Male Red Flags
- Home
- Board: /r9k/ - ROBOT9001
- Reading: Male Red Flags
>he listens to death grips
>>27928903
How is that bad? DG is based
>hes a trip on an anonymous image board
>he only uploads "high quality rips"
>he has his nose pierced
>>27928903
>she thinks she has taste
>he isnt a neet
i dont want to date a slave
>he makes b8 threads on a Syrian parkour forum posing as a girl
Red flags for girls?
Red flags for girls.
She
>has tattoos
>piercings other than ears
>hair is colored a bright color not naturally found on people
>is fat
>doesn't work out
>is a single mother
>doesn't know how to cook
>doesn't know how to properly clean
>has had more than 3 sexual partners
>>27929043
>he immediately lists all his red flags for girls in a red flags for males thread
>he's not a virgin
>he's ever bought a sex toy
>he's ever masturbated to 3D porn
>he's insecure about his height or penis size or his hair line
>he has online "female friends"
>he won't answer my texts
>he doesn't like physical contact
>he thinks pegging is gay and won't even try it
>>27929043
>she doesn't ride
Instant red flag.
>>27929067
>she talks out of turn
>>27929162
are you saying you're going to lock me in the house all day and fuck my butt all night?
>>27929198
>he assumes people who talk back to him are girls
RED FLAG, RED FLAG
WEE WOO WEE WOO
>he listens to swans
>he picks his nose and eats his boogers
>he drinks soda pop
>he doesn't Floss
>he doesn't consume a minimum of 25g of fiber daily
>he likes enders game
>he chews gum too often
>he thinks he's special for drinking black coffee
>he's promiscuous
>he owns a fedora
>he made poor grades in high school
>he can't change a tire
>he doesn't like greek food
>he is friends with indians
>>27929043
Picture related, being a single mom should be added to that list.
>>27929272
>she acts like a retard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTEscgVDnAU
Red Flag all the way
>>27929298
>he chews gum too often
What's your problem cunt, it keeps my teeth clean
>he pretends to be a girl on anime boards
>>27929298
Whats wrong with Swans?
>>27929298
>>he made poor grades in high school
i have changed, please don't judge me for my past
>>27929272
>she phonetically spells her guttural tard noises on the internet
>he doesn't listen to death grips
>>27929334
It's the sign of a jawlet
>>27929360
Everything
>>27929372
No, you did not try in school so you will not try in life.
>he's not AT LEAST 6 foot tall
>he lifts
>he has ginger hair
>>27929298
Chewing gum helps relieve my anxiety I'm sorry
>he hates clowns
The only red flag anyone needs, the ultimate sign of a normalfag
>>27929464
>>he lifts
i'll fucking strangle you bitch.
>she has multiple cats
>she is fat
>she plays dumbshit girl-tier vidya (LoL for instance)
>she spends more than 5 minutes per day on facebook
>she has facebook
>she eats more than a male
>she studies something arts related
>SJW, but expects you to pay for everything
>she has daddy issue's
>she smokes
>she has no real hobby or interest
>she has friends that are better looking than her
>her mom is fat
>she whines
>>27929004
The double edge irony
>>27929434
How is it in any way related to my jaw?
>>27929483
Yeah, most females are able to detect the underlying issue's of "lifting'. Its like having a fucking T-shirt that says "I'M INSECURE".
Most women don't even like it anyway.
t. fembot
>these threads unironically depress the fuck out of me.
>>27929515
It's common knowledge that weak jaws chew gum to try and build their jaw muscles
>>27929528
I'll stop lifting
please be my girlfriend, i wont lift again. I'll let gains goblins take my gains away for you.
>>27929528
>Most women don't even like it anyway.
Incredible, they really do believe there's nothing in the world but them
>>27929483
>Letting a woman hold you back on doing your manly task.
Just lift, fuck what they think of it. There is no reason to hate it unless it's counter productive.
>>27929529good, you originally deserve it
>he posts "red flags" while pretending to be a female online
>>27929543
No, keep lifting anon.
Strangle me to death between your muscular thighs bb
>>27929550
>this guy again
Fucking kill yourself then. You literally talk shit about women yet you respond to every thread based on females..
>>27929528
Have you considered that people can do things for themselves and not just to impress the opposite sex?
>>27929580
>No
but i started lifting just to impress you
>>27929550
Implying you are not just lifting because you think girls will be more attracted to you
>inbefore:
>its healthy for you
>I'm actually into powerlifting
>I do it work out and stay /fit/ for myself
>I think its fun
Any girl can sniff this bullshit out in a matter of seconds.
Sure there are some bimbo's that will be attracted to the /fit/-body type, but the /fit/-meme is a giant red flag.
>>27929583
This is the first red flag thread I have ever opened
>>27929528
weird thing is, i used to lift and exercise frequently, tried to dress well and tried to impress girls
then i suffered a bereavement, became very depressed, stopped giving a fuck about anything and automatically became better with girls
when normies tell you to "be yourself", what they're really saying is "stop giving so much of a massive fuck"
>>27929598
>doing it for themselves
>heart attack
>>27929607
What if i'm aiming for ottermode.
>>27928903
IT GOES IT GOES IT GOES IT GOES IT GOES
BAIT THREAD
YAH
>>27929607
>its healthy for you
>I'm actually into powerlifting
But I am, I'm not even ripped or good-looking, I just want to build strength
>>27929598
see:>>27929607
You beat me to it. Like anyone in their rightful mind would spend free time in a sweaty greasy disgusting hall full of gym equipment between literally the worst that humanity has to offer. For hours on end pushing metal bars into the air, between complete uttermost meatheads /bro/'s.
Who are you even trying to convince. When a girl even brings up the "they fell for the /fit/ meme"-meme, you all swarm to it like crazy.
Geez, prolly has nothing to do with the underlying insecurity, right? :^)
We sniff this shit out.
>>27929607
>>27929528
i dont think anyone cares what a bunch of fat hairy blobs who post on r9k think, you are just upset you cant get someone that's /fit/.
>he works out in general
>he thinks women should work
trashed
>>27929528
Lol kill yourself dumbass. Women only think they know what they want and its always something that is modern and will help them increase their social status. In reality, they wet their panties atthe sight of muscles
>>27929677
You aren't even a girl, senpai
>>27929677
>Geez, prolly has nothing to do with the underlying insecurity, right? :^)
Woman are the more insecure sex, actually. They worry about litrelly everything.
>>27929714
He's probably a noodle-armed manlet who got laughed out of the gym
>>27929528
>fembot
Nice meme
>not lifting to be able to dunk on niggas
Fucking laffing at ur lyfe rite now
>he considers himself a hooligan or takes part in any other club created by subhumans
>>27929685
Bitch please.
I'm a girl. All I need is a bar, a push-up bra, tank-top and a pack full of condoms. Its THAT easy for me.
The /fit/-guys are easiest, because they are so fucking insecure and desperate. But its just to pityfull for me. I'm just not attracted to a guy without any confidence hoping that his body will just get him girls. Its fucking pathetic beyond words. All I can think of when I see them /fit/ people is: "dawwwwwwwwwww" "He must be really close with his mommy".
I tend to go for the artsy, dark strong silent types. The whole /fit/ thing just ruins that for me. All I can see is screaming red flags of "IM SO FUCKING INSECURE".
I've tried the /fit/ type. I convinced myself that body type just doesnt matter. But, they are always fucking damaged, insecure and incapable of being in an adult relationship. I can do better.
>>27928931
you would say that, "hack blastard"
Death Grips is the band of reddit crossposters and memespouters
>>27929712
Yeah, but they'll pass up on /fit/ males because they can make em feel insecure for looking like trash
see
>>27929701
>>27929193
ive been seeing you everywhere bikebro
>>27929773
All i see from your post is /I'm a fat fuck/, to be honest. Have you thought about working out yourself?
>>27929712
Ah, and how many GF's have you gotten since you started lifting?
How many times have you gotten laid?
>yfw
>>27929787
I'm still searching for my future qt bike liking / rider. It's a tough world.
>>27929795
I dont work out. I play in a girls soccer team. Its an actual sport. That you actually play for fun and competitiveness. Instead of desperately trying to get a bf/gf.
I'm so goddamn sick of the "I LIFT FOR FUN GUISE :D DD"-maymay. Just fucking admit it. You lift because you think it will get you laid.
And if it would work, you wouldve already gotten laid by now. You havn't.
>>27929773
>she's so insecure about her body she has to ridicule people who put effort into bettering themselves
biggest red flag. Its sad you cant even srr you're the only one oozing insecurity here
>>27929800
Why are you so happy for the fact that you are nothing more but a wet hole?
>>27929304
>not wanting a qt christian girl
>>27929162
Will you be my originiginial gf?
originaloriginialojijoir
>>27929834
>I play in a girls soccer team
So you don't do anything
Lmao
>>27928903
>>27928931
Every Death Grips fan I've seen has been some faggot looking skinny white kid
>>27929848
How many times have you gotten laid because of the /fit/ lift meme?
Please, If girls are so widely attracted to you. Post the Numbers. Show me the results.
>attempts ad hominem because he lost the argument
>>27929800
Gfs? Not one. Hookups? About 5 or 6. Women holding my arms and burying their face in my chest. Stay insecure about your shitty body lol
>>27929834
I played soccer nearly my whole life, actually did running in general my whole life ranging from things like cricket, softball, and cross-country.
Picked up lifting a good few months ago and loving it, that awesome feel when you bench more than you weigh, squat more than you weigh, and OHP nearly your body weight.
>tfw you get passed that plateau
>>27929847
>bettering themselves
>lifting
KA
RINGE
>>27929913
Don't forget the sick biceps pump you get
>>27929603
Muscles are very impressive.
Strangle me anon. Do it.
>>27929955
>tfw still small biceps due to me still doing SS
Still doing chin-ups to hit them directly with a 20kg vest 5x5, for me forearm pumps are one hell of a thing and i fucking love them.
Feels good.
>>27929885
that reply wasn't me. that's me:
>>27929903
>>27929528
Those that are insecure are those fags on /fit/. A real man should lift for himself, he shouldn't allow himself to be weak. This has nothing to do with insecurity but just being reliable as manly man.
>>27930001
>no hair on chest
>some dirty patchy beard
>brownish nipples
Gross, you are prolly British or something.
>>27929853
>Wanting someone who is bound by religious superstition.
I rather have someone who prefers logical thinking over the conformity of religion.
>>27929528
My /pol/ sense is tingling
This has to be Australian
>>27930001
Haha, your nipples are so weird m8.
They're large and brown, like an azn girl's.
>>27930032
Close but strayan.
>tfw gym tomorrow
>>27930001
Lel
Manlet
>>27930047
Close, Dutch.
Can't reach that Aussie-tier posting, but a strong second.
>check back on this thread
>find out I caused a whole argument because I said I don't like it when guys lift
Holy shit, just face it. Lifting is ugly. Stop lifting and you'll get a gf.
>>27929773
its cool to have a preference but its not cool to shit all over everyone who doesn't fit into what you find physically attractive. you seem like a real catch, generalizing everyone you see. i like chubby dudes myself but its dumb to assume that everyone at the gym is working out because they're insecure.
exercise is a stress reliever, i work out to release endorphins not bc i give a fuck about muscle definition or appearance, i wanna be able to beat ass if the situation arises.
>>27930089
They are all insecure.
You are not a fembot, because a fembot would agree with me.
>>27930120
>I'll shun and entire group of people who has a better body than I
>they are the ones who are insecure
>>27929773
If all this is true why are you on this website?
>>27930151
It basically stems from her not being able to get an attractive boyfriend and one that isn't fat or skinny fat
>>27930169
I can't begin to imagine what it stems from but it's ridiculous that she's missing the irony in what she stands for
>>27929043
>>27929304
What if she's a widow? Is that an exception or would you still not go there?
>>27929298
>he picks his nose and eats his boogers
>he likes enders game
>he thinks he's special for drinking black coffee
>he's promiscuous
>he is friends with indians
that's where you fucked up.
>>27930169
>>27930152
>>27930151
Nice attempt at deflection. (Demonstrates insecurity)
Now please stop. You are becoming boring.
I'm sure some girl will find the lifting thing attractive one day and you will get a nice girlfriend : ).
>>27930081
>stop doing your hobby because it doesn't appeal to me
kill yourself you stretch mark ridden cunt
>>27930151
Things like that never really bothered me in the slightest, though if anything lifting weights and wearing things like tank tops now you do get more looks from the opposite sex. Which does feel pretty nice.
>tfw at the gym tomorrow I'll do an extra rep on every set
Whatever it takes, RIGHT BABE?
>>27930217
Widow is a different story, but if she has kids it's still a red flag.
>he doesn't eat pork
Very dangerous, could either be a vegan, a mudslime, or a jew.
>he's biracial
>he prefers cats to dogs
>he's scared of bees
>he's a stoner
>he likes Seth mcfarlen
>he has younger siblings
>>27930228
It's not your hobby though.
You literally only started it because you think it will make up for your autism.
Let's face it, if you knew that girls wouldn't like it you wouldn't have started it, but now you're just going through denial now that you fell for the lifting meme.
>>27929877
In all honesty, you got me there
Feels weird to finally belong to a meme stereotype
>>27930225
Kek you got BTFO you just need to throw in buzzwords like "deflection" to ease the blow. Whatever floats your boat.
Next time you're gonna b8, try to formulate a point that makes sense and doesn't contradict itself. This is a rookie mistake an Aussie will never make
>>27930224
Why would someone want to date a booger eating snowflake that hangs around with pajeets?
If he hangs around pajeets, he is probably a shady fuck.
>>27930225
Wasn't deflecting, it was a genuine question.
>>27929773
>I tend to go for the artsy, dark strong silent types.
Then why don't you ever fuck me, whore
-/ic/
>>27929298
Fuck you, Indians can be great friends no matter how funny it is to meme about their abhorrent home country.
>>27930345
T. Pajeet
originality
>>27930228
>lifting
>hobby
There actually is this pathetic guy in university class that lifts. He literally thinks he's the shit and acts like an alfa-chad. Adds all girls on facebook, sends them pictures of his body on whatsapp. When we need to work on a group assignment he tries to hit on you. Constantly attempting to flex or to show his muscle, expecting everyone to be impressed
Meanwhile all the girls (and guys) fucking laugh behind his back at how insecure and pathetic he is.
I'm just trying to fucking save you from yourselves by telling you what a female actually finds attractive in a guy.
>>27930305
>them lifts
Mirin brah
Currently
>110 kg squat (back)
>150kg DL
>90kg bench
>65kg OHP
Don't know my ORM
>>27930345
Indians are charlatans, the dirtiest people on earth. They are just waiting for their chance to deceive you
>>27930338
Because you don;t ever talk to me or take initiative and expect me to fucking offer myself on a plate wearing bra and panties.
And because "Chad", does fucking ask me out?
If you would just fucking have to confident to talk like girls like me you would actually swim in pussy.
>>27929511
Women have shit tastes though.
>>27930364
That's cool, but as I've said before I'm not into bodybuilding, I'm an actual lifter.
>>27930407
So you don't go for the silent types, then
>>27930455
shes a women they dont know what thy want
>>27930407
>artsy dark strong silent types
>silent
>talk to me first
top kek
>>27930367
Why does Mr.Piano always look so fucking scary
>>27930455
Welcome to die, my friend.
>>27930476
Because he is constantly leaving HUMANITY behind.
>>27929745
>litrelly
you can't be serious
>>27930364
>one guy is the example of millions
Are you this dense? This guy would have been a douche even if he had never lifted in his life.
Putting his personality aside, he chose to pick up a hobby in order to better himself. This is what people do you fucking retard.
People do extracurricular activities in order to better their own self and their own image. Some pick musical instrument, some pick drawing, some pick lifting. The insecurity excuse is most likely the shittiest I've ever encountered as to why lifting is bad since 99% of humanity is insecure.
However, trying to justify your laziness and inability to better yourself in anyway with the excuse of "everyone who does it is insecure" is truly the essence of insecurity and basically being a very shitty person.
>>27930455
>>27930469
I like the silent types, but I'm not fucking gonna be the one to approach you. That's just not how it works.
Some of them actually fall trough after I hint them. Its not impossible.
>>27930407
No, you're just a lazy coward who won't talk to guys. That's why the term "pussy" denotes timid, cowardly and non-initiative. i.e. females
>>27930537
And they wont approach you because you're a fat bag of shit with no self worth.. it's why you failed at god mode and posting on r9k.
This thread is a fucking trainwreck.
>>27930488
>girls think this is attractive
>wants to look like this
>is not insecure
>>27930537
>That's just not how it works.
Says who, you spineless shitlord
>>27930557
>implying he cares what anyone else thinks
Leaving humanity behind one step at a time, hun.
>>27930069
Ik krijg kanker van vrouwen
>>27930554
I know. I'm grinding (you)'s like crazy.
>>27930537
Hint how?
>>27930488
>>27930570
I refuse to believe a woman can ever love a man like that except for the gimmicks. He literally looks like a heart attack, and so do most lifters.
>>27930557
You don't talk about the man that way you vapid cunt
He could lift you up and squash your head like a tomato
>>27929677
You push too many of the right buttons to be a girl, if you are though then why are you so malicious. What more could you possibly take from these men?
>>27930621
i think just looking into her fat direction would send her tampon right up and flying out of her mouth.
>>27930367
how long have you been lifting? those are nice numbers. post body no homo
>some landwhale triggers the shit out of /fit/
Priceless.
>>27930614
>tfw no qt Icelandic wife
>>27930685
I already posted a picture of myself, i was a incredibly skinny guy before hand.
I say lifting maybe 7.5 months now.
>>27930633
Of course I'm not really a girl. This is 4chan.
I just like messing with the /fit/ memers. I mean they are "not insecure", but I scored 40 (you)'s and counting by just telling them they are insecure.
>>27929162
>>he thinks pegging is gay and won't even try it
But it is. I swear "straight" men who into getting fucked in the ass are in denial of their sexuality.
>>27930704
nice. I recently finished my cut for the summer
>watches anime regularly
>owns any weeb or capeshit toys
>plays vidya for more than 10% of his total time
>masturbates several times a day
>STEMlord; as in smug STEM major
>computer desktop and documents are neatly arranged, but car and room are a mess
>doesn't eat properly
>wears tennis shoes (ex: autism shoes) with jeans
>wears cargo shorts (10x if camo cargo shorts)
>wears graphic tees (200x if metal tees)
>muh depreshun
>muh soshul anxiatee
>muh 80HD
>unironically uses the term e-sports
>Readily dehumanizes entire groups of people for trivial shit, or things outside of their control
>thinks this list is dehumanizing them
>is MRA/MGTOW/TRP/etc manosphere member
>doesn't exercise regularly
>takes pride in inborn traits (i.e: race, gender, height, etc.) rather than actual accomplishments.
>primarily defines himself by his media based hobbies
>repeatedly blames his parents for major life failures
>has /pol/ mentality
>has sjw mentality
>believes that people only exist in either of the above two mentalities; false binary thinking
>wears white socks outside of exercise
>starts autistic rant on above point
>wears wristbands outside of exercise
>fedora
>can't prepare a basic array of meals
>falls in love with every girl who gives the slightest amount of attention to him
>unironically uses the terms friendzone, beta, white genocide
>can't hold a proper conversation with the opposite sex
>shy and soft-spoken irl, becomes a flaming argumentative asshole online
>>27930791
Looking good brah, no homo. Cant wait to get off SS and hit up a fucking bro split. One of the things I'm really looking forward to is finally filling up my arms as well as working on those lats.
I want the bat wings.
>>27930846
>wears white socks outside of exercise
What?
WHY A BITCH GOTTA LIE
WHY A BITCH GOTTA LIE
WHY A BITCH GOTTA LIE
WHY A BITCH GOTTA LIE
WHY A BITCH GOTTA LIE
WHY A BITCH GOTTA LIE
>>27930554
>This thread is a fucking masterpiece.
Fixed that for Ya'
>>27930907
Pretty commonly known clothing faux-pas, and a good litmus test for belligerent autism.
>>27928903
IT GOES IT GOES IT GOES IT GOES
GUILLOTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINE
YUH
>>27930933
But black socks make more lint than white socks and are expensive.
>>27930933
Wouldn't paying attention to colour of socks be more autistic than wearing a certain colour of socks?
>>27930915
try and tame i'll ruin you fucker try your luck
lucks on your side you're feeling yourself huh fucker that bout enough
well guess what fucker
fucker try and game me then
i'm end of your line i need an offering you'll do just fine
i'm type a hell
why a bitch gotta lie
try and tame it's not about you fucker
don't make me make this about you fucker
try and tame me i dare you
try and tame me how you dare you
i stand through you
obviously
i laugh when you ask if you're under my spell
obviously
i guide your demise like funeral sails
obviously
my touch tied to strings that steer my figures inside out their wax
you pour i swill you're false like tears priceless to feel my subjects crack
why a bitch gotta lie
try and tame me i'll redirect
ain't fucker tame me yet
fit ta try and tame me be my guest
just try and game me bitch
try and tame me i'm like so anyway
try and game me i'm like no not today
this bitch
try and tame me i'll make you mine
why a bitch gotta lie
try and tame if you're so sure
ain't dead or alive ain't wore this floor
my floor tremble your voice
silencer
i make your choice
i make no excuses just fucking noise
try and tame me maybe not up to you cuz
can't tame me i'm proof of
fuck you gonna do scream
What could this song be about? Death Grips hates roasties just like us.
Is hating fit men a meme or something now?
>he's the kind of guy that hates chads/staceys even when they're nice to quiet people
>he isn't a virgin
>he believes in original virtue
>>27931038
>tfw meet 3 out of 3 redflags
guess we'll never work out eh
>>27929773
>I'm a girl. All I need is a bar, a push-up bra, tank-top and a pack full of condoms. Its THAT easy for me
yet you post on r9k...
>>27931017
This is a board populated by autists and people on the fringes of society, of course they are going to hate fit men
>>27930972
>but isn't paying attention to fashion trends the REAL autism?
No; people pay attention to what you wear and make judgments of you based on it. Fashion and stylistic trends are determined via unspoken contexts and nonverbal social cues. People who are incompetent at figuring out said cues are behaving in a manner similar to a people afflicted with a social processing disorder; one that we call Autism. When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule, and being belligerent and defensive about it, you're being militantly autistic, and that label doesn't go both ways.
Just because you don't like something doesn't make it autism, that's just a dilution of the term to fit your rhetoric.
>>27931074
I guess, all my time in the real world showed me one thing girls love muscles..
>>27931095
>belligerent and defensive about it, you're being militantly autistic
That's exactly what you're doing right now kek. I was simply asking a genuine question about your point and you went on an autistic rant about it.
Just because you don't like something doesn't make it autism
>he posts "Male Red Flags" threads whilst pretending to be a girl on an anonymous image board
>>27930032
>>some dirty patchy beard
I thought girls loved patchy beards or only on chad?
>>27931219
>That's exactly what you're doing right now kek
Not really; there's always half a dozen of you anons starting a ruckus with that point, every time. Just trying to be proactive this time around.
>Just because you don't like something doesn't make it autism
Yes, which is why your accusation of autism falls flat. Already explained the basis of why that trait is considered autistic (e.g: failing the social fitness test), you can continue to label any disagreement with you as autism, but you'd be wrong.
>>27930345
Feeling a little triggered, huh Raj?
>she doesn't swallow
>she can't deepthroat
>she doesn't do anal
>she won't do a threesome
>she doesn't let him fuck around with side pussy
HAHAHAHA ITS 2016
Guys don't have to put up with your prude bullshit
>>27931324
>>27929488
>posting female red flags in a male red flag thread
Calling card of the affected and insecure. Reminds me of how /pol/ gets triggered by the BLACKED /gif/ threads everytime.
>>27931311
>Just because you don't like something doesn't make it autism
Exactly. This is why you accusation of autism falls flat. Yet the need you have to go on a rant and explain it just corroborates your autism.
Using the "I thought you were maybe gonna be retarded so I pretended to be retarded as well" excuse won't save you
>>27931394
>tfw you realize women are bigger cunts then men
>>27931394
>Exactly. This is why you accusation of autism falls flat. Yet the need you have to go on a rant and explain it just corroborates your autism.
Wrong again, as usual. I've already laid out the basis for why that characteristic qualifies as autistic: due to it being a clear marker of social cluelessness. All you're doing now is weakly attempting to redirect the label in an attempt to backpedal. Your label of autism doesn't fulfill the criteria, whereas mine does. That's why this "no u" comeback of yours is hilariously ineffectual.
>Using the "I thought you were maybe gonna be retarded so I pretended to be retarded as well" excuse won't save you
Don't worry; you proved me right.
>>27930846
Either this isn't legit, or you're the most autistic person on this earth.
>>27929877
Most fans of actual good music are skinny whites social rejects.
>he upboats
>>27931492
that also describes the people who listen exclusively to basic bitch /mu/core though
>>27930846
Stick to fly fishing baitlord
> he doesn't know how to cook
>>27929043
This is more like rwd flags for humans.
I don't get autists, they want pure gf but don't want to be or are not pure themselves.
>>27931487
>n-no you're autistic, not me!
Someone already beat you to that projection, buddy.
>>27931462
>clear marker of social cluelessness
Lel first indicator of autism.
How are you failing to see how you're the only one here throwing an autismfit over an innocent observation about your foul view?
>using buzzwords like "backpedal" to deflect the fact you've been called out
mmmm
>Don't worry; you proved me right.
You can only pretend to be intelligent if you had an actual proven point.
When you try doing it after being the one who flung the most insults and avoiding the point it just makes you seem unaware of reality
>>27929773
>I've tried the /fit/ type. I convinced myself that body type just doesnt matter.
But you literally just said it does lmao.
>>27929625
>heavy dosage of roids
>working out
>the same thing
>>27931668
>using buzzwords like "backpedal" to deflect the fact you've been called out
It's less a buzzword and more an apt term to describe what you're doing. You got your passive attempt at trying to disprove that point knocked down immediately, and all you can do now is accuse me of autism without being able to clearly define what that means, besides "I don't like you or agree with you".
The only real buzzword being used is here is 'autism', by you. You've divorced it from the technical meaning and are trying (and failing) to use it as a rhetorical bludgeon.
>How are you failing to see how you're the only one here throwing an autismfit over an innocent observation about your foul view?
2/10, you're awful at framing that as 'innocent' questioning. Might want to do a few leading questions before trying that, if you want that plausible deniability.
>You can only pretend to be intelligent if you had an actual proven point.
Exactly, which is why you're here failing to do even that. I've already laid out my criteria, which you've decided to avoid addressing in the original context for the most part. I'm insulting you *in addition* to the original argument i've laid out. You have no argument except "nah bro ur autistic" without any real backing for that besides me disagreeing with you.
I addressed the point at the first post, you've yet to do it once. Keep dancing around the issue by calling me autistic; it won't help you.
>>27931517
/mu/ still has superior taste to most normies
As ridiculous as it sounds, the more exclusively white, male and socially inept the fanbase is the better the music tends to be.
>>27929434
>No, you did not try in school so you will not try in life.
Not true, my brother dropped out of high school, got his GED, then had a cumulative GPA of 4.0 in University.
>>27931917
>all post about a "no u"
Kek. It only slightly perturbs me that you're claiming to take the high ground despite being unable to validate it.
You were the first one to use the word "autism" and you base your entire "argument" on it because of your personal preference.
>to clearly define what that means, besides "I don't like you or agree with you".
Once again, you fail to see this is what you've been doing since the beginning.
>I addressed the point at the first post, you've yet to do it once.
Claiming something is a code "because I like it" isn't an actual point. I know this is a cheap bait but I'm enjoying seeing how stupid people here can get in order to save some face
>>27931917
not him, but kys faggot
pseudo intellectual scum like you should be hanged
>>27929348
kek
that was a good one
REALLY good one
like a really REALLY good one
>>27931917
>pretending to be intelligent with high language to hide the fact you have nothing to say
Women, everybody
>>27932010
t. skinny white boy
>>27928903
>no muscle
>skinny
>obese
>>27929464
Does ginger beard count (when I let it grow, it's shaved now)?
Could you be my gf?
>>27931917
You're right that white socks are fucking stupid outside of working out most of the time. I think that there are certain exceptions to the rule, but for someone to wear white socks with everything is kind of sad.
>>27932129
Yep.
I'm not a fan of Death Grips though.
>>27932046
>Kek. It only slightly perturbs me that you're claiming to take the high ground despite being unable to validate it.
>You were the first one to use the word "autism" and you base your entire "argument" on it because of your personal preference.
>Once again, you fail to see this is what you've been doing since the beginning.
See this is where you're completely, objectively wrong; and no amount of faux-smugness will save you. I have validated it. I already laid forth the definition of autism in my context, and I'll remind you of it again:
>inability to grok social cues and nonverbally communicated behaviors, similar to the sufferers of the social disorder known as autism
Thus, people who can't pick up basic clothing trends and become belligerently ignorant about them demonstrate 'autism'.
On the other hand our entire exchange hasn't demonstrated any autism, from either side. Idiocy from your end and hostility from my end, definitely, but not autism.
Now here's the things, you on the other hand, haven't established your criteria for why my responses qualify as autism. You just say they are autistic because that's the only real comeback you have at that point, even if you can't really establish what autism 'is'. It's the same way other unintelligent robots use buzzwords like 'cuck' and 'SJW' without much thought behind them; it's a catchall for someone who' can't really think, but still thinks they can argue with the adults.
This is why you can keep trying this "I'm rubber, you're glue" tactic on me all you want, but you're only making yourself look mildly stupid
>>27932108
>>27932068
>thinking is hard!
>REEEEEEeeEEEEE
Cry some moar, your tears sustain me.
>>27932200
I agree that there are some exceptions, it's just not worth mentioning in the list just because robots are so clueless to the rule to know well enough when it doesn't apply.
It's usually this or the cargo pants that triggers them.
>>27931375
>h-haha... Guys don't actually expect all that gross sex stuff from me... Right? Chad stayed with me for almost a year, and I even did doggy style for him! Until he left me and started dating that SLUT Kourtney...
Life is hilarious. Women start to express their sexuality saying they're "liberated", then when it becomes a competition, they whine when they just can't keep up. So used to guys competing so hard, they don't connect the dots when she can only land some beta nu-male liberal male-feminist type, while the girl with the toned ass, Dick sucking lips, and anal-only fetish has her pick of wealthy fit dominant alphas.
This is your grave, roasties. You're going to have to suck and fuck your way out of it now. Or stay in it with your little BlackLivesMatter supporting cuck-boy barista BF :^)
>>27931618
>they want pure gf but don't want to be or are not pure themselves.
that seems more like a chad/wannabe-chad/manosphere trait
>>27932314
You are trying to pretend to be intellectual and defining your personal preference as an objective truth which is fucking retarded.
Autism is a word on 4chan that's thrown to demonstrate stupidity, idiocy and actual autism.
Putting an emphasis about minor things like colour of socks is an indicator of all 3 on you.
You were the only one throughout this entire conversation who acted belligerent and vain.
You are the same as those "unintelligent robots" who have nothing of value to say but pretend to be intelligent with long textwalls and fancy words. All your argument was "I like that" and the thing is that that you seem to be genuinely full of yourself and missing those cues.
Nothing about my posts was stupid. Unlike you, I didn't have to use pseudo fancy language to conceal my inability to deal with people who call me out. I've only wanted to make you realise how retarded you are being and with every post you've helped that purpose.
>>27932342
>being this assblasted
go get some cream, bitch nigga
>>27932342
you seem like an angry teenager who got btfo by logic and simplicity so you try hard to compensate for it by using high language
>he doesn't let me cook for him
>he doesn't let me fix his clothes (straighten his collar, brush off things, etc)
>he doesn't let me cuddle him
>he isn't patient with how shy I am
>he berates me for trying to be polite
>he doesn't like it when i play him songs
>he doesn't like big dogs
>>27932598
omg silly biys im a pixie dream girl love me
don't forget your hair dye at sallys senpai
>>27932598
original bait niggertits
>>27932643
t-teehee >w< gomenesai senpai hehe ...
>>27929193
>his name is moto
>he rides bikes
Big red flags. Yuge.
On a more serious note:
>he isnt voting for Trump
>>27932453
>Autism is a word on 4chan that's thrown to demonstrate stupidity, idiocy and actual autism.
Like I said, vague nebulous buzzword to ridicule something you don't like. Thanks for admitting it for me; it only took several paragraphs of you posturing.
And here it is, you're refusing to give a concrete definition, instead choosing 3 vague criteria. Also, defining a word with itself is pretty idiotic, might want to try again.
And nice attempt at calling judging people on their clothes as a form of autism; still wrong though.
>You were the only one throughout this entire conversation who acted belligerent and vain.
I'm not the one who's purposefully being vague and evasive around establishing a common definition for one term. That's you. I'm not the one trembling behind smugness and denial to avoid having to admit he's being intentionally vague; that's also you. I clearly, concisely defined my criteria at the beginning, and you never did.
>You are the same as those "unintelligent robots" who have nothing of value to say but pretend to be intelligent with long textwalls and fancy words. All your argument was "I like that" and the thing is that that you seem to be genuinely full of yourself and missing those cues.
Not really. This observation is shared by the majority of people outside this hugbox of yours, and is a pretty accurate test to weed out socially inept people. And if you want to talk about missing cues, *you're* the one who has been unable to pick up repeated, explicit, verbal instructions to clarify what you're talking about.
>Nothing about my posts was stupid.
So prove it, instead of just repeatedly insisting it. Because you haven't done that once. You keep telling me you have substance, but all you show is that you have a poor definition of the words you're using and can't actually address my original statement. You immediately defaulted on emotional rhetoric while repeatedly squawking that you won.
>>27932477
>projecting this hard
>>27932525
>logic and simplicity
Well, you're simple, I'll give you that. And wrong.
>he's under 6 feet tall
>he does not work
>he does not own a car
>he does not go to college/did not graduate
>he has no friends
>he watches anime
>he plays video games for more than 2 hours a day
>dick < 8 inches ew
>creepy vibe
>has no friends
I could go on but I don't want to be too bitchy.
>>27931095
>No; people pay attention to what you wear and make judgments of you based on it.
The number of people who care about white socks to the degree that you seem to is smaller than you'd think.
>>27930120
>you cant be female because you disagree with my superficial bullshit
what even. i mean, sure if you're at the gym 24/7 constantly only talking about lifting and gains, then sure, i'd assume you're a bit insecure but there are worse ways of showing it. being insecure also isnt the worst thing in the world, plenty of people are uncomfortable with something about themselves.
i'd rather date someone that is trying to improve themselves than a person that spits venom at folks that do.
>>27932806
It's not the most important thing, but not as insignificant as you think it is. Trying to shake your head repeatedly and insist that normies aren't superficial and judgmental won't make it any less true.
>>27930206
probably stems from her being fucked with by chads in her school years. also, sometimes girls who have a slightly out of the ordinary view of what is attractive they like to shit on conventionally attractive folks.
could also be sour grapes, she cant get the conventionally attractive chad /fit/ dudes so she convinces herself that they're shit as apposed to...strong dark artsy types? too much sasuke uchiha in this fembot's life is my diagnosis.
>>27932737
Jesus you're starting to become boring with this constant attempts to save face after being proven retarded.
>you're refusing to give a concrete definition, instead choosing 3 vague criteria
Learn to read, I just gave it to you.
>I'm not the one who's purposefully being vague and evasive around establishing a common definition for one term. That's you. I'm not the one trembling behind smugness and denial to avoid having to admit he's being intentionally vague; that's also you. I clearly, concisely defined my criteria at the beginning, and you never did.
I wonder if you're actually lack of self awareness or just trying to troll. All your posts are filled with smugness and inability of introspect. You haven't been able to make one clear point aside from trying to move goal posts by throwing it on me.
>Not really. This observation is shared by the majority of people outside this hugbox of yours, and is a pretty accurate test to weed out socially inept people. And if you want to talk about missing cues, *you're* the one who has been unable to pick up repeated, explicit, verbal instructions to clarify what you're talking about.
Again, I'm not the one who needs to resort to using academic language and vague terms in walls of texts just to save face instead of admitting defeat.
This is the most disgusting form of damage control I've ever seen. Because you just keep hanging onto the dead corpse which is your initial point instead of letting go.
>>27932737
The substance of it was not "white socks are okay!!" but to show you how stupid you are being for the double standard in argument, which I have succeeded. The fact you believe it has to be proven directly and haven't picked it up yet just proves I was right all along
>>27929528
You triggered this entire thread, good job keep going
>>27932857
No shit, most people are that way. This board is probably far worse than normalfags when it comes to off the cuff superficiality and being judgemental. I know we're all 'red flag' memeing here, and I hope you are too because normal people honestly don't care about white socks that much. At best they'll think it looks goofy and ignore it. If you genuinely think otherwise you're weirdly deluded.
>>27932957
>Learn to read, I just gave it to you.
You gave me 2 vague terms for 'not smart' (i.e: something I don't like), and then used the same word to define itself. I read just fine; you've just outed yourself as having a poor criteria for what autism means.
>I wonder if you're actually lack of self awareness or just trying to troll. All your posts are filled with smugness and inability of introspect. You haven't been able to make one clear point aside from trying to move goal posts by throwing it on me.
I have made my point, twice in fact. Want me to do it again, since I'm beginning to realize you have reading comprehension problems?
And I haven't moved goalposts once. I started out saying the white socks trait shows autism for the aforementioned reason, and this exchange does not. You're the one who's refusing to come near that goal.
>Again, I'm not the one who needs to resort to using academic language and vague terms in walls of texts just to save face instead of admitting defeat.
Yeah, you're too dull to realize what qualifies as "academic language". But you have been using vague terms repeatedly (ex: 'Autism'). 1 for 1 i guess.
>The substance of it was not "white socks are okay!!" but to show you how stupid you are being for the double standard in argument, which I have succeeded. The fact you believe it has to be proven directly and haven't picked it up yet just proves I was right all along
The double standard doesn't exist because I'm using a definition that's concise, and one set of behavior falls within it, and the other does not. You're desperately trying to make the meme definition of autism the one I'm referring to, despite my saying otherwise, so you can invent a double standard. We are using two different definitions for one term. I'm using a tight, clearly explained one. You're using a self-referential, intentionally vague definition, and insisting that's the one I'm using.
>>27928931
red flag
>he's not Jetmarry me
>>27933084
>At best they'll think it looks goofy and ignore it.
And you by extension. It's like you people have forgotten your grade school lives. Enough of those "weird" indicators, and you're seen as a social leper. At this point robots are being willingly ignorant of all these minor things 'that shouldn't matter' that end up accumulating irl to make neckbeard mascots. Give off enough warning colors, and people steer away from you.
>>27930069
Antwerp??
>>27933117
>Yeah, you're too dull to realize what qualifies as "academic language". But you have been using vague terms repeatedly (ex: 'Autism'). 1 for 1 i guess.
I don't mind using "academic language" I just don't see a point to it in a japanese cartoons forum. The only reason you do it is to appear "intelligent" to hide the fact you have nothing of actual value to say and you just got btfo.
Shitty damage control and disgusting smugness.
>But you have been using vague terms repeatedly (ex: 'Autism'). 1 for 1 i guess
>complaining about using the word autism on 4chan
Nice butthurt. 1 for 1 I guess.
You just moved the subject again from "white socks" to definition of autism. To think it all started because I asked you to clarify how was it different from your point of view.
Then you had to go on a belligerent and defensive rant about how I'm the one being belligerent and defensive.
Look at your posts and see how ridiculous you seem, seriously:
>"and being belligerent and defensive about it, you're being militantly autistic"
Do you really not see how retarded you are and how you contradict?
Stop trying to save face with high words and ambiguous meanings, I get it that you try to tire me with long texts with no actual substance but It's like watching a retard trying to eat. It's amusing yet sad at the same time
>>27929535
thats... thats just completely and utterly wrong
>>27933291
>I don't mind using "academic language" I just don't see a point to it in a japanese cartoons forum. The only reason you do it is to appear "intelligent" to hide the fact you have nothing of actual value to say and you just got btfo.
The fact that you consider what I'm doing as "academic language" shows you're fairly stupid, and don't really know what that term means either. I'm writing this way to express an idea with as clearly as possible, something you're intentionally avoiding.
>Nice butthurt. 1 for 1 I guess.
You can't actually admit that your terms are vague af, and now all you can say is I'm butthurt. You're refusing to address what I just said, and going back on personal attacks instead. See, here is me demonstrating you doing so, with your words. All you can do is just claim I do the same, while having nothing to show for it.
>You just moved the subject again from "white socks" to definition of autism. To think it all started because I asked you to clarify how was it different from your point of view.
Wrong, as usual. Your first post involved you asking about the nature of white socks and autism; I gave an answer linking the two.
Then you tried labelling my "rant" as autistic, which I disproved repeatedly, and you dug your head in the sand further each time.
My statement:
>When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule, and being belligerent and defensive about it, you're being militantly autistic, and that label doesn't go both ways.
This isn't calling *you* autistic, I've already clarified this several posts back, if you actually read properly. It's stating that people who do that and staunchly deny the existence of said social norms are only reinforcing said autistic behavior.
>Stop trying to save face with high words and ambiguous meanings
I have shown the substance behind my posts multiple times, you have failed to show your substance even once without it crumbling and you evading the issue.
Is Vaporwave or Synthwave a redflag too?
>>27933819
Depends if they're listening to the meme-tier artists or listen to it ironically.
>>27933857
Do you mean unironically?
>>27933915
>intentionally listening to music ironically
>wasting your life with purposeful inauthenticity
Suicide would be much quicker and less cruel to yourself.
>>27933819
I don't think there's enough of it to really make it a genre, it's more the musical version of a macaroni painting then a real style.
>>27933982
..Wait, what? You said meme music or ironically, which are the same things. Listening to music unironically would make those two choices different.
I think we're talking about different things now.
>>27934200
Oh shoot, I didn't separate those clearly, my bad.
I meant that if she listens to meme-tier music, or listens to standard music but ironically, she should be avoided. Those were supposed to be two different instances.
>>27933857
I like Perbuator and Kavinsky mostly for Synthwave
Don't listen to much vaporwave but its hard to not like Floral Shoppe
Completely unrelated to the last two artists, I really got into World's End Girlfriend recently. He's the fucking man. Favorite artist of the year easily
>>27934229
No worries, was just a bit confused. Agreed on the meme music, who the fuck listens to meme music for enjoyment?
>>27934286
Late end millenials (the pewdiepie types) seem to eat that shit up
>>27932010
>tfw have taste in music that isn't top 40 or just 500 days of summer core but not white and not male so it's not expected
probably gonna go to shows alone until I die 2bh
>>27930001
Mirin lats though senpai
>>27929773
"I don't like chad I like brad he's so deep teehee"
>>27929598
So do you agree women can put on makeup just for themselves?
>>27930846
>pass everything but metal shirts
not sure why people think this is bait
>>27933532
>The fact that you consider what I'm doing as "academic language" shows you're fairly stupid, and don't really know what that term means either. I'm writing this way to express an idea with as clearly as possible, something you're intentionally avoiding.
No, you're writing this way to go in circles to distract the fact you have shot yourself in the leg multiple times with empty arguments
>You can't actually admit that your terms are vague af, and now all you can say is I'm butthurt. You're refusing to address what I just said, and going back on personal attacks instead. See, here is me demonstrating you doing so, with your words. All you can do is just claim I do the same, while having nothing to show for it.
I'm just playing your own game. Being vague and pointing out how retarded you are. Stay butthurt
>Wrong, as usual. Your first post involved you asking about the nature of white socks and autism; I gave an answer linking the two.
Wrong, as usual. Your post was a complete show of vanity empty of any substance and you just keep digging your head in the sand further each time trying to present it as a "misinterpretation on my side". Pathetic.
>This isn't calling *you* autistic, I've already clarified this several posts back, if you actually read properly. It's stating that people who do that and staunchly deny the existence of said social norms are only reinforcing said autistic behavior.
This is calling people who are being "belligerent and defensive about it" autistic. Which is funnily the exact thing you were doing.
>I have shown the substance behind my posts multiple times, you have failed to show your substance even once without it crumbling and you evading the issue.
No you haven't. All you've been doing is trying to distract me from the issue and exposing you as a moron.
>>27935544
>not sure why people think this is bait
People just label anything that triggers them as bait, because they'll take such observations as attacks on them. It's a defense mechanism.
>>27935572
>No, you're writing this way to go in circles to distract the fact you have shot yourself in the leg multiple times with empty arguments
You haven't shown a single instance. Like I said, prove it. You have no proof, just talk. I have proven it multiple times.
>I'm just playing your own game. Being vague and pointing out how retarded you are. Stay butthurt
You're the only one playing this game, buddy. I just pointed out specific instances of you doing this while you come up empty handed,
>This is calling people who are being "belligerent and defensive about it" autistic. Which is funnily the exact thing you were doing.
And again, learn to read:
>On the other hand our entire exchange hasn't demonstrated any autism, from either side. Idiocy from your end and hostility from my end, definitely, but not autism.
You just mentioned to me you weren't even arguing the issue of whether "socks are ok" or not!, as well.
>No you haven't. All you've been doing is trying to distract me from the issue and exposing you as a moron.
You have been actively misinterpreting information though. You JUST admitted it too, and then quickly brushed it over when called out.
I'm not distracting you, I'm telling you: prove to me where all these apparent holes in my argument are, because you're talking a whole lot but have zero backing to anything you're saying. I can substantiate anything I say, and have done so the last post. I'll do it again and again, while you bring up zero evidence to support your claims. I proved multiple times that you're using a pisspoor definition of the term 'autism', and then actively tried to insist that was the one I was using. I proved where you willingly ignored a blatant hole in your argument in favor of calling the other person butthurt. We can keep going; if you really want to "play my game", you'll actually have to back up your statements as well as insult me. All you're doing now is substituting an argument with insults.
>>27935880
>You haven't shown a single instance. Like I said, prove it. You have no proof, just talk. I have proven it multiple times.
Gave you already one post where you completely contradicted yourself without even realising. You've done it numerous times on every post. Just look at them.
>You're the only one playing this game, buddy. I just pointed out specific instances of you doing this while you come up empty handed,
Well according to you using insults in addition to clarifying a point is alright. I'm doing both.
>You just mentioned to me you weren't even arguing the issue of whether "socks are ok" or not!, as well.
That's right. The issue was of how you accuse people of doing something while you do the exact same thing. It's baffling to see how you're deliberately ignoring it in order to save face.
>You have been actively misinterpreting information though. You JUST admitted it too, and then quickly brushed it over when called out.
Are you just pretending to be retarded now? I've been saying to same thing while you keep bringing up new issues that have nothing to do with it and then make up stuff like me "admitting it". Kek this is possibly the worst coping mechanism I've ever witnessed.
> I'm telling you: prove to me where all these apparent holes in my argument are, because you're talking a whole lot but have zero backing to anything you're saying.
Again, since you're clearly unable to read or you don't want to look it at and cringe I'll give you your very first "point":
>When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule, and being belligerent and defensive about it, you're being militantly autistic,
>calling being belligerent and defensive about a certain topic as 'militantly autistic' while being belligerent and defensive about the opposite of it
Jesus christ, I'm beginning to think you're THIS retarded you are unable to see how you contradict yourself on almost every post you make.
You can only pretend to be intelligent if you can back it up.
>>27935880
>>27935572
Since you're going to just keep on projecting your failures by insisting that I'm the wrong one and I have no substance, let me just list them all right here, so you too can appreciate how mind-numbingly retarded you are when you make that claim again.
>you begin the dialogue with a faux-innocent leading question to try and reflect back the autism label (>>27930972)
>I give a clear definition of autism (>>27931095
) in respect to the socks norm, and how continued belligerent ignorance of the social norm demonstrates 'autistic' traits (social cluelessness). And since the label depends upon social cluelessness and not general hostility or "stupidity" (like you'd later try to claim), it can't be reflected back like you suggested
>You repeatedly insist of an imaginary double standard I'm being oblivious to( >>27931219 >>27931394 >>27931668 >>27932046 >>27932453 ), and refuse to actually divulge your definition of the term 'autism' (which your fictional double standard hinges on) until being prodded 5 times. Throughout all of this you continue to state, with no real proof, that I'm the one talking out of my ass, and making weak attempts at ad homs to substitute actual arguments. Throughout each response I provide the same basis of proof which you ignore each time
> After you reluctantly define it, I refute your intentionally vague definition of the term 'autism' (>>27932737 >>27932314
), as being self referential and overtly vague. You continue to say I just arbitrarily applied the autism label despite me telling you multiple times the reason why, which you continuously ignore.
>After implicitly conceding that your definition of autism was intentionally vague, and directly in conflict with the one I *clearly stated in the beginning*, thus dismantling your entire basis of a "double-standard", you continue to ignore it in favor of more adhoms and baseless claims. (>>27932957 >>27933291 >>27935572)
Here's all the proof, now where's yours?
>He's a bible thumper
>He's very short
>He plays video games for hours
>He smokes weed
>He calls himself a "cis male", he's just a male lol
>>27936284
>Gave you already one post where you completely contradicted yourself without even realising. You've done it numerous times on every post. Just look at them.
I'll tell you again, you need to demonstrate how I contradicted myself, not just proclaim it and expect everyone to buy it. You have backed up 0% of your words so far. Go FIND where I contradicted myself and show it.
>That's right. The issue was of how you accuse people of doing something while you do the exact same thing. It's baffling to see how you're deliberately ignoring it in order to save face.
Except I'm not, and I just explained why multiple times. You've ignored it multiple times. I've now made an additional post showing you all those times you've ignored them. That's the beauty of a transcript, we can read what each of us wrote, and verify our claims. Verify yours.
>Again, since you're clearly unable to read or you don't want to look it at and cringe I'll give you your very first "point":
You're not in a position to give anything, you still have to provide evidence to just one statement of yours. And then we'll talk about you 'giving' points.
>Jesus christ, I'm beginning to think you're THIS retarded you are unable to see how you contradict yourself on almost every post you make.
I just explained how it's non-contradictory, and you summarily ignored it, like all the times before. Go to my additional post, and use it point out exactly where I'm contradicting myself. I have explained to you multiple times why your "contradiction" doesnt exist.
>>27936378
Linking a bunch of my posts and claiming something else than what they are won't make you in the right. Are you actually autistic?
I've given you the initial proof and basically every other post you've made after that just goes on circles with you trying to pathetically defend this miserable statement and constantly changing your its view with ambiguity.
Your attempt to make it seem like you know what you're talking about with a 'pseudo intellectual' speech has failed.
Give it up, you've been exposed as a complete tryhard retard who won't give up even when faced with simple truth.
Maybe one day, when you grow up out of this teenage phase you'll learn that intelligence is a matter of actual knowledge and grasp of logic and not fancy words and false interpretation along with constant change of subjects.
>>27928931
>DG is based
Ahhhh, that's adorable
>>27936536
>I'll tell you again, you need to demonstrate how I contradicted myself, not just proclaim it and expect everyone to buy it. You have backed up 0% of your words so far. Go FIND where I contradicted myself and show it.
I have backed it up, you're just apparently too stupid to read.
>Except I'm not, and I just explained why multiple times. You've ignored it multiple times. I've now made an additional post showing you all those times you've ignored them. That's the beauty of a transcript, we can read what each of us wrote, and verify our claims. Verify yours.
Do I really need to link your first post again? You'll probably just ignore it again or pretend to not see it.
>You're not in a position to give anything, you still have to provide evidence to just one statement of yours. And then we'll talk about you 'giving' points.
Gave it already, keep ignoring it. Faux-intellect at its finest.
>I just explained how it's non-contradictory, and you summarily ignored it, like all the times before. Go to my additional post, and use it point out exactly where I'm contradicting myself. I have explained to you multiple times why your "contradiction" doesnt exist.
Contradicting your initial point to show how it was non-contradictory doesn't make it right. It just puts you in an endless circle of contradiction you seem to have trapped yourself in.
>blonde and light skinned
Blonde tan white men are superior to pasty white boys.
>>27936539
>I've given you the initial proof and basically every other post you've made after that just goes on circles with you trying to pathetically defend this miserable statement and constantly changing your its view with ambiguity.
Where is it? you've given none. Show. It. I have a clear logical sequence of reasoning that exonerates me, and I've assembled it into one post. Go ahead and pinpoint where exactly it's wrong, instead of just saying it is. Again, all talk, no proof.
>Give it up, you've been exposed as a complete tryhard retard who won't give up even when faced with simple truth.
>see projection
>Maybe one day, when you grow up out of this teenage phase you'll learn that intelligence is a matter of actual knowledge and grasp of logic and not fancy words and false interpretation along with constant change of subjects.
For the hundredth time, claiming something is illogical is not the same as disproving something as illogical.
Do I need to walk you through every post you wrote?
>>27936628
>Where is it? you've given none. Show. It. I have a clear logical sequence of reasoning that exonerates me, and I've assembled it into one post. Go ahead and pinpoint where exactly it's wrong, instead of just saying it is. Again, all talk, no proof.
I'm actually amazed at how you blatantly ignore me quoting you numerous times. Either you're legitimately retarded or you just try to damage control.
>claiming something is illogical is not the same as disproving something as illogical.
Pointing out how you're being moronic for claiming that X is bad while you're doing X is a proof. I suppose you got that and now it's all just an attempt to get yourself out of this mess
>>27936621
>I have backed it up, you're just apparently too stupid to read.
Backed what up? you've barely made any concrete statement beyond "ur wrong lol" or "ur going in circles". The transcript is all laid out right there, go ahead and prove where I'm wrong. Stop talking and claiming you've already done it and do it.
>Contradicting your initial point to show how it was non-contradictory doesn't make it right. It just puts you in an endless circle of contradiction you seem to have trapped yourself in.
Where have I contradicted my original post? Where? Show me exactly where? If it's so easy to expose my apparent contradiction, why is it so difficult for you to just recite a few lines from the dialogue? You're talking out of your ass unless you can prove what you're saying.
>>27929298
>he picks his nose and eats his boogers
stop dating 5 year-olds
>he chews gum too often
if guys with stank breath is your thing...
>he's friends with Indians
feather or dot indians
>>27936674
Go and take a look at (>>27936378), now point where the bad man made the contradiction you suddenly can't seem to verbalize.
>Pointing out how you're being moronic for claiming that X is bad while you're doing X is a proof. I suppose you got that and now it's all just an attempt to get yourself out of this mess
And by "X", you mean behaving autistically? A simple yes or no will do fine.
>>27929043
My gf has
>piercing in her navel and tongue
>Doesn't know how to cook (AT ALL)
>Has had more than 3 sexual partners
My ex had NONE of the traits you listed, i guess i shouldn't have broken up with her then lol
I can post some male red flags even though i'm a straight man, i don't give a shit
He:
>Has no style
>Has no grace
>Has a funny face
>>27936797
if you'd leave a good girl for a stacey because "muh excitement" then you deserve the stacey
>>27928903
What's deathgrips?
RED FLAG FOR GIRLS
>She has guy friends
>>27936858
She was a total bitch at times though
Very controlling, and we had a lot of fights
>>27936890
Also, i am out of her league
>>27928931
>>27930276
this is why dg is a red flag
>>27936687
>The transcript is all laid out right there
And it shows how you are going in circles
wrong here:
>>27931095
>being belligerent and defensive about it, you're being militantly autistic
>while being belligerent and defensive militantly autistic about the opposite.
>>27931311
>saying you were just being "proactive"
lel pretending right
1st damage control
>>27931462
>characteristics of what I don't like are autistic
>continues to be belligerent and defensive about it
>>27931917
>realising he's been revealed for stupidity so changing the subject to definition of autism
>>27932314
another attempt to save face by accusing me for being "smug" although all the vanity and smugness came from your side
>>27932737
>pretending to take the high ground because "autism on 4chan is mean"
>still complete change of subject after others have been blown
>>27933117
>>27933532
>>27935880
>>27936536
>realise it's all printed so just avoid addressing it and repeating "Y-YOU HAVE NO PROOF"
>>27936749
Claiming that acting belligerent and defensive over X is autistic yet doing the same for the opposite of it
>>27929598
Lol this is the male equivalent of "I wear makeup for myself! Not for guys!!!"
>>27936947
Oh wow, you're so determined to be wrong it's almost sad.
Let's go through a step by step process, since you're pretty slow and all. I want you to answer very simple yes or no questions.
>"When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule, and being belligerent and defensive about it, you're being militantly autistic"
Did I write this, yes or no?
>social rule= white socks faux pas
Yes or no?
>"it" in "belligerent and defensive about it..." refers to being unaware of said white socks norm
Yes or no?
Therefore..
>When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule, and being belligerent and defensive about being unaware of said white socks norm, you're being militantly autistic
Is this accordingly true, yes or no?
>>27937238
>"When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule, and being belligerent and defensive about it, you're being militantly autistic"
Do you try to place the matter of you completely addressing a different issue than your initial one into a yes or no, yes or no?
Did you do the exact same thing with your own "basic social rule" and then proceeded to be belligerent and defensive about it, yes or no?
>social rule= white socks faux pas
No. It's your own autistic (in the 4chan sense, since you're pretty slow and all) preference.
>"it" in "belligerent and defensive about it..." refers to being unaware of said white socks norm
I know you're trying to avoid the issue and organise it in your tiny brain, but when you deride a concept and argue defending it is this and that and then do this and that for the opposite idea of said concept you're being illogical and quite stupid.
>When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule, and being belligerent and defensive about being unaware of said white socks norm, you're being militantly autistic
Not if it's your own made up rule but that wasn't even the issue of our debate. This damage control of yours is tiresome.
The issue was you being unaware of how stating something and then following it is idiotic.
If you want to simplify things, at least to it correctly you colossal retard
>>27929535
That is retarded anon, the only way that would help is if the gum was basically rubber, otherwise you might as well be chewing on air.
>>27937435
I know it's hard for you to understand, but all you need is a yes or no answer for these, not another long winded sarcasm vomit, since that's leading to a block.
>No. It's your own autistic (in the 4chan sense, since you're pretty slow and all) preference.
And you're trying to prove I contradicted MYSELF, not the arbitrary 4chan. We're trying to establish what I said, and then make the logical conclusions from those statements. I start with simple questions for you to simply verify if I posted a certain statemetn, and then follow them with article substitution to make sure you're getting the same message being conveyed. Whether you agree with it or not is irrelevant right now.
Now be a good boy and actually go back and answer the prompt, it cant' get much more simple than this.
>>27937435
Since I know you'll probably have trouble after being given dead simple instructions, I'll try and clarify it down to dog-level simple.
>I will ask you questions to have you verify I posted said thing, so you can't be a faggot and deny I said it later
>I will then elaborate on indefinite articles and clauses
>THESE PARTS DONT FACTOR IN YOU AGREEING WITH MY OPINION/PREFERENCE/ETC, JUST BEING ABLE TO VERIFY WHAT I SAID AND THE LOGIC (however flawed) I PRESENTED.
>remember, yes or no answers.
>>27937591
I know it's hard for you to understand but yes or no are only good for people who have been blasted by true and now try to save face by putting it into simplicity according to their own skewed wording. The fact I managed to bring you to this point just proves I was right all along.
>And you're trying to prove I contradicted MYSELF, not the arbitrary 4chan. We're trying to establish what I said, and then make the logical conclusions from those statements. I start with simple questions for you to simply verify if I posted a certain statemetn, and then follow them with article substitution to make sure you're getting the same message being conveyed. Whether you agree with it or not is irrelevant right now.
This is really repetitive. I've proven you already how you contradicted yourself you dumbass. Stop ignoring it. I've called you 4chan autistic because of this rule, not because of your previous statements. Those two have nothing to do with each other.
There's no point answering to your skewed questions, my answers are logical and straight to the point. Also able to point out the pathetic attempt to change the flow of the debate.
>>27937694
I'll try and clarify it down to a rat-level simple:
The
Fact
You
Need
To
Bring
It
To
A
Yes
Or
No
According
To
Your
Carefully
Skewed and Worded
Questions
Proves
Me
Right
I hope you got that. You are really bad at debating and even worse at damage controlling after the fact
>>27937736
>This is really repetitive. I've proven you already how you contradicted yourself you dumbass.
Again, no you haven't. You've been repeatedly changing my definition of the term autism, which I am attempting to get you to verify, to yours. These are not the same definitions. You're only proving I contradicted your meaning, not mine. For me to contradict myself I would have to have had the same meaning you did. I do not. You confirmed this with me on several occasions.
And you have a golden ticket with the lowest possible effort, to have me btfo, but you're too much of a trembling coward to answer simple yes or no questions to just verify what I said in my posts. This doesn't require you agreeing with my opinions, just you recognizing what I said. And you're suddenly too scared to do that. Because you know once you do that, you're fragile argument falls apart.
You have literally the easiest possible route to confirm that you've read and understood what I conveyed. If you're too chickenshit to do that, even you must be aware of how little ground you have to stand on.
>>27937795
The fact that you can't even confirm that you read and understood my posts without your argument falling apart shows how wrong you are.
If you can't even say "Yes, you did post that passage that's clearly linked and quoted", you've already lost.
>>27937895
>Again, no you haven't. You've been repeatedly changing my definition of the term autism, which I am attempting to get you to verify, to yours. These are not the same definitions. You're only proving I contradicted your meaning, not mine. For me to contradict myself I would have to have had the same meaning you did. I do not. You confirmed this with me on several occasions.
Kek did you read this message before sending it?
You are so beaten you need to now bring it back to autism definitions just because I've deliberately called you autistic (and specified I was doing it in the 4chan sense of usage)
>And you have a golden ticket with the lowest possible effort, to have me btfo, but you're too much of a trembling coward to answer simple yes or no questions to just verify what I said in my posts. This doesn't require you agreeing with my opinions, just you recognizing what I said. And you're suddenly too scared to do that. Because you know once you do that, you're fragile argument falls apart.
You are so retarded. Phrasing your questions in a way that has nothing to do with any of our actual points and that will make you seem innocent is something only a coward would do. You are so afraid of getting stomped again you need me to validate your points despite them being put in a subjective manner.
If you can't take my answers and translate them into a yes and no with the comments I've added next to each other, calling you out for your weak attempt. You are clearly a hopeless cretin.
This is a whole new level of desperation
>>27937972
I did play your little damage control game though. I've just added my own commentary to you skewed questions to call you out on your pathetic attempt. If you have to deliberately avoid that and insist I "v-validate" you, you've already lost.
>>27928903
>he won't eat ass
>>27938030
>You are so beaten you need to now bring it back to autism definitions just because I've deliberately called you autistic (and specified I was doing it in the 4chan sense of usage)
And then you continuously tried to claim 'I contradicted myself' and run a whole argument off of that, when in reality I didn't. You can label me as 4chan autistic all you want, but that doesn't make me contradict myself. Whether or not i contradicted myself is central to the definition I posted verbatim (that you refuse to even confirm, kek). Not your definition. For me to contradict myself, I would have had to speak out against one thing, and then engage in it myself.
>X= my cited autism
>Y= 4chan autism (yours)
>I criticize people who are X, and do Y myself (according to you)
>You say I criticize people who are Y, and do Y myself
>Thus, you say I contradict myself
>But we both just discovered X=/=Y, and explicitly stated as such
>Thus, your prior statement is FALSE
>You are so retarded. Phrasing your questions in a way that has nothing to do with any of our actual points and that will make you seem innocent is something only a coward would do. You are so afraid of getting stomped again you need me to validate your points despite them being put in a subjective manner.
How is "VERIFY I POSTED THIS", in any way subjective? How? At this point, you're refusing to even recognize I actually posted something, because you know you couldn't defend yourself after you actually had to address the content of what I posted. Seems like the retard here is you, cowering from having to confirm a written transcript
There's the simple logical failure you seem terrified of even approaching. For me to contradict myself, I'd have to have been inconsistent with what I posted, not what you posted, and we explicitly disagreed on.
Notice how you're desperately trying to avoid having to answer simple questions verifying the words I posted? That's because if you do, your premise crumbles
>>27938058
Only person playing damage control here is you, bud. You are refusing to even verify my definition, because you know that if you do, you cant deny that
>X=/=Y
And your whole shitshow crumbles. So now you're stalling and posturing, which you've been doing when you run out actual argument, which is often. And if you want to claim I have nothing else to say, just go ahead and verify my prior statement. You don't even have to AGREE with them, just confirm that it was what I posted. But we both know you can't. Because reality would destroy your current argument.
>>27933419
No it's not, weak jawed people chew gum all the time
>>27938264
This analogy is possibly the most incorrect one I've ever seen. But you're an expert in breaking records of stupidity today.
>You criticise X and say doing it is Y and Z, while you're doing it you're being Y and Z
>I say 'hey, can you not see how you're being exactly what you're claiming others who oppose your opinion to be?'
>You refuse to admit it and go on a longer illogical rant, constantly moving goalposts
>we both discovered you have no argument but you've acknowledge your mistake, although you won't admit it
>you try to save face once again with phrasing questions that will validate you in a way that won't touch the points where you contradict and make a complete fool of yourself
You pretend to be unable to take my answers and translate it into a 'yes' and 'no'. My side notes shouldn't interfere with that task, it'll just add to it. You can't even defend yourself you have to insist I answer you directly because there is no other way you'll be able to present anything else.
This is a simple logical failure you seem terrified of approaching, why is that?
You continue to ignore all the proof I've posted previously and go on with.
>Notice how you're desperately trying to avoid having to answer simple questions verifying the words I posted?
Notice how you're desperately trying to avoid looking at the answers to your questions just because I'm smarter than you and revealed your pathetic attempt to fix the damage you've caused yourself?
At this point I'm fairly convinced you are actually retarded and not just pretending
>>27938338
You, yet again, can't see beyond a simple yes and no.
Were you being belligerent and defensive while claiming belligerence and defensive behaviour is autistic?
Yes or No?
>>27938443
>>27938443
>I say 'hey, can you not see how you're being exactly what you're claiming others who oppose your opinion to be?'
Except I'm not acting like what I'm "claiming others who oppose [my] opinion to be". I'm acting like your "4chan definition", which we've both determined is a separate thing altogether.
>You criticise X and say doing it is Y and Z, while you're doing it you're being Y and Z
Wrong, stop attempting to muddle the variables. You haven't defined either of them, or even this mystery Z, and refuse to even directly address the original logic chain I just gave you.
You won't even confirm the yes X=/=Y, that our definitions of what 'autism' is are different. Because if you did, you'd have to prove that I really meant Y, when I've been saying X from the first response I gave you. And it's right in the post, the same one you refuse to even acknowledge.
I'll ask you again, how is you confirming I wrote down something subjective? Isn't there an objective record for that? Explain why you're continually saying it's subjective.
At this point you're free to add whatever side notes you want, but you can't even seem to verify. what. I. posted. Because you know then that:
>X=/=Y
For me to contradict myself, I would have to speak out against one thing, and then do that one thing. Effectively, you have to prove X=Y, and you can't seem to do that, and all you're doing is falling back on your tired rhetoric.
Again, disprove this line by line
>X= my cited autism
>Y= 4chan autism (yours)
>I criticize people who are X, and do Y myself (according to you)
>You say I criticize people who are Y, and do Y myself
>Thus, you say I contradict myself
>But we both just discovered X=/=Y, and explicitly stated as such
>Thus, your prior statement is FALSE
>>27928903
>she artistically avoids guys who listen to a specific band
you're just as bad as the shit part of their fanbase
>>27929775
a lot of bands you like are probably talked about on reddit, i don't know why dg is an exception, its possibly your unfair bias
>>27929877
those fans are just /mu/ basic bitch nerds who see dg as a commodity/meme
personally, i have a more naturally bulky body and don't get dressed by /fa/, but enjoy dg for their art and music
>>27931517
that's the problem
that's all you see dg as
that's all /mu/tards who don't care about music see dg as
plenty of people like me enjoy dg for how artistically fantastic they really are
too many people see them as novelty
>>27938507
>Were you being belligerent and defensive while claiming belligerence and defensive behaviour is autistic?
And this is where you're wrong, and if you bothered to actually confirm what I had posted instead of flailing like a braindead Mongoloid, you would have figured this out by now.
I specifically defined militant autism as being " belligerence and defensive" IN RESPONSE TO being ignorant about a basic social rule >>27931095
If I'm just belligerent, defensive, and w/e, but not due to ignorance about a social norm, then it's not militant autism. It's just being militant. This is not your first false equivalency.
>Named Meg
>>27938621
>Except I'm not acting like what I'm "claiming others who oppose [my] opinion to be". I'm acting like your "4chan definition", which we've both determined is a separate thing altogether.
Except you did and your first post proved it. Can't escape from reality.
You are acting like a 4chan autist. What does that have to do with any of the previous posts? I realise it's another form of moving goalposts but you're starting to make no sense.
>Wrong, stop attempting to muddle the variables. You haven't defined either of them, or even this mystery Z, and refuse to even directly address the original logic chain I just gave you.
This is the most accurate analogy of the situation. Your embellished interpretation won't change it.
>I'll ask you again, how is you confirming I wrote down something subjective? Isn't there an objective record for that? Explain why you're continually saying it's subjective.
Because it's how you want it to be, it's not how it really is. You've put those questions in a way that will ignore all the ways you've contradicted yourself in the process.
I've answered those questions and added a note to each, explaining why you're wrong. You are apparently too scared to address any of them since you know you will have nothing to respond with after your little act has been exposed.
Again, this analogy has nothing to do with reality. If you want to see an accurate version, look up mine in the previous post.
>>27938691
Oh? you're unable to answer a simple yes or no? Are you a chickenshit? Lol this is where your entire shitshow falls.
You've shot yourself in the leg once again and proven to everyone how much of a retard you are. Next time you plan on pretending to be smart, get some actual knowledge beforehand you idiot. Thanks for playing.
>he has facial hair
>he ducks out of meeting my dad
>>27929488
Cats and arts are cool though. What does owning multiple cats say about the owner? What if she's super good looking, who cares if her moms fat?
>she has friends that are better looking than her
Kek
>>27930846
>>27935544
lol I passed all of it too. But I think this describes a solid 99% of 4chan users lmao.
>>27929773
>managing to trigger an entire board
bravo
>>27938799
>Except you did and your first post proved it. Can't escape from reality.
No, you can't.
>You are acting like a 4chan autist
which is YOUR definition, not the one I used in my claims. You would have to demonstrate I'm acting like my version (X), for me to have contradicted myself. All I've done so far is fulfill your arbitrary definition. We have already established that they're two diffeent
>This is the most accurate analogy of the situation. Your embellished interpretation won't change it.
Wrong again. You have failed to define any of those variables. It only becomes accurate when you define them. Like I did. You have no real explanation as to why my logic chain is wrong, and no real proof beyond your word that your's is right
>Because it's how you want it to be, it's not how it really is. You've put those questions in a way that will ignore all the ways you've contradicted yourself in the process.
So me asking If I wrote down an objectively recorded passage is being subjective? Is that what you're saying.
>Oh? you're unable to answer a simple yes or no? Are you a chickenshit? Lol this is where your entire shitshow falls.
Alright: NO.
I was not claiming " being belligerent and defensive while claiming belligerence and defensive behaviour is autistic".
I was claiming that "being belligerent and defensive while claiming belligerence and defensive behaviour IN RESPONSE TO being ignorant about a basic social rule is autistic".
You are objectively wrong about this, since you're avoiding having to account for the other half of what I stated constituted militant autism.
Still waiting for you to disprove that logic chain, line by line (good luck, you can't do it)
All you can really do at this point is weakly try to twist my words against me, but you have none of the backing behind it. You're refusing to address a 5 line logic chain right in front of you, and can't recognize a key component of what I considered militant autism.
>>27928969
>shes on a trip on an anonymous image board
pure case of feminism here
>shes a pleb
>her hair is died to an unnatural colour
>she has piercings
>she has sleeve tattoos
>she wears too much makeup
>shes a leftist
>shes a feminist
>shes a militant atheist
>shes quirky
>she represents herself with a scene
>shes obsessed with fitness
>shes obsessed with image
>shes a weeaboo
>shes obsessed with anything
>she uses social media
>shes sensitive
>she has no sense of humour
i will never be happy
>>27933121
where u at shawty, looking for a wife
>>27938971
so basically you want an Android?
>>27938799
A few typos
*I was not " being belligerent
*I was "being belligerent
>>27929298
>>he made poor grades in high school
fuck off cunt
im probably doing better than you while having never enjoyed or bothered with school
>>27939016
that would be great
>>27939058
soon, familia, soon. I too would like an Android bf.
>>27929773
I'll be the ninth (you)...daamnit. I really think the most pathetic people here are people who post how much better they are, behind a computer screen. Post those tits in a pushup bra or leave. This is pathetic even by roastie standards, jeez.
>>27938962
>which is YOUR definition, not the one I used in my claims. You would have to demonstrate I'm acting like my version (X), for me to have contradicted myself. All I've done so far is fulfill your arbitrary definition. We have already established that they're two diffeent
4chan definition of autist is definition everyone makes for his own. THIS WASN'T THE DISCUSSION. You intentionally need to bring it up because I've pointed out you're acting like it, despite it not being the point of any part in our debate.
Clear indicator of damage control. Just to distract me, right? ;)
>Wrong again. You have failed to define any of those variables. It only becomes accurate when you define them. Like I did. You have no real explanation as to why my logic chain is wrong, and no real proof beyond your word that your's is right
Apparently you can't read then. It fills up every empty variable without needing to skew reality like you did.
>So me asking If I wrote down an objectively recorded passage is being subjective? Is that what you're saying.
Wrong interpretation. Not the first time you need to resort to that in order to save face after being proven wrong.
Phrasing a question in a way that would clearly be in favour of you is being subjective.
>Alright: NO.
Well, then that's blatant lying because I've shown you multiple times that you have said it. You've failed playing your own game, pathetic.
But now you need to explain it, right? Because I presented it in a certain way. You are clearly not fit.
>Still waiting for you to disprove that logic chain, line by line (good luck, you can't do it)
The fact that you're unwilling to admit it being true doesn't make it false. I can and I just did.
>All you can really do at this point is weakly try to twist my words against me, but you have none of the backing behind it.
No need to, you're doing it on your own.
>>27938962
>>27938799
To keep this short, since you like fluffing your lack of argument with posturing, I'll keep it with just irrefutable data that you can't wriggle around.
>X= my cited autism
>Y= 4chan autism (yours)
>you have confirmed the difference between X and Y multiple times
>I criticize people who are X, and do Y myself (according to you)
>You say I criticize people who are Y, and do Y myself
>Thus, you say I contradict myself
>But we both just discovered X=/=Y, and explicitly stated as such
>Thus, your prior statement is FALSE
You haven't refuted this logic yet. Probably will never. Talking more shit won't do the trick either.
And also
>Were you being belligerent and defensive while claiming belligerence and defensive behaviour is autistic?
>Yes or No?
No. I was being belligerent and defensive while claiming belligerence and defensive behaviour IN RESPONSE TO being ignorant about a basic social rule is militant autism
Keep dismissing these out of hand without actually addressing them, you'd still be wrong. You're not going to get anywhere until you have a stepwise refutation of these.
>>27939123
This logic makes no sense since it never happened.
>You criticise X and say doing it is Y and Z (y= belligerence z=defense), while you're doing it you're being Y and Z
>I say 'hey, can you not see how you're being exactly what you're claiming others who oppose your opinion to be?'
>You refuse to admit it and go on a longer illogical rant, constantly moving goalposts
>we both discovered you have no argument but you've acknowledge your mistake, although you won't admit it
>you try to save face once again with phrasing questions that will validate you in a way that won't touch the points where you contradict and make a complete fool of yourself
This is what happened and you will never be able to refute that since every attempt will be you losing grasp of reality.
>>27930846
>>wears graphic tees (200x if metal tees)
>>muh depreshun
>>muh soshul anxiatee
got me here
but you're probably a cunt if you're this obsessive
>>27929162 woah I'm none of those
>still has dick sleeve
>believes men deserve rights
>talks back to me
>thinks men are capable of critical thinking
>thinks he deserves an opinion
>dominant
>over 6'
>looks too old
>enjoys Western media
>browses 4chan
>>27939089
im a guy and my post was about girls
>>27939173
>being this autistically butthurt over socks
you're a fucking failure, bitch
i have too many....
>has a short temper when we argue if we ever do
>too dogmatic
>won't make an effort to get along with my mom
>he's too passive and won't tell me when I'm wrong
>no sense of humor
>won't be okay with the fact that i might have a lot of work to do
>obsessed with image
>overly religious or overly against religion
>racist
>doesn't have an opinion on how i look (for instance, won't tell me if he prefers something over the other when it comes to my appearance)
>has had more than 2 sexual partners
>he's bothered by me being touchy in private and not in public
>he pacifies me too much instead of sometimes just telling me to stop whining and work to fix what's making me upset
>is indecisive
>doesn't want to try new foods
>he won't let me help him when he's having a difficult time and wants to be the tough one 24/7
>>27939173
>>27939122
>4chan definition of autist is definition everyone makes for his own. THIS WASNT THE DISCUSSION
YES IT IS.
When you attempt to prove i contradicted myself, you failed to identify MY DEFINITION, and instead placed YOURS. You still aren't addressing this.
>The fact that you're unwilling to admit it being true doesn't make it false. I can and I just did.
Then where's your line by line refutation? All I see here is you puffing your chest? What? Afraid I'm going to use more big scary "Academic Words"?
>Well, then that's blatant lying because I've shown you multiple times that you have said it.
No you didn't. It's In the sentence.
>When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule, and being belligerent and defensive about it, you're being militantly autistic,
You're ignoring half the statement in an attempt to be right. I don't qualify both criteria, hence I'm not militant autistic. Just militant. That's what I said, I was not just criticizing people just for their belligerence and defensiveness.
You can't even recognize what I read without having your argument fall apart. Pathetic
>You criticise X and say doing it is Y and Z (y= belligerence z=defense), while you're doing it you're being Y and Z
And that's where you're IMMEDIATELY WRONG
the correct version would be
>I criticize X and say doing it is Y and Z and A
>where X= militant autism
>where Y= belligerence
>where Z= defensiveness
>Where A= in response to ignorance of social norms
ALL of this is supported in my original post, so don't say I'm pulling this out of my ass, I've cited it several times, you've just willingly refused to read it.
Didn't take long to completely destroy that equation of yours :^).
>X=Y+Z+A
>X=/=Y+Z
>You claim X=Y+Z
>You are wrong
>>27939277
Nah, it's about logic, not socks. I won't expect a retard like you to understand it
>>27939277
he's been doing this for a while. I'm pretty sure he's mentally ill.
>>27936932
>death grips is a red flag because of youtube comments
what a compelling argument
>>27928931
I love seeing your beautiful face around the board, hack_blastard senpai
>>27939297
hahaha okay fuckface
reminder the argument was perpetuated because of you're idiot preferences
you're also arguing with someone you will never know in your life on the internet
>>27939309
my insult was directed towards the cunt who escalated this fucking bullshit and ruined a thread i can use to improve myself
>>27939297
>Nah, it's about logic, not socks. I won't expect a retard like you to understand it
You don't get it either, you're purposefully avoiding a whole 3rd variable that makes your equation dogshit.
>>27929623
Normie reporting in
>This guy gets it
>this
>fucking
>guy
>GETS IT
>>27939293
You haven't criticised X which is autism. You've criticised Y which is 'being belligerent and defensive'.
How stupid are you? You see how this """logic""" falls apart right from the beginning?
You cricise people who do Y and do Y yourself (according to both of us and common sense)
I say you criticise people who do Y and do yourself
Thus I say you contradict yourself
But we both discovered that Y=Y and X has nothing to do with it to begin with, except when you get cornered and need to bring it up as a damage control attempt.
thus, your prior statement is FALSE
I even broke it for you so you can see how you fail at it.
>When you attempt to prove i contradicted myself, you failed to identify MY DEFINITION, and instead placed YOURS. You still aren't addressing this.
Still wasn't the original discussion. I haven't pointed out you were autistic about caring for socks I have pointed out you contradict yourself by claiming someone who does something is autistic while you do the same
>Then where's your line by line refutation? All I see here is you puffing your chest? What? Afraid I'm going to use more big scary "Academic Words"?
Look above, your attempt to use 'academic words' was to hide the fact you miserably lost. Common among 4channers who get BTFO
>You're ignoring half the statement in an attempt to be right. I don't qualify both criteria, hence I'm not militant autistic. Just militant. That's what I said, I was not just criticizing people just for their belligerence and defensiveness.
I don't need to ignore anything, it's written right there. You keep trying to show it in different ways to save face, again.
>You criticise X and say doing it is Y and Z (y= belligerence z=defense), while you're doing it you're being Y and Z
Once again, this has nothing to do with reality.
>>27929877
damn my brother is a meme
>>27939356
Not at all. I honestly never put a thought into socks or had any preferences.
I just pointed out the logical failure in the statements made by the other anon.
>>27939360
No, you don't get it. You're purposefully avoiding the actual issue and keep bringing in different variable since all the others have been blown to bits
>>27939345
he's fucking gross desu egheg
>>27939284
a grill that actually wants to here when she's wrong? what
>>27939540
wrong spelling of hear you moron :^)
>>27939383
>You haven't criticised X which is autism. You've criticised Y which is 'being belligerent and defensive'.
Wrong again, I clearly criticized X: autism. Let me jog your memory.
>When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule, and being belligerent and defensive about it, you're being militantly autistic,
This was what i wrote, on my first reply to you.
>When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule,
>and being belligerent and defensive about it, >you're being militantly autistic,
And If you're still unsure AUTISM is the subject of the post, let's refer to the rest of it:
>...you're being militantly autistic, and that label doesn't go both ways.
THE LABEL OF AUTISM WAS THE SUBJECT
>but isn't paying attention to fashion trends the REAL autism?
You asked this; the focus was on autism.
and then...
>Just because you don't like something doesn't make it autism...
Huh, wow, it's almost like this post is centered around AUTISM.
That's what's written down, verbatim. Don't believe me? Go check it. You are wrong, no way around it this time.
>I don't need to ignore anything, it's written right there. You keep trying to show it in different ways to save face, again.
Do we need to review this again?
>When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule,
>and being belligerent and defensive about it, >you're being militantly autistic,
You are wrong if you think I'm criticizing just the belligerent+defensive part, or if that was even the only part of what qualifies as militant autism. The part about social ignorance was ALWAYS there, and you were refusing to see it
>>27931668
>>27931668
Here, in case you want to see how wrong you are
>>27939427
>No, you don't get it. You're purposefully avoiding the actual issue and keep bringing in different variable since all the others have been blown to bits
And you're as wrong as ever. The part about social ignorance was there the whole time, and you failed to account for it. No goalposts were changed, that was the first post made, about as fixed as goalposts can get.
Looks like you're too retarded to notice 1 of 3 total variables that were always there, and are now furiously backpedaling to try and discount it.
>>27929598
Shes a woman, so no she probably can't even conceptualize "doing something for yourself" literally everything she does is driven by a desire to either manipulate a man into taking care of her or competing with other women.
>>27939284
>>he won't let me help him when he's having a difficult time and wants to be the tough one 24/7
Fuck that, I don't like dragging people into my problems.
>>27928903
>Fuck you bitch
>Death grips is great
>your distasteful words fill MC Ride with hate
>now its time to masturbate
>>27939383
>>27939603
Whoops, here's the right link
>>27931095
>>27931095
Kek, go ahead and find ONE case of me criticizing me for the belligerence and defensive in a way that's separated from their social ignorance.
You can't :^)
>>27939603
>Wrong again, I clearly criticized X: autism. Let me jog your memory.
Wrong again.
>When you're this ignorant of a basic social rule, and being belligerent and defensive about it, you're being militantly autistic,
Had nothing about criticizing autism, it's a conclusion, that's pretty basic and you can't find way around it this time. It's words YOU wrote.
>THE LABEL OF AUTISM WAS THE SUBJECT
No it wasn't. The subject was your double standard in criticising a behaviour that you were practicing yourself. You are the only one who keeps talking about autism.
>You asked this; the focus was on autism.
>>Just because you don't like something doesn't make it autism...
It's been brought up as a riposte. In order to prove you wrong, which succeeded. Nowhere in my posts I have based my argument around autism. My intent was to show how you were doing the same thing you were criticising and I did it successfully.
You only decided to hang onto it since your original points (where you contradicted yourself with Y=Y) have been refuted.
>Do we need to review this again?
Gave you the accurate analogy, your twisted grasp of it won't change it in any case.
>>27928903
>troll/bait thread
Nice try you been spotted.
>>27929623
I am quite carefree and don't give that much of a fuck, still girls aren't flocking around me.
I work out at the gym frequently and eat in a surplus with lots of protein, tryhard mode, but I do it 100% for me, and me only, because I love doing it.
The most important part should be to socialize with girls, which I don't think most robots on here do, including me.
>>27939669
I was talking about the logical failure in your statement. You are the one who has to backpedal and bring in more unrelated variables constantly in order to avoid defeat.
You've already lost btw
>>27929043
>has had more than 3 sexual partners
>>he immediately lists all his red flags for girls in a red flags for males thread
jesus anon basically everyone over age 20 has had more than 3 partners
>>27936797
trash deserves trash desu
no need to leave her
>>27929488
>he uses apostrophes to indicate a plural noun
>>27939748
This is sad to watch, the attempt of a mentally ill person to save himself in an internet discussion has brought him to a place he needs to link posts from a complete unrelated matter (which he brought up as an attempt of damage control).
Are you honestly this stupid or you just want to convince me you're retarded and give up on you?
I'm actually waiting for you to come up any second now with a troll face.jpg and say "lell i was only pretending to be retarded"
>>27928903
haha that's pretty funny I have yet to find a death grips fan outside of 4chan maybe you are right
>>27929162
>goes to look up what 'pegging' is.
>mfw when I use google images
>>27929298
Some true some not
but the one about black coffee is so fucking true +1 upvote
>>27929528
What if I lift because I actually enjoy going to the gym and not because I want to impress girls? Am I still pathetic then? You don't even have to answer, because the answer is 'NO.'
If I actually cared what silly girls thought, then I would truly be pathetic. Fuck off gains goblin, you'll never steal my gains, NEVER.
>>27939722
but don't you think talking to someone about them, like a gf could help even just a little bit? hell maybe she can even help you with whatever is bugging you idk
>>27939770
>Wrong again.
Where?
>Had nothing about criticizing autism
You are objectively wrong, again. Remember how the RED FLAG THREAD WAS CRITICIZING THE AUTISM AS WELL. No? Look it up?
The entire post was about autism, and criticizing all the criteria that qualified militant autism. Go find one example where the belligerence and defensiveness are brought up separately from the other factors. Just one. (Hint: you can't). Thus, If I'm criticizing A, and Y, and Z; I would be criticizing X
remember basic addition?
>X=Y+Z+A
I'm criticizing the whole set of behaviors (Y+Z+A) as a single whole (X). This
> My intent was to show how you were doing the same thing you were criticising and I did it successfully.
And you're wrong because you're ignoring vital context. ITS ONLY AUTISTIC IF ITS COUPLED WITH SOCIAL IGNORANCE. I am criticizing them for the entirety of their actions: The social ignorance+defensiveness+belligerence, which all combine to lead to militant autism. I've been consistently criticizing all 3, and never individually isolating on any one or two of them. So if I only am guilty of two, then I'm not contradicting myself!
I know you're cripplingly retarded, and can only spare the brain power to recycle my bantz and do simple addition, but bear with me:
>I criticize murder: the shooting of a man who broke into my house and is trying to escape my house
so
>murder=X
>shooting=Y
>man in house=Z
>is currently trying to leave= A
so
>X=Y+Z+A
If i only completed two of those variables (Y and Z): just shooting a man in my house, then I'm not contradicting myself when I made my original criticism
BECAUSE THE INDIVIDUAL VARIABLES ARE ONLY BEING CRITICIZED AS PART OF COMPLETE WHOLE.
Same is the case with the defensiveness and belligerence in our analogy.
This is where you're completely, irreparably wrong. And no amount of intellectual cowardice, or flinging back the same insults I told you 10 minutes ago is going to help you :^). You're done.
>>27939853
Can you even make one original comeback, buddy? I'm not even being hostile to you right now: do you have some sort of mental disorder? You're making basic failures in additive logic, and you have a weird tendency to repeat the same rote zingers over and over, until the other person makes more you can copy off of.
>>27940060
If it's emotional, I just take a bit to drive somewhere secluded and clear my head. Take in nature, relieve some stress, have a cry, whatever. Nobody needs to see that.
If it's a practical problem, it's just a matter of tackling it the right way and not getting my mind all clouded up by getting frustrated over it.
>>27939812
>I was talking about the logical failure in your statement. You are the one who has to backpedal and bring in more unrelated variables constantly in order to avoid defeat.
It's not an unrelated variable; it was there the whole time, y'know since it was posted? You're exceptionally deluded. Sadly that doesn't make your logic any sharper. All you had to do was account for one more variable, and you fucked up spectacularly. And now you're stuck fegining victory because all you can do is parrot your same schizophrenic dismissals ad nauseum while ignoring the truth right in front of you.
>>27929834
I don't enjoy playing soccer. Everyone knows that people who plays soccer just do it to get laid. I'm so god damn sick of the "I PLAY SOCCER FOR FUN GUIDE :D D"-maymay. Just fucking admit it. You play soccer because you think it will get you laid.
>>27940177
then because you're able to handle it yourself, would you mind if your gf had to rely on you for help? or would you expect her to be the same as you?
>>27929304
>short hair
lolwat
>>27930001
>small biceps due to me still doing SS
He fell for the SS meme.
On a serious note: Add dips for your triceps and a biceps exercise at the end of your workout, do 3 sets of 10-12 reps each. Don't focus on the amount of weight as you do with your SS exercises; focus on having a slow eccentric phase for maximum hypertrophy. Your arms will grow like crazy if you do this.
>>27929298
all of these are good besides
>he doesn't like greek food
Greek food for the most part, is trash feta cheese is very low-tier. Most Greek people I know are great cooks though regardless of what they're making.
>>27929464
Don't girls prefer tall guys because they make them feel safe? If so why the fuck do you prefer tall guys who DON'T lift? Wouldn't a tall guy who lifts make you feel even safer?
>>27928903
>tumblr image filename
100% positive you thought, "well, just jerked off for the 6th time today, time to shit post," googled "female pepe," grabbed the first image you saw, and then made the most controversial post you could on here
>>27929043
You have been muted for 2 seconds, because your comment was too low in content (0.00%)
>>27930001
Nice Delt bro
>>27940699
But women with abandonment issues are my type of gals
>>27940267
No, if she needs help, or emotional support, I'm more than happy to be there for her.
I just don't feel right having to rely on someone else like that myself. That's my mindset, and I know not everyone rolls that way.
>>27932222
Wasted quads desu senpai
>he wears the same jeans or jacket every day
