go on to become wizards. Old virgins on both sides are a rarity. The statistics bear that out. Yes, there will be more men who find themselves in that miserable situation. However, that number is still very small. The number of "witches" are smaller, to be sure, but their position is no less wretched for all of that.
