Are we humans by definition impure?
>>27640056
Can you define "impure" so that your question makes at least some sense?
>>27640056
nothing is pure ever
>>27640072
Sinful. Unclean. Contaminated. Prone to evil. Accepting of evil.
I mean, does an uncorruptible person exist? And if it does, is it even a human anymore?
>>27640128
You are still not being specific enough.
Sinful as in the Christian sense?
Unclean in the Jewish sense?
Contaminated in a racialist eugenics sense?
You need to be more specific.
>muh we're evil
>it's natural to feed on other weaker specimens
>some dumbass decided to intertwine atrocities with our way of life and now millennials think humanity is dark side and shit
It was probably the jews
>>27640128
Nope, the idea of humanity being impure or sinful was made up by racist nomads who wanted to pretend their "civilization" was better than everybody else.
>>27640341
>it's natural to murder bruh
yeah, this attitude is why the word evil exists
Vegetarians are pure sex
>>27640056
Moral purity is a subjective concept. So its up to you to make that decision.
>>27640128
Humans follow human nature
"Good" and "evil" are imaginary qualities, so whichever quality humans fit depends on your definitions of said qualities
>>27640128
Now you have to define "evil". Stop using vague words.
>>27640056
you missed the point
even a "pure" being like the batter appears as a horrible genocidal monster from another perspective
so I guess the answer would be no
>>27640802
They aren't vague if you're not autistically obsessed with the concrete denotation of every word.
>>27641900
No, the answer would be yes then.
>>27643111
oh yeah
it would
