I'm doing a small research paper on the effects of online anonimity, for this purpose I made a short survey but I need a sample of users of anonymous imageboards or the like.
If someone can fill it out it'd be very useful.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1HM0sMvgkQQzbVmeoNZhJ9tGjhjt8SFU5kxiZFpXcCao/viewform?usp=send_form
>>26371805
answered
also bump
>Leaving this safe place to get IP logged
Have fun retards
sage
Thanks, I will love all those who answer forever, not that it's relevant or useful.
>>26371805
Done, nice and short.
top button master race
>>26371941
How does that work tho pham
>>26371805
>online anonymity
>asks for identifying information
wat
>>26371805
Make sure you change "anonimity" to the correct spelling though; it looks very unprofessional if you have to cite
>>26372115
Fixed, thanks, english's my second language.
>>26372110
How is age and gender identifying information? Standard on any form.
Answered. Would love to see some age/gender stats on this if you can share them.
>>26372222
Will do if you're interested!
Here's the stats so far:
Sample is 15.7% female, 84.2% male. Average age is 20.7, lowest age is 15, highest age is 37. Most common age is 18.
>>26372501
Thanks for delivering anon! That's pretty interesting
>>26371805
>research paper on the effects of online anonimity
Literally womyn studies tier
>>26372760
It's mostly centered on website design effects on behavior, but yes, sad psych major, 99% women everywhere.
>>26371941
Who gives a fuck what my IP is?
>>26372714
Sample size grew and stats changed a bit.
18.18% female and 81.81% male as of now. Average age remains the same pretty much.
>15.7% female
>18.18% female
ree
>>26373381
It's pretty ree, but think about how that is reflecting femanons who are just trying to integrate and not attention seek.
>>26373473
Or, more likely, a bunch of the responses were men pretending to be women
t. person who clicked female despite being male
>>26373032
I do.
Im cummin for that ass anon.
