>tfw beta.
we shouldn't even fucking exist, we should have been killed at birth.
the only way a true utopia can happen is by genetic engineering so everyone has the same chance, that includes genetics
>>27428201
First you need to explain why you think you're in the position you're in. Also what the hell drugs that crash test dummy took
>>27428310
genetic inferiority is my drug
and you can never change it
We can have whatever we can get away with.
We may deserve more, or less, but what we receive is always what we take.
>>27428360
Genetic inferiority is too vague OK? It ranges from "an inch shorter than average" to "you're in a wheelchair and also have cancer and a disfigured face and you're going to die before you turn 25". Spit it out
80/20 rule is what i'm referring to. If you're not chad all women are unloyal.
79% and below shouldve been killed at birth
im totally serious. we aren't people if we aren't in the top 20%
>>27428201
>he fell for the utopia meme
Kek, it'll never happen, why are you stressing?
>>27428604
This doesn't even make sense.
If 79% of men "aren't people" and would have been better off being aborted:
Why is depression not more common?
Why is suicide not more common?
Why do 77% of men, not just 20%, eventually get married? (http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/09/24/record-share-of-americans-have-never-married/).
Not to mention that men are more or equally likely to cheat than women (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-cheating/2012/02/08/gIQANGdaBR_story.html)
Why do parents still have children knowing that if they have a son, they would have most likely been better off being killed at birth? I mean, the male parent surely would have known, and surely would have done something about the situation. Right?
Or maybe this 80/20 thing is kind of flawed...
