Are furries mainstream now? Will their furfag degeneracy be acceptable after their flagship piece of propaganda made it big?
Furries will likely never become mainstream. Not in any if our lifetimes, anyway.
The hips on that rabbit though
>"This is the beginning of a furry mainstream." says increasingly nervous closet neckbeard for the millionth time in 88 years
My sister tried to drag me into watching this furry movie. No way, it's degenerate.then again I browse /mlp/
>>27208566
Youre just a closet furfag
>>27208441
I would fuck a Judy Hopps
Would you?
>>27208508
i feel you famalam
>>27208566
bronies are even worse than furfags
>>27208441
Yup this is totally the first animated movie with talking anthropomorphic animals, totally, next fur suits will be allowed in classrooms life is ruined OP
Can someone find this pic attractive, but not sexually attractive?
You complain about degeneracy on a degenerate board?
>>27208934
Depends on what you mean by "attractive, but not sexually attractive?"
"pleasing to look at"
You're a furry.
"well drawn"
No, but it isn't.
>>27208934
There is objectively nothing attractive about that picture on in any sense of the word. So no. So kill yourself.
>>27208441
Zootopia is Jewish propaganda created to convert more white children into furries and further soften the white race for its inevitable genocide. Gg lads we lost.
It's a good movie. I was actually happy while watching it. Nick had a robot moment, very sad.
>>27209064
I feel like r9k was created for VERY similar reasons
>>27209147
>robot moment
Spoil it for me, what happens
Fampai fapfap oregano bump
this was a nice movie i dont like how people are talking about furries and rule34 along with it just enjoy the nice movie jeeze
>>27209033
nice dubs. i'm not the one who does. someone told me they did, but wouldn't go into it too much.
>>27208441
I wish, oh I wish.
>>27210092
tell them to kill themselves
>>27209182
it was created to serve the victims of these types of plots
its over bros, in 100 years the whole world will look like africa
>>27208441
I want to fuck that's Fox
>>27208441
>Are furries mainstream now?
Depends on what you mean.
Anthropomorphic characters being mainstream and popular? then they have been mainstream since the first children's books, probably even before.
If you mean the fandom/subculture then no, not really.
>Will their furfag degeneracy be acceptable after their flagship piece of propaganda made it big?
You are a idiot.
>>27210205
>You are a idiot.
wew butthurt
Oh for fucks sakes! It's a kids movie!!!! FOR CHILDREN.
If this shit is going to make fur fags go mainstream, then Cinderella will turn an a tire generation of men into foot fags. What about other Disney movies with talking animals:
>lady and the tramp
>lion king
>all dogs go to heaven
>animal farm
>most damn movies made by Disney
Kids like talking animals. It's just basic child development, kids have always identified with nature without being fur fags and they always will.
It's a family film. By your definition, paw patrol will do it too
>>27210386
Agreed. As a child I pretended to fuck my stuffed animals. I was a fur fag from the beginning. Disney had nothing to do with it.
![19a25301c82b9cb95ceb59afa7d7bc0b[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/sQ7NdUz.jpg "19a25301c82b9cb95ceb59afa7d7bc0b[1].jpg")
>>27208441
Nah it needs to be a series.
>If children are routinely exposed to these sorts of anthropomorphic representations of animals, it is no wonder that they grow up to become adults who look at non-human animals as if they are people wearing animal suits.
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/thoughtful-animal/when-animals-act-like-people-in-stories-kids-cane28099t-learn/
I look at furry porn sometimes.
>>27211609
>I look at furry porn sometimes.
same tbqhwyf
>complaining about degeneracy in degeneracy board
