What do you think about this? Seriously. I'd like to hear what you have to say.
Your opinion is important. What are your thoughts about this?
I just wrote a huge paragraph about what I thought about this picture. Hot rid of it and wrote this shit instead.
Please tell me what you think about this.
I'd still like to hear what you have to say about all of this.
Would look much hotter if the guy was BLACK.
>>27329440
I think it's weird how white people evolved noses so pointed that they can't even kiss each other without tilting their heads
>>27329652
Only a skeleton could kiss another skeleton without tilting.
>>27329639
got ya on this familian
Whenever I see people being happy I just think "good for them".
I doubt their relationship will last, though.
Disgusting normalfags
>>27329754
Also this
She'll cuck him in a week tops
>>27329863
Statistically he's more likely to cheat. Point being, the relationship is built on sand, like every relationship.
>>27329892
>statistically he's more likely to be caught cheating
Ftfy
Women cheat way more than men ever do
>>27329741
most other races have less pointy noses and blacks have bigger lips
>>27329898
So women are smarter than men?
Most studies that survey cheating do so completely anonymously.
Evolutionarily speaking, cheating is very much a male thing. Males have more incentive to cheat, and they consistently display behaviors more consistent with a lack of monogamy in studies (thinking about other sex partners significantly more often, etc.)
>>27329934
Women lie about their partner count and cheating. This is a known fact you roastie cunt
>>27329440
>>27329466
>>27329506
I hope they are happy
And I hope everyone ends up in a strong marriage.
>>27329943
The easiest conclusion is that men cheat more. It's consistent with what we know about evolutionary biology and the available data. Merely making up an alternate stance that suits your worldview is not philosophically robust.
>>27329898
>>27329934
>>27329943
The GSS, CDC, and NHS analyses [as well as Forste & Tanfer, Baumann & Hopkins, etc.] of cheating confirm that in first marriages only about 4% of women cheated compared to about 6% of men.
Yes, there are controls for deceit.
about 1/2 of the men who cheated did so with prostitutes, BTW
>>27329999
>actually believing only 4% of women cheat in marriage
Are you fucking stupid?
>>27329992
>It's consistent with what we know about evolutionary biology
Even though we know that even though men want sex more, women control the sexual bargain chips and can get sex a lot more easily than men
To the point that in just about every species with an open mating system (no alpha male to bed all the females) the men have to present and court females or just straight up rape them
>>27329999
I think in most cases where the man is cheated on, he's almost entirely to blame as well.
You have to allow your marriage to be sabotaged to be cheated on. ie. being emotionally or sexually unavailable or acting like a beta.
>>27330027
I know, I know - you're the type of moron that thinks PUAs and their "10% of men fuck 90% of women" or whatever it is is the gospel Truth from Above.
And I know that you think 'all women will ditch anyone for Chand' and 'all women cheat' blah, blah, blah.
And you probably believe in the 'alpha/beta/whatev' bullshit, too.
But - Reality says you're wrong.
Actually statistics from a number of multivariate controlled studies with deception controls-
Odd of cheating by women
>Who are dating = 18%
>Who are cohabitating without marriage = 21%
>Married = 4%
And that varies, of course. W oman who never cohabitated and was a virgin on her wedding night has a rate of cheating within marriage of a touch less than 1%. A woman who had previous partners, cohabitated before marriage was about equal to 7%.
>>27330027
And what's you source for claim?
Hurt feelings and just wanted to hate them?
I mean go ahead and hate them just do so honestly
Don't get yourself tied down with bullshit you can't prove.
>>27330048
>he's to blame
Nope. See, I think of adults as adults. If someone cheats, it is their fault.
>acting like a beta.
The 'alpha/beta' thing is not just false, it is stupid. Stop using it, it makes you sound like a 'tard
I hate that fucking hipster haircut men do since Macklemore, it perfectly delineates someone as a normie
>>27330129
I think you're buying too much into the 'free will' meme.
Adults are biological machines that evolved to spread their genes. They're not exempt from material logic merely because they hit 18.
The point remains: female cheating can be attenuated by an attentive male. You have to fail as a partner or provider to be cheated on as a man. For a woman, a man could cheat randomly simply because he can.
>>27330170
>female cheating can be attenuated by an attentive male
That's not a 0 sum game
You can't effectively remove a female's desire to cheat, if there is, by becoming more and more attentive
In fact, being more and more attentive actually increase chances the chance your SO cheats
>>27330170
Your flaw here is you assume biology is a controlled science when the reality is it's just as random as everything else.
Also humans have show to overcome their biology, first world countries are proof of this.
>>27330210
It's an important balance.
Men fail as partners when they act like betas or don't give their partner attention.
She seems like she has the kind of tits that look great in a dress but when you get her kit off they are probably long and noodly.
>>27330170
But in biology a attentive male mammal will be less attractive after coitus and the female will want to leave him to seek out other/better mates.
Seriously don't drag this shit into it it just makes the conversation stupid. We are mammals but we are so above them in both what we can do, have done and accomplish it's not a good idea to try and user the same measuring stick that they use.
>>27330233
But it's not true balance, where attentiveness increases when cheating decreases
It's purely opinionated, based on what the female desires or considers "beta" or "attentive"
There's no true scale so your argument of "lack of free will" and "genetic drive" falls short
>>27330233
If you are going to drag wolf pack terms into this:
You can't act like a beta unless you are dating them while they are already committed to an alpha.
That's how that shit works in the wild and god save all you retards that try to apply it to humans.
>>27330109
>>27330127
My issue isn't just with the obviously false stats on women cheating. It's as high as 50% for both men and women easily
>>27330254
It's nonsensical to hold human reproductive behavior to a non-evolutionary standard.
Most studies re: cheating usually find that women only do so in unhappy arrangements (the male being a beta is probably the least likely single cause, but I recognize it as a factor one should work against), whereas men cheat for sex even when they're happy.
>>27330284
It has a different meaning when applied to humans you pedantic pseudo-intellectual.
>>27330299
>you're the pedantic pseudo-intellectual
>"Adults are biological machines that evolved to spread their genes. They're not exempt from material logic merely because they hit 18"
go away
>>27330285
> It's as high as 50% for both men and women easily
You need a source anon.
You cannot just claim it's true
even more so with one having good sources supporting their claim
anecdotal evidence isn't real evidence
>>27330299
>wants to use wolf pack terms to box people into groups like they are crayons
>calls others pedantic pseudo-intellectual
Thank you
You can now say your failings have lead to me having a better day
>>27330369
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-cheating/2012/02/08/gIQANGdaBR_story.html
>>27330109
There is no conceivable universe in which only 4% of women commit adultery in marriage. Anywhere from 10 - 30% of all kids aren't even raised by their ostensible real fathers for fuck's sake.
>>27330170
>'free will' meme.
Nothing, and I mean *nothing*
is as funny as someone arguing that there is no free will.
>>27330409
Friendly reminder that paternity tests are banned in France because feminism :^)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_paternity_testing#Legal_issues
>>27330435
>Nothing, and I mean *nothing* is as funny as someone arguing that there is no free will.
Why is it funny to face reality, anon?
Or are you one of those "compatibilists"?
>>27330233
>act like betas
LOL.
NOT ONLY are you falling for the moronic 'alpha/beta' malarky dreamt up by PUAs to sell books, you aren't even using it properly.
>>27329440
>not shaving for your wedding day
What a twat
>>27330443
Fatherhood is more than DNA, anon.
>>27330285
I've cited the GSS, the NHS, the CDC, and 2 papers by name.
You've offered, what?
"Nuh-uh"?
>>27330405
>Opinions column
>Shere Hite is a source
Thank you for googling some effort into this but she is not the best for this argument.
The Chicago study has better merit but the issue is it was just men in that.
And the 12 million on ashelys is about 8% of the US population and again it doesn't give clear numbers of who is and isn't cheating.
>>27330483
Nigger there is no way you actually think <10% of spouses cheat over the course of their entire marriage. Are you daft? Everywhere I've checked from Google puts the number upwards of 30%
https://www.truthaboutdeception.com/cheating-and-infidelity/stats-about-infidelity.html
To humor you
I'm still interested in hearing about what you have to say about this.
>>27330409
Where are you getting those numbers?
If it's where I'm thinking it's worth noting those numbers are counting any one whose spouse has died as well which throws numbers off greatly.
>>27330453
>you aren't even using it properly.
This desu fampai. It's a pantsu on head retarded meme.
"Beta" is quite literally only second to "alpha".
The correct term would be "omega".
>>27330405
>1) quoting a nwpaper
What's next, the 'study' that if men stare at big tits their blood pressure goes down?
>2) quote the Hite Report
SRSLY?
She used *voluntary response* anonympus questionnaires where those being asked knew the thrust of the research and she has never released her full original data set for review.
AND the primary targe of her questionnaires were women's groups like NARAL and NOW
AND she had less than a 4% response rate coupled with discarding 40% of responses as 'outliers'
In other words, she was slinging Feminist bullshit to discredit marriage and you swallowed it
>>27329440
>>27329466
>>27329506
I'm triggered and depressed. I will never be a seemingly handsome white guy with his qt white girl. Happy its a same race white couple though
>>27330496
>links to website
>doesn't link to actual study
>ends up proving he knows less about the subject that anyone in this thread and that he's never actually attempted to learn more
Unless the website you link to provides sources to their own data from studies they created themselves, don't take it seriously or use it as proof
As you think about this, what comes to mind?
>>27330533
>>27330548
I have not found one study that puts the number below 30%
If it's just 4% then I must be extremely fucking lucky to live around people whose spouses cheat on them and divorce regularly
>>27330496
and most of those results were conducted by less then credible sources. You take them at face value because they feed what you want to believe.
Hell look at you now, you cannot even pause to think numbers could be that low, you rather hand wave me as stupid then to consider the idea that numbers have been exaggerated or manipulated to get the click baits.but it's worth noting you have lost point of your argument reread >>27329999
>>27330109 the number is that 10%-30% but you have been trying to fight women cheated more which has not been conclusively shown so now you are spinning your wheels and agreeing with us while still arguing.
>>27330587
No, I'm arguing that you're absolutely delusional if you the one anon thinks it's actually 4%
>>27330409
>Let me just MAKE SHIT UP, the post
You are thinking of the Johnson and Wilson study that found that about 18% of men who *doubted the paternity of their children enough to pay for a full paternity test* were correct.
Actual genetic analysis of the general population (rather than men who were already pretty sure) by King & Jobling, Gilding, and the Birkbeck Analysis show that the actual general rate of Paternity Fraud
>i.e, 'it ain't really your kid'
is about 0.8%
ZERO
POINT
EIGHT
PERCENT
The fucked up thing about Robots is there are so many things they base their life on that are obviously false.
>>27330450
HA HA HA HA HA HA!
You still don't get it?
Think about it
--Arguing!
>>27330572
That this shitposting is getting old and here soon you won't have any baiters for awhile.
>>27330585
post the studies you have found as evidence that there's overwhelming trend in your favor
typically if you want to prove a point, you need something besides your own word
>>27330600
You can't read can you?
Here I'll hold your hand
>of cheating confirm that in first marriages only about 4% of women cheated compared to about 6% of men.
>first marriages only
That's not counting second, third and beyond.
second you hit another 15% combined
pile all the infidelity together and you get about 20%-30%
Then if you add cohabitation without marriage and dating you get the number closer 50%
You would have caught that if you read a little slower
>>27330496
>https://www.truthaboutdeception.com/cheating-and-infidelity/stats-about-infidelity.html
>Follow Link
>Go to first analysis - it is for the likelihood of infidelity in first year of marriage
>Read the study the number cited IS DISCREDITED IN THE REPORT!!!
In other words, the linked report REFUTED the statistic that '30% to 60% of married individuals will cheat'!
You fucking moron, if you had followed ONE LINK you would have realized that was bullshit
>>27330639
Well for one just Google and you'll find every study shows upwards of 25% of men and women cheat
>>27330691
Nice one study you got there
>>27329440
Super boring photostock life, they never talk or do anything even slightly outside of mainstream. I was happy to see that all those boring people couple off and settle down in a boring suburb and there are less of those marriagefags in the cities where people actually want to achieve something or not to be so mainstream.
>>27329440
she's hot, I sort of want to be that guy
he's probably rich and handsome too
>>27330548
see also
>>27330703
lol
>>27330496
>he's just throwing click bait links without reading them
never change robots
>>27330585
>I have not found one study that puts the number below 30%
Well considering you links I say you are not trying all that hard
>>27330703
>>27330585
Whisman & Snyder, 2007
Blow & Hartnett, 2005
Wiederman, 1997
Leigh, Temple, & Trocki, 1993
Choi, Catania, and Dolcini, 1994
These are just the *most cited* from the first page of my research paper search.
Maybe, just maybe, you should read actual research, not PUA blogs
>>27330691
that's not actually how statistics work....
>>27330710
>just Google
Telingl people to find data that supports your argument isn't a source of data
imagine writing a report to literally any company or official section of anything and citing your sources to "google"
it's not an argument backed up with evidence
>>27330703
I drown him out when he gave a source that was both an Opinions blog and was siting a study by Hite who is an absolute nut case. She's like a feminist Freud
>>27330710
But that one study has weight to it and has a source
That worth way more than clickbait google hits.
>>27329999
nice quads familam
witnessed
>>27330746
But where will he find truths that match what he wants to believe?
>people itt actually believe under 10% of men and women cheat
>>27330746
They only research what reaffirms what they want to believe
Welcome to the robot arena
>>27329440
They can either be the happiest couple on the planet or the most messy one. Couldn't care less.
>>27329440
Guy looks like a fagbut a happy one
>>27329440
It makes me sad that I will never get to experience it.
Oh well, back to WoW.
cheating, alphas and betas aside, do you really want that kind of life? It is as sexy and interesting as this
>>27329440
>that joke he calls stubble will be in his wedding photos for the rest of his life
in all seriousness, though, he's made it
>>27329754
>>27329863
>looks at a happy couple that was just married
>assumes she will turn him into a cuckold, if not, she'll eventually leave him
you guys need to take a little /r9k/ break
>>27331969
I just call it as it is
Seems like such an unlikely match I bet they met in church.
>>27331969
Do you really see happiness and not a fake stock photo life? This photo, their fashion choices, the fact they take part in a boring conservative tasteless tradition like wedding and especially the most stock image way as possible, makes it as sexy as having a meeting with your bank and taking a loan.
>>27332065
This is the most tumblrfatty post I've ever read.
>>27332132
And you seriously think that this picture is adventurous, stylish, interesting or unique in any way? Even tumblrfatty style beats it any time.
Traditional wedding is just a conservative habit for people who have no style of their own, it is like watching reality shows or going to church
>>27332212
It isn't meant to be. It's clearly a wedding photo. It's essentially a meme.
>Traditional wedding is just a conservative habit for people who have no style of their own
You mean like not wearing Fedoras? Yea yea whatever.
>>27330572
Penquin from Batman, such a silly conservative pose
>>27332239
OP asked what I think of it and I answered. I am just surprised that so many people talk about cheating but don't see it is a stock image in the first place. I thought r9k is not following the herd, trying to reinforce that marriage makes your happy and has to be your dream. I find it on the same level like taking a loan and buying a house in suburb. Just boring. And if you think that marriage has to be and look boring, you don't define your own life.
Fedoras have nothing to do with being unique. Just internet trend. However, this guy reminds me quite a lot a fedora-wearing neckbeard because of his clothing
>>27332239
and kissing is unhygienic and a cliche. The same goes about sex.
