Who is the bigger loser, the one who has no redeeming qualities, or the one who has everything but still fails?
> ugly robot vs handsome autist
Definitely the one with no redeeming qualities.
At least the other guy has redeeming qualities which redeem him.
>>27679894
Is he not a bigger failure for failing even when a girl gives herself up on a plate?
I don't think looks really have anything to do with how much of a loser you are. I mean being ugly isn't caused by some kind of personality flaw. Unless it's because of poor hygiene or something.
>>27679997
No because at least he got that far.
You're essentially asking:
>Who's the biggest loser? The guy who never started the marathon, or the guy who tripped right before the finish line?
>>27679860
>handsome
>failing life in easymode
"handsome" "robots" need to be purged
>>27680045
In your scenario the guy who tripped before the finish line would feel infinitely worse than the one who never tried.
There's a big difference between a loser who never had any chance and a loser who managed to fail on easy mode.
The former tends to get pity from most, whereas the latter gets only spite from those who put in far more effort than him but due to chance are in a far worse situation.
Speaking as a 6'6" moderately handsome friendless loser
>>27680143
>pity from most
Uhh, have you seen how society treats ugly robots?
>>27680200
My bad, I was referring to getting pity from other robots, not from society at large.
