Would you marry a pornstar despite knowing she has sucked thousands of cocks and gargled liters of piss?
She would never cheat on you and be your wife 4 life, pleasing you in every way you want
No, I wouldn't marry a pornstar.
It's amazing how much the jew is coming out in her face as she ages
>>26879490
I wouldn't really marry anyone since I don't want to get fucked up by the legal system. Would I date and have a serious relationship with one? Sure.
>tfw no Phoenix Marie gf
>>26879490
No. But women that are in porn - even amateur porn - do not have trouble getting bfs these days. It's not socially acceptable to hold a woman accountable for anything in western society anymore. She could have gotten her ass gaped by 7 Chads and then creampied on camera, if you reject her, YOU are considered the bad guy. Western society is a matriarchy now.
If she would never cheat on me, why wouldn't I? The only real worry of promiscuous women is that they might cheat on you, romantically or sexually. If the magical fairy makes that disappear, then I'll go for it.
Nah, porn is problematic and I disagree with it fundamentally. I think our personalities would just be too incompatible. I could never love a woman who made money from allowing others to objectify and abuse her.
>>26879516
This.
I'm not religious, but I don't understand promiscuity in our society. It is justified as liberation, when really it is just a way of being chained more strongly to your animalistic desires.
People try and argue against promiscuity by saying, "It makes them a bad marriage partner!" and all that stuff, and while true, it's not the best reasoning in my eyes.
I don't see why we don't just point out that it is inherently shameful to let yourself be ruled by animal desires and urges. To focus your life around sex and satisfying these urges is just inherently shameful- there is no getting around that.
>>26879519
You wouldn't care that millions upon millions of people have seen your woman take hundreds of cocks?
>>26879559
Modern society just allows you to experience your life as you prefer it. You can be as promiscuous or celibate as you want. There's still stigma towards both by different people, and it'd be much better if there weren't, but tolerance towards people living their personal life as they prefer is a huge achievement of modernity.
You also have to keep in mind that 'animalistic desires' are different in different people. Why should someone whose biology tells him to fuck different people be chained down just because some more naturally chaste person considers it 'beneath' him or vice versa?
That's exactly what people mean when they say it's 'liberation'. Living life as you want it with no authorities telling you whom to fuck and when, not specifically being promiscuous.
>>26879639
If what you said is true, then why has the tide turned so much? I watched as the Internet went from anti-slut to pro-slut. The Internet now loves female sluts and despises male virgins. You give western society too much credit.
>>26879490
Nope. That would be like dating a prostitute. Fucking embarassing.
> would never cheat on you and be your wife 4 life
If you put it this way, I don't see why not
>b-but d-degenerate
>b-but you c-cuck
Who gives a flying fuck, if I can have a qt to cuddle with who'd always love me and be at my side, society with its prejudices can go fuck itself
>>26879490
yeah, if i loved her i would
what kind of fag would have an issue with this?
>>26879639
Just to clarify, I am the guy you're responding to, not >>26879669
You are right, tolerance is important. Please don't mistake my judgement for intolerance though- I think that people should be able to fuck all they want and live the life they want, but I reserve the right to judge them just as they can judge me for being a virgin.
I agree that that is the original connotation of liberation, but it has been perverted by many modern (popular) feminists with large followings, like Laci Green, to mean sleep with whoever you want whenever you want, it will liberate you.
My issue is not that I am intolerant, rather that I think the distinction needs to be made more often- for some women, being faithful to one partner for their whole life, raising kids, and being a housewife is what feels right, and that is liberation just as well. Someone needs to be telling young women that liberation means the freedom to find what makes you happy- not only the freedom to sleep around.
>>26879669
Nah, I don't agree with you. Both 'sluts' and 'virgins' still get hated on different segments of the internet, precisely because our "animalistic urges" tells us that female sluts are worthless (you just give it away like that?) and male virgins are damaged and broken (you still haven't gotten laid?).
I personally prefer to let people live their sex lives as they wish. I'm a monogamous guy who prefers long term relationships, which I freely express if someone asks me, but I don't shame either sluts or virgins, male or female and wish others would also do the same since it's the best way.
The genuine robots will disagree with me and keep slut-shaming and pining for the 'old days' where their arranged wife would be someone they'd consider ugly after watching all this porn and keep whining about how hated male beta virgins like them are and they'll never understand how ridiculous they are.
>>26879690
normie detected
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefuck you robot, 16 seconds of life wasted
>>26879741
I only see sluts hated in very isolated pockets on the Internet. Even here, Ledditors swoon in like whiteknight dudebros to defend m'lady constantly. Leddit watches this board, mind you. But I saw the tide turn myself. I'm convinced at this point that the people that whine about "slut shaming" are just projecting their own guilty about what they've done onto beta males on the Internet.
>>26879731
>I reserve the right to judge them just as they can judge me for being a virgin
Obviously, we all judge people and we should be free to respectfully voice that judgment as well. But that rarely happens and instead we get the online gender and sexuality wars where clowns from around the world can insult each other to their hearts' content.
Talk about 'animalistic urges'.
>>26879772
guilt* not guilty holy shit
>>26879490
Fuck yes . Gibs me dat
>>26879792
I am happy to have a polite discourse with you on this, and I am not one to actively slut shame people. I was just stating my reasoning for why, in my mind, sleeping around is shameful.
I agree that the people with animosity on either side are bad. I judge silently just like any decent folk and move on with my day.
>>26879772
>I only see sluts hated in very isolated pockets on the Internet. Even here, Ledditors swoon in like whiteknight dudebros to defend m'lady constantly. Leddit watches this board, mind you.
Go to reddit itself where the sentiment that 'sluts' don't make good gfs is frequently posted on very popular boards. As for reddit watching this board, /pol/ frequently raids reddit threads or organizes Trump-related shenanigans.
It's all the same shit.
>I'm convinced at this point that the people that whine about "slut shaming" are just projecting their own guilty about what they've done onto beta males on the Internet.
Or they prefer for people to stop insulting each other over their sex lives and preferences, like I do. Times I've insulted virgins: 0.
>>26879830
>Go to reddit itself where the sentiment that 'sluts' don't make good gfs is frequently posted on very popular boards.
I've only ever seen women defended on Leddit. They love slut culture there. Assuming that what you said is correct, I agree with them. Many guys think sluts won't make good gfs for many reasons, we are hardwired to think that way. Thought Catalog and Jezebel can talk about fedoras all they want, it won't change the way us men think about this.
>Or they prefer for people to stop insulting each other over their sex lives and preferences
This is the way I am, I casually criticize everything on the Internet. I'm not even a virgin myself, but I saw firsthand how the Internet became a place where women did what they wanted and beta males were ruthlessly bullied. The same people that do these things to beta males then have the audacity to talk about how "society" still oppresses women. Fucking retards.
>pointless hypothetical implying anyone on /r9k/ would have fuck all of a chance
>>26879894
>I've only ever seen women defended on Leddit.
Both attitudes exist. Reddit is even more varied in its views than 4chan which is a much more niche and small site. Also that's my point, having opinions is fine, calling people 'sluts' and generally outright insulting their sex lives is just unconstructive and creates the atmosphere you see in the online gender wars with 'neckbeard' and 'legbeard' insults being hurled around.
Keep in mind that my arguments are about the 'mainstream' internet, not about niche shitholes like 4chan which have their own place, much like uberfeminist sites do.
>I saw firsthand how the Internet became a place where women did what they wanted and beta males were ruthlessly bullied.
I disagree with you on this. The internet is still the white guy's (i.e. our) playground. I don't want to go more into this since it's a long argument and this is not the best board to make it anyway.
Would you rather marry an innie who has fucked 10 guys before you or marry a virgin roastie?
>>26879500
Any proof that she is a kike?
>>26879975
she isn't, she's a euromutt
>>26879490
I had one of those pornstars once. I now have a deviated septum.
It was in my thirties, and she was hot.
When I realized she went into situations looking for drama; I finally told her to get lost.
I was drinking pretty heavily when I was dating her. I thought she was this misunderstood goth chick. Well, when I stopped drinking, I saw the sutle cues she was giving out. The little coy looks, while I was getting drinks. Actively stretching her neck in order to hear some idiot say anything remotely sexist.
I think she enjoyed the fights I got in over her. She just needed to know she was pretty enough to fight over?
Well--no one is fighting over her anymore. The labial facial lines are deep. The gray is comming through the black die. The magic is gone. Her fiery personality is now just angry, and bitter. Age is a leveler of that beauty asset.
I thought I was the least superficial man in the world. I used to laugh at guys who doted over pretty women. I used to tell girlfriends upfront, "I'm not one of those guys who momma will like. I wish I was more like your other boyfriends?" I thought I was in charge. Thought?
Boy, I was wrong. And I have a nasal cavity to prove it. She was an anomaly though. I never had this problem(defending thy maidens honor) with anyone else. She definetly had me fooled, or my drinking blinded me from seeing the person she really was?
To be honest yeah because otherwise I'll be alone my entire life
Yeah id do it and go full cuck mode. Shit would be amazing.
>>26879956
>I disagree with you on this. The internet is still the white guy's (i.e. our) playground.
The people that repeat this never prove it correct. It's like a mantra that is repeated over and over and over again, and the people that repeat it use it as a way to justify their bitterness and abuse of beta males.
As for everything else you said, I can only predict that hating sluts will be revived one day if people keep pushing slut acceptance in everyone's faces. I see people defending sluts and pushing feminism on this site, and I also see feminism almost everywhere I go. The same cannot be said for anti-slut and anti-feminist sentiment.
>>26880189
>The people that repeat this never prove it correct.
As I said, it's a long argument. Feel free to disagree anyway. I also see little abuse of 'beta males' coming from me.
>I can only predict that hating sluts will be revived one day if people keep pushing slut acceptance in everyone's faces.
That's where you lose me and I realize the conversation is pointless.
>The same cannot be said for anti-slut
Who'd have thought, tolerance should be promoted over intolerance. I assume you don't feel the same away about anti-virgin sentiment. Be more consistent please.
Bye.
>>26879500
I always thought she was white
Actually she'd probably be more likely than most women to cheat
>>26880243
>Who'd have thought, tolerance should be promoted over intolerance.
Try telling that to people who spent their entire Internet lives making memes about 'virgins' and insulting beta males. Go ahead, try it.
>I assume you don't feel the same away about anti-virgin sentiment. Be more consistent please.
I am under no illusion of how tolerant people can be. I am not nice or tolerant either. The situation right now is heavily lopsided in favor of women (or, more accurately, sluts, whores and feminists), and women and whiteknight dudebros hold up this mythical idea of a "sexist society" as justification for why they abuse beta males online.
Women are not oppressed in western society and "society" does not hate women that have sex. I hope people that think that "society" hates women grow the fuck up one day, but they are probably broken beyond repair.
>>26879490
Nope.
Ever meet those girls that 'always pick the wrong guy'? You know the ones I mean; they pick they date musicians, or druggies, or Jamal, or whatever. All of their boyfriends spend her money, slap her around, and cheat on her, then leave her and she cries, then dates another guy just like the rest.
Those girls are what I like to call 'stupid, crazy, or stupid and crazy'.
Well, porn stars are worse.They have that same combo of 'stupid or crazy or stupid+crazy' AND they see themselves as objects (thus, sex for $$$).
>>26880029
>I had one of those pornstars once. I now have a deviated septum.
what?
>>26880243
>Who'd have thought, tolerance should be promoted over intolerance.
Fuck.
That.
Some piece of shit Feminist Socialist wants to tax families out of existence to 'smash the patriarchy'?
Fuck her and everyone like her - I won't tolerate that shit.
A couple of faggots want to play house and pretend they aren't just 'not crazy' but married just like normal people?
Fuck them. I don't tolerate insanity.
The hilarious thing about the Liberal Tolerance Equality Hippy crowd is their unabashed eagerness to use threats, intimidation, and violence to FORCE their viewpoints on the world as they call it "tolerance".
>>26880345
not him but what's hard to understand?
>>26880375
>A couple of faggots want to play house and pretend they aren't just 'not crazy' but married just like normal people?
Spotted the actual crazy one. At least your viewpoint is being relegated to the trash bin.
>>26880429
>Making my point for me
So someone who disagrees with you is 'actually crazy' and headed for 'the trash bin'?
Where is your TOLERANCE?
Can't you see how my DIVERSITY ADDS STRENGTH?
Can't you RESPECT MY CHOICES to live DIFFERENTLY THAN OTHERS out of CHOICE?
>>26879709
>he fell for the love meme
how do so many men unironically let movies and songs make them feel pretend meme emotions
>>26879490
Maybe, couldn't date a nasty whore like Sasha Grey though. Someone like a younger Rachel Roxxx (cuz she refuses to fuck niggers and seems cool) or Christina Bella before she started escorting and became full blown plastic. Retired pornstars only of course, excluding camwhoring or solo masturbation stuff, don't care bout that shit, ez money, wouldn't give a shit if millions of men seen her masturbate.
I just want a hot gf, I'm shallow and know it, I hate my self for it, but I seriously just can't bring my self to lower my standards and settle, I don't wonna regret settling and loathing the poor girl for something she can't control. So I'll proly be foreveralone.
Be cool to find a camwhore gf, I'd be encouraging her to do it, the amount of money they make from thirsty betas seems insane.
>I didn't shoved my dick in a lot of places i'm ashmed of and even pissed in some of them
Yeah...i'm pretty ok with her life
>>26879490
No. That's disgusting.
I might have considered a camgirl but nah that's still way too much exposure.
Glamour models would be the lowest I'd go.
Not that any of us have such range of options.
>>26879490
Date one yes but not marry
>making a big deal about someone's sexual past
you're just jealous she has more money than you and that she thoroughly enjoyed her career in front of a camera.
>>26881115
Dude, this is a trip or a short essay?
>>26880429
damn son, you just proved his point by calling him crazy...
>>26881243
Of course he did. The funny thing, just like a Feminist calling all men rapists, etc., he's too dim to get the implications of what he thinks and says.
>>26880429
This has to be a same fag wtf
>>26881447
Nope.
That is actually another anon responding
>>26879490
>She would never cheat on you and be your wife 4 life
So what's the issue, then? That kind of loyalty is so rare that it is worth any price. Plus, imagine: she'd be awesome in bed and do ANYTHING your twisted mind wants. Also, you KNOW and can check EXACTLY what she's done: with other girls it's like "maybe she had one boyfriend before me, maybe she did IR gangbangs every sunday, who knows?" because women have an incentive to lie about crap like this.
So, would you rather have a KNOWN former whore, that you know for sure will be loyal anyway, or gamble and wind up with somone who's an even bigger whore and not loyal at all, but you wouldn't ever know? I'd rather take the devil I know. Plus I like to drink piss lol hail satan.
>>26881583
>That kind of loyalty is so rare
Stopped reading.
FFS, less than 18% of all married women cheat on their husbands. So 'not cheating' isn't 'so rare' it is 'most common'.
>>26881731
> less than 18% of all married women cheat on their husbands
Most cheating women aren't going to admit they cheat you absolute cretin
>>26879490
I'll never marry because there's no upside to legally marrying someone but let's just get this out of the way.
I would rather marry a pornstar who sucked a thousand dicks than a non-pornstar who sucked a thousand dicks. In fact, if a girl has sucked a thousand dicks and isn't a pornstar it's a dealbreaker, don't have to think twice. Even a couple dicks is gonna make me most likely dismissed her as a suitable partner. But if she's a pornstar I couldn't care less. Don't care if she drank piss or got creampied by niggers, as long as she is currently clean.
>>26881731
Really, I've heard worse numbers, you have souce on that? Also, 100% chance of loyalty > 82% chance. And, like I said, you'd KNOW her past instead of having to gamble on whether to believe her or not.
>>26881776
>I have NO IDEA how multivariate studies control for deceit, and I am also unfamiliar with the basics of divorce statistics
FTFY
Communications major, huh?
>>26881793
The University of Ohio Marriage Study.
I am not talking about OP, I am referring to anon's statement that 'that kind of loyalty is so rare'.
No. it isn't. even if cheating is twice as bad as the studies suggest the majority of wives are absolutely faithful.
Remember - 50% of the reason that robots are KHV is because they believe things that aren't true.
>>26882071
Sociology, actually. The studies I've seen just put it around 30%, and that's just with the definition of "cheating" being penetrative sex. Never cared enough to study it carefully, though, so either be a bro and link me to some studies or eat shit.
>>26882105
It's not just cheating, though, it's literally everything that can make two people split or grow apart. Divorce rates are still high. The OP presents the perfect partner, who's love in unconditional and would be there for you forever, and the only catch is that you KNOW she was a whore. Just sayin' that ain't a bad deal.
>>26882129
>hurr, durr, I am going to admit that I have no real idea what the numbers are and I ain't gonna' link shit, but you better link something or I will cry
So, tell me - how much debt do you have for that worthless POS degree?
At my uni a ton of the Sociology majors went into ROTC because they knew that was the only job they'd ever have.
BTW, try
'Analysis of Infidelity within Marriage' Blow & Hartnett (2005); 'Infidelity: When, Where, Why' Tsapelas, Fisher & Aron (2010); 'Patterns of Infidelity'm Brown( 2011); there are a shit ton more if you can actually get to a uni database, you lazy bastard.
I'd probably fuck one if the opportunity presented itself, but marry? No. Knowing that she has a high mileage would turn me off. In that way, a porn star is a bit like a classic car. You'd love to take one for a spin, but you wouldn't want to keep one around.
>>26879490
Only if she only did interracial porn.
If I have to be a cuck at least I need to be a good one.
>>26882159
>Divorce rates are still high
Fucking moron
Less than 20% of first marriages end in divorce and the number has been falling for 2 generations.
>And for the ignorant AND lazy, try the census, CDC, GSS, and a ton more
--more than 4 out of 5 marriage last and about 5 out of 6 wives never cheat
get this through your thick skulls - MOST wives are loyal, faithful, and don't leave.
>>26881583
>she'd be awesome in bed and do ANYTHING your twisted mind wants
No she wouldn't. She'd be tired of that stuff. She certainly wouldn't want to do the fucked up stuff with you.
>>26881731
But something like 90% of men are unwittingly raising another guys child. How can that be if only 18% of wives cheat?
>>26881785
>implying that somebody tainted by nigger dick can ever be clean again.
>>26882333
....
Where the fuck do you morons get these numbers?
Even the Kinsey Institute's freaky-deaky high numbers show that a max of 9% of children a man believes to be his aren't; the genetic analysis of 'Paternity Confidence' [Anderson, 2006] shows that NO MORE than 3% of children believed to be theirs aren't, and that includes the *cough* 'high risk of false paternity communities' of inner-city Blacks. The Anderson study along with the Bok study, and the Wasser analysis all agree that among Whites and Hispanics the incidence of 'false paternity' is about 1% max.
Do you guys just make this shit up, or is a PUA lying an=bout shit and people believe it, again?
One day I'm gonna marry a porn star.
We'll have a big-ass crib and a long yard, we'll have a mansion and some fly maids Nothing to hide, we both screwed the bridesmaids
Grab my hand and baby we'll live a hell of a life
>>26882254
lol i'm doing environmental sociology and already have a job + no debt cause I got a grant. But thanx for the links, interesting reading even if you as a person suck
>>26882298
20% is still kinda high... higher than 0% anyway (which is what the OP said the chance was). All I am saying is that the OP presents it as a problem-free relationship apart from her past. If one can accept that there are per OP's defitiontion no downsides.
>>26882498
Nah just a cuck-fetish. But cool to see anons who actually back up their claims, good on you bro!
>>26879490
YES
beats being alone
>>26882541
>Your first reply, you call me an 'absolute cretin' because you don't agree with the numbers
>Your second reply - you tell me to search google for you or I can 'eat shit'
>Now you say I suck
Guess what, nancy - when someone starts out insulting me for no reason, I insult back. It is a little game I like to play called 'reciprocity'
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=reciprocity&l=1
As I proved you wrong you kept insulting me so, in a shocking twist, I kept replying in kind.
So next time you disagree with someone try
A) not starting out with baseless insults
B) not whining like a little bitch when they treat you like you treat them
You might be better off.
>>26882541
>I am replying to specific comments, not OP
>You keep referencing OP
>>26882607
Sorry, you must've confused me with another anon, I never called you a cretin or the like and I actually found your claim interesting since it contradicted my previously held prejudices. I only asked for references because I didn't want to be bombarded with the same "50% cheat" BS I've been exposed to so far, and wanted the specific studies you based yourself on. I said you suck because you are rude and condescending, and I stick to that, but there is no denying the validity of your claims.
>>26882498
Are you saying I just made up those numbers? Like anyone would do that.
>>26882763
his claims can be denied. He uses studies that include ALL of america including small towns, rural areas,etc. Let's see what infidelity is like in major cities like LA vs what you'll see in small towns. Just like you see way more openly gay people in major cities you'll probably see more infidelity.
>>26882763
>Sorry, you must've confused me with another anon,
Uh-huh. Whatever you say, sociology boy.
Go forth with your new knowledge and enjoy life more.
>>26879490
I would like to say no, but the thought of fucking Gianna every day is just too tempting.
>>26882817
>his claims can be denied
>missed the fact that I both mentioned 'high risk' communities and the studies cover that
Go actually read them friend. Sure, the rate of non-paternity events in the inner city Black community of Detroit is almost 11% - but in the religious rural White communities of Indiana, just 100 miles away, it is about 0.1%. So the average is under 2%. Just like the average rate of failure for previously-promiscuous high school drop-outs with drug addictions who marry *after* pregnancy is over 80% while the divorce rate (first marriage) for Catholic HS graduates+ who are both virgins on their wedding night, don't do drugs, don't use birth control, and pray every day is effectively 0% - the average rate of divorce for first time marriages is under 20% and dropping.
>>26882830
Nope he's right
>>26879490
I would totally marry your pic related
>>26882909
I can be a pretty rude bastard on the chan. Admitted
>>26883008
So can I. Ironically the guy you ended up talking to was pretty reasonable.
>>26882901
in america only 3% of americans claim to be gay. But in new york, la, chicago, and so on it's usually 10%. Do you think that's due to evil liberal brainwashing in cities or to greater honesty?
Are you the guy who keeps saying the average person only has sex with 4 people their whole life?
So you guys are telling me you would turn down a gorgeous woman whose personality meshes perfectly with yours, who would make every attempt to please you, and who would enrich your life as much as she can, because you are stuck on the idea that no one else can ever have had your pure virgin wife before?
>>26879490
Well I am in a relationship with a girl who was a slutty stripper.
She got good genes
>>26883132
if she's fucked that many people you are nothing but betabucks to her. You're not who she wants sex with and it's likely she won't be trying to please you in anyway
>>26882817
Having read them, no. The person was a bit of cunt to me, yes, but facts are facts and they backed up their position. Not gonna be the person that denies facts because I can't handle it: I was wrong and I'm better for knowing what's really going on.
>>26882830
Seriously, I ackowledge disagreeing with you (and being proven wrong about that), but did not call you a cretin. That was another anon, who seems to not understand that these studies are done anonymously and give people no incentive to lie.
>>26883091
>But in new york, la, chicago, and so on it's usually 10%
Nope.
Only about 6% of metro San francisco is gay and that is easily the highest of any US metro
>Gallup and the GSS agree on this one
the average is for the population as a whole, so there are areas with few, too.
No, I don't think it is brainwashing, I think gay people go to cities to look for other gay people.
>Are you the guy who keeps saying the average person only has sex with 4 people their whole life?
Sorta' probably. According to the GSS, the Gallup, the Ohio State Sex Survey, the CDC, and a number of other studies *when adjusted for deceit* (i.e., men lie high, women lie low) the average is about 5 to maybe 6 partners, but the breakdown is odd with about 9%-12% lifelong virgins, about 10%-12% 'promiscuous' with 10+, and a huge middle ground with about 4
>>26883212
>Only about 6% of metro San francisco is gay
no it's 15%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation#United_States_2
also 10+ is not promiscuous at all that's average.
>>26883208
Meh - sorry I took it out on you.
>>26879698
>Sticking your dick into a hole where 100 Niggers have came in
I don't mean her pussy I mean her mouth, ass, nose, and ears
>>26883282
>10+ isn't promiscuous
well, you need to go tell the CDC, the GSS, the Kinsey Institute, the Ohio Survey, Gallup, the NIH, the NIMH, and the NHS that they all got their numbers wrong and that they need to listen to you because they all roughly agree that the mean not counting prostitutes for men and women is about 5
>>26883352
http://www.slate.com/articles/life/moneybox/2015/05/sex_history_calculator_is_your_number_of_sexual_partners_low_average_or.html
it's 8 for millenials 10 for x geners and 11 for baby boomers.
I don't know where you live but here in california it's sure as hell not 5. How do you explain hpv, herpes, or any of the other stis that are common as fuck if the average person only has 5 partners?
>>26882882
>Gianna as your ever loyal fuck toy/girlfriend. Cuddling at night after mind blowing rough sex where you smack her around and she chokes herself on your dick and you cum all over her face and she scrapes off your baby batter and licks herself clean.
hnnnggghhh
I would give everything I own plus one of my legs for that
>>26883319
It's cool brah, my fault for replying to a comment that wasn't aimed at me, seems to be the source of the confusion.
>>26883440
>One anon mentions the CDC and the census
>You link to Slate
Well, you aren't that bright, are you?
LOL
>Herpes - prevalence ~16%, mainly among promiscuous; number of promiscuous? About 12%
Lookee there
>HPV affects less than 6% of Americans
You know, I have no idea what an infection rate at 1/2 the number of promiscuous people has to do with invalidating total median number of sexual partners, do you?
What nest, you're going to tell us about that kid that sat next to you in Senior English that bragged about fucking 44 girls?
nope i'd prefer not to have a roastie.
>>26879490
nope. i wouldn't be able to form a genuine connection with a woman who's had gallons of cum on and in her. it
>>26879500
I thought she hated jews.
