>the universe infinitely repeats itself
>you're doomed to this life forever
Can I be a girl in the next life?
I'm sick of this hard mode.
>>26451575
There's always the afterlife. Keep improving each cycle. You have all eternity after all.
>infinite realities
>you'll still never be with your waifu
i hope i'm reborn into the body of a mother who immediately has an abortion thus ending the cycle of rebirth
>>26451575
No. I wont remember it. I could be on the millionth time right now
>implying the universe doesn't crave novelty
>implying it would repeat the exact circumstances over and over
>repeats forever but every time is different and seems like the first time
So are there people who are stuck as harlequin babies who die shortly after birth for all eternity? That's some scary shit, OP.
>>26451592
Only if you stretch your tuck every day.
>the atoms that make up your brain wil just be a fucking rock or some shit in the next cycle
>>26451575
>implying
we have quantum tunneling
So what exactly is the basis for this theory? It kinda just seems like something someone pulled out of their ass. Doesn't make any sense imo
>>26451575
Yfw nature of consciousness is dependable on material structure to let us feel. Yfw you are literally happening in billions of parallel life forms but will never share their feels in your current one.
Yfw everyone you have done bad things to are in essence... Yourself with other conditioning factors
>>26451575
I can't do this again
>>26451575
>tumblr
>anime
Opinion disregarded in the trash it goes
>>26452178
It probably comes from Nietzsche
>>26452178
>Universe started as a singularity
>Started expanding for some reason (Big Bang)
>Universe could collapse eventually and return to a singularity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch)
>Back to square one
>>26451794
If you are, would you even remember she's your waifu and not done random whore? What if you're your waifu and get plowed by chads?
>the universe is infinite
Found the retard
>>26452488
What happens to black holes, do they dissipate or something? If everything goes back to a single point would black holes be the only thing left+
>>26452488
k, but how does that imply that if it does return to a singularity and had another big bang that it would end up exactly the same as it did this time? the whole
>universe repeats itself you'll be the same person in the next life or whatever
just sounds like fanfiction logic.
>>26451575
I'd rather be dead forever tbqh
>>26452561
All blackholes will combine into one supermassive blackhole then the blackhole will be the entire universe and then consume itself
>>26452614
Would that cause another "big bang"?
>>26452583
Why would another big black bang happen? It does? Gee while trying to disprove op you literally admit the first thing happening is reoccurring.
>atom breaks down
>(you): y would atom return as atom?? Make no sense bitch morherfucker give sources
>>26452583
https://youtu.be/4_aOIA-vyBo?t=4m15s
this nutshell video explains it prety well
>>26452662
whoopssss meant for
>>26452637
blox blox
>>26452654
>>26452662
nevermind i don't care anymore
>>26451575
An oscillating universe is unlikely given our current understanding of physics
>>26452662
Without watching this, I suspect this massive black hole has all the makings to create another universe especially if carousing into itself cause an explosion
That's just my thought tho, I'm no science man
>>26452746
>given our current understanding of physics changing like every 10 minutes*
"Scientific theory" becomes less and less credible the more often we discover 50 years later we're wrong about shit.
>>26452915
I know, just saying that currently it is not proven one way or the other, but appears unlikely based on the equation of state accounting for exotic matter and dark energy. As it stands, we will either have a big rip or big freeze, but the most unlikely (basically proven it is impossible) is the big crunch
>>26453013
The donut theory is most probable.
The cradle of first energy blackens out due to age as blackholes acting as webcrawlers export released energy to the outerring of the expanding universe inevitably causing a hair line circular existence that dies from within. When the line is consumed the reboot reassembles the universe.
The freezing deadend only happens if anything is there to exist.
>>26453149
Right. Only time will tell, I guess
>>26452380
You've already done it a trillion and more times before
>>26451575
dark souls
prepare to die
to live
and die again
I'm nearing my goal. Soon the repetitions will stop and eternity will cease.
Have patience and have fun until then.
>>26453213
>implying time will even be a concept when this happens
>will live the same life over
>fuck yeah
>will make the same decisions
>mfw
>>26453520
>implying we will even be there to conceptualize things
>>26453567
>implying he's implying
>implying we will be able to imply
>>26453567
I don't mean time as something observed by sapient life, but actual time. As in movement of particles in the universe.
>>26451575
Ooh cool thread. I've got some deets.
Turn on a light.
do something. move something.
Turn off the light.
That is life.
What evidence do you have besides a convenient recording that the light was ever on in the first place, whether it was before you cut it on, or if it was on after you cut it off.
Ignoring the fading energies in the bulb of course.
I'm saying it's like this, while the light was on, however short, shit happened, it affected things.
It allowed you too see and interact with things you wouldn't if it weren't on, and if you had too much of it it can blind you.
But after it's off, who can prove it was ever on?
Came from darkness, went to darkness. And so it'll stay until someone decides to flick the switch again.
Maybe a lot of things are odd like that. Really comfy feeling. I just hope someone breaks my switch with a fucking rock mallet with I die, but that's just me.
>>26453613
>and the shittiest post of the year goes to
>>26453583
By only time will tell I meant with time we will be able to tell the fate of our universe, not that time will continue to exist at the end of the universe
>>26453764
What makes you think we'll ever definitively know what's going to happen at the end of the universe without actually observing it as it happens?
>>26453713
>shittiest post of the year
>>26453803
Definitively, never. Nothing can be outright proven until it is actually observed. However, there is enough reason to believe that the expansion rates of our universe display the nature of our universe, and it's fate, that I am willing to put my eggs in that basket, at least until a better explanation comes along. Nothing I've mentioned ITT is definitive, we just don't know yet m8
>>26451575
what if this were actually fucking true though?
you've replayed your shitty life billions of times already, you have no knowledge of your past lives, HOW DO YOU GET OUT OF THE FUCKING CYCLE
Oh my Pepe I'd rather be a miserable african child starve to death by five, so that I can sleep longer of course ;3
>>26453899
There are no end of the universe situations that are bright and cheery desu, oscillating universe at least makes my life feels small and insignificant in a 'It will all happen the same anyway, so don't bother trying to stir shit up' way, instead of a 'This is the only life you or anyone will ever get but it doesn't matter, your life won't affect anything, it will all end with nothing' way
>>26453810
yes, another person whom thinks they know everything
>>26451575
If that's so, then you shouldn't be afraid because you know what will happen. But you don't. You can't be certain of that claim. So I wouldn't get myself caught up with that thought.
>>26452561
Blacks holes shrink after they stop consuming. Everything in the universe will be swalloed by black holes sooner or later. That's when the universe ends when black holes shrink from exstience. It will be pitch black and completely empty
>>26452614
You got it half right
>>26454086
If hawking is correct, then even the black holes will eventually dissipate, leaving nothing but low energy photons and shit
>>26454120
>implying that cripple has ever been right
>>26452178
Has been theorized that matter may have a finite amount of configurations, if this is true and the universe is not infinitely expanding then there is a finite amount of possibilities in the universe meaning every possibility will repeat forever
>>26451575
I'm ok with this, sadly it's not true.
