A new study proves that cut dicks are NOT less sensitive than uncut:
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/04/18/circumcised-less-sensitive_n_9721202.html
>>27974547
This is fucking bullshit fuck you
>by Arti Patel
>Arti Patel is an editor at the Huffington Post Canada covering lifestyle and viral content. A 2011 Ryerson University journalism grad, she generally covers health, women's issues, food, relationships, trends and coverage around diversity. Follow her
When do they ever learn to poo in loos?
>>27974547
I don't even care about being less sensitive t b h.
I still bust a nut whenever I masturbate and I never have a problem with pre-jac whenever I sleep with my girlfriend. She also says that she thinks cut looks 'cleaner' than uncut.
>>27974547
who cares
im cut and i dont see the point in getting mad about something you have no control over
everyone that has seen my penis has liked it so who cares
>>27974563
There's a link to the original study right in the article.
>>27974547
>cutfags so fucking mad they do a whole study on their dried up dicks
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>27974547
>Jewish owned media claims Jewish practices (savagery) have no downsides
Amazing.
>cutfags unironically have to buy lube
>they need lubrication to masturbate
>>27974610
Yes, I understand that it's painful for you to lose the only thing in your life which has allowed you to feel superior, but the march of science moves on, friendo.
>>27974547
Don't cite blogs
>>27974615
You know HuffPo is actually owned by AOL, right?
>>27974674
The study was published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Urology, retard.
http://www.jurology.com/article/S0022-5347%2815%2905535-4/abstract
OP's pic is horryifing
>>27974748
Do you even Pain Olympics?
>>27974547
>you see? This excuses genital mutilation!
>>27974779
>genital improvement
FTFY
> feminist rag promotes circumcision
> shocking
>>27974547
I think uncut penises look gross but i also feel done dirty to have one of my earliest experiences in life to be having my fucking dick sliced
>>27974547
Daily reminder that this study concluded that the foreskin elicited high sensitivity to touch and also that it was performed on non-erect penises; sensitivity was not considered when comparing these two variables in a erect state, where the range of sensitivity increases due to increased blood flow.
I will never have a moist glans and this makes me jealous of uncutfags
>>27974854
>pic related 2
Where's pic related 1?
>self reported """"""""""studies"""""""""""
>>27974547
>huffingtonpost
are you this retarded op?
>>27974547
I'm cut and I can orgasm pretty pleasurablywould like that foreskin back anyday
tfw i have no foreskin naturally because bulb is huge and i don't have to deal with peeling that shit to masterbate.
>>27974877
It's not related. Make a more relevant thread and I'll see what I can do.
>>27974547
since when did women know anything about dicks?
they know so little of themselves we beat them at that, too.
Fuck off, loo pooers
>>27974563
>poo in loo and a feminist
Discredited.
>huffpo
Will you cunts EVER learn?
Its not even about sensitivity, its about not having a dried up piece of burn victim looking dick head with little to no skin to give when fucking/fapping.
But yeah that article is a load of bullshit.
Naturally a dried up desentizised dick feels less sensitive and pleasure from being stimulated.
The foreskin protects the head becuase its sensitive. All cutfags have lost that since they were a baby (thank god you guys dont remember the pain) exposed dickhead hurts as fuck even to your undies
When will people realise its just done to hinder masturbation?
>>27974547
>believing what jews say when it comes to your penis
wew lads
>>27974547
I was cut at 22.
There was a decrease in sensitivity.
>Huffingtonpost
Oh God, what makes it so easy is you goys want to believe so bad. Well done! Make sure to have your child mutilated for a low, low price!
>>27975093
cutfag here, through technique you can overcome the reduction in sensitivity
>amerijews in full damage control mode
fuck off fatties
>>27975121
>>27975118
>>27975088
>>27975021
>>27974948
>>27974898
>>27974800
>>27974674
>>27974615
>>27974563
>>27974555
So many fucking morons who are incapable of reading for basic fucking comprehension. It's an article about A PEER REVIEWED STUDY published in the fucking Journal of Urology, you STUPID fucking LOW-FUNCTIONING, LOW-IQ, SEMI-LITERATE SLOPEHEADS.
Fuck.
>>27974849
so the study is media bait shit
>>27975394
See
>>27974879
oregano connolii
>>27975394
t. Schlomo Mohammed Rosebergenlevengoldstein
>insecurity ft. articles, the thread
nothing matters man
>>27975427
The power of m00t compels you. Leave this place.
I don't know how sensible are my elbows compared to the interior side of my cheeks, but I'm sure that having my mouth all leathery and dry sounds like shit
originale
>>27974706
>The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile site
>sexual stimulation is primarily tactile
>hence sex will be less pleasurable for cutfags
>cutfags btfo
>feminist reading comprehension btfo
>>27975636
>Conclusions
>
> Findings suggest that minimal long-term implications for penile sensitivity exist as a result of the surgical excision of the foreskin during neonatal circumcision. Additionally, this study challenges past research suggesting that the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the adult penis.
>>27974547
just follow the money, you are talking about an industry
I literally could not care less.
Sayonara
>>27975509
Inside of your cheek feels nothing like a dickhead, bad comparison. Its easily the most sensitive part of the body now that i think about it, being uncut that is.
Sure a hit to the nuts hurt worse than a hit to the dick but if we dont count violence and just everyday, the dickhead is by far most sensitive.
Question to anyone with a cut dick. Does your dick head hurt when it rubs itself on your clothes? Because if it doesn't, that's proof right there that your dicks are less sensitive than non-mutilated penises.
>>27975956
why are you acting like this is a good thing lmao
>>27975976
You do realize the foreskin protects the head right? You don't walk around with it retracted. Are burgers really this stupid?
And why the fuck does that matter in the slightest? It doesn't mean that chopping off parts of a man's penis before he can decide to or not is morally correct.
>>27975671
I'm saying the study is bunk because it doesn't take into account that more higher tactile sensation * more penile sites = more sexual pleasure.
>>27974596
I just hope you don't get your children cut. Let them decide for themselves.
>>27976175
So fat people experience more pleasure because they have more body to experience it on?
>>27974547
>huff post
>kike central
>endorses genital mutilation
hmmmmmm
>>27976214
>pretending to be this retarded
le_shig.exe
>>27974547
>heat tests
>study FUCKING SAYS THAT FORESKIN IS MOST SENSITIVE PART OF DICK
>"not less sensitive XD"
i love how fucking retarded literally anyone in journalism is when it comes to reading scientific articles.
even if you consider a survey done on 30 fucks in a controlled situation to be meaningful, i could easily find you 300 people on 4chan who would say that the head of their uncut dick feels uncomfortable as hell if its exposed and touching something that isn't soft tissue. Even sex and blowjobs were painful for literally every uncut fellow at first because of the sensitivity until they got a little more used to it.
And the fact that the study supposed to debunk this concept blatantly says the foreskin itself is highly sensitive, gg no re.
>>27976264
It's called argumentum ad absurdum you absolute fucking moron. You show the logical implication of someone's argument and demonstrate that it's absurd in order to show that it's wrong. Christ you people are stupid.
>>27975394
Wow, one whole study. You don't determine whether an intervention/procedure is beneficial based on cherry picked data.
>>27976271
> muh anecdotal lolbroscience > peer-reviewed studies in the Journal of Urology
>>27976290
>uses the latin phrase for no reason other than to appear smart
>had to google it before posting
simply epic, my underage friend.
>>27976327
> I'm too stupid to recognize commonly-used phrases, so you're dumb!!!111!
Genius.
>>27976313
If you weren't so emotionally invested in the topic you could see that he was saying that the study is not easy to generalize from, which is true.
all these mad goyim lmao
>>27976313
>if its in a journal it must be true
i'm not saying my experience is more valuable to huffpost, but it is more valuable to me. if the head of my dick is challenging to even wash because i can't touch it without discomfort in a nonsexual way, and cutfriends are rubbing their exposed head everywhere just fine, then i will believe that even if the answer isn't purely in the foreskin, that my dick is more sensitive.
i don't even think that it's a big deal or changes how you have sex. clearly they couldn't find much of a difference on multiple stimuli, but the study itself which you take as undeniable truth says that the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis on tactile stimulation.
>>27976347
common in high school, maybe. i just think it's funny that you had to google it.
>>27976382
It's all in your head you insecure faggot
>>27976470
which one, jew?
>>27976470
Well yeah, the dick head.
ITT people who didn't read the study and are jumping at the clickbait title.
>>27976405
What the actual fuck are you talking about? First of all, using "Google" as a verb is annoying, and I can already tell that you're sub-normal. Second, I'm middle-aged and considerably better read and better educated than you are, and I clearly pal around with a brighter group of people, since no one I know would consider "argumentum ad absurdum" to be an especially arcane or obscure phrase. Since you're so clearly stupid, I did you the courtesy of dropping its definition into my response since I know from experience that the Dunning-Kruger mouth-breathers around here can't be fucked to look up something they don't understand.
And no, I didn't need to "Google" a commonly-used phrase in order to define it. I think what's most irritating about you cretins is you're so pig-ignorant that you're incapable of recognizing your own stupidity even when it's on display for the whole world to see and it's pointed out to you in excruciating detail. I don't know why I'm bothering writing this, since you'll never read it -- TL;DR, I know. Your gnat-sized brain isn't capable of tracking anything longer than a Bazooka Joe comic.
>>27976506
>goyim gets mad he doesn't have imaginary problem to blame his self hatred on
There you go again
>>27976536
you're only embarrassing yourself further. you're not smart if you have to explain (with the help of google) what your point is.
>>27976585
Please get a trip so I can ignore your encapsulated stupidity. Please.
>>27976611
>that guy who has to be verbose with every post
>that guy who literally responds with "i'm ignoring you"
>>27974547
this makes me feel good
>>27974547
Who actually gives a shit? Just respect your kid's rights and don't get them cut.
>>27976630
Should we respect kids' rights and let them eat birthday cake for every meal? Should we let them never take baths, never have to go to school, and play in traffic?
>>27976651
>mfw being cut makes you this retarded
>>27976651
You can't be this stupidright?
>>27976667
>>27976680
ARGUMENTUM AD ABSURDUM. You STUPID TWATS. Jesus fucking christ. No wonder you're all fucking loser shut-ins. You're too fucking stupid to live.
I'm cut and it's sensitive as fuck, senpai. In fact, i erect very easily.
>>27976704
I honestly hope you're trolling anon because otherwise you should kill yourself
>tfw uncut
>tfw cant touch penis head without it feeling uncomfortable and cant do it for more than a few seconds
im getting cut tbqh
>>27976704
Anyone can guess the deleterious effects on health of eating cake every meal. But what are the adverse effects of not being cut?
>foreskin contains sensitive nerve endings and protects the nerve endings of the glans
>cutting it off does not make the dick less sensitive somehow
???
>>27976755
What is smegma, Alex?
>>27976783
What, too much effort to clean under the foreskin you dip?
>>27976290
You completely misunderstood my point and chose a totally unnuanced, ignorant rebuttal. I never said that more skin is better but and extra sensory site that is specialized for the type sensation caused by sex obviously is. Now fuck off you pseudo-intellectual.
>>27976783
A non issue if you shower even once a week.
>trusting anything that comes from american medical studies regarding circumcision
lol not only is it considered normal but it brings in enormous profits for the medical industry. report back when this study is confirmed by a country that doesn't mutilate new born babies for fun.
>>27976750
>get cut
>underwear, legs, and scrot constantly rubs against your glans
>torment everlasting
>>27976783
>admitting you have smegma
disgusting dude. you know what soap is?
>>27976825
>shower even once a week
Apparently you've missed the hundreds of threads in r9k where robots boast about going months or years between showers.
>>27974547
How do you even study something like this? And what kinds of person wants to do this? And who pays for it?
>>27976849
this is the worst. I can put up with not feeling pleasure, but irritation every time your dick gets hard and you're wearing clothes is unbearable.
Huffington Post is a liberal gossip magazine and as such should never be used as an actual source for news, but rather used as a source for cringe material.
>>27976859
In which case smegma is the least of their hygienic concerns so it matters not.
>self-reported
Fucking kek OP you disingenuous faggot.
>study agrees with my opinions
>lmao cutfags btfo
>study disagrees with my opinions
>IT'S WRONG. IT'S A CONSPIRACY BY THE JEWS.
why are anteater dicks so insecure?
>>27976920
> "Look at these charts..."
/pol/ pls leave
>>27976948
it's a shit self-reported study, rather than the countless that focus on how many nerve endings are actually removed. You cannot honestly believe that removing something that contains over 20,000 nerve endings and protects the glans form becoming kernelized doesn't make a difference dude
>>27976961
>a diagram visually explaining what is lost with sources is invalid because I say so
>>27976948
You have ONE study, hardly a scientific consensus.
You have ONE rationale for cutting that can be countered by proper cleaning (i.e., smegma).
>>27976214
>>you can put on weight and grow your penis
holy shit I never knew this thanks anon
>>27977058
Is aesthetic not a rationale? Almost every girl I know prefers cut dicks
>>27974555
What a solid counter argument
>>27975636
>my entire identity in life revolves around one (1) specific physical pleasure
sad picture you're painting there man
>>27976209
times and mentalities have changed, circumcision isn't as popular nowadays
>>27977088
>being so much of a beta that you mutilate your genitals for your estrogenic overlords
The majority of the world has no issue, and from my experience a lot of American women have no issue.
The issue stems from lack of education about the matter, in sex ED when a side by side comparison of a cut and uncut penis is shown, it is in it's flaccid state. A lot of Americans I have come across do not even understand that when an uncut penis is aroused, the glans is exposed.
>>27976704
This guy, this fucking guy. Thanks man I had a good laugh at you.
>>27977088
For adults getting themselves cut maybe.
Which begs the question: Are you such a beta that you mutilate your body to suit the preferences of women?
>>27977122
>I don't need sexual pleasure to feel good about myself
>So I will cut piece of my dick off!
Does getting cut damage your brain as well?
>>27977088
>>cutting off parts of your kids sexual organs for aesthetic reasons
Barbaric
>>27976209
My kids will be circumcised too, and it won't be a choice. We need to end this meme of "let kids decide" because kids aren't capable of making decisions that are in their best interest. Do you let your kids decide whether they want vaccinations? Nope, so shut up.
>>27977229
http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/immerman2/
It actually does
>>27977251
>using a false equivalence to drive your shitty argument
wew lad
>>27977251
>>letting kids decide whether or not they want to have a complete penis or not is a meme
>>Do you let your kids decide whether they want vaccinations?
Nice false equivilence mate. Because potenitally dying of TB=/=having a smelly dick if you don't shower regularly or don't have a bidet.
>>27977251
The whole point is to allow that child to decide as an adult, how has this point gone completely over your head?
You're disgusting if you would inflict that much pain and suffering on your baby because you're so fucking stubborn and set in your ways at your own foreskinless butthurt.
>>27977435
>much pain and suffering
Like Phimosis?
Also I'm circumcised and it never fucking hurt or changed anything growing up. You stupid fucks with dick cheese just want to feel a sense of superiority over cut-fags
>>27977088
>Almost every girl I know prefers cut dicks
In a country of cuckolds maybe. Keep mutilating yourselves for the glory of Judaism.
>>27977573
Babies have an attached foreskin at birth, so circumcision for phimosis is not likely to occur at that stage...
>>27977573
>Like Phimosis?
Except that cutfags are guaranteed pain. You sound like a balding cuck trying to convince his friends that lice will get them unless they shave.
>huffingtonpost
Yes, totally a coincidence
>>27977229
>im an infantilized hedonist
>>27977787
You're grasping that single straw pretty hard m8
>>27977841
i know its par for the course to be a virgin here, but if you can honestly say that an orgasm is a better sensation than the sharing of an intimate and vulnerable moment with another human being i dont know what to tell you.
>>27974547
>Removing thousands of nerves has no effect
>>27977573
>implying phimosis requires surgery to 'cure'
You can stretch your foreskin out naturally on your own.
>>27977939
WTF!? How does being uncut preclude that?
>>27977102
Good one reddit please stay on your home board
>>27977968
i can tell youre a very smart individual
>>27977088
>i don't talk to girls
your sister is a virgin who pretends to be a slut. preferring cut dicks is like preferring that your car has a few scratches on the hood of the car to give it character. it doesn't change anything about how big or functional the car is.
>>27978023
Well then explain it to me in terms I can understand...
How does being uncut preclude the "sharing of an intimate and vulnerable moment with another human being"?
>>27974547
>Consequences are the only thing that matters, not the actions themselves
Daily reminder that consequentialists are moral monsters, and would literally circumcise the entire skin off a human body if there was evidence that it had health benefits.
>>27975394
>Sample size of 62 men
Wow, truly a found scientific study.
>>27974547
>author who only writes clickbait
>misquotes "information on sexual outcomes" as "sexual benefits" regarding getting circumscribed
>one study that says there's no significant difference is presented as "evidence" to circumcise your child
>huffingtonpost
>study itself agrees that tactile sensitivity is greater in the foreskin than different parts of the penis, it's only those different parts that are comparable between cut and uncut cocks
>mfw this is all completely blatant misinformation and you only need to click on the links to figure it out
>mfw im sure most people will take it at face value
>>27974634
>Uncut faggot thinks cuts actually need lube to masturbate.
Kek mate. Dry since 13 and never planning to use lube. Oh, and my dick looks nicer.
>>27978200
sounds like torture. foreskin is already lubed up but i can't imagine pulling it back, drying it and trying to jack off. did you also pierce your nipples?
>>27977573
>Sir, your child might get phimosis, which might mean he will have to circumcise later in life
>Hurr lets cut it off right now then durr
>HUrr durr the article was posted in huff post it must be bad
>Omg donald trump told me to read the bible, it must be racist and evil and full of pro-toupee rhetoric!
You people are fucking retarded.
Next study: If circumcision is related to I.Q
>>27974575
>girlfriend protects fragile male ego
news at 10
>>27974687
Please tell us you didn't try to do the passive aggressive question thing after showcasing your embarrassing ignorance on media, namely that all outlets are controlled by 6 conglomerates all of which are Jewish at the top.
>>27978997
> Rupert Murdoch, so Jewish
Oy vey.
Any chance you can post the study its self and not huff and puff post.
>>27979164
It's been posted twice so far you lazy sack of shit.
Strange study... I mean I'm uncut so I actually know how sensitive my own foreskin is and for people to say it isn't is kind of absurd.
>>27974547
Complete nonsense, it sure sounds comforting to think your mutilated dick that got damaged by your parents functions the same as a undamaged dick. Nerves and skin got cut away so it's like expecting someone with amputated legs to walk.
>>27978173
You don't need many more than that to make a legitimate and accurate study. People aren't that different from each other.
