Which factor(s) would you say most women automatically skip that makes their logic so shit?
>>27714313
Being female
Original comment
>>27714313
>women's logic so shit
That's a broad generalization. Or should I say a generalization about broads! I'll be here all week.
>>27714437
The logic of the women who fit the description of what I automatically think of when I think of women, I meant
>>27714313
Logic itself. And lack of common sense.
women are more sensitive and allow feelings and emotions to override logic more
>>27714475
So a strawman?
>>27714580
literally this board
>>27714580
Women are better at interpretating subtle meanings, some autists mistake that for being illogical since they don't know how to communicate in body language/tone/social meaning, non-verbal communcation skills
>>27714475
>description of what I automatically think
Stereotypes about women are mostly true, but hey, one can only hope. Met a couple decent ones. None of which i'd want to actually be friends with though.
>>27714313
Women are only concerned about two things:
>Not feeling guilty
>Does it help them?
Girls always put the issue of blame before everything. Their record is the most important factor. Then they determine if it means anything to them. Another person gaining benefit means absolutely nothing to them.
>>27714580
How would you describe this overriding? Surely there must exist particular factors that trigger the emotional decision in a logical tree.
>>27714607
yes, but I was basically curious about what people who thought like this would say.
>>27714675
Such a simplification. Women are being capable of logic (how could they not be?), it's just that it stops at a certain point. Which is the point they arrive to first?
>>27714652
kek, too true m8
