People on normiebook are freaking the fuck out about this and I have no idea why. They know that she has a porn video out right? A video where we can not only see her breasts, but watch her suck a dick and see her be penetrated by it. Why are normies wigging out about a censored picture of someone who has had porn made?
>Flipping off the camera meme
Do girls think it's attractive to be shameless, trainwreck sluts?
Like, what are they trying to achieve with that?
Did they censor it themselves before posting?
Pretty pussy if so.
I'll give that disgusting cow credit for knowing exactly how to trigger people so she can be the center of attention and remain relevant.
I don't know how people haven't caught onto her games yet. every 3 months or so both her and Kanye do these types of publicity stunts to get attention. I'm kind of interested when people truly stop caring. another 2 years seems like a good enough bet.
>>27548898
>Like, what are they trying to achieve with that?
That they don't give a fuck.
>Did they censor it themselves before posting?
Yes.
>>27548924
This is what I tell people all the time. But for some reason normies feel compelled to look at and respond to it. I'm interested in what history will say about Kim 50 years from now.
who cares, sluts like this are a diamond dozen and most of them wont change
it's better just to switch your brain off and not talk to or pay attention to this people
>>27548924
Not being a cunt is bowing down to the patriarchy. The only way to be truly free is to act like the most obnoxious male stereotype you can and bitch about people not accepting you for it while simultaneously hiding behind being female whenever there's any hardship.
>>27548961
If they didn't give a fuck or wanted to prove some feminist point they would show some fucking nipple.
>>27548991
was intended to respond to
>>27548898
>>27548898
It's not because they think it's attractive
It's literally all for attention, that's been the goal since their show aired
likes, reblogs, and retweets and (You)s for normies, so obviously they'll do anything to get them
>>27548861
>censor the fucking photo
What was the point then you dumb sluts
>>27548861
Is that the blurred lines girl that gets pissy about people objectifying her when it's the only reason anyone cared about her in the first place?
>>27548961
>This is what I tell people all the time. But for some reason normies feel compelled to look at and respond to it. I'm interested in what history will say about Kim 50 years from now.
I'm trying to think of a celebrity like her from the 90s or 00s. the best I can think of is maybe Britney Spears and Angelina Jolie. those two were pretty big deals for a while. both are completely irrelevant now, their fame lasted like 5-10 years. neither of them were serious media whores like Kim though, but there was no Facebook or Instagram back when they were "in"
I'm gonna stick with her being relevant for maybe 2-3 years max, by then some new whore will come along.
>>27548861
she is a whore and deserve no money,
if you say something else you are a hyper cuck.
There's also several fappening pics and those horrible "break the internet" pictures of her that are shooped to hell
on the other hand girls should be able to be topless just like men. Nothing special. And only half a million likes? I guess they are getting a little old.
On side note kyle just released 3'new lip glosses. We all must buy them.
Not to be negative of the older sisters but the younger ones are already replacing them. So they get their ten years I guesd
>>27549068
if they show their intimate parts for likes they are literally whores.
if you say their tits are not one of the intimate parts you should finish elementary school.
