Why does this upset you so much even though he's right?
>>25587492
It matters because slutty cherios dont come with social diseases, mental baggage, and dependent children. His analogy is completely flawed.
Nice b8m8
>>25587492
Cheerios won't get pregnant, get eaten by someone else and then take my house and force me to pay for the human-cereal halfbreed hellspawn for 18 years.
When I've had this discussion with women, I always ask if they'd buy a used dildo. Not one has ever said yes.
>>25587492
But if cheerios were the first cereal you ever tried they would be so much more interesting
People who are 'sexually liberated' (aka sluts) tend to be much unhappier later in life
>>25587572
This
If a person refuses to disclose their sexual past to their partner they are either ashamed of being a whore/fear rejection or arrogantly feel that they have the right to lie about their past because "it doesn't matter lol xDD". If someone won't be honest with me I'm dumping them
>>25587590
"Daddy, daddy! Build me a tyre swing!"
"Now son, why don't you just use your sister instead?"
Cheerios (TM)
>>25587492
I can't believe I get to post this everyday
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com.au/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/21/more-sexual-partners-unhappy-marriage_n_5698440.html
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2012/08/more-promiscuity-data.html
>>25587492
He is not right
People arent fucking cereal. You can enjoy sex with girl who fucked around, but you most likely wont enjoy relationship at all.
And fuck this anyway, this is a preference, and you can't prove that its right or wrong
Also i dont care How much a guy fucks becouse i will never be atracted to him.
Shoo Shoo roast beef
>>25587609
Excellent analogy friendo, and thanks for the market research. I shall rethink my dildo rental business.
>>25587655
I think it has prospects on the gag market, let me invest anon.
>>25587492
Do cheerios wait until you get published to let you eat them?
>>25587492
dude I hate my ex because he dumped me just so he could go fuck stacie's, because he can or something. So yeah he's banging chicks and I'm still the same loser, no wonder no one could ever love me. I was just the practice girl. Sluts are bad either gender.
>>25587492
I don't give a fuck learn to take responsibility for your own actions. Have some self respect for your body and yourself.
For a man to sleep with a woman he needs to put in alot of hard work.
For a woman to sleep with a man she just needs to be there.
That's why their is a difference between them both.
>>25587492
So... if I cum in his cheerios he's still going to eat them?
>>25587572
what did you expect from a woman?
>>25587751
Seems so senpai. Rather gay desu baka.
>>25587492
Instead of swallowing the cheerios, spit them back into the bowl after chewing on them. That's more accurate.
>>25587492
>>25587492
>>25587492
Because women aren't cheerios and I don't date sluts
>tfw took my current gf's virginity
>tfw last two gfs were virgins too
>>25587492
but cereal doesn't talk John.
>>25587847
>he hunts unicorns for fun
Using his logic cheating is ok.
Why should a bowl of cheeriors feel upset because yesterday you had some coco pops for a change?
>>25587647
Obviously /thread and no one replied to you...
>>25587721
be my jaded gf?
>>25587492
Cheerios don't get dirtier and less flavorful with every time they're eaten.
>>25588067
>Cheerios don't get dirtier and less flavorful with every time they're eaten.
That's the problem with his analogy
The same bowl of cheerios will get nastier every time it's eaten and spat out
>>25588052
yeah it's not gonna get any better for me anyway. Might as well cling to one last thing to bring me some sense of happiness before I inevitable off myself. you don't mind if I die unexpectedly, or expectedly I guess but you don't mind right? This world is not for me.
>>25588115
>you don't mind if I die unexpectedly, or expectedly I guess but you don't mind right?
I'd prefer that you not :3
>>25587884
Virgins are a little more common than you'd think, especially if you're dating in the college 18-22 yr old bracket.
You just need to know what to look for and what to avoid.
>>25587492
I wonder how many women this guy has fucked. Probably not many. This is why he feels the need to praise whores, because he's so desperate for love that he'll marry the town slut. Look at a Chad. Who does he marry? He doesn't marry the whores he was running trains on at house parties, he marries the girl that fucked >2 guys in her whole life.
>>25588123
ok well too bad we can't date because we're all gonna die.
Just kidding I'm so lonely, what is your contact information? How old are you and what do you look like?height? jk it doesn't matter
>>25588141
My skype is piusx32 :3
I'll give age and appearance there. Height is 5'8"
>>25588067
>>25588080
Look guys, I hate women as much as the next robot, but you realize this isn't real life right? That's not how vaginas work? They get tighter [but less wet, that's what lube is for though] as they age. Also, more fucking = more muscular activity.
You can hate them for whatever standards you want, but they shouldn't be scientifically wrong.
>>25588125
And what's that?
>>25588166
I don't mean women get physically nastier autist
>>25588166
>they get tighter as they age
I wasn't even those anons and I've never thought about the looseness or tightness of vaginas as related to age. Why would they be tighter anon? Got a citation?
>>25587492
Would you like a fresh bowl of cheerios?
Or a bowl that's had 11 penis' in it?
>>25587492
difference is that the previous cheerio didn't leave John green with a baby nor does John green keep in contact with the previous cheerio because it's dead, this makes Johnny boy the equivalent of a widow. There is nothing wrong with widows.
>>25587492
but he's not.
why would you hold a woman to the same standard as a man? equality is cancer. shit doesn't even make sense. there is a reason chad's are praised and staceys are condemned for their respective sexual encounters. if you can't figure out why that is then you don't belong here.
I wouldn't use a spoon that someone just put in their mouth
>>25587492
You have been muted for 2 seconds, because your comment was not original. ORIGINAL DESU SENPAI
>>25587492
The reason only betas say things like this is because roasties are their only chance.
>>25588133
The image isn't mentioning marriage though.
>>25587492
To be fair, virginity is overrated on this site. A woman who has had sex multiple times isn't incapable of love. That being said, John Green is wrong. It is equally ludicrous to suggest that it won't affect the relationship at all.
What if she is selfish and/or impatient and refuses to have sex because "he can't satisfy me".
What if he is too embarrassed or insecure to go through with it?
>>25588604
>30-70% drop in marriage rate over ten years
>report unhappier marriages
JUST
>>25587492
But this is more like someone eating the cheerios, and then digesting them and shitting them out, and then the next guy eats the shit and digests it and shits it out... and this goes on for 48 guys until it's your turn.
Would you rather eat 48th times secondhand shit, or a delicious bowl of fresh cheerios?
>>25588643
* compared to virgins, risk is like 50% - 90% on it's own compared to 25% for virgin brides on their own (i bet non-virgin husbands skew the numbers and virgin bride + virgin husband rates higher)
>>25588604
Dude, how about I'm sure I will never get over the fact the she slept with other people, every night on the bed holding her hand I will think about it, I may even be mean to her whenever I'm thinking about it, I don't wanna mess up a woman's life because of that, I will just pick a girl that I'm conformable with her past.
>>25587647
>implying staying with one partner automatically makes it a healthy and happy relationship
That is what people tend to forget - those people with one lifetime partner obviously came from a 'traditional' society where having more partners would be heavily ostracised, it has nothing to do with their mental stability. They still tend to live a miserable life, only noone would care about that anymore since it will stay inside the family. Why do people even find this kind of pretense of good morals superior? If anything it shows that people are too lazy to deal with their life problems, so they will sweep them under a rag and claim everything is fine.
Wow, he's the spitting image of this guy
>>25588828
>women need to get gang-banged in their 20s in order to have a happy marriage
Daily reminder that this slimy, cucked beta faggot's opinion is mainstream in the West. Thank Allah Europe will be Islamic soon.
>>25587492
What if I told you it's easy to write whatever you want over a set of 4 pictures and pass it off as an actual quote?
>>25588840
haven't seen his comics for a while, did he finally off himself?
>>25588857
Is it really what you understood from it?
>>25588890
>2 posts away from quints
fuck you
>>25588888
>>25588840
tok kek you are right they look almost exactly the same with the the suit to show they are beta provider cucks for some used up roastie.
>>25588828
>They still tend to live a miserable life
They
Report
Happier
Marriages
You
Fucking
Moron
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/21/more-sexual-partners-unhappy-marriage_n_5698440.html
> came from a 'traditional' society where having more partners would be heavily ostracised
So what, prove that that's a bad thing these people are having more kids, are leading happier lives, have more stable marriages, and have happier marriages. I've posted the studies where's the proof for your anecdotes?
>>25588828
>implying that hes implying correlation = causation
Women like that will always be like that.
![sperm_rect[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/dg98pHh.jpg "sperm_rect[1].jpg")
>>25587492
Women asorb part of a mans dna when they have sex with them and pass it on to their children.
SO every chad who fucked her before your beta ass is now part of "your " child.
http://www.medicaldaily.com/dna-sperm-ex-partners-lingers-female-flies-and-influences-genetics-her-offspring-305934
>>25587492
This guy reminds me of a duck. Guys that look like ducks always say queer shit like this. I wonder why they're always so passive aggressive with men, and submissive little bitchboy creeps with women; are real ducks like this?
>>25589065
thats flies you fucking idiot women make their eggs before they can even have sex and are kept in the deadliest place known to sperm away
>>25588670
I'd say chewed up and spit out.
"If these Cheerios are so great then why didn't anyone finish eating them?"
>>25588990
Happyness
is
fucking
relative
>>25589065
>he fell for this meme
>>25589065
And the report itself (god do they try to be hip and cheesy)
http://nationalmarriageproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NMP-BeforeIDoReport-Final.pdf
>>25589168
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084184
The person conducting that study said that it might totally be possible that something similar is happening for humans and I trust her judgement more than yours. Did you even read the link?
>>25589197
>you're not actually happy because I say so
You fucking idiot.
>>25588670
>>25589180
I'd say it's more like renting a car, your intention is never to to buy or keep it, yet it will deprecate in value along the way due to usage.
>>25589197
Okay
So
Why
Piss
On
Traditional
Couples
?
It's all relative bro so how do you know that these women are unhappy and being shamed into staying married?
[insert graph showing number of woman's sexual partners and stability of marriage]
get cucked
>>25587492
/r9k/ puts much more worth on sexual experience than we ought to, but John Green is obtuse to ignore the social importance of sex.
A better analogy would be if 47 strangers before him ejaculated into his bowl of cheerios. I wonder if he would be as amped to eat it as a fresh bowl then.
>>25587572
This. Women get butthurt when we objectify them in terms that benefit us, but oh fucking no! When it comes to being sluts it's okay because we're le cheerios hehehehe
Which is sort of ironic because women are just holes like fucking cheerios.
>>25589249
>One reason that more experience could lead to lower martital quality is that more experience may increase one's awareness of alternative partners
I.e hypergamy.
Women who have fucked 500 guys before they get married are literally looking for "the next best thing".
>>25587492
because i want to murder john green and where his face whilst fucking disadvantaged (be it physically, mentally, economically etc) young girls around the world
fucking hate him
>>25589295
have you ever heard a woman compare themselves to cheerios?
>>25587647
I'm a little bit skeptical of this study, because people with very few sexual partners tend to be less likely to divorce anyway.
Divorce is forbidden in Amish, Mormon, and Orthodox Jewish societies. These societies throw off the curve.
>>25589197
Has there ever been a white knight who isn't a fucking retard?
This fucking damage control.
>s-she's not happy even though she said she was
>I say so because I'm hoping women will think I'm a nice guy
Kill yourself you idiot.
>>25589323
and wear*
how embarrassing
>>25589339
>Divorce is forbidden in Amish, Mormon, and Orthodox Jewish societies. These societies throw off the curve.
Doesn't mean they're unhappy.
>>25587492
Because he's not. He's wrong and completely ignorant of the detrimental effect a woman's notch count has on her long-term mate worthiness.
Pic fuckin related.
>>25588172
Girls with dyed blonde hair, girls who go out a lot, girls who hang out with guys, and girls who drink or smoke a lot
Green flags are introversion, low self esteem, old-fashioned hipster clothes, and hair dyed light blue or gray.
If you really want to date a cute virgin, though, you'll need to be very attractive and also very charming and traditional. There's a reason why she is a virgin at 20. Don't expect to fuck her very quickly.
>having so many sex partners it's comparable to everyday breakfast
>>25587492
Let's stick 48 dicks in his bowl of cereal and ask if he's still hungry.
>>25588928
Hopefully he did.
>>25589405
>hair dyed light blue or gray
All hair dye is a red flag
>>25587492
I don't get an STD from eating Cheerios.
>>25587492
He's so right he has to hide the fact he is Jewish by truncating his last name.
Why do you retards always start out your arguments using someone else's statements?
>>25589405
>>25589435
Yup pretty much.
>>25587624
How would you know? I mean if she says she only fucked once but has had like 20 different guys how would you know
>>25589414
you can compare anything to anything, he just didn't do it well or use any logic
>>25589339
>Divorce is forbidden in Amish, Mormon, and Orthodox Jewish societies
Those probably make up a pittance of the study sample, if any at all, and certainly make up a pittance of the american population.
529k orthodox jews
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthodox_Judaism
6.1 million mormons
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormons
270k amish
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_Amish_population
6.89 milion members of a culture where divorce is verboten, this includes people who are too young to be married, so the number could still be smaller
Unless they did this study in utah I wouldn't worry about these communities 'poisoning' findings especially since despite their cultural rules you can still get legally divorced.
>>25588990
Yes, i read that, but as i wrote, i'm not buying into the normie-tier happiness they claim to have. They didn't even precise what is that happiness and quality supposed to represent. Financial stability? Sure, if the society requires you to stick to the traditional form of relationship and get children because this is what makes you 'happy' then of course the will need money for that. And of course having unstable marriages will make you deal with more problems with more people. But you be as financially stable alone, and if you are not an average Joe, then you can afford being rich and having more partners.
>So what, prove that that's a bad thing these people are having more kids
So basically it is a good thing because everyone else says it is good? Personally i'm surprised there isn't a restriction on children number all over the world like they used to have in China, which was a great idea. I guess society needs to evolve to get to this point, considering how majority of the world is a shithole, heh.
>where's the proof for your anecdotes?
Personal experience with my parents living together for 20+years and having no other sexual partners. They won't agree on anything and only reason they won't divorce is because of muh society won't like it.
Marriage is overrated and people shouldn't be kept in artificial pairs set by some outdated institution.
>>25589435
I dunno. Not the same guy but I've noticed that girls with blue hair tend to be more loyal to their men. No idea why, but I know several girls with blue hairs and non-Chad bfs who are borderline stupidly loyal to them.Weirdly enough they're also all Hispanic.Also I've noticed purple hair or purple + another color = mega whore
>>25589405
>green flags
>low self esteem
>dyed hair
AAAAAHAHHAHAHHAHA
OOHHHHHOHOHOHOHOHHO
Oh wait is he being serious?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
>>25587609
That puts a new perspective on it, I never actually thought of that. It honestly just boils down to how you prioritize sex. Some people put it on the level of marriage, and some on the level of acquaintances.
>be 23 year old khv
>most of the girls my age have already had multiple boyfriends and sex partners
>tfw I will never ever get a gf who's on the same level with me
>tfw my first kiss will not be her first
And there is no way in hell I'm going to settle with someone who's "used goods". No fucking way I'm going to be some second choice/the safe bet for some sloot. If I had multiple partners like that as well then maybe I wouldn't care, but for me it's not like that at all.
If I can't have a khv gf who's equally inexperienced in love, then I don't want to have a gf at all. I wish I could just ask from a god to give me the perfect certainty if I'm ever going to get a gf like that, because if not I could just kill myself already and end my misery.
>>25589495
Not if the nature of one thing is inherently different to another
>>25589389
Certainly not, but they confound the study's results. Because people more likely to have fewer partners are less likely to be ABLE to get divorced, it's harder to know if marriages between low-count people are actually stronger.
>>25587492
Because cheerios can't give me stds. Can they?
And also it's not shameful to eat cheerios, unless you were at a much higher number, because you'd get fat.
What an awful analogy for this argument. Yeah, a lot of people hold an odd sense of judgment over the amount of sexual partners, especially based on gender, but I don't need to be talking about cereal to assert that point.
>Cheerios, you're pretty fulfilling and you provide a lot of nutrients I wasn't getting with all those other cereals. However, considering the variety of cereals I've had in the past, I may find your taste boring over time. We could try adding other fruits and sweeteners and maybe even mix in another cereal for fun, but I don't think I can stay committed to one cereal forever.
And then the cereal doesn't respond because it's fucking cereal.
>>25589435
>>25589454
Really depends. "Tumblr girls" rarely have had sex, due to shyness, weirdness, and often poor feelings toward men on average
>>25589613
>less likely to be ABLE to get divorced
Just because you have a culture of monogamy, doesn't mean you aren't able to be divorced you moron.
Besides all the groups you mentioned as >>25589511
this guy said, is too small a group to draw any conclusions anyway.
I think you just need to realize that if a woman fucks around too much when young, it becomes a permanent part of her personality, and she will never be able to be monogamous afterwards, because that's too boring for her.
>>25589665
Which is precisely the reason you should avoid them like a bottle of undiluted scorpion venom.
>>25589515
>Personal experience with my parents living together for 20+years and having no other sexual partners.
Here's my personal experience, parents divorce and mom physically and verbally abuses me to get back at dad.
>Financial stability? Sure, if the society requires you to stick to the traditional form of relationship and get children because this is what makes you 'happy'
If I found a study saying people with kids and or lots of kids were happier would you accept that? Or is it still too subjective? Society, especially societies with welfare for the elderly, need new young ones to push it onwards.
>I guess society needs to evolve to get to this point, considering how majority of the world is a shithole, heh.
China included, I don't want good goy internet so big brother chong can control every aspect of my life.
I've seen a few married couples, some bad, but the more traditional the gender roles the happier the couple and children i'm obviously not with them every night to see all the ins and outs of their marriages but they look happy and the kids look happy.
>>25589530
W/r/t self esteem, while it's true that many girls use casual sex as a way to deal with personal poor feeling, most girls with esteem issues feel themselves unworthy for sex and never seek it out.
Problem is, depressed girls often switch between being shy virgins to being shy promiscuous girls. That's what happened to my ex.
>>25589695
If finding a virgin is paramount, then girls like that are your best bet
>>25589673
>and she will never be able to be monogamous afterwards
That's possibly not true either, there's still a significant non-zero percentage of women who fool around getting and staying married, it's certainly possible that in this regard there are couples who 'have it all' she fooled around a lot, they stayed married lifetime and are happy.
>>25589750
Nah, you're just delusional and probably some married cuck who wants to convince himself his girlfriend isn't riding some chad cock somewhere.
You'll have a wake up call eventually.
>>25587492
>Jawn Green the meme man
>right
Nice try. He just compared women to objects.. cereal! Know who else consumes cereal? Men. Obvious misogynist.
>>25589665
You believe what they say? you know "I'm shy" on tumblr is the common lie just like I read a lot of books on reddit.
Because he's wrong and that a really stupid and self-destructive way of dealing with and unequal sexual history.
>>25589586
you still can, really
You're supposed to compare 2 different things
I think you should look up the definition of a comparison.
>>25587492
>Food food analogies
>2016
>>25590025
Trust me, if you ever tried to read his fodder-books.. It gets much, much worse. A girl conned me into them saying they were good. Absolute shit and he's amassing his wealth by pandering to social justice heroes who can't see there's still two sides to every coin.
>>25587492
everytime i see this guys face i lose all faith in humanity
>>25588354
For men to have sex:
Be attractive, rich, smart, funny, sociable
For women:
Have a vagina
That's why. It takes effort to hav sex if you're male. Women literally just need to be there.
Cooking for yourself everyday is survival, partaking in every meal is gluttony. Men survive, women don't.
He's not right because girls pussies turn into hot air balloons after multiple poundingslike the girl I have been seeing
i'll just leave this here.
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0S3aAewZIsj
>>25587492
A better analogy would be this:
>imagine a girl as a bowl of cereal and a guy as a spoon
>30 spoons go into the same bowl of cereal
>one spoon goes into 30 bowls of cereal
>not every spoon is washed after going into a bowl, some are but not all
Would you want to eat from a bowl that 30 other people have eaten from?
This is a really poor analogy.
Cheerio's are eaten, and then it's gone. People don't(typically) die or vanish by having sex. When I eat Cheerios it is eaten and is gone. It doesn't roll out of my bed the next morning and tell Fruit Loops about my horrible table manners
Cheerio's doesn't just decide it's going to be free, tasty, and more nutritious for one person because it genuinely enjoys the thought of being eaten by them. But be bland, costly, and kinda stale for another person because "it's not like they can eat another cereal anyway".
>>25589696
>Here's my personal experience, parents divorce and mom physically and verbally abuses me to get back at dad.
That is why the way families function need to be completely reformed. People should be tested and those showing mental instabilities/incompetence shouldn't be allowed to have children and there needs to be a slightly fluent ability to change your partner if they won't meet required standards, since tests won't be a 100% guarantee. I have also experienced abuse in my traditional family and learnt it wasn't an unusual situation.
>If I found a study saying people with kids and or lots of kids were happier would you accept that? Or is it still too subjective?
I rely on what i see around me or other people's experiences, since studies can be ambiguous or hide half of the truth. I don't find them 100% trustworthy. Major example is old studies on how animal fat is supposed to be the cause of diseases related to obesity and that encouraged overconsumption of carbohydrates. How did it end can be shown by looking at USA
>China included, I don't want good goy internet so big brother chong can control every aspect of my life.
If there were any good decisions China had made, this one is definitely belongs to them. Young people are needed, yes, but limited resources ought to make people think for how long they will be around. Australia has 10 million less people than the yuropoorian country i live in and it is doing well. It's problems appear from different issues. So what we get from this, is controlling the mass is necessary if it leads to good results, since most people have no idea what they are doing. You are controlled despite not living in China, anyway. People have always been controlled with different results.
>>25587492
Why do people always compare complicated social functions/situations to eating food?
>>25590748
Everyone has eaten food. Everyone understands food on a basic level. Most people generally associate positive things and feelings with food.
>>25590748
They compare it to many things, like putting keys in a lock or plugs into sockets ;^)
>>25587647
>marriage indicates happiness in life
>>25589398
>That cereal analogy
fucking perfect
>>25590735
>this one is definitely belongs to them
also all their bases are belongs to us, i of course didn't mean to write 'is', kek
>>25587492
sorry to burst your bubble roastie but you are a sponge of chads seed which must be avoided at all costs.
>>25587492
I wouldn't eat a bowl of cheerios someone else put their dick in.
>>25591093
>People still fall for that meme
>>25591193
>call something you don't agree with a meme to be baselessly dismissive
Reason females complain about this is just because of the Chads, most women today seem to think all boys are Chads and fuck around. People like us aren't in the equation.
>>25589639
>And then the cereal doesn't respond because it's fucking cereal.
I chuckle
Not saying I agree or disagree, but that's a completely retarded analogy. Better would be "would you rather eat out of a bowl of cereal that 0~2 people have eaten out of? Or would you rather eat a bowl of cereal that 10+ men have already taken a bite out of?"
>>25587492
Let's put it like this
If you have one cereal you really like, you'll always have that one cereal.
If you have had multiple cereals, you'll neglect the cereals you currently have because you're always looking for that new tasty looking cereal and upon finding it you won't be buying those cheerios any more and ride around the cereal carousel for years until the sugary shit gives you diabetes and you want to go back to cheerios because cheerios won't kill your pancreas and treats you right.
>>25591268
Because 'hurr sperms live in a brain and then influence the egg during pregnancy' is something created by faggots like you that won't bother reading comprehensively and just repeat what they see daily on the boards. So yes, it is a meme.
>>25587492
Because you are immature OP
Why do social justice worriers always get rekt?
>Do you think it matters how many people someone has slept with?
>Yes and it particularly bothers me that women aren't held to any standard whatsoever on this
>Also its completely normal to care about. Like imagine if I started eating Cheerios for breakfast, The Cheerios would be like "You're the 48th person who has eaten me, you're not special"
>Well them screw you, Cheerios, I don't want to eat what 48 other people have eaten. I'll go enjoy a fresh bowl of Cheerios to enjoy your whole-grain crunch
>>25587492
he is right but that's irrelevant. he's pandering and thinks he's both adorable and clever. he thinks he's important. it's a stupid thing to take a stand about and obviously he couldn't care less about it, it's all about his image. his sanctimony is really transparent and irritating.
>>25587647
neat, when people get sex elsewhere they're more likely to get sex elsewhere. irrefutable proof of the reflexive property.
>>25587647
The best part of this is that women can't really argue their way out of this.
It's either
>Whores are shit, so you should only use them for sex, don't ever get emotionally involved with a whore
or
>All women are secretly whores, even the "traditional" ones, so you should never get married and just use them for sex
thread ended right here >>25587609
everything else after that is just being retarded, shitposting and bait
This whole thread reaffirms why you're all virgins tbqh. Your double standards are ridiculous.
>inb4 roastie get toastie
I'm a 35 year old beta virgin. If she doesn't have kids, clean as a kite, no stds, then their shouldn't be a problems. You people should just stay virgins senpais. It's funny how the same people that get mad at women for being too overly picky/superficial are getting mad at them for the dumbest shit.
>>25592734
>>25592734
>This whole thread reaffirms why you're all virgins tbqh
>I'm a 35 year old beta virgin
>>25592734
>I'm a 35 year old beta virgin
Stopped reading there.
Taking advice from a 35 year old beta virgin is the last thing anyone on /r9k/ should do.
Why the fuck would I want your same beta outlook when you're a 35 year old beta faggot who will most likely kill himself within the next 5 years?
People can sleep with whoever they want. I myself haven't slept with anyone and won't unless I happen upon a woman who isn't a cock hungry slag who has had 10 cocks.
That's just me. I'd gladly die a virgin. It's only sex.
