Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
2016-03-28 04:49:44 Post No. 27454739
[Report]
Image search:
[Google]
Anonymous
2016-03-28 04:49:44
Post No. 27454739
[Report]
So I have a philosophical question.
Most of us are rightly concerned with the possibility of being cucked by a Chad, a meathead, a douchebro type, and most of us consider ourselves to be highly intelligent, sensitive gentlefolk.
I've been talking to a lot of different girls about their preferences, though, and many of them insist that they're drawn to intelligence in men. Which makes me wonder, doesn't it make sense that intelligence should be a turn on to women? THE greatest biological asset a human being can have over others when it comes to reproductive success is intelligence or cunning.
It also occurs to me that a sensitive, intelligent male is LEAST likely to get truly cucked or to tolerate being cucked. He's most likely to be enraged and to abandon a woman (perhaps after an extended period of internal consideration), he's less likely to accept sloppy seconds, etc. Whereas the meatheaded guys women SEEM to always end up with seem to give it little thought.
Women in relationships with dumber males are going to be able to trick those males into raising more intelligent offspring, and the more intelligent offspring are more likely to survive and reproduce.
So is it possible that the 'truest' most 'realistic' and likely form of cucking is when intelligent males like us sleep with women who are in relationships with dumb normies? That we are far less likely to be cucked than normies and Chad?
