women, everyone:
>The one encouraging stat in OkCupids report is that women tend to send the first message to men who are rated, on average, 10 percent more attractive than themselves. Keep reaching for those stars! Men, of course, make the first move on women who are rated an average of 17 percent more attractive than themselves, which could be one reason why that inbox full of come-ons is so uninspiring.
http://archive.is/gA1P7
From the quote I gather that women are slightly more realistic about picking mates close to their level of attractiveness than men are.
>>27101725
So men are more unrealistic about their standards?
>>27101725
>men, everyone:
ftfy
>>27101773
>women who send the first message
desperate ugly whales are more realistic than qt girls is what I gathered
>>27101742
>>27101784
>I can't read a short article because I'm a millennial cucked by digital media and I have zero attention span outside quick soundbites. I will never read a book.
>>27101795
While it is true that uglier women will start conversation more often, from my experience average women do it too.
>>27101811
Read it but this information is just as true- men message more women but those women are almost 20% more attractive then they are.
I wonder why I even keep trying as average girl if even "loser" guys who do online dating go only for top women
Is this 10% on average more than they rate themselves, or what others rate them?
>tfw rated 5-7/10 on here and /soc/ and the only responses i get on online dating sites are from fat/ugly 2-4/10s
online dating is fucking shit, don't do it, i bet half of the girls on it are just there for an ego boost
>message women 10% more attractive than themselves
I have to call bullshit on this. I looked through the women and AT LEAST half of them are obese. I looked through the men and they all look like Chad. This must be bullshit. It cannot be objective attractiveness.
>>27101936
this tbqh
unoriginal comment fuck you robot piece of shit cunt faggot jew
