Nope, 80$ gets me an hour long massage.
Snuggling is lazy af.

I would pay up to 200 probably

No. I'd have more fun with a bottle of scotch at that price, or burning off an afternoon's worth of ammo at the target range. I get it though. Some people need that kind of intimacy.

>>27592181
Why wouldn't you just rent a hooker?

Unless that's a cover for an escort agency, I wouldn't be calling them for cuddling.

I probably would. Depends on how nice the girl is and what she feels like and smells like.

>>27592316
Of course it is lmao

>male snugglers
Can't imagine they get too many requests for those.

>>27592181
No, but I've toyed with the idea of being a professional cuddler. It's the easy money of prostitution without the hassle of sucking dick. I'm not bad looking and I have a solid, stocky build that I'm told feels good.
>>27592389
There's enough for at least some of them to make a pretty good living out of it. Even though the demand is low, so is the supply. It's not like porn where there are tons of guys who'd literally do it for free. Also, keep in mind that casual sex isn't the same as intimacy. Sure, it's easy to get Chad to fuck you, but he's not going to stick around afterwards and he's definitely not going to want to spend a quiet night in with you watching 90's romcoms on the couch.

no, i have a female friend who snuggles with me for free. i'm pretty in love with her, and her me, but don't want to compromise friendship with relationship