>>27992018
Never heard of a woman who wanted a male virgin. and I'm pretty sure their biological urges help them find the best genetics.

we wuz genetically superior

>>27992018
>If you look in [scientific] literature, relatively early ages at first sex and first birth have been associated with lower educational achievement, poorer physical health, poorer mental health
And then they found /r9k/.

for-all-slaves-a-song-of-false-hope.study

>>27992018
"later" literally meaning 18 years old.

>>27992148

No, it probably means early 20s.

Tacticus reported that the germanic tribes were a superior race because they usually didn't have sex until their 20s

>>27992018
>just keep waiting, white teenage males, not having sex yet just means youre better :^) dont worry it will happen :^)

>>27992074
Not quite: biologically superior for Stone Age hunter gatherers? yes

Not for 21st century city dwellers

>>27992206
it's 18-21, and genetics accounts for +/- 1 year, while environment accounts for around 3.

There's no indication of an upper OR lower bound for the ages being talked about.

I just want science to finally confirm that staying a virgin is unhealthy beyond a certain age point.