>current year
>not making dough on the stock marketers like you wanna be a wagecuck forever
Too unpredictable and I'm not smart enough or hardworking enough
>>27379700
>Not hard working enough
That's the big one for me as well. I'm sure I could figure it out eventually but I'd rather sit at home, smoking cigs, playing games and masturbating
>>27379683
Are you implying you know anything about investing?
Daytrading is zero-sum; net money only goes to speculators in the form of dividends and new buy-in (e.g., wages that go to a 401k). Thus it's a situation that typically needs a large number of small losers to support a small number of big winners. Not exactly robot paradise, unless you have enough money up front to count on dividends.
im dumb as a rock i'd lose the pitiful amount of cash i have in this world
>2016
>Not using automated programs to buy & sell
Lol
there are supercomputers and thousands of people with Ph.Ds in math and economics getting paid 7 digit salaries working 80 hours weeks to perform extensive analysis on stock returns, utilizing a tool set of stochastic calculus and derivative pricing models, EVERY DAY for hedge funds on wall street, which are all constantly trying to get the one-up on, and you think you're going to just waltz into the market as an amateur and
>hurr durr buy when low, sell when high
don't fucking waste your time. buy into a mutual fund and stop trying to be the wolf of wall street
This
But hey it's the American dream so go go, you can do it.
If all these "@home traders" actually had a clue of maths they'd know that any chart signal or price advantage has already been exploited by a bigger fish. Meaning the remaining risk is almost always 50/50. Try daytrading over 5 years and see if you made a reliable income.
The only thing that works reliably are dividends and betting on the overall economy, but that's really not a lot.
