So what do you, robots, think of Stefan 'not an argument' Molyneux ?
>>27327189
I really liked his book Culture of Critique and how it exposed the kikes for the societal parasites that they are
>>27327223
it was a very good read.
my general take on him is that's he's a pretty decent guy, he fights for something he really belives in, and I can respect that.
>>27327245
He's certainly impassioned, while I don't agree with everything he debates, or all of his points, he certainly has earned my respect in that regard.
Overall though, I find him hard to stand, much like Russel Brand before him, I saw some intellectual insight, then saw it for what it was. I don't really see the point in listening to him too regularly. He pretty much re-treads the same topics more than the Indy 500 re-treads the race track.
>>27327268
true, some of his points are really debatable.
never really noticed the fact that he's been retreading to similar topics, but i will keep that in mind.
>>27327189
he's a fucking pretentious loser, it's nothing to do with his views he's just a fucking terrible person in general.
>>27327336
I'm also a High Functioning Autistic, so my memory of word usage/topics is really stupidly sharp. It's annoying, ruins a lot of people whom I would otherwise enjoy, either as a guilty pleasure or just as a normal pleasure.
So keep that in mind, regarding that criticism.
>>27327351
what makes him so terrible ? please elaborate
>>27327352
oh, i should have seen that coming honestly.
but yes, i will keep it in mind
There are literally no good ideas on the political right because it's completely based on false principles. Conservatism is false because by definition it's better to make things better, and social darwinism is false because of mutual aid in humans. Without mutual aid all humans would literally be dead.
Sometimes I listen to his videos and nod in agreement almost the entire time.
Then I watch the next one and think he's a fucking nutcase.
>>27327429
i was under the impression that he was an anarcho-capatalist and not a conservative.
or am I wrong on this ?
but on your point, I see flaws in both the political right as well as the left. None of them are 100% true to what is best for the people.
>>27327457
>anarcho-capatalist
That's social darwinist, they're not really anarchists either so don't be tricked. It's the same as national socialism not really being socialism.
>>27327437
that's generally what you can expect from him 2bh.
>>27327477
huh, i didn't know they were essentially the same
do you know of any place where i can read up more on this ?
>>27327496
What do you mean, it's a metaphor for the use of language, not the actual beliefs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_2XyoxK-uE This video explains the basic principle. What we see know with right-wingers calling themselves libertarians and anarchists is the same thing as we saw in the 20th century with fascists calling themselves socialists, syndicalists, workers' parties etc.
>>27327189
He's right about all women being whores
>>27327513
what i mean is that i am not a good english speaker, i didn't know that they're merely metaphors.
but i will gladly watch the video for a new perspective, if it's what you wish.
>>27327519
single mothers are the true parasites, man.
>>27327189
The good thing about him is that he acknowledges facts and counters the arguments of the SJW crowed.
The bad thing about him is that he is boring, cringy and acts like some moral god who has life all figured out. The only videos of his that I enjoy are the ones where he reads data from research papers, but this doesn't require any real intellectual effort. The rest of his videos are "debate" videos or videos where he gives people advice in life. His "debate" videos are shit because there is rarely any debate. It feels like he picks up some idiot from the street to appear smart compared to his opposition. Also the "debate" almost never starts right away, you need to fast forward 45 minutes into the video to skip the small talk and Molyneux's shitty jokes. The last "debate" video I saw of his was a "debate" against some conspiracy-tard on the subject of 9/11. The other guy just spews out all the conspiracy theories he knows. Molyneux would stop and comment but only on the most meager of points raised. He commented when the guy said the phone conversation between one of the passengers and his mother sounded like bad acting but he didn't comment when the guy said it's weird how there were only two plane hits and yet three buildings going down. He actually ended the video with him giving the guy a warning that he needs to change the way he thinks and lives his life because it's bad for him. What a fucking morally superior douche. And his advice videos are pure cringe; they consist of him making cheesy jokes and asking unintresting people about their life.
>>27327189
I used to be really into the an-cap stuff for a while and got really into the subject. Not so much anymore, but I still find a lot of his videos to be very informative and interesting.
>>27327797
This and only this.
IMO if Anita Sarkesian is the embodiment of faggots on the left, the Stefan Molyneux is the embodiment of faggots on the right
>>27327408
Not the person you are asking but, if you look up the youtube channel trushibes you'll find highlights of his stupid,crazy and creepy moments.
What made me lose respect for him was the "DO YOU WANT TO SHOOT ME!?"
no
"WELL DO YOU SUPPORT TAXES"
yes
"HOW CAN I DEBATE SOMEONE WHO WANTS TO SHOOT ME, YOU PAY TAXES THAT MEANS YOU PAY COPS TO SHOOT ME! I CAN'T DEBATE YOU BECAUSE YOU'RE A TOXIC STATIST! okay and next caller"
>>27329070
That's what taxation is though, that's how he obliterates progressives by saying they're not pro-gun because they're pro-state goons having guns to take your money for retarded programs.
>>27327189
He's my spiritual father and I love him
>>27329096
>>27329096
>progressives
>pro-gun.
wha?
When I saw that it made me see how much of a fucking nutcase and vile narcissistic piece of shit he is.
>>27329070
>if you look up the youtube channel trushibes you'll find highlights of his stupid,crazy and creepy moments.
Holly shit, dude, thanks for sharing this channel! At first I thought Molyneux was just a douchebag with high mental capabilities but now I see that there is something really wrong about him. He is building a personality cult around him.
He's an annoying weirdo. Anarcho-capitalism is garbage.
Though he genuinely convinced me on not spanking my kids.
>>27329703
Is it cool to sound like a female these days?
he talks a lot and has no real job. can kiss my ass desu
>>27329070
TY for the channel. Found this little gold nugget and holy shit this dude is full of cringe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UB9kkmwR5w
>>27331165
I get his point, but physics has applications aside from wasting billions to put a glorified RC car on a barren rock.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CM_--di7L8
HI THERE
ONE DOLLAR
He put a kook on his show to talk about 9/11 talking about crazy shit when he could have interviewed somebody like Ryan Dawson and make it rain redpill but we can't have that.
>>27329157
>progressives
>pro-gun
Yeah. What do you think cops will use when you resist having your property seized? A sternly-worded letter? Progressives are ultimately against citizens having guns, but still employ the state to use them.
I like him
Serial Number 1
he's the typical fill-in-the-gap-of-a-father-figure cult leader-like personality
uses manipulation and word mazes to confuse people with otherwise simple things (like, dont hit children, and taxation is theft) to push his sinister agendaand if you got all flustered and angry of what i just said and wants proof of what i just said... well im sorry for you, he got you good
>>27327797
I remember him saying something to the effect of "the threat of force isn't necessary to maintain order" or something like that, and I remember thinking of how retarded it was. Been a long time, sorry I'm vague.
The only thing I can agree with him on almost entirely is women, feminism, single motherhood and interpersonal romantic relationships. He's good at dismantling and analyzing manipulation tactics, shaming, the usual bullshit that women pull and how we as a society aid and abet them in doing so.
In one vid, he told this simp with Mom issues that "man up" basically translates to "Surrender to female needs. That is the direct translation. Don't inconvenience the holders of the eggs. For you to have needs inconvenient to women is absolutely heretical to the egg-cult of society. Not to pick exclusively on women, the two groups that prey on men are more powerful men, and women. 'Man up' means put on a uniform and get shot for not fuckin reason. Don't have needs or preferences that conflict with women or with men who have power over you."
Here are some good ones
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rW6tP-YjMaw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pGLNeov2VM&list=PLMNj_r5bccUxICsS5sl_xRKIqoyZ7OOAj&index=16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VMeu-EnKeY
this guy got a STD from his slut GF and keeps defending her and making excuses and Stefan kind of taps out after a while and tells him he's fucked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSV3R5hwMsM
>>27331536
I partially agree, I don't think he has a sinister agenda. At least his format brings up certain topics that his followers might not have not heard about otherwise. But it's not good to parrot opinions.
keeps on lying to me about what i can do in his videogames
>>27327223
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9ls8pyV684
OY VEY
