The YouTuber Zoella posted this photo on Twitter or Instagram, I don't know which and the British newspaper The Sun's website thought it was slutty - of course this offended everybody and sparked #activism by girls posting photos of themselves in their underwear wanting attention. Women logic amirite gaiz XDDD
>>27358995
That's extremely tasteful compared to most attention whoring posts today.
This shows less than a picture of her in a bikini would. This shows less than a picture of her in a bikini with a tshirt over it would. Half of her pelvis is covered by a fucking blanket, who gives a shit? It's attentionwhorey as fuck but the hypocrisy annoys me
>>27359024
True, but her fans are mostly 12-16 year olds. And she knows that.
>>27358995
>not knowing she was paid to post that pic from Calvin klein
Viral marketing at its best
Also if some Youtube faggot posted the same picture of him in his boxers nobody would even care. Even if he were wearing briefs I doubt anyone would unless a bulge was visible.
>>27358995
Who the fuck is this cunt? What are you even babbling about?
Fuck off you paid whore.
>>27358995
So what, I go to Twitter and search for activism and I should get girls in their underwear? Thanks OP.
>>27358995
Wait. So some youtuber posted a vaguely revealing picture of herself on instagram and a newspaper decided to cover it as if it was news? Now that's fucking retarded. And it's funny that the only way you could make a situation like that even more ridiculously stupid is to add feminists to the situation. Why are people so fucking dumb?
>>27359228
literally everyone is getting something they want from the situation, how are they dumb?
She's actually pretty qt without makeup
