Probably not.

Original comment hereblox

>>27961917
No. In the words of Chris Rock (i know, i know)
"Stop looking for a soulmate, best you're gonna find is a mate". Nobody's perfect

>>27961917
Probably, but the odds are stacked against us - even for normies.

I'd treat it like the lottery. It's not impossible to win, but I wouldn't base my life around winning it.

>>27961917
Most likely but good luck finding that one person across the globe with 7 billions people on it.

>>27963459
There needs to be something more than a dating site. Something that takes every piece of information about you, with more psychological depth than a simple dating sites "I want someone who is funny and likes table tennis". I am talking a TRUE matching system.

>>27963519
It would propably greatly improve everyone's lives since having someone who truly loves you would make you much happier, shame it's almost impossible but perhaps in the future it will be available tech but even then there still would often be an location and language barrier between matched people.

>>27963664
I think it can be done with today's technology. The system would also take into account language barriers, everything.

You complete a VERY thorough quiz, I'm talking 1000+ questions to get an exact bearing on who you are, try to quantify you as a person as much as possible. This will get stored as values and then matched with others who suit your profile, but only if they suit yours back, kind of like an automatic tinder with machine-ran swiping. I think you would need a lot of psychological experts and other professionals on board to make it happen, but I think it's very possible. It might not be the perfect idea, but it's better than what we have now.

>>27963760
This is autism, pair-bonding is not rational

>>27963786
You don't think a person can be quantified based on their traits?