Fresh shipment of exotic Pepes just arrived.
>pepcasso
>still has a normal face arrangement
You fail at art.
>>27096576
You clearly failed art history. Not all of Picasso's paintings had fucked up faces.
>>27096606
You clearly failed at art. If you want to call it pepcasso make it a picasso you faggot.
>>27096606
Also post a picture of a non-fucked up face Picasso painting. Post the name of the picture as well. Protip: you can't. Picasso had depth perception problems.
http://uploads2.wikiart.org/images/pablo-picasso/self-portrait-1907.jpg
>>27096628
>>27096651
retard alert
reverse image search if you want the name
>>27096691
No name. Obviously not a Picasso. Look at these fucking retards.
>>27096678
Self portrait isn't a painting. It's a fucking doodle. Learn some art dumbass.
Pepe line art
>>27096628
>>27096651
and a piece from the blue period for good measure
>>27096728
Lol still no name. Shit is fake, or some faggot on the internet pretending to have "lost" picasso works. Try harder retard nigglet.
>>27096778
Why are you responding? Anybody reading this thread already knows you're wrong, and it's not like your meming is particularly funny.
>>27096651
google "picasso rose period" dicksucker, or "picasso blue period"
>>27096651
Okay fine, just for you fuck face, a fucked up face.
>>27096728
Blue picasso is best picasso imo
>>27096966
Big fan. I think a Pepe in this style is in order.
>>27096923
Not even fucked up faggot. Still has a normal face. Learn how to picasson retard.
>>27096890
>>27096827
Fakes. I've done my research. It's just some faggot painting in his backyard saying "look at these """""lost""""" picasso paintings." They're fakes asshats.
>>27097041
Just like the moon landing, right?
>>27097065
>>27097065
Fucking artfags think they're so goddamn smart because of "Muh culture" but you're all really gullible.
>>27096923
I really like this. Some more pepes in different art styles would be great. Impressionist, flat art, surreal, etc
>>27097125
Do you have any requests?
Spooky Pepe.
what are you using to make these? Some website that combines two pictures?
>>27097321
It's an implementation of this algorithm, running on my local machine.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.04589
Impressionist Pepe.
Trippy Pepe is extra green.
>>27096923
wtf, this is actually good
>>27097745
Yeah sometimes it just meshes really nicely.
A little watercolor action.
These pepes fucking suck.
>>27097925
I disagree. These pepes are great.
some are okay. did you use https://dreamscopeapp.com, or other one, or installed it in your pc?
>>27098028
Dreamscape uses an older algorithm. This is a newer one (published in January). It's installed on my machine. Takes about 3 - 4 min/Pepe using a GTX970.
oriental pepe
>>27097925
I make no guarantee on the quality of the Pepes. I just procure them.
>>27098061
good for you. it takes ~40 minutes doing just 100 iterations at 500x500 in my machine
>>27098127
Ah yeah, CPU-bound computation for something like this is a slog. Though I think for some of the algorithms you've got an advantage since you can use system RAM instead of VRAM.
Fractal Pepe.
>>27098200
>>27097909
>>27097587
>>27097417
>>27097290
>>27096923
>>27096717
Love these pepes
How do you apply this algorithm anon? Do you use some kind of software?
Fuck off you underaged little Redditors.
Nightmare Pepe from hell.
>>27098342
This particular algorithm, I implemented based off of a research paper. There might be an open source implementation out there somewhere. Look above I posted a link to the original paper, and if you search around for that you might find someone who's made their code open source.
Most implementations like this you're going to need:
- A Linux installation
- A machine learning package, such as Torch or TensorFlow
- A GPU
Search for "neural style github" and you will find a similar algorithm that's pretty good, and it's got instructions on how to install all of the required software. It can be tough to get up and going if you're not familiar with using Linux/command line programs, but it's addictive once you make a few of them that turn out well.
>>27098428
so, did you code it yourself? is it in GitHub? are you in computer science? are you Chuan Li or Michael Wand? are local constraints for photorealistic synthesis really such a big deal?
>this guy found "cool artwork filters for photoshop" and is making pepes out of them
