What's your range, brobots?
Who would you date?
Who would you fuck?
Who would you never consider fucking?
All of these women are 5'4". These pictures may not be the best representation of their weight class but you get the point.
All of them
All of them
None of them
If you say otherwise you are not a robot btw
>>25673248
>no traps
baka senpai
>>25673248
Any. I would date any of them.
>>25673248
All up to 150
All up to 150
All above 150
I have standards.
>>25673248
>90-100-110
so every woman who is heavier than me is a no-no
>>25673361
gain some weight, skelly.
>>25673329
this is my answer too
140 looks like the ideal imo
>>25673248
160 doesn't look bad. but 170 is too high test 5 me.
>>25673428
I think after 140 they stop being "curvy" and become fat, if we're talking ideals, 120/130 is mine.
>>25673248
>All
>All
>----
>>25673248
110, 130, & 150. There's an obvious pattern there, so either one would do. I love big hips and pear shape. The rest are pretty gross.
>>25673475
But not 120 or 140?
>>25673532
No, they're gross. Look up pear shape, dude. Those girls have no hips in accordance to their waist or shoulders. 120 is a box and 140 has is a box with fat legs and no shape or thigh gap, which is a pretty good indicator of a nice hip to waist ratio (only if they aren't skeletons though).
>>25673248
>Who would you date?
110-120-130
>Who would you fuck?
110-120-130
>Who would you never consider fucking?
rest
>>25673606
Scratch that, 120 is a box with broad shoulders. Which is worse.
Changed a few pictures
>>25673997
Yeah 110-170 a bit unsure about 170 but eh sure. Under 110 is gross.
>>25673997
<=130 desu phamily
>>25673248
100/110 is the best
>tfw you will never do squats with her
>tfw you will never train for mountain bike races together
;_;
>>25673248
100-160 here.
I see nothing wrong morally with objectifying women. They objectify men all the time, and apparently that's fine.
>>25673997
Just to be clear though 130 is miles ahead.
>>25674470
This is the era of the woman. They have the upper hand nowadays. It's okay to strike back.
>>25673997
140 should be changed.
Those tits are way worse than any of the previous options.
>>25674444
>you will never play at 10 fps like her
feels good man
nice quads tho
90-150
but 130 is the hottest image
From 100 to 160 I would date and fuck, 90 could pass for both if she's got a cute face.
170 and 180 would maybe fuck.
>>25673248
>5'4
>90 to 100 for date and fuck
>never consider anything past 110
>>25673248
To be honest I would probably fuck all of them at least once. 170 & 180 isn't gf material tohugh
the hips on 130..... i want to shower her with cuckbux
>>25673248
110
120
130
are best, but I'd obviously give anyone from 90 to 140 a chance>implying they'd give me one
>>25673248
>no large breasts on any of them
What's the point
>>25673248
180
180
anything under 180
between 100 and 160. I think that's a pretty good range
Everything from 100-150 is great with 130 being perfect.
all except 170 and 180, they look old af
These girls are all different heights
I prefer them on the chubby side personally
>>25675509
Literally they're all 5'4". I intentionally chose women of the same height.
