>makes fun of SJWs and others for talking about trigger warnings on websites
>gets mad when someone posts about having a girlfriend or sex, demanding they stop
Much like /pol/, /r9k/ is one person.
Normies are cancer, who knew?
>>27330969
Are you saying that there's no significant likelihood that a bunch of the people on here would behave like that?
Even if not, I find the thought process weird. Why would you intentionally open a thread with a topic that annoys you, just to virtually yell at someone?
>>27330969
Funny. When it's sjws they're all one person.
>>27330996
>"A-Are you sure it's not more prolific...?"
>Decides to go entirely into hypothetical.
Good god, you can't even form a cohesive argument.
>>27331026
SJWs are different in that they'll blindly support one another. Here we'll defuse someone being a fucking retard, but with SJWs every single opinion has to be cherished and everyone is such a wonderful pretty gay baby for saying a thing.
>>27331060
Exactly like how you're blindly defending r9k. You dorks even have your own "cis" word. "Normie".
>>27331095
>Offer a single point against your crazy ass
>"blindly defending"
Just like a SJW to jump to ridiculous conclusions.
>>27330903
trigger warnings are a thing of the tumblrkins and other such degenerates, not SJWs (though they do overlap)
anyone who tries to make fun of SJWs with "trigger warnings" doesn't know what he's talking about
>anon I'm sorry, I won't bring up my bf again
>Martin Luther King preached what he believed in
>Hitler did too! Therefor they are the same
Difference is our problems are not make believe and we do not expect others to treat us like royalty
>>27331152
>i am a scholar for internet memes and drama
>>27330903
I never go to your shitty subleddits to try trigger you cucks, I despise your whole leddit site and I don't even wanna see a screencap of it. Back to reddt you massive cuck.
Well I mock SJWs but I think racism is pretty much bigotry
Does that make me a hypocrite?
>>27330903
>thinking anything here on r9k is real
