>>27251035
The problem your experiencing is emotional deflection; because you cannot accept a world in which absolute commitment may be a shade of grey poisons the notion of meaningful relationships. You think all women are the devil created by satan to torture you? Maybe try understanding that people are fluid, and their desires change over time. This might be a hard concept to grasp, but women are people, and as such are fallible to growth, I. E. Change. Just because Mary Sue doesn't give up her body because your nice doesn't make her a devil-spawn, it makes you a cuck trying desperately to barter emotions with physical pleasure, sound familiar? Stop denying the real reason you're unsuccessful in relationships, and grow for a goddamn change.

>>27251035
Welcome to the real world.
Only men can love men. Women can only love money.

>>27251035
>I mostly swing towards women
>mostly
kil urself

>>27251035
Why are you basing your assumption about all women on a shit person to begin with? She's going to a shit small school, which means she has no ambition and nothing to redeem her in either academics or extra-curricular interest. She's an idiot with no interests.

If you have nothing going for you except your looks and ability to have sex, of course you end up a trash person.

>>27251173
I don't want a relationship with her, I just amazed at the complete apathy. I'm not saying she won't grow out of it. Just the fact that she can do it in the first place and that men actually feed into it

>>27251295
I bet you can't think of a single instance in which a man has acted on impulse driven desire that isn't logical. People suck, but we are people, and we have to accept that we are shitty. Stop antagonizing yourself with thoughts of purity and righteousness, we're all shit, and you have to accept it. Gender is a nasty illusion in this game.

>>27251358
But it stops being impulse driven desire when it is carried out in a consistent fashion. Consistency implies some kind of recurring logic or thought pattern.

OP your problem is that you only have eyes for 8/10 women like in your picture. A 6/10 woman is invisible and repulsive go men.

>>27251456
You're not refuting the point I made, which is this is not a gender-select problem. I'm not trying to be a douche here, just stating what I believe. I think it's entirely possible to be hypersensitive to the actions of one group if that is your focus.

> WAH WAH STACY DOESNT LIKE ME WHY ARE WOMEN SUCH WHORES?

Maybe you should stop pursing bitches and party girls. That nice religious girl who is quiet in class may be so dull and plain but she will love you to the end. You won't even look twice at her. Nice girls would love to be with you but you only pay attention to bitches.

>>27251516
There aren't going to be nice quiet smart girls in whatever shit college OP is attending.

It's likely only other druggies, cucks and faggots.

>>27251548
False. They don't exist to you because they are 4-6/10 and therefore invisible to your eyes.

>>27251035
>Why do betas think that they can get with girls by giving them free shit? and Why are women considered the loving, clingy sex? They are literally incapable of true, selfless love. Once better dick comes along they leave without any hesitation.

Historically, females sought after provider males (they still do, as most modern female/male relationships are transactional in nature, with girlfriends/wives having sex with guys who spend money on them), but with the advent of females entering the workforce, a female doesn't have to rely on a single provider anymore.

Women are considered the loving sex due to mothers, but most modern women don't know how to be feminine or a good mother. They've been brainwashed by the media to look like the plastic Barbie dolls you posted.

And yes, women are incapable of unconditional love to anyone that isn't their child. Biologically they can't afford to get too attached to any sperm donor, her offspring take precedence. Her love for a man is conditional on what he can do for her. And all women are looking to upgrade, and think they deserve better than what they currently have.

>>27251579
I think you read that post wrong. I'm not OP. I'm not even a man.

>>27251173

Just say that women can change their mind on a dime based on their current hormones/emotions/what they just saw on Ellen.

That's what all your blabbering about "fluidity" and changing desires means.

Women do not take past actions into account. They are geared for the here and now.

>>27251579
An odd parallel, since most guys want what most girls want; but being desirable doesn't fit into that equation.
>I want a girl who is faithful to me and doesn't slut around, who cares about my hobbies and interests.
This girl exists, though she is most likely below average in looks. Because she is below average, she develops the skills she can use to attract a man.
>I just want a guy who will respect me and listen to my opinions
These guys do exist, and again, are among the lower tiers of the attraction scale.

The metaphor here being if you don't have a big dick learn to please with your tongue. It's a compensation game and you have to play the hand you're dealt.

>>27251640
And men are different how? Where is this moral superiority coming from? You're being so obtuse you make me feel like I'm defending women's actions, instead of condemning the inpulsitivity of humanity.

>>27251599
If you quote a secure biology men have no reference to love anyone considering the amount of offspring they can sire in a lifetime.

>>27251516
>That nice religious girl who is quiet in class may be so dull and plain but she will love you to the end.

This may have been true, maybe even 20 years ago, but not anymore.

Women are herd animals. They are products of their culture. Water takes the shape of the container its put in. And today no woman is immune to the influence of her smartphone. She is a product of the media she consumes.

With the advent of the Pill and the destigmatization of premarital sex, abortion, divorce, even cheating, that "nice quiet religious girl" will fuck a Chad in college in a split second. Because women aren't shamed for their bad life decisions anymore. Feminism is all about helping women shirk responsibility for their actions. And progressivisim in general has the end goal of depopulation (see abortion, homosexuality, transexuality, contraception, women having jobs in their 20s instead of children, etc).

The spread of technology and smartphones and the Internet eventually turns all women worldwide into Westernized Americanized bitches, party girls, and whores who only want to be entertained 24/7. They don't know how to be women, they don't know how to be mothers.

>>27251825
And today's youth knows how to be fathers? I'm playing devil's advocate here, but c'mon. Replace the gender nouns and realize we're all fucked. Men aren't allowed to be men, and women are encouraged not to be women. We live in a time of ridiculous abstraction of self-worth, and the end of which is clouded in misinformation and personal bias.

>>27251740

Men are the hopeless romantics. It's men who write the love songs, the love poems, who create the great works of art depicting women. Basically, men can love women for who they are.

Women can't really love men. Women only love men based on what they are currently doing for them. Women see men as disposable tools. That's what their impulsivity is based on. Women are merely looking for the next best thing. Women have no concept of loyalty. You will get no brownie points from women. I could post the screenshots from Reddit where some whore is saying how good of a husband she's had for 10 years and how she doesn't want to fuck him anymore and wants to fuck other guys.

All it takes is one minute of a woman being "bored" or "unhappy" and she'll flake on you in a heartbeat.

Women are hypergamous by nature. It's not in their nature to be monogamous, that's something men came up with to prevent wasting food on some other guy's spawn.

>>27251899
>And today's youth knows how to be fathers?

No. Which is a result of the spread of feminism, and the demonization of gender roles, and the confusion of "gender role" for "gender" (as if gender is something you choose, like Bruce Jenner, and not something hardcoded into your DNA).

When women entered the workforce, the role of the father in the home was diminished.

In women's struggle for "equality", they have denigrated the leadership role of men in the home, the workplace, and society, and women are unhappier now more than ever.

>>27251908
This is nonsense, not that the example you gave of women is untrue, but that men are different. What's the moral high ground of fucking a 20-some year old instead of your wife? Where's the connectivity between finding passion in someone else, despite how you felt before? You act like only men are capable of everlasting love, when the majority of women's porn (erotic fiction, basically wish fulfillment) is based on this concept. You cannot simply blame society on a singular standard. The breakdown of marriage is a united front, and I believe that's a step in the right direction. You should be who you're happy with, when your no longer happy in that relationship, move on. This isn't a tirade of women's rights, it's an objective look on western culture dealing with romance.

>>27251825
>And progressivisim in general has the end goal of depopulation
Besides the fact that "progressivism" is a meaningless abstraction, I find that people aren't very good at thinking things through and most consequences are unintended. Progressives seem to want people to get along, come hell or high water, and that turns out to be a very dangerous game. But any political stance is going to have the same problem, that "wish in one hand, shit in the other, see which fills up first" problem, that the armchair doesn't often survive reality.

>>27251968
The idea that feminism has poisoned men's ability to be fathers is the ultimate cuck. I hope to Christ you have no children.

There's the people who are out there living it up, the players of the world, then there's the others who argue about it all on the internet.

>>27252041
>What's the moral high ground of fucking a 20-some year old instead of your wife?

How about a guy trying to turn a 20-year-old into a wife? She doesn't want to settle down until she's done riding the cock carousel in her late 30s.

Women are more likely to cheat on their spouse than man are. Most divorces are also initiated by women.

>You act like only men are capable of everlasting love, when the majority of women's porn (erotic fiction, basically wish fulfillment) is based on this concept.

Is that why 50 Shades of Grey sold 100 million copies? Everlasting love???

Most women's porn is not based on everlasting love, at all. It's about sex with new exciting strangers. It's about women having to choose between bad boys and nice guys (and choosing the bad boys). It's about being ravaged by dominant men who know what they want and how to get it.

>depending on the study between 30 and 60 percent of women acknowledged they took pleasure in [rape fantasies]

>another new study by Chivers gave women hypothetical erotic scenarios involving either a trusted friend or a stranger. Though the women claimed to be more turned on by situations with a friend, a measure of genital blood flow suggested they were much more aroused by the strangers. The bottom line: Emotional intimacy is a great predecessor to sex, but you can't make the generalization that it's a requirement for all women.

>You should be who you're happy with, when your no longer happy in that relationship, move on.

No. In the past, marriage and commitment and loyalty actually meant something, since divorce was considered a sin, and adultery was considered a sin.

Nowadays, everyone thinks they are entitled to 100% happiness 100% of the time, and willing to step out on someone the second they are "unhappy."

>>27251035
I think you might be right.
Whenever I see these "oh shit I fucked up" threads where they post their messages to their partner the woman always seems like an unfunny bitch who always takes everything too seriously and makes the guy walk on egg shells around her.
It's nothing like the homo relationship I have with my bf

>>27252233
I don't understand this post. You cite fifty shades of grey being detrimental to women's ideals, yet censor the amount of pornography men view? I get that you want the fault to fall on everyone but you, but c'mon, we have to be reasonable at some stage of this discussion.

>>27252042

The End Goal Of Western Progressivism Is Depopulation
http://www.rooshv.com/the-end-goal-of-western-progressivism-is-depopulation
>Abortion
>Birth control
>Women working
>Homosexuality and transexuality
>atheism, nihilism, individualism, consumerism
>environmentalism
>immigration

>All of the above decreases the reproductive rate, either directly through the killing of life, or indirectly by promoting guilt and alternative lifestyles that are incompatible with the creation of life. At the same time, immigrant populations are allowed to grow at a faster rate that the natives' ability to reproduce.

>Leftists have been soundly convinced of issues that lead to the destruction of the family unit, the breakdown of their society's social fabric, and their own voluntary sterilization.

>Even the form of game that I taught early in my career, of one-night stands, was compatible with the depopulation agenda since reproduction would often not result from it. This meant that I was a useful idiot for many years.

>the only way to defeat the evils of liberalism, feminism, social justice, and progressivism is to have huge families and create tribes that are free-thinking, self-reliant, and, most importantly, armed.

>The last thing that those in power want is for women to pair-bond with independent, masculine men who do not need the state and who place more importance and loyalty in their blood relatives and nation than to leftist ideas, iPhones, and sports teams.

File: 5.png (224 KB, 600x450) Image search: [Google]

224 KB, 600x450

The bait has become progressively weaker.

>>27252469
I'm astounded you took the time to write this, and for once hope to god I fell for pasta.

>>27252099

Feminists have brainwashed generations of boys and girls into demonizing male behavior and male sexuality. They regularly rant against the Patriarchy, when the nuclear family has been about its patriarch, the father, for millenia.

Feminism also holds that fathers are unnecessary, two lesbos can pay for a sperm down and they can be two "mothers" raising another man's child. The entire court system and divorce system is beholden to females and letting them off for their bad decisions.

Feminists see no reason to respect fathers, and respect the role of a father, and fathers in the media are regularly portrayed as buffoons.

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/308135/
>Earlier this year, women became the majority of the workforce for the first time in U.S. history. Most managers are now women too. And for every two men who get a college degree this year, three women will do the same.

http://blog.ted.com/new-ted-ebook-warns-of-the-demise-of-guys/
>There are many factors that play into a general loss of motivation in guys. If you go beyond the symptoms - performing poorly in school, failing to transition into adulthood, flaming out socially and sexually with women - and into the causes, guys are living in an environment that's hostile towards men. We make men feel expendable, unneeded, and like they can't be themselves. When you think about the fact that 85% of all stimulant medications are prescribed to American boys, for example, you can't help but wonder about why there is such a disproportion.

>>27252377

Women's erotic fiction is not based on loyalty and everlasting love.

Women's erotic fiction is based on being ravaged by new strange dominant men.

>>27252699
Well if you believe click-bait then fuck off. Would you raise your offspring this way? The problem with interfaced media is the ability to hijack your mind and ultimately your world views. See; don't think.

>>27252727
Who happen to overcome their desires to realiZe how great the protagonist is, if not directly

>>27252619

I linked to an article and quoted from it.

Would you like to refute any of its points or are you missing the latest episode of Keeping Up With the Kardashians?

>>27252765

Oh so you're a married father with a dozen children, hmm? What are you doing on r9k?

>>27252818
You linked a blog that supports your agenda. Don't attempt passivity

>>27252840
I'm posting my opinion, what are you doing?

>>27251295
>Just the fact that she can do it in the first place and that men actually feed into it
this.
it's all men's fault. we let this happen. we also let feminism happen. i don't think it's reversible at this point.

>>27251358
>people
>we
Stop conflating your own class with all of humankind, thanks.

>>27252880
Stop the elitist mindset that you are different from your species

>>27251908
>content content
>Women can't really love men. Women only love men based on what they are currently doing for them. Women see men as disposable tools. That's what their impulsivity is based on. Women are merely looking for the next best thing. Women have no concept of loyalty. You will get no brownie points from women. I could post the screenshots from Reddit where some whore is saying how good of a husband she's had for 10 years and how she doesn't want to fuck him anymore and wants to fuck other guys.
>content content

See:
>>27251744

>>27252843

I linked to a site that referred to progressivism, which anon claimed was some nebulous concept.

The fact is that progressivist causes lead to declining birth rates, which just happens to be the goal of Agenda 21.

>The United Nations has an action plan called Agenda 21 that advocates for "sustainable development." One way it does that is through worldwide promotion of feminism, which has the effect of removing women from the family home and into corporate workplaces that are under control by the same gloabalists in the UN club. As any Western nation's population chart can tell you, feminism goes hand-in-hand with depopulation.

>>27251035
>start "dating" a slightly older guy for dick but breaks up with him after a few weeks because he was "only 5'9"
This is exactly when I stopped believing your b8

>>27252911
You linked a site that promoted your opinion, if it wasn't your opinion why bother? I bet you believe in eugenics.

>>27252909
>manx and jaguars are the same because they're both felidae
This is how fucking stupid you are.

>>27252984

I agree with a lot of things on that site, but I didn't write it, I quoted it.

I don't believe in eugenics, but that once was a cause of progressives (and ultimately led to the Holocaust, another example of massive depopulation).

>>27252818
I'd like to refute all points given, which have been none. Back under the bridge, troll.

>>27251599
>They've been brainwashed by the feminsts to act like degenerate whores you posted.
Fix'd that for you.

>>27253073

The point was
>All of the above decreases the reproductive rate

Glad to see you agree.

Know how I know you're an SJW? Because you use an ad hominem attack (inspired by Jews who accuse people of being anti-Semites) in order to shut down a debate.

"Troll"? Didn't you mean "shitlord" or "misogynist" or "beta cuck" or some other insult to ignore addressing what I actually said?