Robots, do you want a girl who:
> fucks you like she loves you
> fucks you like an animal
1st girl will never do anything degrading like oral or anal, 2nd will always do that but she'll always seem like her mind is somewhere else.
Which one?
>>27418915
Easy choice: #1
>>27418915
1st obviously
First one of course :3
>>27418974
>>27419014
> pic related
the idea of someone not treating you like complete garbage during your most vulnerable moment is way too much for any robot to handle.
>>27419096
well fuqq
>>27418915
I want a mix. But I'd probably prefer 1 because fear of cheating.
>>27419453
> implying robots don't want to be cucked
> implying any loyal gf wouldn't get called a nagging clinger
>>27419479
Well if she played vidya with me, fulfilled my fantasies, and was perfect for me, I wouldn't call her clingy, whether I could handle it or not. And I will never be a cuck. I will never fall for a meme.
>>27418915
I'd take Girl 2, actually. Principally because I'd never actually believe that someone loved me to begin with, even if they actually did.
>>27419519
Sexual fantasies? The first isn't doing anything beyond P in V, you deviant.
Neither. Both have drawbacks too large to keep me happy long term.
>>27419551
Yeah I realize, but I'd rather not be a cuck. I would rather have a gf I couldn't handle and didn't like that wouldn't cheat on me, than a girl that I couldn't handle and wouldn't like, who could fuck me well but would probably cheat.
>>27419647
>* tips /r/theredpill*
>>27419715
Is the correct option "be cheated on"? I may be a fedora neckbeard, but I don't know why that comment signals it.
>>27418915
There doesn't have to be anything degrading about oral or anal sex. Also, if a girl truly loves you, it is actually very likely that she will fuck you like an animal.
