You're literally retarded if you actually bought the evolution meme.
Scientists BTFO. That's why it's a theory, idiots.
>>26295753
They died out i think
>>26295753
they turned into the niggers we have today
>>26295753
K, but that pic is wrong mate. The apes you see today are more like distant cousins. We didn't evolve from them. There are no more of the 1st ape that's in your pic.
>>26295783
Soooo where are the skeletons?
We can find tons of dinosaur bones but literally none of "transitional" species.
>>26295798That's racist and untrue pham.
>>26295753
That picture is actually correct.
We have niggers...
>>26295827
no, it's actually proven by science.
>>26295779
see>>26295801
hdhhrbrudginal asshasshassoles
>>26295819
Because dinosaurs are a more spacious clade than hom*? I might be wrong, but I think hom* population would rather be counted in the thousands rather than in the millions.
>>26295845
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
NIGGERS ARE ALWAYS AT THE BOTTOM!
>still basing objections off of the linear evolution picture
>>26295753
We don't have millions of the far left. The far left evolved into millions of us, AND millions of apes. Its called a common ancestor retard. If the artist meant that to be a chimp then he also doesn't understand. chimps didn't exist back then.
>>26295849
No, it actually isn't. The entire OP picture is false too.
>>26295845
But, the picture isn't true. Did you faggots sleep through HS biology?
I didn't buy it, I rented it.sitcom laugh
>>26295753
Go talk to a snake you stupid christcuck
If Americans came from England then why is there still an England?
Checkmate historians.
superoni-orignalitychan
Explain Africa then. Didnt scienctists prove that the people inhabiting it are subhuman ?
>>26295753
>there are millions of pallid, dwarf-legged, lordotic monsters
I should hope not.
>>26295977
Nope, they've never proved that ever. Nothing even remotely close to this they've concluded. But, whatever makes you feel better /pol/ cross boarder.
>>26296006
You can cry 'IQ doesn't matter' all you want, bringing up some sort of magical spiritual sameness of all human beings, but the hard facts are that it underlies pretty much every virtue and creative outlet that has ever been defined as humanity. So yes, Africans literally are subhumans. Unless, again, you prefer to pretend that artistic, scientific, and moral progress somehow doesn't relate to sub- and superhumanity.
>>26295753
Humans are an alien/chimp hybrid obv
First aliums seed a planet with basic DNA
They let it evolve yadda yadda until you get a lifeform that's well adapted to the environment and compatible with humanoid (aka alium) DNA
Then they slowly feed their own DNA into that species until they develop sentience, then once they get societies and shit going they drop the monolith bomb and that species discovers science and shit all in one blow
Point is it's a sophisticated method of reproduction that's geared towards habitability on many different planets
>>26296065
I have a feeling all you're doing is b8ing
Just a hunch
>>26296065
It actually doesn't. When our genes are 99.99-100% similar and you can, at times, find more genetic variation between members of the 'same race', you can basically just markup any differences in society, culture, civilization or whatever else to environment.
Stay mad /pol/faggot.
>>26295977
Yeah but you're not allowed to say it. It's raciss.
>>26296116
I have a guess that you haven't done your reading.
Educated and experienced.
>>26296125
>When our genes are 99.99-100% similar and you can, at times, find more genetic variation between members of the 'same race', you can basically just markup any differences in society, culture, civilization or whatever else to environment.
You mean variance?
>a measure of how the data distributes itself about the average
This says nothing about the location of the average, nor its heritability, nor its social external validity.
>>26296125
Fat nazi made me crack up
>>26296125
>intelligence is chiefly influenced by socio-economic status
Does anyone actually even say that anymore? It has been proven false as hard as possible.
>>26296125
We share the vast majority of our genome with sponges as well. Sponges are humans! Don't be a sponge racist.
>>26296187
No it hasn't. Rich people are intelligent, poor people are stupid. That's why they're poor.
>>26296190
Not that anon, but now you're getting it
We're all one big family
Why don't we treat each other like one?
>>26296209
>Rich people are intelligent, poor people are stupid. That's why they're poor.
You are aware that it's possible to determine the causal direction here, are you?
>>26296214
I like shooting and eating animals and niggers keep trying to rob me.
>>26296227
I bet you're poor.
>>26296155
>Variance
No, I mean variation you retard.
>>26296254
Nice.
I actually am both poor and retarded, but the best I could do is not to be deluded regarding its causes, or rather, cause. For instance, I now know better than to try to reproduce and propagate my retard, criminal, violent genes.
>>26295753
They're called niggers
>>26296227
>actually believing this
RETARD
E
T
A
R
D
>>26296290
Sorry, was meant for this idiot >>26296209
You're a fucktard man.
>>26295953
Americans and Australians, actually.
>>26296209
>Rich people are intelligent, poor people are stupid
completely false.
OP is bait but whatever. pic related.
>it's a "evolution isn't real" episode
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agAiIRkHn2o
this has to be bait right
cmon r9k
>>26296325
look how beautiful our skulls are compared to our evolutionary ancestors
we're cool cats
>>26296324
No, it's true, it's just intelligence determines wealth, not the other way round. Why do you think we have retards winning lotteries and squandering it all? Or, if you're going to say environment either way, just get a rich family to adopt an average kid (double-blindly ideally) and watch it fail academically compared to his 'siblings'.
Didn't take long to devolve into a /pol/ thread.
>>26296325
I made this shitty paint diagram
The last one killed all the ones before it because violence, competition, and possibly disgust. Only the very first one is left, and approaching extinction like the rest.
>>26296209
>Turkheimer and colleagues (2003) argued that the proportions of IQ variance attributable to genes and environment vary with socioeconomic status. They found that in a study on seven-year-old twins, in impoverished families, 60% of the variance in early childhood IQ was accounted for by the shared family environment, and the contribution of genes is close to zero; in affluent families, the result is almost exactly the reverse.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1046%2Fj.0956-7976.2003.psci_1475.x
There are millions of studies that prove the same thing, enviorment is just as important as genes.
>>26296376
>millions of studies
>>26296368
Why do you think modern day monkeys are at a lower level of advancement than us?
What does your advancement scale mean?
>>26295977
Only if you take all your scientific data from people living in the based 1800's, as you should.
I can't believe people actually believe in the "germ theory" myth too. You people ACTUALLY believe that there are tiny creatures everywhere that we can't see? And they make us SICK? lmao
BRB, need to get leeched to balance my humours.
>>26296350
http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/intlwlth.htm
This type of thinking is why you'll always be poor; you think that your fate is determined from birth.
>>26296419
>you think that your fate is determined from birth
Never takes too long for environmentalists to move to ad homs of defeatism when faced with facts. 'You might be right, but you're only right because you want to be miserable and have excuses not to try to fix your life!' Embarrassing.
>>26296386
Yeah, that was a mistake. I meant many. Happy now?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SXymdmrpjI
HEY WHITEY
>>26296446
>"A nationwide study found that people of below average intelligence were, overall, just about as wealthy as those in similar circumstances but with higher scores on an IQ test."
B
T
F
O
>>26296446
>>26296419
Also, that 'study' of yours is literally anecdotal exceptions and 'there is a relationship, but it isn't THAT big'. It has nothing to do with science, it's just bad journalism, 'my buddy is smart af and he's a loser'-tier.
>>26296465
See above.
>>26296209
yes ufc fighters are geniuses
same with footballers
>>26295753
no everyone who disagrees is a raving christian.
>>26296510
Mayweather is the Einstein of our time
>>26295896
Being a buzzkill and a moralfag.
Just go back to sleep Reddit. Niggers are inferior.
>>26296539
Yeah Master's Degree on running, hugging and bribery
>>26295819
>We can find tons of dinosaur bones but literally none of "transitional" species.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_evolution_fossils
>inb4 fakes or inconclusive
>>26296209
That certainly is what our capitalist masters try to brainwash us to believe.
>>26296277
>implying you didn't get btfo
>>26296356
>implying this wasn't already a /pol/ thread
Kys untermensch
>>26295753
No there are not millions of "these" those are totally different from chimps and orangutans.
>>26295753
Your pic is kind of misleading. Our common ancestor we share with chimps is long since extinct. The modern chimp is as far away from our common ancestor as we are.
Also most species go extinct, this is just a fact of life, it's no surprise that our ancestral cousins aren't around anymore, modern man has only been around for a short time, and we're probably closer to extinction ourselves than we think.
>>26296408
not pissing into your own mouth
How do you guys think we're going to level up from Homo Sapiens Sapiens to whatever we're going to be if the earth is still spinning
Seriously, are we going to have wings or superpowers in the far future?
>>26296718
*https://
Thought I'd make an accurate representation of what these liberals believe in.
>>26296739
soft singularity senpai
>>26296739like this f a m t b h q
>>26296830
That only satirizes the future of america, not the whole human race
>>26296777
Sorry, baitposter, could you be any more stupid?
I guess you really are a...tripfag.
>>26296739
Depends. If there's a tech+social breakthrough where some sort of directed evolution becomes possible AND accepted then we're good.
If not, then we'll never leave this planet. We'll become that caramel-coloured mess of hyper-aggressive creature.
>>26296739
I can tell you that you won't look exactly like this, but it gives you all a good idea.
We will no longer evolve, only devolve. Natural selection has stopped and normie-tiered traits are passed on.
>>26296910
>Natural selection has stopped
That's literally impossible. If for whatever reason a law were passed that, for instance, only retarded or disabled people were to reproduce, that would still be natural selection. 'Natural' in 'natural selection' doesn't imply some sort of objective desirability, much less that the pressures in question can't be man-made.
>>26296901
>ayy lmaos are actually future humans
It's like this thread was design for pumping out bait. Evolution has already been proven.
>>26297025
>Evolution has already been proven.
Prove it.
>>26297043
This guy says so.
>>26297135
But that's oblong, you cucking leotard.
>>26295753
They couldn't pass on their genes for the exact same reason that we robots can't pass on our genes. Roasties always pick chad.
>>26297135
>mfw he's not even a real fucking scientist
>>26297345
What about this guy?
I'd say an evolutionary biologist qualifies as a scientist.
>>26295753
Most of the evolution happened with the population numbers were small.
>>26297397
he's got a phd in professional atheism
>>26295753
>so where are the millions of these inbetween species
most of them lurk /r9k/
Found the in between species, neanderthalic brow ridge
I like how uneducated virgin fucks here actually think they are smarter than actual real life scientists.
This is just so fucking funny, all these fedora tier arguments and mspaint picture, pretending any of you know what they are talking about.
