Do you think you'd have better luck with women (and life in general) if you were born c.1900?
Pic semi related: qt silent film actress
I would be married by now and have 5 children.
Modern women don't know how to shut the fuck up and stay in the kitchen. A woman has no place in the workforce, politics, or education.
>>27711000
>I would be married by now and have 5 children
You'd almost certainly be dead by now.
Well both my grandfathers were chad womanizers. But then again they were attractive. But i still feel like it would be easier though in some aspects. For one they were a little less intimidating to approach back then plus there was no social media that you had to have or else you would be percieved as weird. I also feel like if you are a loner and dont have a social circle now it is harder. Not to mention they werent all able to just bang the chaddy 1 percent of guys so they had to rely on getting the rest of men and were focused on getting married and taken care of quickly before they get old. I feel it would be pretty easy to play them if i went back in time. Overall i think the chads would dislike it because they couldnt have sex with a new girl every week however for the rest of us we would do better than we do now. If i were to approach a girl on my level of attractiveness in 2016 vs 1916 i would do much better in 1916.
>>27710954
i'd be in some dead end factory job, but i'd probably have a wife and kids.
>>27710954
fuck yeah we'd all have a much easier time back then, before all the i am woman hear me roar bullSHIT made every woman an annoying, uppity, entitled bitch. bitches back then were kinder, gentler, more lady-like, and knew their fucking place
>>27710954
this is an eerie feeling actually. i'd probably be enlisted (and killed) in WW1
>>27710954
yes, there was significant more social pressure for men and women to marry and reproduce at an early age + women around me most likely would have very limited options in comparison to today
>>27711000
>double dubs and trips
>>27711723
this desu, life in the past wasn't that great. I would probably be working like a slave for some wealthy family in the middle of the amazonian rainforest just to die of malaria or leishmaniasis before I turn 30, also >tfw no gf would still haunt me
at least I can shitpost now
>>27710954
>>27711000
I love how everyone of those threads ends up with everyone posting with like "YEAH! I'D BE A MILLIONAIRE AND INVENT THE COMPUTER BEFORE BILL GATES" or like "I'D BE THE LEADER OF ALL THE TRIBES AND HAVE A HAREM OF CAVEWOMEN" if the thread is about going much more further into the past.
You're a robot today and you'd be a robot then, probably someone else's "wife" or you'd die at the ripe old age of 15.
>>27711723
1. During WW1 conscription was only for men 21+, so you would be ineligible
2. Only 50,000 of the 4,000,000 American soldiers during WW1 died
i'd be stuck at home 24/7 while my husband works
>>27713129
So a NEET? Doesn't sound so bad
>>27713257
you're forgetting the housework, plus a few dozen kids running around
>>27713355
Yeah sounds like a chore. Good for the both of us it's not the 1900's anymore.
>>27711991
>Only 50,000 of the 4,000,000 American soldiers during WW1 died
That's because they entered a year before the war ended
Hell no.
Right now I can do fuck all and still live better and have a better shot with women then back then.
You think shit is hard now, you don't even know the true level of suffering that is being lower class in the 1900s.
