Today on arcanine sexbot news:
There's now a Scarlett Johansson bot that can move and respond to commands.
> preorder now
>>27575921
If she didn't agree to have her likeness used in this manner, the manufacturer can potentially be sued.
>>27575937
This would also make any existing dolls created in her likeness to be really fucking valuable since the rarity would increase, with minimal to no usage, of course.
>>27575958
> minimal to no usage
You'd have to be Shekelberg not to fuck a Scarlettbot.
>>27575980
Or gay and a wise investor.
The creator and his bot.
>>27575921
What a time to be alive
I mean it's really like a sci fi novel right now
Look how happy they are together!
>>27575997
This is going to be great in the AMWF spammer threads
>>27576013
>requirement 86: copy the chapped lips
>gives it fucked up teeth
japanese people are fucking weird when its comes to teeth
>>27575921
wait until the feminist get a hold of this. The backlash is going to be huge
> waifubot, show how you'd grab a dick
>>27576123
...still would 2bh
> tfw the age of sexbots is here
> too young to explore space
> too old to explore the earth
> just in time to fuck 10/10s all day erryday
Give me a sexbot that cooks and cleans, and I'll never leave the house. Fuck I want it so bad.
>>27575921
This looks way more like Keira Knightley than Scarlett Johansson.
>>27577222
>tfw no Keirabot ;_;
This really isn't going to do us any favours when the robots become self-aware.
No-one stuck their dick in skynet and it still went berserk. What are they going to do when they realise we'd beenrapingrobots?
>>27576104
Don't worry it's already here
Look at the comments
>http://metro.co.uk/2016/04/01/someone-built-a-scarlet-johansson-robot-from-scratch-to-fulfil-a-childhood-dream-5788714/
I fucking hate this bullshit. As soon as a filthy degenerate tranny does something completely insignificant and gets media attention, the response from everyone is
>you go girl
and similar tumblr-tier comments. If they get any criticism at all, normies come at them screaming
>You have no right to judge!!!!!1!!11!!!
>Everyone lives their own way!!!11!!11!!.
Then, as soon as an intelligent man with obviously exceptional skills in electronics and robotics makes a pioneering move in the robotics field while satisfying a childhood dream, the response from normies is
>ew, creepy
>He doesn't get out much
>what a stalker!
Why do degenerates who do literally fuck all get praise while a truly skilled inventor gets shit on?
>>27575921
This nigga needs a fully fledged funding drive to truly benefit humanity with beautiful scar jo sex bots
Just wait until you can custom order any celeb from him
I need to start saving money
>>27577257
We'll program them to enjoy it, and they'll never go berserk. They'll be tenderly loved and cared for, like only a shunned and shy r9k male can.
>>27577300
They'll probably make rules against custom-ordered sexbots modelled after real people. You'd likely only be able to get ones built to resemble certain porn-stars.
Imagine if you found out that someone you know ordered a sexbot that looked just like your mother. You wouldn't be too pleased about that.
>>27577356
>tfw there will be a glorious period between invention and regulation/legislation where you can get sexbots of anybody
>tfw they won't make my waifu and I'll have to fuck some second tier celebrity
Feels bad man
>>27577356
Copyright expires 70 years after death. Lots of celebs past that point, and besides, we could get a Helen of Troy or Cleopatra sexbot.
Of course the black market won't give a shit, they'll make anything.
> someone wants to fuck my mom's lookalike
I wouldn't give a fuck.
>>27575921
This is some real uncanny valley shit.
>>27577260
Maybe because he created a double of someone without their consent?
>>27577356
if a roastie wont have sex with you, you can just order a sexbot in their likeness. bring it to work, to parties and events. let her know you're fucking her body without her permission, whenever you want. and everything else about her is utterly horrible, you've extracted the only positive element of her being, a fuck doll.
>>27577483
> the only positive element
Your post reminded me of this.
>>27577449
>Maybe because he created a double of someone without their consent?
What right do you have to judge him?
>>27577789
What right does he have to Scarlett Johansson's likeness?
>>27577810
How is Scarlett harmed by some guy fucking a double he made? Mass production and sales would be a more credible argument.
This is little different than fapping to her pic.
>>27577839
Is this actually a sex bot? I didn't see any indication of that in the article.
Regardless, she may not be harmed, but there is no denying that it's creepy to make a bot that looks exactly like her and says "he he, thank you" with those dead eyes when you tell it it's beautiful.
>>27577810
Pretty much all rights, as long as he doesn't go and name the bot "scarjo".
What, you think with 7 billion people, there's only one person in the world with any particular feature set?
The notion you have a right to your image only makes sense in the context of impersonation. Being famous does, in practice, give you superior rights than the rest of us; but there is no moral argument for this sorry state of affairs, if anything it's the other way around.
>>27577839
He never really stated or implied she was being harmed, more so that it was just unfair.
Also, he's getting free press and advertising off of this as opposed to making some generic faced doll. This could be a catalyst for others asking him to make them their own personal celeb-bots even if he doesn't produce another Scar Jo.
I wouldn't necessarily care if someone made a sex doll of me or even if I found out about it, I just wouldn't want it advertised to the world. It's flattering but mostly sad and creepy.
>>27577933
>The notion you have a right to your image only makes sense in the context of impersonation.
You'd be fine with the mass media using your face as an advocacy for cuckoldry? Pedophilia? They aren't impersonating you, they don't even have to say your name, but under your declaration, as long as they aren't impersonating you, you have no right to legally complain.
did anyone else have the urge to track down this thing and stick their dick in it?
Bump for our murican brethrens.
this is the creepiest fucking thing
eugh
hit me up when they pass the uncanny valley
>>27576123
it's like seeing the wright brothers first flight
>>27577197
just gotta wait about 50 years m8
>>27579372
> 50 years
Yeah right, we'll see in 10 when I fuck my sexbot and frogpost at the same time.
>>27580437
Goddamn this post is inspirational.
I love big dreamers.
>>27575921
>HA-SHA-SHA-SHA-SHASHASHA
