so the general concensus id thst pussies are gross right?
robots think they're gross obviously(see roasties)
chads think they're gross, that's why their favorite memes are "real men dont eat it" etc
virgins think they're gross because well...just look at that shit smmfh
the only one who clsims they are "beautiful" are sluts. thry even try to make weird paintings and sculptures claiming they're "beautiful" lmaoing
who is wrong
everyone except sluts or sluts?
They're fucking gross, not good for looking at or eating.
buttholes honestly look nicer desu
>>27367694
Vaginas literally make me throw up.
>>27368272
Why is that vagina sticking out it's tongue?
>>27367694
bussy superior in every way
>>27367694
Yes. Let's take that a step further and agree that women's personalities are complete fucking garbage and ugly too
>>27368410
Yes! Woman are terrible because they live for games and drama, its all they are capable of being passionate about.
I thought chasing mtfs would be the answer, but they are the same as woman mentally and have the same bullshit ways x 3.
I just want a feminine bf who isn't a slut.
>>27368502
Trap or femboys are your best bet, finding a nonslutty one is going to be hard though literally everyone today is or acts like a massive slut. Transgirls are complete trash and in most cases are more needy and special snowflakey than regular women
>>27368410
i don't usually ask this ever, but is this a doujin and can I have sauce on it ?
>>27368299
It wants to tongue your anus when you're fucking her.
I've posted about this before but I really like them.
I am a man. Not that I'm a "real man" because I like them.
I'm just saying, I'm a man and I like them.
>>27368757
http://nhentai.net/artist/kanbayashi-takaki/
here's all the artist's work, senpai
Is that even a human vagina?
>>27368410
they are
ive met some wimmin who i really thought were good but everytime in the end they end up being shit. i cant say ive never tried with them. im awake now
>>27368502
youre full of shit though you fagget. mtf's r good people and go through 100x worse shit than you so fuck off. not all of them but you fuck right off still
>>27368773
>im a man
>not a "real man" a man
>>27369366
Oh fuck off tranny, it's all in your head. You didn't even have these problems till you started listening to other trannies that try to prove their "trans'ness" regular people have harder shit to deal with that creating fake problems in their heads. Not discussing this any further, fucking trannies always trying to derail threads to make it about them like the roasties they are
>>27369511
you brang up mtf's you fagget. dont tread if you dont want dead kid
and no trans go through shit that would make your fagget as kill yourself, you cant hide wearing a dress like you can a fetish like men who just want to talk flamboyant while they suck dicks you slut. pot meet kettle
>>27369635
Nigger, I'm a trap. I have problems but at least they're real problems fuck face. Don't you have something to be crying about anyways?
>>27367694
old hag pussy is gross. puffy vulva is delicious
>>27368300
Fug my bussy XDD
>>27367694
Some are really lovely
>>27371017
Yeah. Some.
>>27371109
Here's another lovely vagina, or vulva rather.
>>27371176
I honestly don't mind more prominent outer lips than pic related, but these are just so aesthetically pleasing.
>>27371195
There is some truly horrifying puss out there. But I don't think this is one of them. I would happily spend hours being smothered by something like this.
>>27371211
Hey, look at that, dubs. Well, here's one last picture. It must be nice as a woman to be born with such ideal genitalia. I guess it must feel something like being born with a nice fat wiener.
I'm a slave to vaginas. I want girls to grind on my face and nose with their vaginas and use my face as their stool, I will lick and eat every inch of it.
Assholes too, girls asshole's are divine
its funny how male circumcision is meant to look good yet it doesn't
if anything we should only do female circumcision, most women have disgusting roast beef ones in need of a trimming
>>27371297
I can't believe it but I actually agree with this and I'm female. Male genital mutilation is incredibly damaging and traumatic- meanwhile female genital mutilation is this terrible traumatic thing and I've been called ignorant for even daring to compare the practices. Circumcision damages thousands of precious nervendings, delays orgasm, decreases sensitivity, raises the sack skin and gives you a hairy dick, gives a huge scar/dry glans/rash, and prevents easy masturbation. Genital cutting of excessive internal labia in women would impact barely anything. The skin is barely sensitive for me, I even have some freckles that I would prefer to have removed if it were up to me. Our society is fucking horrible when it comes to respecting the body autonomy of our men and it makes me depressed and ashamed to know I'll probably never touch an unmutilated dick and most guys even defend circumcision and get super angry when it's brought up. Rant over, I'm just tired of this even being a practice anymore in our society. If I have a son he's staying intact.
>>27367694
As a lesbian, I don't see the problem with it to be honest. It's just flesh and most smell nice.
There are ugly cunts and there are pretty cunts. What's hilarious is that if you even think vags can look gross that it somehow means you're gay.
Hey, I like Arby's, but that doesn't mean I think the meat looks pretty.
>>27371017
>>27371176
>>27371195
>>27371211
>>27371232
wel what would you expect of someone underage?
wait what
>>27371372
>Genital cutting of excessive internal labia in women would impact barely anything.
It's not inconceivable that it could amputation neuromas. A histological study of labioplasty scars has to my knowledge yet to be undertaken, so we don't really know how it affects things on a microscopic scale.
Some women post-labioplasty have complained of pain or parasthesia consistent with the description of neuroma symptoms.
>>27371425
They're all 18+ hombre
>>27371406
>most smell nice
what a bold lie
>>27371447
.t jared
>>27371454
Maybe you're gay, but you're probably a virgin
>>27371527
roasties getting toastie
pussies are fucking ugly. face the facts. literally only roadties will defend this
>>27371372
> Genital cutting of excessive internal labia in women would impact barely anything.
>INTERNAL LABIA
>INTERNAL
Internal relative to what? Both are outside the body. Do you mean the labia minora? What?
>not realising that there are different types of female circumcision
>not realising that some versions are decidedly worse than male circumcision in that the entire clitoris (where majority women exclusively orgasm from) is remove
>not realising that there are nerve endings in the labia
>"the skin is barely sensitive for me"
You think men suddenly burst into orgasms by just touching their dicks? How do you think they go to the bathroom? Just because YOU personally don't instantly cum from touching your labia does not mean that the skin isn't sensitive and that cutting it isn't traumatic. Cutting any skin is traumatic in general, it still is more sensitive than average, etc.
> Our society is fucking horrible when it comes to respecting the body autonomy of our men
Society in general is horrible with all forms of medical autonomy. What is anti abortion sentiments but a prohibition on a form of medical autonomy that is allocated to men but not women? Society's shit in general and specifying mean just sounds like placating.
>condemns male circumcision as bad and yet says "HURR DURR I WANNA TOUCH AN UNMUTILATED DICK"
>makes violations of medical autonomy about herself
Like, it's sad when your partner's sexual experience is limited because you love this person and their fucking happiness is hindered, not because MUH MUTILATED DONG
>saying your female
REEEEEEEE
> "most guys even defend circumcision and get super angry"
>not understanding that these men may have freely chosen circumsision for religious reasons
>appreciates why circumcision is traumatic, but doesn't understand why its victims may act defensively
>trying to play the lady MRA play to get male attention
Just respect yourself and others not to make these types of posts ever again.
>>27371609
kek'd
You have been muted for 2 seconds, because your comment was not original.
>>27367694
>real men dont eat it
lmao, chad eats pussy like everyone else.
>>27371609
guy here
I ate out a roastie the other night. Didn't smell, didn't taste like anything, just wet skin.
but to be fair I smoke like a chimney so my senses aren't the best.
>>27371635
Thank you.
That was the cringiest post.
She forgot the foreskin is present at birth and quickly removed.
Labia develop after puberty so you'd have to wait until a woman was at least 18-20 to perform labiaplasty on her, and you'd have to have her go under anaesthesia and... it has no benefits other than looking better for the Jewish porn industry. Nice.
I really want my tax money to go to some doctor who mutiliates genitals for a living just because that femanon decided it's best after being inundated with zog-brainwashing images.
I'd rather fuck a face hugger than putting my penis in a vagina. Most pussies are fucking gross.
>>27371662
>there are cucks with smoke breath and rancid teeth licking roasties
>roasties will try to have you believe their nasty ass pussies dont stink like shit and look like shit
>guy here
JUST
>>27371372
This post is retarded in so many ways. Kill yourself roastie moron
>>27371635
>not realising that some versions are decidedly worse than male circumcision in that the entire clitoris (where majority women exclusively orgasm from) is removed
The preputial structures (not the glans) are where most of a man's good physical feelings in the penis during sex or masturbation come from, and the prepuce's removal damages or eliminates the bulbocavernous reflex in men and removes a great deal of muscular tissue from the penis as well.
There's no hard proof that the clitoris is more heavily innervated or innervated in a more specialized way than the foreskin. The clitoris is estimated to contain about 8,000 nerve endings. A square inch of skin contains a thousand nerve endings. An adult foreskin is about 15 square inches of tissue.
So if a foreskin were to have even the number of nerve endings as just regular skin, it would have nearly double the nerve endings of a clitoris. 8,000 vs 15,000.
But of course it's not just regular skin--it's a man's primary erogenous tissue so it could have far more than the number of nerve endings expected. And its innervation is actually highly specialized (as has been shown by histological analysis).
There's no proof AT ALL that cutting off a girl's clit sexually cripples her any more than cutting off a boy's foreskin.
They both make the victim into sexual cripples to some degree, but most women with no clit don't complain and neither do most men who have no foreskin. Which is unfortunate, but understandable in light of the fact that its drilled into peoples' heads that these disgusting mutilations are "desirable".
>>27371723
>She forgot the foreskin is present at birth and quickly removed.
It's present throughout your entire life if you don't get mutilated, and it develops tremendously during puberty and adolescence. Changes in size, and changes in function (as it becomes mobile).
It increases in area from just a few square inches to about 15 square inches, and its innervation continues to develop after birth.
Foreskins are a LOT of tissue (roughly 1/2 the external surface tissue of the penis), not just a little bit of tissue.
>>27371635
Yes, labia minora, roast beef flaps. I was referring to cosmetic labiaplasty, not female genital mutilation, which you could tell clearly by my post and by the post I replied to. Obviously cutting the excessive skin could cause issues and lack of sensitivity and scar tissue... just the same as circumcision does to males, often against their will. You do know that some women ELECT to get this for cosmetic reasons, right? I'm not talking about African clit cutting, faggot.
Why is pointing out that circumcision is a horrible unnecessary medical practice "placating"? Men who get it voluntarily, really? Most are cut as a baby against their will because their parents don't give a shit enough about them to think about it beyond "it's cleaner". I've suffered through a relationship with a guy cut too tight and it was honestly terrible, I felt so bad for him, I had no idea it could be so tight/rough/dry. Have you ever licked a chaffed dick? It's a disgrace and I am not ashamed to point it out and wish that less men were mutilated in my country. You should be ashamed of your post.
>>27371922
good girl you awesome
>>27371723
Ay, what up anon.
>present at birth, quickly remove compared to adult labia
I don't think it matters - you shouldn't be doing things to people's bodies without their consent and whether or not they remember the pain is irrelevant. You could abuse a baby in plenty of ways and they wouldn't remember it - doesn't make it okay.
I get your point though, there is a difference between hurting a concious, breathing, horrified adult/teenager and a baby who has the attention span of a goldfish.
Although, I thought the majority of lady circumcision happened to children? Is it just scarring the tissue before it develops and more a matter of inhibiting development?
> it has no benefits other than looking better for the Jewish porn industry. Nice.
Like I think intent matters a great deal.
So when I asked my mom why I was circumcised, her response was health/religious (/pol/.....pls no bully).
I've also heard the "cut dicks look better" (lolwut m8) argument. I remember reading that circumcisions origins traditionally were to prevent masturbation, but in the 21st century Western world I don't see that as a motive for parents and doctors.
Female circumcisions are preformed in some cultures for health and religion, but also for male pleasure and pretty repulsive pedophilic justifications (inb4 roastie getting toastie, there's a difference between an adult woman's vagina, a child's body and a roast).
While intent doesn't change the ultimate consequences, I think it says a lot about the evilness of the perpetrators. I may be a little resentful to my parents, but I wouldn't call them evil for having me cut.
>>27371922
Cut guy here (I am also the guy who posted the info about the foreskin in this thread)
I hate being cut and I hate that other men defend it.
People think they just make "a little snip" and that's a huge fucking lie. A man's primary erogenous tissues are his ridged band, his frenulum, and the frenular delta. Circumcision can involve cutting off ALL that and then leaving the rest of the penis straight-jacketed by its own remaining tight skin.
I don't know if you've seen one done but it's a horrifying thing to do to a kid.
>>27371972
>I get your point though, there is a difference between hurting a concious, breathing, horrified adult/teenager and a baby who has the attention span of a goldfish.
Goldfish are actually pretty intelligent animals that can be trained and have demonstrated altruistic behavior. The 3 second memory thing is complete bullshit idiots made up because some people love to tell lies.
And babies may experience pain more intensely than adults do.
http://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2015-04-21-babies-feel-pain-adults
Behavioral changes of infants post-circumcision include problems breastfeeding, changes in sleep patterns, and irritability.
It's an insane and depraved thing to do to a child. Absolutely insane.
>>27372004
>A man's primary erogenous tissues are his ridged band, his frenulum, and the frenular delta.
So what? if anything it prevents premature ejaculation
>>27371820
> A square inch of skin contains a thousand nerve endings
>thinks all skin is the same
> So if a foreskin were to have even the number of nerve endings as just regular skin, it would have nearly double the nerve endings of a clitoris. 8,000 vs 15,000.
>thinks the clitoris is just the little button under the hood and not a whole system with parts underneath the skin.
The HEAD of the clitoris has 8,000 nerves. The whole clit is bigger than that.
> There's no proof AT ALL that cutting off a girl's clit sexually cripples her any more than cutting off a boy's foreskin.
While circumcision does affect a man's sexual pleasure, I've read only about 11% of men post-op have real trouble coming to orgasm. That's bad, certainly, and I haven't read any statistics about circumcised women's ability to orgasm post-op (likely due to lack of literature) BUT I do know that 70-80 percent of all women need clitoral stimulation to cum.
So potentially, 1 out of 10 circumcised men will struggle to cum. 7 out of 10 women will not cum, period.
The latter seems worse.
> They both make the victim into sexual cripples to some degree, but most women with no clit don't complain and neither do most men who have no foreskin. Which is unfortunate, but understandable in light of the fact that its drilled into peoples' heads that these disgusting mutilations are "desirable".
Smart comment.
>>27371972
>Female circumcisions are preformed in some cultures for health and religion, but also for male pleasure and pretty repulsive pedophilic justifications (inb4 roastie getting toastie, there's a difference between an adult woman's vagina, a child's body and a roast).
That's exactly how tons of people in the US justify male genital mutilation.
Because they think their son will get more blowjobs if he's cut.
Cutfag here and I hate everyone who does it or who defends it.
I hate seeing those threads, mainly due to the fact I can't really defend it and being ridiculed for it, despite me not having any choice) really hits a soft insecure spot.
To all cutfags, just accept your fate like an amputee accepts his and don't do it to your children.
On the bright side, assuming you've managed to get to bed with a girl, the chance she would call it off due to your being cut is close to 0 or non existent at all
>>27368410
Completely agree. I wish there were sissies around my home town, so I wouldn't have to deal with an annoying bitch just to fuck her. Honestly, traps want to get fucked, and usually girls are doing it as some sort of manipulation
What about loli pussy?
>>27372083
>So what? if anything it prevents premature ejaculation
Less erogenous tissue doesn't mean less premature ejaculation.
Frisch et al's study found no significant difference in premature ejaculation from cut/uncut guys but more reports of orgasm difficulties in cut guys.
Anorgasmia is not a good thing; it's a sexual dysfunction that can be emotionally devastating.
Frisch et al also found that female partners of circumcised men were more likely to experience pain during sex, anorgasmia, and incomplete sexual needs fulfillment.
>Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male circumcision is more common is warranted.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947
>>27371922
> I was referring to cosmetic labiaplasty, not female genital mutilation, which you could tell clearly by my post and by the post I replied to
Except you're lying.
>if anything we should only do female circumcision, most women have disgusting roast beef ones in need of a trimming
> I can't believe it but I actually agree with this and I'm female.
Yes, the anon referred to "trimming roast" but they never specified it to the limiting of labiaplasty. They said "female circumcision" and you said yes. So fuck you, I made no unfair assumption.
>female expecting me to read her mind
Come on, the memes are writing themselves.
> often against their will. You do know that some women ELECT to get this for cosmetic reasons, right?
>talks about how most male circumcisions are against their will, and then ignores the fact that most female circumcision are also, often, against the woman's will
>You do know that some men ELECT to get this done for religious reasons, right?
See how stupid that sounds?
> I'm not talking about African clit cutting, faggot.
Couldn't tell since you never specified.
> Why is pointing out that circumcision is a horrible unnecessary medical practice "placating"?
Because you're saying IM FEMALE I LOVE UNCUT DICKS POOR MEN IN SOCIETY LOVE ME R9K LOVE ME.
> I felt so bad for him
>trying to back-pedal because I pointed out how selfish you were being
Don't slam the door on your roast on the way out.
Hey, FEManon (since God knows you made that clear enough) you got the response you wanted >>27371940!
>>27372071
This is true, but I was using it as an analogy. See how it could be a bad thing to perpetuate, though.
> Behavioral changes of infants post-circumcision include problems breastfeeding, changes in sleep patterns, and irritability.
Never knew that though. WTF.
> It's an insane and depraved thing to do to a child. Absolutely insane.
Never defended hurting children (as I explain why it wouldn't matter even if the child was ultimately unaffected), but in light of ^^ that seems doubly true.
>>27372123
> Because they think their son will get more blowjobs if he's cut.
Literally never heard this excuse, ever.
>>27372169
is illegal senpai. unless you mean 2d. but thats illegal too possibly
>>27367694
That thing is a fucking monstrosity
I'd gladly put my dick in there.
>>27372162
>tfw original posting
>>27372094
> A square inch of skin contains a thousand nerve endings
>thinks all skin is the same
Never said that. The foreskin probably has far more nerve endings than than 15 square inches of typical skin, such as you'd find on the skin of the forearm.
>The HEAD of the clitoris has 8,000 nerves. The whole clit is bigger than that.
They don't cut out the whole clit in any form of FGM. Most of it is internal.
>While circumcision does affect a man's sexual pleasure, I've read only about 11% of men post-op have real trouble coming to orgasm.
Where did you read that? Also, I notice you focus on orgasm. The foreskin provides waves of pleasure to many men long before they have an orgasm.
The American conception of male sexuality seems incredibly focused on climax. Maybe it's because so many men don't really experience physical ecstasy prior to the climax since they have no foreskin to give them that pleasure. My conjecture, here.
>That's bad, certainly, and I haven't read any statistics about circumcised women's ability to orgasm post-op (likely due to lack of literature) BUT I do know that 70-80 percent of all women need clitoral stimulation to cum.
That may be the case, but then why do so many women who've had their clit cut off claim to have great sex lives? Perhaps they are just lying to themselves I suppose. The lack of literature is a real problem but not likely to get better soon. So far as I'm aware, no study has been undertaken to check how much more likely women whose clits have been cut off are to report frequent orgasm difficulties or other problems. I'm sure it's much more common than it would be had they been left intact, no doubt.
>>27372331
Loli > anything sorrynotsorry
>>27372263
Here.
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/07/the-circumcision-wars-whats-a-parent-to-do/278155/
>one of my husband's ex-jock friends wrote a surprisingly thoughtful, persuasive, and well reasoned emailed argument to my husband in favor of circumcising our son.
>After the analysis though, his final-and key-factor was, "And it's hard enough for a guy to get blow jobs as it is"
>Shockingly, the misguided belief that uncircumcised men have more difficulties procuring oral sex is shared beyond the male college athlete demographic.
>An OBGYN mother-in-law asked my friend, who was carrying her grandson-to-be at the time: "Don't you want him to get blow jobs some day?"
Took about 10 seconds on Google to find that article, which I'd never seen before. But I have heard this rationale more times than I could possibly count.
some pussies are gross (roasties) but a few are pretty delicate flowers that taste good too.
>>27372385
(replying to my own post here)
I should add to this that in another thread we actually had a poster who was subjected to FGM (Muslim family) and she said she could still have orgasms even though her clit was cut off when she was 14. So she had experience both being intact and mutilated.
She said it was nothing like it was compared to before, but she did still have something of an ability to orgasm.
Just one anecdote from an anon on 4chan. Not trying to use it as compelling evidence of anything; just sharing the story.
>>27372385
> They don't cut out the whole clit in any form of FGM. Most of it is internal.
>thinks the trauma stops where the knife cuts
> The American conception of male sexuality seems incredibly focused on climax.
Personal question, would you be okay with lots of nice stimulation but no final climax?
I appreciate that there's more to sexual pleasure than orgasm, but I do not see my focus as undue or cultural limited since I can think of no other culture where foreplay was entirely a means to and of itself at the exclusion of the final orgasm. When they does appear, it is pathological and deemed a fetish.
> That may be the case, but then why do so many women who've had their clit cut off claim to have great sex lives?
So do men who are circumsied. See this dumb post >>27371372
>most guys even defend circumcision and get super angry when it's brought up
>limited experience depending on age of operation
>lying to defend their culture
>lying to defend their religion
>lying to defend their pride (no man likes to admit his dick is lame, issues of virility, etc.)
>lying to avoid shame on partner
>lying to themselves
>>27372457
Huh, guess that is a thing.
Although, you can hardly say that blowjobs are for female pleasure. The appearance and assumption that cut = clean = less smelly = less smegma = more likely to be put in mouth still prioritises a dude's dick getting sucked on.
Again, not justifying circumcision. Just saying that I don't think female sexual pleasure is a prerogative. I've heard that used as an aside, but I've never seen it as the primary motive.
>>27372499
She could be having vaginal orgasms. Which are very rare. And a "different" type of orgasm from clitoral ones.
The vast majority of women still need clitoral stimulation.
>>27371527
It's time...for another game of...BBB!!!!
anyway, I've fucked over 20 women (inb4 "REEEE GET OUT", fuck off) so let's be honest; it's a hole in a human body, pent up in between 2 limbs all day, with bacterial flora, discharges, and all kind of shit happening inside it at all times.
It's never really "nice", at best it's like nothing, and just much easier to deal with some times than other times.
There's a reason they make Febreze with the smell of Gain or Tide, not Febreze with the smell of Pussy.
>>27372594
wrong pic, I didn't even attach that one, what the fuck happened?
>>27372644
>tfw I got my heart broken recently and most of these apply
Huh.
>>27372521
>Personal question, would you be okay with lots of nice stimulation but no final climax?
I'd want both. If I had to pick one or the other I'm not sure what I'd choose. I can't say the orgasm alone sounds much more appealing than lots of physical pleasure but no climax. It seems like a wash.
>I appreciate that there's more to sexual pleasure than orgasm, but I do not see my focus as undue or cultural limited since I can think of no other culture where foreplay was entirely a means to and of itself at the exclusion of the final orgasm.
Wait, wait. Sexual pleasure during intercourse isn't foreplay. Foreplay is the fooling around before the sex.
What I'm talking about is the pleasurable physical sensations coming from stimulation of the penis, during the act but before the climax.
A man's climax only lasts a few seconds, but he can experience deep, physical sexual pleasure for many minutes if he still has the structures that actually provide that physical pleasure. It would be nice to enjoy the pleasure of the whole act with a woman rather than just pleasuring her until we climax.
Many times when I've had sex I got neither real physical pleasure during the act, nor an orgasm. Looking back I think I was more upset about not feeling it during most of the act than not getting to orgasm. Although seeing my partner's orgasms certainly did make me jealous, as they were clearly on a completely different level than mine.
Indian culture (historically non-circumsising) focuses a lot on the man's (and the woman's) physical pleasure before the climax rather than just the climax. They're both focused on to a great degree. Unfortunately Indian people don't tend to talk about sex a lot, but you can read a lot about it in the classic literature.
>So do men who are circumsied.
True.
