>>26440466
would people actually want to watch that?
why?

>>26440466
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KXqJS2Puv4
It's already been done, and wasn't that interesting.
Go back to watching anime porn.

>>26440499
You could ask the same about almost everything that the modern porn industry shits out.

Because it looks like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KXqJS2Puv4

>>26440499
because a big engorged cock head stuffed and shooting loads in a soft pussy is erotic

>>26440529
Oh my god,

Absolutely beautiful

>>26440499
Why not?

That pill cost $30,000 when I had to get a test involving one for GI problems.
Insurance paid for it all, though.
That was like 15 years ago, though

>>26440529
>science.jpg

Cheaper to use an endoscope taped to the dick so you get the FP pov shot

>>26440529
At first I wasn't sure if I wanted to watch this.
I did and I'm still not sure if it was a good idea.

>>26440529
how is this on YouTube?

We need a GoPro Model: Dick soon

>>26441115
no kidding, i thought they didn't allow porn on youtube

>>26441115
It's more scientific than erotic to be honest. It's like those videos of girls waxing their vaginas; they're supposed to be educational. At least I don't know of anyone beating their meat to girls ripping hair off their pussies.

>>26441418
I did it actualy 2 or 3 times

Part of the excitement was watching vaginas on youtube