I think its about time for a women hate thread again, post the most rage inducing pics/stories possible. Make me loath women even more.
>>27710717
a personnel favorite...
desu orginomno
>doesnt seem to be any single guys left!!!
And they say men are the shallow ones.
>>27710838
I hate people like this. "I partied hard in my twenties" "why aren't there any single guys that want me?" "WAHHH"
I'm in my twenties, and do you know what I'm doing? I'm getting a finance degree, because analysis interests me. She could have spent her twenties doing anything. Even if she couldn't afford college, she could still read a book, exercise, volunteer, whatever. But instead, "hurr durr, I partied," and men like me are expected to want these dull, uninteresting, impulsive, morons.
baka desu familiari
>>27710838
>>27711489
tl:dr god damnit
>>27711489
>girl goes to a party
>gets stoned
>a guy takes her away from the others
>they make out
>she's "scared" but only says she's not sure
>they bang
>she regrets it
>>27711476
You realize that you can party AND better yourself as a human being, right? It's not an either/or thing.
>>27710717
Thispictureisreal
>>27711581
Yeah, but there's a difference between partying, and what was described in the post I was responding to. I was criticizing people that base their whole life around partying. I just didn't word my post very well.
>>27711476
It's hilarious you actually think they want a guy like you.
>>27711581
What's even worse for him to process is more often than not the work hard, party hard types are super successful.
>>27711575
>>27711575
Learn to read. They didn't even have sex. He passed out while making out with her.
>>27711647
You do know literally nobody at all bases their entire life around partying, right anon? Well, except for event planners.
>>27710717
I used to peruse these threads foe fun but now I use them as fuel in attempt to stop my maudlin heart from ever loving a woman again. It's fucking pointless; love isn't special, it's just another powerful driving emotion like fear, anger, or sorrow.
>>27711682
>What's even worse for him to process is more often than not the work hard, party hard types are super successful
>more often than not
Because you didn't say a lot, you're a pompous fuck. You confidently assert that more than 51% if the "work hard party hard" crowd? Lemme see a citation tut pretentious fuck-mook
>>27711838
>being this utterly furious and bitter for no real reason.
How do you think they afford to party, you utter retard? Do you think drinks, drugs, cover charges, tickets, cabs, etc are free?
Do you honestly have no concept of successful, employed, educated people partying hard?
>>27711916
>>being this utterly furious and bitter for no real reason
>furious and bitter
Her have we met? But you're a confused little fella ain'tcha?
I thought I made it clear, pomposity in any form just grates on my nerves, and it's pretty pompous of you to confidently assert more than half of currently socio-normative demographic reflecting the Zeitgeist is.. "super successful"
>>27711682
A bunch do, because once I pass the CFA exam I'll be making six figures. More often then not party hard types aren't successful. Most of the people I've met that are party hard types get Cs in all of their classes, and end up in a low level position. There are a few successful people that party hard, but if you look at most, especially in tech and business, they are fairly straight laced.
>>27711712 I'm trying to describe a certain type of person. I'm just having a hard time verbalising it i guess. Sorry anon.
>>27712170
Yo, where do I begin studying for the CFA? Can I take the exam without having any college? I already do research work dealing with quantum field theory, but I want to expand my horizons. Any suggestions here?
>>27712463
www.cfainstitute.org
just start here. it has all of the requirements, what you need to know, etc.
>>27712511
Fucking dope. Thanks bro.
>>27712533
Sure thing anon. Much love from the finance industry.
>>27712170
>>27712463
>>27712511
>>27712533
can we go back to women hate please
I don't have a picture but does anyone else hate women who take an immense amount of pride in kissing each other? like not even dykes, but straight girls who clearly do it for attention. it pisses me off so much because they think they're hot shit
>>27712675
>too beta to realize that the final form of women hate is actually ignoring their existence and improving yourself
Come on, faggot. Get on board.
>>27712702
I wish it was socially acceptable to call them out on being filth and degenerate. but the orbiters lure me back in with their charms
>>27712149
>being this autistic and pretentious
>call other people pompous because they worded something in a way that triggered you
You're fucking ridiculous, you socially retarded cunt
>>27712752
I know this feel. I truly do. That's why I need to direct my attention elsewhere so I can find a sense of gratification as opposed to foaming at the mouth wanting back hand a bitch over her antics.
>>27712170
>accountants
>party hard types
>>27710717
im all out of hate anon
im just waiting apathetically for death at this point.
>>27712170
>>27711476
how many women have you been with so far?
>>27712858
No dude. No. You don't get to just dismiss what I'm saying because you don't like it
The fact of the matter is that for you to confidently apply even a soft valuation to something for which you have no date beyond anecdotal is pomposity.
Fuck you with your greentext defenses fucking normalshit
>this is what women actually talk to each other about
Monogamy is dead robots you're going to have to settle.
>>27712971
>>27712998
I'm so glad I'll never be with anybody again
>>27712971
>>27712998
>women have sex
damn them
>>27712935
>posts pompous, arrogant garbage
>is still trying this desperately to deflect being BTFO
Again, how do you think those people afford the social lives they have, you wretched autist? Answer the question and then admit you're a pretentious fucking idiot.
Don't you want a girlfriend with character anon?
Why are there so many butthurt white knights in this thread?
>born 9/10
>no social skills
>start browsing /r9k/ senior year of high school
>lightbulb
>clean myself up
>start lifting and going on /fit/
>joining social circles and pretending to like sports in front of women
>lose my virginity by pretending to have experience using shit i got from porn
>proceed to find the most mentally unstable and clingy chicks to fuck through my male friends who know them
>getting revenge on roasties for robots one autista at a time
Every time I fuck, I do it for you, /r9k/.
>>27713142
Good work anon, I'm proud of you.
>>27713160
where's the father
t
b
h
>>27713142
>born 9/10
it amazes me how many people on here are convinced that they were born outstandingly attractive
>>27713168
Idk, she was one of the girls on Teen mom or 16 and pregnant or whatever.
>>27713031
It's betas like you who make women believe it's perfectly fine to be sluts then settle for a provider. Enjoy your roastie left overs
>>27713183
considering how I realized whores throw themselves at me I made an educated guess. my parents are both normie genetic lottery winners
>>27713199
It is fine. When we're done with them they get handed on to you.
Know your place and show some gratitude, omega.
>b-b-but 80/20 rule isn't real
>>27713098
Oh OK so you just have no kind of fucking idea what you're talking about word
>>27713222
Women cannot control themselves when that much free attention is available.
>>27711716
maudlin
new addition to my vocab.
>>27712935
>No dude. No. You don't get to just dismiss what I'm saying because you don't like it
That's actually what you've been doing lol.
Convinced you're baiting.
>>27713222
The only people who say its not real is the 20%. Most guys understand it is real. Really depends who you hang out with.
Women need to be treated like property again. A father owns his daughter until he sells her to a husband who will own her. Women should stay in the house cooking, cleaning, and obeying her husband. Cunts shouldn't be allowed to speak because the lack the level of rationality that men have and are child like. Imagine if children were allowed to vote for example.
Women are basically objects, good for making babies and nothing else. They are possessions to be owned for a specific purpose like vehicles or firearms.
>fembots are lonely too you guise!!!11!1
>>27710717
why does it take so long for fembots to reply?
>roasties now openly practice extortion
http://www.realworlddivorce.com/ChildSupportLitigationWithoutMarriage
>Caliphate fucking when
>>27713387
probably busy talking to her other orbiters and Chad.
is it even possible for a fembot to be attracted to a robot?
>>27713471
No, because one of those things you mentioned doesn't exist.
>>27713221
>a beta thinking he can dictate terms to anyone
o i am laffin
>>27713160
This is the only one that truly rumbles my jumbles.
It's actually a really good idea for people to take out their children and teach them manners and social skills and whatnot. Yet, how did she turn this into "he's six years old and needs dating skills :)" and "he's gotta respect women in particular :)" crap? Why can't she just teach him to respect everyone equally?
>>27713492
what about the girls that post here
>>27713253
>still refusing to answer the question
Here's another one for you - what does work hard, party hard mean, you illiterate autist?
>>27713590
they're called either "femanons" or "roasties".
>>27713623
so why cant a femanon like a robot
>>27713558
>omega trying to convince himself he has options
All of my KEKS
>>27710717
Why does this make you hate women? Everyone is always looking for someone better. Anyone who says otherwise is a liar.
>>27711716
>Don't question this.
I kek every time.
>>27713637
I never said a femanon couldn't like a robot.
>>27713221
>we're
>implying you're not a virgin white knight
This is honestly disgusting, go defend sluts somewhere else Carl.
>>27713637
Because women only want chads, not betas like us. See also >>27713369
>>27712170
I used to party very hard in college and got a lot of c's. Hell I even took 5 years to finish (thanks to schoolbux). Now I have a successful career and make six figures.
Stop hating. People are different.
>>27713692
>bitterly projecting his true self after being BTFO
This never works, omega. Thanks for mopping up after the rest of us.
>>27711716
>love isn't special, it's just another powerful driving emotion like fear, anger, or sorrow.
Holy fuck, I can't believe I never thought of it this way. We think of love as something so much more special and less palpable than anything else, when in reality it's just a normal emotion. I think this thought is comforting.
Another step further into my nihilistic, cynical rabbit-hole. Thanks anon.
>>27713770
This makes my blood boil. Women are evil demons, we need to re-establish a patriarchy like Rome and beat these cows into line. Fuck, Islam almost seems tempting after reading these threads.
If they want to view men as money bags and embrace survival of the fittest, then they need to be beaten into submission and stripped of their rights.
>>27713402
>that link
UNHOLY FUCKER OF MOTHERS
>>27711916
all those things are free if you have a vagina
>>27713971
Well put, but that requires a massive shift in political and social thinking. Men need to realize what women are really like, and that they will be snuffed out of existence by chad (and the other rich assholes who get all the girls) if they do not act in their own interests.
These threads are good at doing this.
>>27711916
>How do you think they afford to party, you utter retard?
I know plenty of poor, working class people who party hard. It really isn't too big of a bust to someone's budget to party. Especially if they have had money saved up for them for college by their parents.
>>27713334
I feel the shame that I hope your parents would feel if they knew you were saying something like that.
Because only the most ignorant people ignore objective remarks due to their ego.
Literally only the hood dumb niggas from my high school would say some shit like that.
>>2f7713622
Like my coworkers who work ever week and go out every Friday and Saturday trying to fuck girls?
Like my brother who does business analytics and goes to edm shows rolling on Molly?
I was born and live in NYC and my name is on my fucking lease. I know more than enough normals who party but I'm not gonna be as self-important enoigh as to claim, "yeah more than half of them are unsuccessful", because I like what I'm saying and I think it sounds right
>>27714074
>Also, I advise reading this:
>how-to-date-a-fat-girl
>>27710717
Women are whores. This shit was after a year of I love you please be with me.
>>27714179
She had a lot of fucking nerve.
2/2
>>27713160
Male feminist in training
>>27714179
>>27714227
whats going on here
and why the tampon?
Did this bitch cheat on you and is telling her friend or something?
>>27714254
Yes, she cheated and this was the conversation I found on her phone.
>>27714270
Did you show her the pictures?
How did she react?
Are you a cuck and did you get back with her?
>>27714179
>hella
Highschooler confirmed
Also why the fuck are you talking to this girl? Don't be somebody's beta orbiter.
>>27714282
>Are you a cuck and did you get back with her?
Of course he got back with her.
This is /r9k/ we're talking about.
>>27714173
>adiposeactivist
>>27714227
>look at my bloody tampon
is this normal for girls?
I don't know much about female hygiene, but one time I snuck into the girls room to take a shit
I wasn't expecting anyone to be there because it was like 1 am in a building near the back of my uni, but there were two girls in there who started having a shit contest to see who could shit the hardest
I'm assuming that they were drunk, but man it was super gross, and that's coming from the guy who shits in ladies rooms because it makes him feel more comfortable
showing someone your bloody tampon is like wiping your ass to show someone the color of your shit, or the crustyness of your cumsock, or the texture of your vomit
literally why?
I'd understand if I saw a guy save liters of his jizz on 4chan, but that was casually sent to a friend close enough to where you'd reveal your cheating infidelity
>>27714282
I woke her out of bed pissed as fuck, told her she needs to get up and get the fuck out of my bed. called her a cheating bitch, etc etc.
She said she was just joking and was trying to shock her friend (knowing her humor/personality and the tampon picture, I actually believed this for a few months)
I confirmed it later on though after her and her friend got in a fight.
>>27714390
>(knowing her humor/personality and the tampon picture, I actually believed this for a few months)
> I actually believed this
>>27714390
>I actually believed this for a few months
top kuk
>>27714227
>that tampon
i dont understand
>>27714179
>>27714227
>>27714390
Why didn't you take a screenshot on her phone, send the pictures to your phone, and then delete everything from her phone instead of taking a crappy picture of a screen?
>>27714390
>I actually believed this
>>27714385
It was normal for her. She'd like taste herself every day (non-period). I thought it was hot. Her blood she wouldn't taste, but she'd wipe it on me messing around every period. Would even draw stuff on me with her blood if I'd let her.
>>27710717
Women are superior to men in every way. That should be rage-inducing for you, OP, largely because you know it's the truth.
>>27714449
Well not surprised she cheated. You litrelly were shitting were you ate. Deserved it you normie.
>>27714423
Some smartphones can't take screenshots.
These threads don't anger me anymore, after a few years you just begin to accept society lied to us and feel disappointment towards them
>>27714449
>she'd wipe it on me messing around every period. Would even draw stuff on me with her blood if I'd let her
>>27713942
You never thought about it cause youre 12 year old
>>27714454
wew, gr8 b8 m8
>>27714454
Nothing wrong with ol' TC
>>27714390
That fucking sucks, anon. I'm sorry. I hope she got syphilis from that dude.
Reminder that women will always cheat or leave in any given relationship. Best way to not get cucked is to not date girls (and if you do, don't date them for long)
>>27714449
what the fuck is wrong with you you fucking monster
>>27714467
>>27714407
>>27714411
Yeah, but she was the hottest girl I had ever dated. The sex was pretty great too, I wanted to give her the benefit of the doubt anyway.
Also, I am double digits older than her and really... I don't give a shit.
>>27714486
>These threads don't anger me anymore, after a few years you just begin to accept society lied to us and feel disappointment towards them
>Implying that's a good thing.
You are a pussy who gave up. People like you enable this shit. You are pathetic.
>>27714468
I'm like 70% certain that it's an iphone
>>27714487
>I thought it was hot.
>>27714536
>People like you enable this shit.
How? I'm never beta with women, I just pump and dump them
>>27714423
I could of, but then I'd have to bother to cover my tracks and taking the screenshot of her phone screen actually looks more real.
She was sleeping in the bed next to me.
>>27714533
>I don't give a shit.
If you didn't give a shit you wouldn't have confronted her, you're just a cuck.
>bb-bb i believed her for months
Man you are pathetic.
>>27714536
>Controlling your anger and accepting the true nature of women is bad
Literally what
>>27714536
>it's pathetic to not get buttblasted about normalfags acting like normalfags
>>27714536
>People like you enable this shit
>by not getting super upset about bullshit posted on a forum for chinese cartoons, you aren't helping up contribute absolutely nothing to absolutely no one
>>27714536
There no good women left. Giving up is the only thing that makes sense when the only options are being a cuck or not dating. What, is a single man supposed to change society and all its degenerate sluts?
>>27714533
>Also, I am double digits older than her
MOOOOOOODS!
>>27714581
I gave a shit then, I don't care if girls are sluts, just don't lie to me about it.
Go fuck 3 guys this month, ask me if I want to be number 4 and I'll probably say sure. Just don't pretend to do and be something you're not.
>>27713222
>>27713336
But it's a myth:
http://www.hookingupsmart.com/2010/09/14/hookinguprealities/sex-and-the-pareto-principle/
The number of men interested in hookups outnumber women. So the hookup-interested women become very promiscuous and have their pick of the litter. But most women aren't like that as shown by the fact that they have substantially less partners than men.
Sure you can say "women lie about their partner count to make it low" but men also lie to make their partner count high. So it's safe to say men have more sexual partners (Due to fucking the few promiscuous women) or if that's not true then at the very most men and women have around the same number of partners.
>>27714626
This
Too many girls wanting to act like they're pure, nice people when they go out and cheat on their boyfriends and lie about their sexual history. I have a weird respect for sluts who can admit they're sluts and will bee 100% honest about their sex life, they at least know their place.
>>27714536
>enabling
>If someone doesent act to stop something even if his action would be totally irrelevant to solving the problem, then its still his responsability
Litterally sjw mentality
>>27714627
I dunno if it's literally 20%, but everybody can see in Western society that a small selection of men are getting access to basically all the women
hell I'm even seeing females admit to it these days so the jig is up
>>27714627
>So it's safe to say men have more sexual partners
That actually doesn't make any sense
It's safer to say men have less sexual partners because they have less people available to be sexual partners AND less people who even want to be partners
The number of men interested in hookups does outnumber the number of women, but the number of men and women who actually hook up would be exactly even if the whole 20% thing was actually false
Just look at dating site stats about who is attracted to whom, who responds to whom, and who gets the most attention
Obviously women get far more attention than males because they don't seek relationships in the same way, but you can still see that with women who are rated to have low attractiveness/physical appeal and men who are rated the same, the women have far more people interested in them
>>27714627
Roastie slut retard, linking a blog and calling reality a myth doesn't change reality.
80/20 is undeniable hard fact. A discussion about it can only start when you accept the reality of that fact. It must take place within that factual, rather than your fantasy, framework.
>>27714731
Of topic but god damn who the fuck made that original comic? Do people think it's really THAT hard to be a WoC in America? Seriously?
>>27714751
it should unironically be a white male
should have the jew taking money from his pocket too
>>27714751
are you a WoC in America?
>>27714751
>WoC
Just say nigger or negress, slut. Stop introducing your soft retard speech to this board. When in Rome, you useless cum bucket.
>>27714751
How can you support the notion that the 80/20 ratio is real but think that being a "WoC" isn't difficult
I mean, the very same data that supports the notion that a majority of guys have bad luck when it comes to dating shows that minority women, particularly black women, are even more undesirable
outside of everything social, it's harder to be a woman
>>27714567
>>27714595
>>27714600
>>27714608
>>27714620
>>27714684
Keep making excuses for your cowardice and apathy. It's ok, just let chad breed you out. The fact that you embrace your oblivion and sneer at anyone who suggests you do otherwise is why you will die alone.
Men have forgotten how to stand up for themselves, you think working with each other for your own interests against people who breed against you is silly. Meanwhile Jews, Niggers, Hispanics, Asians, and women are all doing it and slowly replacing you.
>>27714788
>its harder to be a woman
I'll make it harder for you too slut, just jump on this dick.
>>27714807
stop pretending that getting mad at someone over the internet ever did anything
>inb4 you make another mass response because you have nothing of value to add after getting BTFO
>>27714787
To understand SJWs, you have to think like them, as perhaps speak like them
>>27714824
>gorgeous young blondes with designer clothes and handbags
right, because the reason they are privileged isn't because they are white and have rich parents, it's because they are female
nice picture, asshole
>>27714541
The blood thing was a little odd, but really I just wanted to get her comfortable enough to period fuck.
>>27714842
If you stare too long into the SJW, the SJW will stare back into you. Too much risk.
>>27714862
I may be too far gone then.
>>27714852
Look at this man's sons. All his sons sitting around the table, being privileged because of race and not sex.
Why did you end your post with the hole you wanted me to fuck? Spread it slut.
>>27713142
>revenge
dude you are just being social, people go to sports bars and shit just to have some bro time, and roasties go just to impress the guys.
also, what the fuck does r9k have to do with anything?
>FUCKING NORMIE REEEEEEEEEEEE!!1
>>27714852
Dudes white too senpai
![1437913195561[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/HHsg31c.png "1437913195561[1].png")
>>27714889
Could you imagine what his life would be like if he had daughters?
Sitting down around him at a table, just hanging out with him, enjoying the day, in a comfortable silence because when you have a real relationship, you don't have to fill the air with meaningless bullshit
This is what he got instead
A bunch of no good punks who are needlessly violent and cruel to their peers, absorbing cultures and adding them to the awkward mishmash of style that they deem cool, hanging out with other degenerates (yes, "other", because they are considered that as well), using his credit cards to buy cars and sports equipment they are just going to wreck later to show of to their boys and to engage in meaningless pursuits while they slowly leech off of their fathers success
because they get to do that, they get to just jump right into society because their father laid out the plan that instead of improving they took advantage of
>>27714926
That's really not what I'm debating senpai nor is it the point I'm making
>>27715029
Your entire post was incoherent wishy washy babble with no substance. Women are pampered sluts, men do the work.
>>27715073
Your entire argument is based upon your own bullshit personal opinion that is literally driven by getting mad about literally anything on the internet
Just because you lack the comprehension skills to have an actual arguement without resorting to posting images that contain the point you could never make, doesn't mean you get to play with the big boys, kiddo
>>27714889
>>27715029
Neither of these posts make any fucking sense, the original dude in the post had daughters and both of you mentioned it like they were sons
>>27714627
The Pareto Principle is used as hyperbole to get the point across. I don't think anyone but jaded robots literally thinks that 80% of guys are consigned to jacking it. We simply mean that a minority of men are having a disproportionate number of sexual encounters. The stats in the article bear this out:
>4. About 29% of men will have 15+ partners in their lifetime, compared with about 9% of women.
That's only counting monogamous sexual partners, hook ups would be much higher. Nothing is said about who these men have sex with so it is possible that women have sex with only two guys in a year but both are Chads. That would feed into the cock carousel and pareto principle.
There is no data that I know of which refutes the cock carousel. For the sake of clarity it is: young women have many sexual encounters with many different men until they get too old and haggard for men to be interested in them. Data on monogamous sexual partners obviously has little to do with this.
>>27715112
>girl is getting increasingly angry
Calm down there sweetheart. I'm sorry if you feel oppressed. Wage gap is totes real, you are super duper like, totes, oppressed.
You are super smart and like, totally, because, like, you like have such big comprehension and like massive vocabulary. You are so super duper strong, totally. Images with words r like totes not things that exist like oh em gee gurl you are strong he is kiddo.
>>27715127
Don't be an idiot
The first post was sarcastic, pointing out how his life would be easier and more fun if he had sons instead of catering to his 3 daughters' whims
The second post was the reverse, pointing out the hypocrisy that lies in the post, both within the defense (life would be better with sons) and attacking statement (life would be better without daughters)
lrn2reading comprehension
>>27715171
but anon
I'm not a grill
think about it
if I was a girl, I would have mentioned it several times, ruining the whole point of being anonymous
>>27715171
>Wage gap is totes real
Within the specific jobs that have an equal amount of women, or a significant amount of women to compare to the average of men
>the word comprehension is too hard for you to comprehend
go back to building blocks, son
>>27714692
But those're just personal anecdotes. The blog uses data from the Center for Disease Control (CDC).
>>27714696
But dating sites are sausage fests and men are expected to initiate. If you look at men messaging women they tend to favor attractive ones. Meanwhile women reply to and message guys they see as unattractive.
>>27714731
A blog with data from the Center for Disease Control (CDC).
>>27715195
You sound like a bitch. Therefore you are a bitch.
>>27715223
I see you have a fetish for young boys. Should I bare my ass for you while I play with my blocks, sweet thing?
>>27715233
>If you look at men messaging women they tend to favor attractive ones
That's a constant across both genders and applies to literally every single situation ever
seriously, name 1 situation that involves comparing two things
>Meanwhile women reply to and message guys they see as unattractive
The significant statistic wasn't the amount of women replying (not initially messaging) to unattractive guys, it was the amount of guys that women saw as unattractive, which was completely skewed when compared to a normal curve
>>27715129
Sexual partners is a catch all term for hookups and gf's/bf's you've had sex with.
>>27715223
>Some occupations have men making more on average, therefore they must be oppressing the women
Or maybe men work longer hours and push for promotion more often? Not like that's been proven in countless surveys anyway.
>>27715233
>Meanwhile women reply to and message guys they see as unattractive.
why lie when you know you're lying? ah yes, a troll
>>27715247
At least I have a reading level beyond the 3rd grade
>>27715269
>young boys
>Should I bare my ass
confirmed for underaged
>>27715294
It's also been proven that women are often discouraged from taking hire positions
The number of hours worked would have been accounted for, and has been accounted for multiple times with every study done
>>27713160
There's absolutely nothing wrong with this.
But it's probably fake, though.
>>27715310
Name your college and degree then slutwhore. Put your money where your mouth is, right on top of my cock. Prove it.
Unless you were a dumb bitch with no history of achievement. C'mon, prove it. Oh wait, that's right, you can't.
>>27715338
*higher
You should also take note that literally no solutions that have been seriously considered to the wage gap problem have been "pay women more"
It's always, "encourage more women to do more"
>>27715306
>displaying the world trade center in such a way
For shame
>>27715285
http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-looks-and-online-dating/
Women tended to judge men more harshly on OKCupid. But men were more likely to message a the top 20% of attractive women than women were to pursue the top 20% of men. Women might be harsh, but they judge less on physical attractiveness than men do.
>>27715291
Hook ups aren't just sex. Blowies given to strangers should count when determining promiscuity.
>>27715356
>thinks you need to have a college degree to have a 3rd grade reading level
confirmed for 3 year old
I'm surprised your mommy is typing all of this out for you to post on 4chan
attention anon's mommy, you have to be 18+ to post on this site, which means you should have 18+ opinions
>>27714423
Taking a photo from your own phone is waaaay faster that all the crap you just listed, plus I guess the guy was in a hurry since he's spying.
>>27715310>>27715306
In a more civilized age you two could have possibly married each other and had children. Now you both are sending hatefull ideas back and forth via an electronic gloryhole about who is more miserable and who has it worse. You both do. There's your answer. You both do
>>27715338
>>27715360
>Just because women don't higher positions it's men's fault
kek. It's 2016, feminism is being shoved down everyone's throats and most people think men and women are equals. They have nobody to blame at all, "Internal misogyny" is a fucking myth and hardly any men are openly telling women to stay in lower positions.
>>27715401
>waah waah you backed me into a corner im a retard who couldn't even make community college why did you have to ask for proof
deflect harder sweet cheeks
>>27715338
nice sources
Google 'gender productivity gap' get your mind blown
This literally just happened 15 mins ago.
>neighbor girl texts me at midnight
>asks me to help her get her car unstuck
>I'm in bed at this point so I ask why she needs her car at midnight, cause I'm not getting out of bed if she's going to the bars or something dumb
>"It's not like I need to tell you. Feel free to make assumptions as you please. I was asking a favor as a friend and if you want to say no that's fine. "
>literally what
>tell her I'm just asking cause I'm not getting up for some dumb bs but I'll help of it's important
>she gets pissed talking about how she doesn't need her actions judged relevant or not by me
>starts swearing at me over text
Like what the actual fuck
>>27715399
They would count those. It's the CDC. They're recording data for public health reasons.
>>27714414
If there is blood, she isnt pregnant
If there is no blood, she's pregnant
>>27715388
>Women tended to judge men more harshly on OKCupid
>they judge less on physical attractiveness than men do
Pick on
Also, when you combine that statistic with the number of messages received as based on attractiveness (just using it as an average), you see that
1. All 3 levels of men would probably message the hot girl, the medium girl, and the ugly girl
2. If Women pursued unattractive men as much as you're claiming, the unattractive male would have a positive non-zero number in his inbox
>>27715419
But the quality of the picture would be better
>>27715420
>waaah waaah, two people are shitposting in my shitpost thread, but it's not the kind of shit I like to smell
>>27715437
>thinks you need a college degree to learn how to read
dear anon's mommy, please take your child away from the screen
>>27715493
She was sucking dick and getting gang banged. Why do you even message her? Are you her shoulder to cry on while she rides Chad?
>>27715552
you deflected harder!
deflect even harder now!
>>27715532
It's not your job to tell robots how reproduction works. Let his mom do that over some tendies when he is comfy. You're going to traumatize him!
>>27715430
>>27715473
I have
I've also actually read studies, instead of just parroting whatever image macro that happens to get posted
productivity is accounted for, it's not even an issue if you're comparing hourly rates
>>27715552
>But the quality of the picture would be better
Nigga, your biggest concern is not getting caught, not the fucking quality.
>>27715493
>Drunk friend asks for a favor
>Autist asks condescending about it and doesn't say yes
>Autist wonders why drunk girl responds poorly
You should've tried to get money out of it or something, you're a literal retard
>>27715567
>deflect harder
dear anon's mommy
please explain to him, using the smallest words available in your vocabulary, that abandoning your argument and telling someone that they are deflecting is the ultimate form of deflection
Running out of something to say and the projecting on to someone else your insecurities is no way for a toddler to behave
>>27715574
>I've also actually read studies
>>27715554
I cut friendship contact already but we still have basic neighbor contact like help me jump my car. I'm just not getting up at midnight to do it unless there's a good reason
![oJ2AJGn_[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/cPRv1Z4.jpg "oJ2AJGn_[1].jpg")
>>27715360
www.women.anz.com/at-anz/we-are-bridging-the-super-gap
Not only are they actually just throwing money at women, they plan to throw jobs at them too http://www.baka.com.au/business/workplace-relations/men-will-will-have-to-lose-jobs-to-make-way-for-gender-equality-transfields-diane-smithgander-20151013-gk7kzt.html
>>27715399
But they didn't. Nice dubs tho, have a Cirno.
>>27715574
Please post a few good sources that corroborate your argument, then
>>27715590
But he's a dude
If he really wanted to, he could just knock her down or run away
Also, it takes much less time than to pull out your phone, unlock it, load the camera app, and then take the worst kind of screenshot ever
>>27715493
>texts you at midnight
in hindsight, if it were important she'd have rang your doorbell or at least called
>>27715595
deflection reaching maximum deflectiveness!
vagina reaching maximum sandiness!
deflect even harder! we're almost there!
>>27715594
Nah her car was right outside next to my house. She wasn't drunk though she might have wanted to be. I'm not getting up at midnight to help you go somewhere if you can't even tell me why.
>>27715594
>drunk driving
let her die
Reposting my favorite woman getting absolutely wrecked story
>>27715609
She gets up to stupid shit at late hours. Clear sign of thotness. Help her but don't be a beta politeman, be a condescending prick about it. You will achieve p in v
>>27715595
this roastie is fucking toastie
big old floppy meat curtains
>>27715679
>Becoming a cuck for money
I think they both got BTFO honestly
>>27715610
The first link isn't actually increasing wages, it's increasing retirement collection services
It's a roundabout way by le sneaky merchant to address the issue without directly increasing wages
it's cheaper this way because people could switch jobs before actually continuing with that specific retirement plan
>>27715620
>>27715608
http://www.aauw.org/research/the-simple-truth-about-the-gender-pay-gap/
http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2012/ted_20120110.htm
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304198004575172382976442708
>>27715641
>>27715595
Can you two shut the fuck up please?You're ruining my comfy woman hate thread. This is a safe space.
>>27715641
You aren't even arguing at this point
anon's mommy, please tell anon the definition of deflection
Also, tell him that abandoning literally every single point to focus on one insignificant one that is loosely defined as unguarded by anon's own definition is also a type of definition
I didn't start deflecting until you did
I honestly wonder how someone like feels knowing they are so wrong that to stop shitposting would mean dying on the inside
>>27715610
They didn't really specify that. All I saw was that some people according to the Kinsey data thought blowies weren't.
And ty famalam.
>>27715753
>A biased source
>A study that doesn't even prove an intentional wagegap
>A study from 2010 hidden behind an account-wall
Wow nice studies, you really put me in my place buddy
>>27715779
fuck off nerd
I'm doing the heavy lifting of the posting here
>>27714449
>but she'd wipe it on me messing around every period
>>27715806
>A study that doesn't even prove an intentional wagegap
nobody is arguing that it's intentional
nobody is going out of their way to say "tee hee, I'm paying women less because they are women"
You also asked me to show my sources about the existence of the pay gap, not the reasons behind the pay gap
The reasons behind the pay gap wouldn't be pure data with charts, it's be a psycho-analytical review of potential reasons we do certain things
Which has even more potential to be biased than the first link I posted
Literally every non-biased source shows that there is a wage gap, but it's not as severe as some dictate
Besides, if you won't use the bureau of labor statistics' hourly wage report, then there's literally no hope for you
>>27715552
Women message far less than men, but when they do they're less picky basically.
men are disgusting, vile, creatures. why would i want to get stuck in a marriage taking care of a manlet and however many kids?
>>27715753
None of the links you cite mention occupation or hours or anything besides cunt-having vs dick-having
Here's some real info from lefty media no less:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/05/the-biggest-myth-about-the-gender-wage-gap/276367/
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/08/gender_pay_gap_the_familiar_line_that_women_make_77_cents_to_every_man_s.html
>>27715807
No, you're somehow shitting up the shitpostiest place in the universe. You're out autisming r9 fucking k and feeding a tumblr troll. She's rubbing her fat pussy to your "oppression" you know that right?
>>27715863
If you agree it's not intentional then what's the damn argument
Women get paid less because they work less, have less ambition, and have different goals in life. God forbid women and men are different and that we may not be 100% the same. Women still aren't oppressed in the slightest.
>>27715876
If they were less picky, then the average ugly guy would be getting more messages than 0
But look here
>>27715306
http://i.4cdn.org/r9k/1460088949653.png
Even the most unattractive female gets just as much as the most average looking guy
the most unattractive guy has an infinitely smaller percent of messages as the most unattractive girl
And at the rate messages were sent, it would take a little more than 2 years for the most attractive guy to have a full inbox
If women were actually less picky, the most unattractive guy would have a non-zero positive number of messages (replies)
>>27711047
Theirs rainbow penis's on that thing...
>>27715902
>http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/08/gender_pay_gap_the_familiar_line_that_women_make_77_cents_to_every_man_s.html
This articles still shows a wage gap
And like my argument, it explains that there is a gap, just not as big as people say
>http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/05/the-biggest-myth-about-the-gender-wage-gap/276367/
Again, shows a wage gap, shows it's not as big as people say
>>27715965
>what's the damn argument
That the solution to the problem is to incentive women to become as competitive as men, decrease gender tensions/differences, and give women the relative equal pay they deserve
>>27715915
>boohoo, boohoo, boohoo
I don't speak faggot and google translate is giving me nothing
>>27715679
I don't get what her problem is. She doesn't once say the sex was bad, or she was only doing it because she thought they were his friends. In fact it sounds like she really enjoyed all the dickings she was receiving.
She isn't being faithful but then the 'boyfriend' is receiving monetary compensation for that. I just don't get it, it seems like they are both winning.
>>27716044
>the solution to the problem is to incentive women to become as competitive as men
Impossible. Women are innately less competitive, we can't change neurobiology
>decrease gender tensions/differences
Top kek, listen to yourself
>give women the relative equal pay they deserve
Already happening
>>27715975
Picture it this way:
Ugly Woman: 15 messages
Average Woman: 75 Messages
Hot Woman: 420 messages
Ugly Guy: 0 Messages
Average Guy: 12 Messages
Hot Guy: 38 Messages
The hot guy gets about 3 times the messages compared to the average guy. The hot woman gets about 5.6 times the messages compared to the average woman. That's counting 428, not the 500+ one.
>>27716044
Holy shit femicunt FUCK OFF. You have like the entire fucking internet to play around in. Literally the whole thing is a safespace for your butthurt. Is it really so hard for you to let men have one little corner to bitch about you?
What do you think you are going to accomplish here? That we are going to read a witty back and forth discourse and think... hmmm maybe women do have it rough. Fuck no we aren't. Most of us were brought up thinking that way and only after having reality shoved in our faces did we begrudgingly accept that women are privileged out their cunts.
>>27716084
>Women are innately less competitive
according to a study detailed by the slate article that >>27715902 posted, women are just as likely to ask for promotions
whether or not the receive them would be perceived gender tension/difference
>Top kek, listen to yourself
says the dude that says women are innately less competitive
is your argument against my claim involving the notion of gender differences seriously "pshaw, gender differences, like those exist"
>Already happening
If that were true, and literally all variables were accounted for, then why are the no studies detailing that?
This has been an issue for more than 20 years, so if women were receiving equal pay, wouldn't it make more sense to pay for a study that proves that's wrong?
We are getting rid of as many variables as possible, but it still shows that there is a differences in wages
>>27716044
>the relative equal pay
What does this mean?
I don't think women will ever be as competitive as men. Sure they ask for raises and promotions as often but that doesn't account for all the women who drop out to be moms. As long as being a stay at home or part-time-working mom is a viable option women will be less competitive.
>>27716175
Look fuckhole. If women can prove they are not receiving equal pay they can sue the shit out of their employer.
Quit pretending that unequal compensation due to gender is legal. There are a fucking ton of SJW lawyers who would soak their panties if given the opportunity to sodomize a corporation for doing this.
So where are the fucking lawsuits? If unequal pay is everywhere there should be lawsuits everywhere. Where are they?
>>27716175
A negligible difference. Which is believed to be caused by a lack of negotiating on women's part.
>>27716162
That still means literally nothing and has nothing to do with your previous argument of "women are less picky"
Yes women do message (and in general, use dating services) less than men
No, if women WERE less picky than men, and if the messaging rates actually followed the data you provided in the manner you dictated, the ugly guy would still have more messages than 0
He would have at least SOME interest and that interest would rival that of the average guy because women tend to rate men as more unattractive, meaning the qualifications to be average are lessened so the gap between the average guy and the ugly guy wouldn't be a magnification of infinitely large proportions (I keep saying infinite because had it been a non-zero positive number, we could at least use actual numbers, but because the ugly guy has 0 and because 0 goes into every number an infinite amount of times, I say infinite to not only accurately describe the magnification but also emphasize the very fact that you are wrong by a large degree)
>>27716168
>Holy shit femicunt FUCK OFF
>still thinks I'm a chick
>still hasn't read any of the rest of the thread
r9k is your woman hating heman club
it's the robot board, for robots
hate isn't the default robot setting, it's depression
>>27716257
>What does this mean?
This means, had you read the articles, accounting for every variable that could potentially increase the perceived gender gap
things like productivity, competitiveness, and other things that contribute to a larger wage
>Sure they ask for raises and promotions as often but that doesn't account for all the women who drop out to be moms
Another variable
> As long as being a stay at home or part-time-working mom is a viable option women will be less competitive.
Which implies that it's not a suitable option for males/fathers
>If women can prove they are not receiving equal pay they can sue the shit out of their employer.
They do
All the time, but not every woman can/does/realizes she could
>where are the fucking lawsuits
I'm sorry they don't publish as many lawsuits on buzzfeed or whatever other "media shill" site you hypocritically patronize
>Which is believed to be caused by a lack of negotiating on women's part
By whom?
Show me literally any study done that backs this up
This goes to everyone I'm replying to
I've given the studies I've read, the articles I've read, the literature I've consumed
show me
I'm not talking about some third rate blog
I'm not talking about whatever thoughtpiece bullshit that happens to coincide with your specific brand of toxic ideology
>>27716287
*isn't your woman
>>27716287
Hot Guy: 38
Ugly Guy: 0
Difference: 38
Hot Woman: 428-536
Ugly Woman: 11
Difference 417-525
>>27716287
>hate isn't the default robot setting, it's depression
>OP: I think its about time for a women hate thread again
rekt
>>27716437
>I'm so angry I can't even proofread.
>>27716488
Hot Woman: 536
Ugly Woman: 11
Percent Larger: (536/11)= 4800%
Hot Guy: 38
Ugly Guy: 0
Percent Larger: (38/0)= DNE
38 is infinitely larger than 0
>>27716521
I'm responding to like 5 different guys
way to go on responding to one
>>27716497
>hate is the default robot setting
>>27711878
>here's a thread about loving a tripfag tranny
obviously r9k is the cams and meetups board, right?
>>27711575
It sounds like they didn't even bang
>>27711706
>>27716625
They did bang
she just didn't explicitly say it
just like she didn't explicitly say she didn't want to have sex
infact, she actually said she wanted to have sex
she literally consented to the sex
>>27713802
>I have a successful career and make six figures
>doesn't mention what the career is
Go on, make something up, I'll wait
>>27716588
>>27716488
Also, at the end of the day, you're literally complaining that the ugly girl didn't get as many messages as the hot girl
even though the ugly guy got none whatsoever
>>27710717
tfw all girls do this to you
i mean, h-haha suckers i must be chad
I never realized how much girls are hated. It's really depressing.
>>27714449
>wipe it on me
What the fuck?
>>27713637
I am very much in love with a robot, though he just doesn't know it yet
>>27716419
>This means, had you read the articles, accounting for every variable that could potentially increase the perceived gender gap
http://freakonomics.com/podcast/the-true-story-of-the-gender-pay-gap-a-new-freakonomics-radio-podcast/
>a lot of that occurs a year or two after a kid is born, and it occurs for women and not for men. If anything, men tend to work somewhat harder. And I know that there are many who have done many experiments on the fact that women don't necessarily like competition as much as men do - they value temporal flexibility, men value income growth - that there are various differences.
>really the lion's share of the difference is due to the fact that in every occupation, just about, women receive less than men. And they're receiving less than men for a host of reasons, one of which is that they're not working the same amount of time. And in many occupations, working more hours or being there when the firm wants you to be there earns you a lot more. So, in fact, something like three-quarters of the difference, if you look at the 469 occupations in the Census, and you look at how much is due to the fact that women are disproportionately in certain occupations, and how much is due to the fact that within each occupation there are differences -75% is due to the within each occupation. Thus, another way of putting it is, you could hypothetically give women the male distribution of occupations and you would wipe out only about a quarter of the difference in earnings between men and women.
TL;DR Women earn less because they work the hours that are most convenient to them not the firm.
I can't fucking take it anymore robots. I'm losing my fucking mind and it's partially due to coming to this board. All this cuck shit, this whore shit, it all swirls around in my head like this big fucking cloud. It's nauseating. Every night now I take Xanax just to get these thoughts out of my mind so I can sleep. I don't think I'll ever be able to be in a relationship with someone. I'll be too obsessed with fear of getting cucked. Or obsessed over past partners she has had. If she says she's a virgin then I'll be obsessed with the idea she's lying to me. I wouldn't be able to have sex with her without thinking these things. And the cuckolding. I'm no Chad. No girl pictures me as the ideal man. So if she's with me it's because she's settling for me. She probably brain-cucks me by fantasizing and masturbating to more attractive looking men. I can't do it robots. I wish I could flip a switch in my brain to completely disable my sex drive and desire for romantic companionship. I really wish I could. I think I ought to kill myself.
>>27716768
how did you meet? why are you in love? because i dont believe it
>>27712998
DAMN I wish I could get laid like that. Is it because Im not a woman?
>>27716699
Women are outnumbered on dating sites and men message more often. It's not women being mean.
>>27716588
Average-Hot differences still match up.
Also imagine if the guy's inbox had 1. That's a 3800% larger. His inbox could've easily been 1.
>>27713126
Uhhhh good example. And by good i mean bad, because in the first one she is just saying guys in general and the second one she says guys she liked. Good nitpicking though, you almost had something there
>>27716838
>being weak
top kek
>>27716838
Just like others may have had their time with her you have yours. You will have other times with other women. These trysts will be brief compared to the love you've imagined but it is better to savour them in the moment than to dread their passing.
>>27716838
Chill my manimal.
Accept the conclusions and work with them. Any woman you find is going to be a hustler. A few can live with the reality they live and will tell you they are a slut, most don't. But now that you know that they are don't believe anything they say and look at them the way you know them to be.
Going into the deal know that she will dump you in a second if she can get a hotter guy. Those are the terms of the deal. Don't pretend it's not like that then get surprised later.
Don't get attached and don't aim to get attached. I know it sucks. I know it's not what you want. But that is the way things are.
If you really want out of the game, chemically castrate yourself, then try life out. If you don't do it for too long it is temporary.
>>27716814
>we found out* that the best orchestras in the united states, most of them use a blind when they do auditions
>we found that blind auditions mattered a tremendous amount. Our best estimate was that it was about 25% of an increase, which is pretty large.
>That's right. It appears to have led to an explosion of auditions.
>That's right. I think that this is a very good example of where individuals might not come out to interview - it's expensive to do that in some sense, you have to travel to do it, you have to put your pride on the line. And so now there was just a much larger group of individuals doing these interviews
Tl;dr, there are factors that prevent women from competing at the same level as men which include but are not limited gender bias
*In reference to a paper that points out how the acceptance rate of orchestral auditions may differ based upon perceived gender differences and bias of the judges
>>27716892
>Is it because Im not a woman?
What do you think?
>>27717079
This is a perfect example of someone ignoring the evidence that suits their preconceived notions and excluding all else. You've chosen to focus on a very limited example despite the more relevant information being given to you.
>you could hypothetically give women the male distribution of occupations and you would wipe out only about a quarter of the difference in earnings between men and women.
Fuck off Dona Quixote.
>>27716894
>Also imagine if the guy's inbox had 1
But it didn't
Across all experiments done, the least attractive guy had 0 messages, the least attractive girl had 10 times the amount of the (or one of the) average guy
It shows that women aren't actually less picky
It wasn't just messaging, it was by replies
which means that 0 females replies
(I can't actually find the other study that did this)
Also, if anything you were saying was actually true, the other males, the not completely ugly males but not handsome males's messages would have scaled accordingly
but they only had 1 or 2, while the females in the opposite category had dozens
>>27717192
You claiming that the more relevant information is just your own bias
Your "evidence" is literally just a hypothetical that doesn't balance out actual numbers of females in the workforce
>>27717331
>>27717192
also, you're ignoring evidence that shows women can and will be just as driven as men to compete in the work place
>here's evidence that shows that women will compete more should you give them equal setting
>NUH UH, THIS MINISCULE PART OF THIS ENTIRE ARGUMENT THAT SUPPORTS THE EVIDENCE OF A WAGE GAP SAYS THAT WOMEN DON'T WORK AS HARD
>but this evidence is from the same pap-
>FUCK OFF DONA QUIXOTE
>>27715171
Remind me of pic related.
>tl:dr womyn CEO thinks having an all women work place will be better. Actually fails for them beign stupid and superfluous, along with everyone having a quarrel and laziness.
>>27713126
Whoever made that pic needs to check their reading comprehension
