>post yfw not only does Trump win in a landslide in all states but Bernie "Cuckold" Sanders loses to Shirley in every state
>>27181894
Berntards on suicide watch.
>>27181894
I guess you can't trump the Dolan
bernie master race checking in
>mfw most trump supporters are underaged /pol/ edgelords or lazy basement dewellers that are too scared to leave their basement, let alone go out to vote
enjoy president hillary rodham clinton you fucking retarded niggers
>>27181994
>implying it matters who becomes president
rebbit pls
>>27181994
Sorry for not wanting America to become Sweden 2.0.
Boy, does it feel good to be with the winning team
The communist is finished and probably bankrupt.
>>27181894
Trump and bernie woud be better than hillary and them facing eachother is the only way either of them could get elected. you fools!
>>27182146
You are seriously delusional.
>b-but trump is l-literally hitler
This may be hard now, but it will all be made up for when we see the crushing defeat of Trump in November. This is the path you chose, /pol/tards.
>>27182041
If you're talking about the memetic version of Sweden that hates white males, $hillary will make that a reality long before Bernie ever would while at the same time serving her corporate masters. Now you will be both poor and cucked.
Cuckolds on suicide watch lmao.
>>27182745
Exactly, Bernie v. Trump would be fine, but now $hillary has a BIG chance of being our next president.
>>27181994
If that were true, then he wouldnt be winning in every state ;^)
>piss poor bait/10
>>27181894
It's going to be glorious
>>27182175
That fucking face
Those fucking eyebrows
>>27181894
I only paid attention to Missouri because I'm from there
Good thing I voted for the dude who has over 50%
>>27183933
Trump hasn't even started on Hillary yet. He's going to destroy her.
"Things will be great when _____ gets elected, right guys?"
>>27188368
See >>27182034 and lose some weight you fat fuck
I honestly wanted Bernie, but ill vote for Trump before I vote for clinton.
As stupid as he might be, Trump truely is un-owned and independent and NOT someone the government wants running shit, which is enough reason to vote for him at all
>>27182175
Women's rights, civil rights, and equality already exist legally.
There are no laws oppressing or excluding anyone anymore.
These Bern Victims are really delusional fuckwits...
>>27190281
The reason this happens is because "progressiveness" is a cancerous idea that just keeps growing and growing. Once there's nothing left to change and destroy it will turn on it's own society because there's nothing left to do. so white males become it's target just for existing
this kills the society
>>27181994
Keep saying that while he wins most of the states while bernie is losing most of them
>>27188489
>inb4 he completely ruins the country and it devolves into an anarchistic wasteland with no economy to speak of
>>27184820
Let's fucking go I actually have a bit of hope again.
>>27181894
>2016
>voting authoritarian
>>27190691
no, you are thinking of Hillary or Bernie getting the general
>>27190747
I don't think you know what that word means.
>>27181894
Well, dude. You have to consider a couple of factors here. It is not as simple as Trump winning landslides and Bernie losing to Hillary on account of the fact that Trump is somehow a better candidate or because he has a more supportive base.
If you look at the 30 primary/caucus results that have come in so far, you'll notice a couple things. First, Trump actually has a ceiling of about 40% in all the races he has won. If you look at the races he hasn't won you have to consider why.
Well, the reasons as to why he hasn't won some races and why he polls at around 40% are somewhat related. Basically, while there are only two candidates running on the Democrat side, there are (currently) three candidates running on the Republican side.
People who do not support Trump are going to be pledging their votes to another candidate, someone like Kasich or Cruz. What this means is that there is a larger percentage of the vote being spread out across candidates on the Republican side than on the Democrat side.
Because of this, and Trump's ceiling of 40%, the Republican races have more of a "landslide" outcome than on the Democrat side where the votes are spread out between two candidates.
There are less options for voters to choose from on the Democrat side than the Republican side and as a result of this, the races seem more clear cut than they actually are.
Hope you find this post informative! Thanks!
>>27190795
Cruz and Trump have a very similar policy, and both bases were interested in one or the other being the VP to the other before they had the fall out when Cruz got bought off by the establishment after Jebs meltdown.
When Jeb dropped, most of those voters went to Trump. In almost every poll, if Cruz or Rubio drop, the people polled said they would vote for Trump.
The only major states Trump has 'lost' in were home states (Ohio and Texas) and by a few points- not a land slide. His 'loss' to Cruz was only by 1 delegate, for example.
If Trump were any other candidate, the GOP would have called it months ago and the others would be dropping out at this point, but are not in hopes of a brokered convention.
Either way, Hillary will more than likely loose the general because
>Berniefags splitting the dem vote by writing in Bernie/ not voting/ going to Trump
>Republican primary is getting some 20% more voters over all then the democrat voters- the same turn out percentage that made Obama such a landslide vs Romney
None of this matters though because someone will shoot Trump even if he gets in, as the American Left are all authoritarian fascists that like to kill dissenting thoughts from their cult of victimization.
If Trump ends up winning, will there be any progress in alternative energy technology?
>>27190869
the collective tears of liberals everywhere will be enough sustenance for a life time
>>27190855
> His 'loss' to Cruz was only by 1 delegate, for example.
Yeah, but in a winner take all state, like Florida for example, if he Cruz were to have won then it would have been seen as a more substantial win, wouldn't it?
I agree that the GOP would have called the race a long time ago if it were anyone other than Trump. I still think that if Kasich gets out then Cruz may have a path to the nomination if he can coast a little through the next few races (Utah for sure, Arizona, maybe?) and somehow pull off an upset in California. The same goes for Bernie, btw.
Otherwise it is definitely Trump vs Hillary and that will most certainly be a landslide for the Democrats. Probably resembling 1968 with Goldwater vs LBJ.
>>27190912
If Kasich were out, Trump would have won Ohio- he only lost by some 6-7%, while Cruz third place was by more than 20% to both Trump and Kasich. Cruz and Rubio both lost horribly, not even close, in Florida. So its not even a 'if' question- they didnt stand a chance.
>Otherwise it is definitely Trump vs Hillary and that will most certainly be a landslide for the Democrats. Probably resembling 1968 with Goldwater vs LBJ.
Im not sure why you think this, since all the polls show Republicans voting more, and independents switching to Republican just to vote Trump. Republican numbers are way up over all, while Democrat numbers are way low. All the early polls show Trump beating Hillary by more than 8% and he hasnt even started campaigning against her while she is basically running on a 'Im a Clinton and Trump is Hitler' fumes now. If it is Trump vs Hillary, Trump wins. If the GOP decide to broker the convention and give it to Jeb or Rubio, Hillary wins. If Cruz vs Hillary it will be much closer.
The DNC has alienated and disenfranchised most of its voting block who think Hillary scammed them from a Bernie win. And Hillary fucked up by going after Bernie- if she had him as VP it would be a sure win for the Dems. Not so much any more.
