Let's see r9k's political stances. Complete the quiz -> https://www.politicalcompass.org/
>>27243482
were pretty close, you and i are free thinkers, true gentlemen of knowledge
>>27243482
I'm left-leaning? That's gay.
>>27244089
yeah that sucks, i guess you will need to get your fill of red pill youtube videos from sargon of akkad
>>27244226
I'm fucking confused.
Redpill? I thought leftism was a SJW thing.
>>27244263
sargon of akkad is against feminism and blm, but he is on the left. he lives in the uk
>member of a Marxist-Leninist party
Feels bad man
>>27243482
Use this one you cucks
http://www.abtirsi.com/quiz2.php
>>27244326
>implying political stance can be determined with 30 westins
Probably worse than Facebook quizzes.
>>27243889
>ubermensch.png
Nah, Hitler would've put you in a camp
Inb4 /pol/ hate
Only people with empathy go left.
green master race :^)
Always the middleman. At least I'm not a cuck.
>>27244326
>>27244519
You are a: Socialist Pro-Government Multilateralist Humanist Progressive
Collectivism score: 67%
Authoritarianism score: 17%
Internationalism score: 50%
Tribalism score: -67%
Liberalism score: 67%
>>27243889
>>27244326
You are a: Left-Leaning Libertarian Interventionist Cosmopolitan Progressive
Collectivism score: 17%
Authoritarianism score: -50%
Internationalism score: 17%
Tribalism score: -17%
Liberalism score: 67%
>>27244608
i mean you and i are atleast the same amount liberalyou communist fuck
>>27244326
You are a: Communist Authoritarian Multilateralist Humanist Liberal
Collectivism score: 100%
Authoritarianism score: 67%
Internationalism score: 67%
Tribalism score: -50%
Liberalism score: 33%
Never seen this one before. Thanks.
green like my weed
If any other greens want to talk you can kik me @LiverpoolPolicy
>>27244696
wew kill yourself my mang
>>27244716
Ok mr. "I have the best ideas"
>>27244740
Better ideas than those who end up on your end of the political spectrum.
>>27244314
Tankies REEEEEEEE
>>27244601
>middleman
>not cuck
It's the other way around you dildo
Individualism all the way
>>27244696
>>27244519
Wowie we got almost the same results.
>>27243482
Voting Trump if I ever bother to register btw.
>>27244922
2016 political candidates on compass
>>27244982
kek@where they put clinton
>>27244326
Didn't notice this test. Let's see...
>>27244862
You are a: Right-Leaning Anarchist Total-Isolationist Cosmopolitan Libertine
Collectivism score: -33%
Authoritarianism score: -83%
Internationalism score: -83%
Tribalism score: -17%
Liberalism score: 83%
Sounds about right?
>>27243889
>>27244862
only decent people on this thread
>>27244696
>>27244910
Hello fellow Libertarian Socialists/Anarchists
I am literally Gandhi
>>27245383
The government should provide things that the free market can't, like a military, healthcare and liveable wage then fuck off from the rest of our lives. We should localize things more than globalize them to create stable communities and reduce impact from far supply chain abuse.
That's what I am
I kind of see myself more right leaning than this chart suggests.
Some of these questions require more nuance to be answered accurately, since the terms are particularly loaded in US political discourse.
>>27244982
thats the most retarded thing ive ever seen fuck you anon
>>27243482
I guess I'm a moderate who favors individualism and freedom to a reasonable degree... The thing they don't know is that I'm voting for Trump just for the lulz.
>>
>>27243482
normie here
no wonder you guys are all fucking losers
holy fuck you guys are cucked to shit liberals
>>27244862
You're the closest person to me in this thread. Why is /r9k/ so left-leaning?
>>27245537
Just posting to say I did this test a few days ago and got almost the exact same alignment as you. I also agree that the questions could be worded a bit more clearly.
>>27244982
What a joke.
>Cruz is more authoritarian than sanders
This quiz is pretty kekworthy.
>>27246198
>tfw you're a normie on r9k
>tfw you favor free market but live in your moms basement
![chart[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/3AmV06M.png "chart[1].png")
Fucking commies and statists everywhere.
A bit further left than I thought I'd be but ok
I used to be much more on the left some years ago, but now I'm more in the middle. I consider myself classical liberal. I know liberalism is currently being hijacked by crazy lefties but you bet your ass I will call out any social justice bullies if I ever see any.
I'm pro free speech, pro freedom of expression, against political correctness, etc. all that good stuff.
Green is best. Purple is second best.
>>27247058
Agreed, I have inherent distrust of anyone above the x axis
somewhere 'round square [6;2]
too lazy to retake it
>>27244089
>http://www.abtirsi.com/quiz2.php
>You are a: Left-Leaning Anti-Government Non-Interventionist Nativist Reactionary
Collectivism score: 33%
Authoritarianism score: -33%
Internationalism score: -33%
Tribalism score: 50%
Liberalism score: -50%
That's a little closer, desu. But also more obscure
I'm more far left than Sanders? Well shit...Didn't expect that, Senpai.
Pretty sure I'm the only one here in the red
>>27247090
This. Fuck authoritarians.
>>27247208
a decent human being at last
damn i'm disgusting
>>27243482
who are these green retarded leeches who actually believe in collectivism? kill yourselves if you're not blue/purple
Here's the chart for comparison
not what i expected tbqh
>>27247273
You're against collectivism? so you don't believe in taxes at all?
>>27246774
Your position is sort of minarchist desu
>>27247205
And here's that other test someone posted.ORIGINALORIGINALORIGINAL
>>27244326
>I got communist humanist progressive
What does this mean it sounds like a right-wing insult
>>27247416
Communist: you believe in collectivism
Humanist: you're egalitarian and believe in a separation of religion government
progressive: used to mean someone who believed in social change like legalizing weed and prostitution but now more commonly associated with SJWs
well, that wasn't surprising
posting all my good stuff
>>27246527
>Why is /r9k/ so left-leaning?
The purple quadrant is left-leaning, at least socially.
Do people not even know what liberal means? It means "I don't give a fuck what you do." Get gay married, have an abortion, shoot a gun, whatever. The purple quadrant just believes in a greater degree of economic liberties on top of that, whereas the green quadrant might support extensive economic regulation.
>>27246929
>I know liberalism is currently being hijacked by crazy lefties
>I'm pro free speech, pro freedom of expression, against political correctness, etc. all that good stuff.
Social justice has nothing to do with liberalism. Why people egregiously call them "lefties" in the first place is beyond me. They would place more along the red quadrant.
>>27247279
This reference is a bit more concise
Not as right wing as I thought.
who here /tooradicaltoanswermostquestions/?
This is my result
>inb4 /pol/ children cry about my post
Lick my boot tbqh senpai.
Ja wohl.
>all these liberals and libertarians
disgusting
>>27247948
You've got to be kidding me. You're on /r9k/, you fucking degenerate. You'd be the first to go in the kind of society you advocate.
>>27247964
Hello, Stalin
>>27247984
Sounds like someone needs a nice shower und toasty furnace.
>>27248014
It's not my problem that you're delusional.
>>27247738
So are you a libertarian socialist, anarcho-communist, left communist...?
>>27247945
We got almost the same result! Green ftw. Anyone in blue or purple is a trying to be a massive edgelord
>>27248039
It is nicht mein problem you are lebenunwertenleben.
>barely any people in the blue
Disgusting
>>27248109
I'm sorry that your parents beat you so hard growing up, but you really shouldn't be taking it out on the rest of us.
>>27248078
Are you even German?
>>27247695
Prefer this one
>>27248133
Nein, but ich leeeeeeeeeibe bratwurst.
>>27248059
Maybe he's not a faggot unlike most people in this thread
>>27245519
Heyyyy brother
>>27248138
Chomsky is an anarchist, most people who like Chomsky are anarchists, should be further in the green.
Reddit is closer to the bottom part of the "Indecisive pushovers" bit. Vaguely anti-authoritarian but otherwise no distinct views. Yeah, there are a lot of Bernie fuckers, but there are also a lot of libertarian types. Put Tumblr in the red where Reddit is.
>Thatcher and Reagan even touching purple
No.
Also, should've been more creative with the lower left quadrant. There are laughs to be had, but this was probably made by someone with no clue what the libertarian left is.
>>27247273
Well said. Blue is best. Anyone who disagrees needs to be shot.
Red and blue
>I'm an ideological cuckold who needs authority figures to tell me what to do
Green
>I'm a failure and I don't like it, so the hard-working people who earned their shit should give me what they have because I said so
If you're not purple, you're retarded famalam
>>27248392
Purple
>m'lady *tips hat*
>>27248419
>le fedora meme
Thanks for proving me right
>>27244478
>>27244716
>>27246198
>>27247208
>>27247948
>>27247964
>Still authoritarian sleazebags in 2016
>>27248507
Authoritarians are retarded, but so is the "current year" argument.
Democracy is a fallacy. Liberalism rewards parasites. Collectivism enforces a ceiling of mediocrity on mankind.
>Be blue.
>Be Chad.
>Win and mercilessly punish all cucked peasants who cry foul.
What does this mean politically?
Anarchist communism is the only true form of libertarianism that exists
>>27248588
That literally makes no sense and is a retarded edgy way of saying "I want no rulez, pizza and ice cream 4 breakfast.
>>27248138
>ADAM AND EVE NOT ADAM AND STEVE, OK
Got me a kek, feels nice to be a conservacuck
>>27248640
It feels nice because you're smart enough to crawl out of the ideological dumpster.
>Much keks and respect.
>tfw the only liberal on 4chan
>>27248695
>only
Read the thread, you cancers have infested this board.
>>27248695
Nah, don't listen to the stormweenie propaganda. There are a lot of reasonable people here.
>>27248722
What does it mean, if I am a big liberal but hate trannies, black lives matter, feminism, and that whole gender acceptance thing.
>>27248559
You believe in promoting individualism and the growth of business, and you are 14% more likely to want the government to lay off than have them enforce what you want.
Sound right?
>>27244982
>let's ignore that Sanders is a socialist
>>27248744
Hmm. It means you're reasonable at least, and worthy of some respect. You're still a fag until proven otherwise though.
Would vote for Trump.
>>27248744
It means you're 25% wrong.
>>27248745
About individualism, yes. But it's strange because I've always felt closer to anarcho-capitalism, and the chart doesn't reflect that.
I basically think that liberty is absolute and fundamental, I don't want to force anything on anyone as long as they don't try to force anything on me. Ideally, everyone does what they want, follows whichever set of morals they like, and people defend themselves and their property as they see fit.
My way of thinking doesn't seem to conform to libertarian capitalism. It's even quite different from ancap since I don't truly believe in the non-aggression principle.
>>27248819
>>27248769
Well here's my chart (which apparently isn't original damn it)
>>27244982
>clinton right authoritarian
>all republicans ranked nearly equal as extremist
>bernie only slightly left of center
looks like /r/sandersforpresident made this
>>27244982
this is the most autistic and biased peace of shit I have seen here in a long time
>>27248911
Bad but not terrible. The test seems rather odd though, I believe in fascism and want it yet I'm barely in the conservative area
>>27248991
It's funny because I'm ok with social freedoms, but god, third wave feminism and the like really chaps my ass. I don't know why, because many other people in my position are ok with it.
>>27248601
Being this politically uneducated
>>27248601
What's wrong with pizza for breakfast?
>most of /r9k/ is in green
FUCK EVEN IN POLITICS IM LIKE YOU FAGGOTS???
Something something I like guns. Where my fellow blues at?
>>27249134
So how the fuck else could communism work, and how does it work together with communism... Isn't that basically the opposite? I don't see how these ideals are compatible with each other at all. I'm all ears, so please explain.
>>27248991
Hope you enjoy being put in a concentration camp for not being Chad thanks to that fascism you want so much, idiot
![73ee01fc7e[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/v2u1JJT.png "73ee01fc7e[1].png")
>>27243482
Opposite of commies seems good to me.
Why won't barely any party touch the purple square tho?
>>27248761
He's a moderate social democrat, not a socialist. He'd be a centrist in any European country.
Any ancaps here?
>>27249185
Because if you're purple you're literally retarded
>>27248233
>>Thatcher and Reagan even touching purple
>No.
Are you kidding?
Thatcher shut down government run industries because it was getting too expensive for the tax-payer. Reagan was doing his best to keep government OUT of everything.
>>27244982
>Clinton
>LESS authoritarian than other candidates
>>27248761
I think these things tend to be on a more global scale, so the farthest left would be extreme communist like "no one should be able to own property or food" kinda bullshit
so in that sense he's somewhat left but not far left
>>27249186
>implying anything near socialism is considered average in western europe
>15 and 16-year-olds start pouring in
>r9k is suddenly more liberal
wouldn't you be happier on reddit or tumblr?
There are tons of better political tests. I don't understand why this one is so popular.
>>27244601
>>27245519
>>27246153
>>27247506
>>27247717
>>27248226
hey neutralfriends
>>27249175
There's a good goy.
>>27249277
Do you believe there's a time for every purpose?
>>27249277
I thought a lot of the questions were written by someone left leaning his/herself
>saying "Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races." as opposed to something along the lines of "I am proud of my nationality and believe I am fortune to be in the nation I am from"
The fact literally every country on Earth that even thinks about using a political ideology in the red quadrant is a pretty good indicator the blue and green are just stepping stones to purple.
>>27249193
>the green square
or I just don't care about other people, really
pretty much all the questions that lead to the green side were like "should gay people be able to adopt kids?"
to which I really just don't care and it's less effort/regulation if they are allowed to than if they're not allowed to
>>27244326
You are a: Right-Leaning Anti-Government Nationalist Reactionary
Collectivism score: -17%
Authoritarianism score: -33%
Internationalism score: 0%
Tribalism score: 17%
Liberalism score: -67%
That makes me sound like /pol/
>>27248226
we're the same, can you explain us to me?
>>27248588
Hello comrade! Nice to see another Ancom here
>>27248911
How the fuck does this work out? Took the other test and compared to the previous one... what?
>>27243482
Same as usual
>>27249171
Communism is simply wanting to achieve a stateless, classless, moneyless society, and Ancoms (and anarchists in general) want to achieve this via a directly democratic horizontal network of free voluntary associations, all while being against all unjustified hierarchies (the beauty of this is that it means different places can have hierarchy how they want, so long as it is collectively agreed to be justifiable/necessary).
>>27249447
Internet political test are inconsistent and unreliable, stop the presses.
>>27249410
Living in a dream world m8
>>27249463
I just don't see how that would work out unless perfect conditions, because there's definitely gonna be someone who will change the entire dynamic. I don't see it being achievable whatsoever. Especially considering how interconnected we are in today's world.
>>27244326
You are a: Objectivist Anarchist Total-Isolationist Liberal
Collectivism score: -100%
Authoritarianism score: -100%
Internationalism score: -100%
Tribalism score: 0%
Liberalism score: 17%
>tfw no option for wanting to eliminate all governments entirely
>>27249171
Communism itself is stateless by definition for starters. Even the most unrepentent M-L obstensibly wants a stateless social order. Communism is a classless, stateless, moneyless society where the means of production are owned by the workers themselves, upon which every individual has free access to an abundence of resources without any rationalized system of procurement. Communism itself requires a level of automation that isn't presently available (although some other reds will disagree with me). Essentially, where Marxists and classical anarchists disagree is the utilization of the state as a vehicle for class struggle. Marxists hypothesize that the state is a tool for class domination that can be utilizes by any class to impose its will, so a transition from a capitalist to communist system requires a transition period of rule by a proletarian-controlled state. Anarchists, on the other hand, point out that the state is a social class in and of itself, that must be abolished along with the bourgeois in order to transition from capitalism to communism. As a instrument of domination and stratification, the state must br abolished if in order to acheive classlessness. I hope I explained that clearly enough, am currently drunk and on mobile. Sorry for any typos.
Pls no judge
>>27249463
That's retarded. The one with most power simply would take all for himself, like has happened thousands of times in the history of humanity.
>>27249410
Nice to see another one too! :)
>>27249193
libertard_post.png
Better one
>>27249548
But it's not like an anarchist society would simply let some fascist take over without a fight.
>>27249518
>Communism itself is stateless by definition for starters.
A definition that conflicts with it's goals.
You can't prevent people from initiating in free trade without some type of monopoly on violent force present.
>Communism itself requires a level of automation that isn't presently available
It will never be available either, due to the second law of thermodynamics scarcity will always exist in this universe, and even the smallest possible amount of scarcity will lead to a market forming.
>>27249543
dude weed mlaoo
>>27249554
Wait. The boot and the word "tread" imply authoritarianism, aren't you an anarchist?
>>27249574
I'm in purple and a pedo & lolicon. Shit dude.
>>27249548
There's always that one guy to maintain the status quo.
>the one with the most power would take all for himself
and how, in a voluntary, directly democratic society, where no-one has a monopoly on power, would that happen? Also, provide evidence for your claims :^)
>>27249633
post was meant to be for
>>27249548
>tfw moderate centrist
exciting times
>>27249581
>>27249633
Because there will eventually be someone who is persuasive enough and someone with enough like-minded ideals to form a formidable opponent and take over. And it wouldn't be illegal either, maybe they think HIS ideal for the world is better than what society is giving him. There isn't any "evidence" because communism has never been put into practice, all forms of communism were modified in some way and fell apart. And achieving TRUE communism would be impossible.
>>27249611
Yeah but that picture is just meant to piss off ancaps lmao.
>>27249633
Easy. People is easily influenced, all you need is a strong and charismatic leader and people will follow him, following is easier than leading, after all.
>>27249730
Agreed. Communism sounds nice and fluffy when you bury your nose in a manifesto all day, but take a moment to study the real world and behold: people are shit.
Communism only works if you can suppress human will and ambition, and at that point you may as well be in the blue.
>>27249824
>Communism only works if you can suppress human will and ambition, and at that point you may as well be in the blue.
Where the fuck did you get this idea from?
>>27249851
Imagine that someone creates a device that changes the way people lives their lives and that the creator can only manufacture so many products. These products become highly sought after, so much so that a new class rises up out of the fact that the items are scarce. Don't you think that the whole system would fail then?
>>27249730
Then the big question must be: would it be better to have a leader that enforces taking initiative, thinking, and working autonomously, or a shepherd of a hugbox?
>>27249730
But why would anyone follow a leader without reason to do so? If everyone has control over their own lives and access to resources, what would any "great leader" have to offer? Populist authoritarian demagouges are influential when the people are marginalized economically disspossesed. With economic liberty it'd be unlikely that any authoritarian would have the support of the masses neccacary to take power over anything.
>>27249892
That's not the point, the point is will people follow him til the end and if that's the case then there's nothing you can do.
>>27243482
Don't feel like filling that one out. Here's one I have saved.
>>27243482
Social Democracy is best Democracy.
>>27249878
That's the legacy and bittersweet legacy of humanity though: fucking up, figuring something out to fix it, and then fucking up that fix too.
Humanity will never rise above being a superfluous entity of fuckupery, and it's college kid naivety to think otherwise.
>>27243482
I've never been a big politics guy, but the government be given more power in my opinion.
1984 is an instruction manual
I believe I'm the first person in this thread who is neither left or right wing.
>>27244326
You are a: Left-Leaning Isolationist Cosmopolitan Liberal
Collectivism score: 33%
Authoritarianism score: 0%
Internationalism score: -50%
Tribalism score: -17%
Liberalism score: 17%
>>27249913
>If everyone has control over their own lives and access to resources
How is that going to be possible, and can you be sure people won't wish for more? Ambition is a natural part of the human race.
>>27249274
The liberal age meme doesn't apply to the millenials.
>>27243482
This representation of someone's political stance doesn't make any sense. Authoritarian is by definition right, and libertarian left. They know it's wrong so they had to put a disclaimer on their site defending the bull shit representation.
POOPOOPEEPEE GTFO AND GET THEE HENCE TO /POL/ FAGGOTS REEEREEEREEEEEEEEEEEEE... AFK tendies are burning
This test always sucks.
Hint: I'm a fascist.
>>27250051
Im pretty close, but I suspect I would have been purple if it wasn't for not trusting corporations to not fuck up the environment.
>If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.
Even the first fucking question is retarded. Where's the "fuck globalism" option?
>>27250105
It's possible with automation + the abolition of the statist institition of private property. Also, in regard to "wanting more" if anyone tries to establish authority over resources they'd be BTFO.
>>27248348
Purple or bust. You authoritarian trash.I don't agree with greens, but at least they aren't a bag of dicks.
I guess Im primed and ready to be politically molded
>>27250456
Plus ambtion under capitalism = tirelessly working under someone else's bootheel in hopes thar they'll offer you more than scraps
Ambition under anarchy = you have access to all the tools neccecary to fulfill your own self-actualization
I considered myself a centrist. I disagree with Liberals on Economic issues and gun control, but disagree with conservatives on social issues, war, the border, abortion, drugs and pretty much everything else.
>>27250598
so you're me
>>27248138
This sucks ass. Chomsky is an anarchist, not a tankie. Reddit isn't that left leaning. "Legalize it" could be put in a million different places on it, I don't know why it's arbitrarily where it is.
>>27249221
>The guy who spearheaded the war on drugs wasn't authoritarian
>>27250482
Holy shit. It took you nearly two hours to come up with a response to that? No wonder you French egalitarian, dick sucking,thrice-recycled tampons got blitzkrieged. You're lazy and a literal pisspot. If I'm a bag of dicks I'll take that as a compliment, rather than being a gaping, sloppy, gang-fucked cunt of an excuse of man you are. Go kys or get good, cuck.
Meh, feel more right wing than that IRL
Guys, what am I?
>>27250810
I'm not that guy. I was just scrolling through the thread and saw some trash who should be told what's what.
>>27249447
>>27248833
What's this? Where do I get this?
>>27251239
Read the thread. It's right there.
The other one I took, with a neutral option, landed me closer to center and slightly authoritarian, so I think this is a little off.
Still pretty close to the origin, though. I'm pretty politically apathetic.
This is where I am on this chart
>>27249410
There are at least three of us here apparently.
>>27249585
>You can't prevent people from initiating in free trade without some type of monopoly on violent force present.
Y-you can't exploit the exploiters! That makes you as bad as they are!!!!
>>27251308
Oops sorry. That's disappointing, though. That test doesn't have enough questions.
>>27244326
You are a: Conservative Libertarian Isolationist Nativist Reactionary
Collectivism score: -50%
Authoritarianism score: -50%
Internationalism score: -50%
Tribalism score: 50%
Liberalism score: -50%
>>27244326
At least I'm near Ghandi
>>27248138
The psychologist Tim Leary had a name for people that behave like you: "Hostile Weakness"
Bill Hicks, Stephen Colbert, Christopher Hitchens, "Sargon of Akkad", Reddit, etc all enjoy carping from the sidelines, complaining about everything and everyone. They're normally despicable people and whinge about whoever is in charge. Those familiar with MBTI, it is expressed by the "ENTP" type. They irritate me.
>ENTP: "you shouldn't wear slutty clothes because you will be raped"
>woman: "I'll be okay"
>(gets raped)
>ENTP: "hahahah I told you so!! serves you right for disagreeing with me! :^)"
>ENTP: "are you... Praying?"
>man: "my son died last week, he meant the worl-"
>ENTP: "ahahah you believe in a sky fairy? come on debate me, fucking debate me I dare you."
>(later posts on reddit about how he "dominated" a bigoted christian)
I'm a greencuck
>>27252026
Accurate but you'll be shitted on my man
Always ready to post that desu, 1v1 me whenever.
>>27244326
You are a: Conservative Authoritarian Isolationist Ultranationalist Reactionary
>Collectivism score: -50%
>Authoritarianism score: 50%
>Internationalism score: -50%
>Tribalism score: 100%
Liberalism score: -67%
REEEEE! THE EDGE! FEEEEL THE EDGE!
>>27249304
hello there as well
>>27253019
no, you clearly have aids from the dicks of your many bfs
>Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races.
>our race
so is this for white people only?
Economic Left/Right: -2.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.62
>>27247717
>>27249277
>>27249689
>>27250510
Right from the first question I knew this test was full of loaded questions so that the answers will lean more towards the left-wing.
They even quoted Trudeau in the last page.
That being said I expected a lot more guys like this:
>>27248588
>>27253201
as if I don't get infinite pussy
they didn't even ask me about guns man. i'm sure the jews were behind this.
>>27253406
man ass is not pussy fag
>>27253544
as if. Also nicely disprove me by commenting my sex life.
it seems im still leftist even after outgrowing my pseudo punkrockanarchy phase from my teens
I'm just a bit off from Ghandi
Hippy filth here
in previous compasses I was more right wing, but always in the purple quadrant.
I got "Communist Anti-Government Interventionist Humanist Progressive"
Basically I'm a degenerate faggot. Good to see this place isn't as /pol/ infested as I thought.
LET THE MARXIST NEET REVOLUTION BEGINDont know how I got interventionist, I said the everyone should just fuck off and mind their own buisness
Here's what I got mates. Judge me pls.
I've moved vertically over time.
It's more than just muh roads, it's that as much as I want a libertarian society, government brutally crack down on people and cultures who see it as weakness to be overthrown.
Europe is case in point of this
>>27249992
show's you have no understanding of basic economics
Ayy we in this. we smart. we loyal. we from brazil
>tfw almost dead center
Feels good. All extremist faggots need to fuck off and stop copying word for word what /pol/ or leddit tells them to believe
>>27255581
>not having much of an opinion at all makes me superior
>i don't form my own opinion on things, other people must not either
???
>>27243482
Guess this means I am a bit of a Stalinist.
>>27244326
Collectivism score: 0%
Authoritarianism score: -33%
Internationalism score: -17%
Tribalism score: -17%
Liberalism score: -33%
>>27255639
It's called having a mix of opinions on things, retard. If you have two strong opinions on differing sides of the spectrum, they cancel each other out! I'm sorry that basic math concepts are difficult to understand for you.
>>27255639
>looking at things from different perspectives is a bad thing
>everything is black and white
>>27244326
You are a: Objectivist Libertarian Isolationist Ultranationalist Moderate
>>27255975
Collectivism score: -100%
Authoritarianism score: -67%
Internationalism score: -67%
Tribalism score: 100%
Liberalism score: 0%
>>27245464
I am literally you and gandhi
I'm chocked by how left-wing (i.e degenerate normie weakling) this place is. Sincerely, all leftist political fags, kill yourself.
>>27248744
That you're a liberal bigot
Ghandi was a faggot and all you libcucks need to be killed
I'm a proud fascist for crying out loud.
>>27247208
got you, bro
>>27249574
Very accurate chart
lmao I thought I'd be closer to the bottom
>>27249878
Someone could copy his or her invention. People are smart so unless the inventor can protect the invention. That idea will be copied
TRUMP 2016
MAGA AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
>>27257602
Most people here are NEETs leeching off their parents. What do you expect?
Well that's odd. I go on /pol/ all the time and am a Trump supporter.
Am I an actual moderate?
>>27247393
You are quite similar to me desu.FUCK THIS GAY EARTH
>>27258245
No, you are a liberal.
Holy fuck, I knew r9k was full of self entitled fucks who want their free stuff but you'd think more would be able to see beyond their own shithole of a room.
Bit weird considering i think my country is shit but whatever
>>27259470
>self entitled fucks who want their free stuff
there's been like 6 non-centrist reds in the whole thread
1/2
whats with all the greens and reds in this thread?
So, that's my chart. I was expecting to be more on the libertarian side of the chart, though.
>>27259680
2/2
inb4 >>>/pol/
fuck the robot
Weird i got that high his year, i really want less taxes
